On 08/19/15 23:30, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 04:34 +0000, woggle wrote:
>> WHEREAS the yoyo mailing list appears to have died, and
>>
>> WHEREAS the only way to be sure it is dead is to kill it yourself,
>>
>> I intend, without objection, to c
On 10/19/14 16:56, Eritivus wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-10-19 at 16:45 +0000, woggle wrote:
>> This information is not self-ratifying. The list of players registered is as
>> a
>> result of R2162(c).
>
> Ah, I see. I mistakenly thought that all information required
27;s 11 Oct report failed.
>
> Arguments:
>
> The Registrar's 11 Oct report did not include me on the player
> list. woggle implicitly claims that the minimal gamestate modification
> of ratification is my retroactive deregistration.
>
> However, The Registrar's report also in
On 08/31/14 22:45, Luis Ressel wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Aug 2014 22:33:13 +
> woggle wrote:
>
>> Rule 2160/12 (Power=3)
>> Deputisation
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> When a player deputises for an elected office, e becomes the
>> holder o
On 08/31/14 22:26, Luis Ressel wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Aug 2014 22:12:02 +
> woggle wrote:
>
>> - woggle, Registrar and Clerical Error Generator
>
> I'd appreciate some clarification here. In yesterday's Registrar Report
> you referred to yourself as a Depu
changes. These questions have clear
answers if Agora were to "cease to exist".
[1] The definition would presumably cease to be effective, but, fortunately,
we're checking the definition at a time when it is clearly effective.
- woggle
d a win, it does not have the
> power to override the common-sense meanings of the words.
How does it have the power to award a win?
If "awarding a win" common-sense-meaning-implied "ending the game", then R2419
would be of insufficient power to do it.
- woggle
der they appear
in the message, unless otherwise specified.
[1] It would be reasonable to disregard such a server's timestamps, but we
would have no way of reliably detecting when to do so.
- woggle
>
> Caller: ais523
>
> Judge:
On 8/15/13 14:49 , Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Aug 2013, woggle wrote:
>
>> HORTON'S WEEKLY REPORT
>>
>> Date of this report: 2013-08-10
>> Date of last report: 2013-08-03
>>
>>
You should point out that you can recuse yourself from any case for free.
[snip]
> Most officers have a weekly or monthly report which they publish to
and/or?
> agora-official so that everyone knows what is going on in their part
> of the gamestate.
>
[snip]
>
> If the holder of an office becomes inactive or deregisters, anyone can
> assume the office and start performing its duties.
Suggest citing Rule 2276 here.
[snip]
- woggle
n asked about this. Alex Smith suggested that I had until the controversy
> was settled to dispose of my dictatorship. Is that not tradition? Is the
> controversy settled then?
You can purportedly keep your dictatorship without purportedly preventing the
normal play of Agora from continuing.
- woggle
refer to things like "Berks" which I take it are obsolete.)
Yes; we are due for some more Promise cleanup.
As for Berks, "Berks" are the title of that promise.
- woggle
On 6/23/13 16:25 , Tanner Swett wrote:
> On Jun 23, 2013, at 2:29 PM, woggle wrote:
>> I judge CFJ 3339 FALSE.
>>
>> ...
>>
>> It has been generally uncontroverisal to resolve conflicts in rules and
>> similar documents not handled using the usual precede
On 6/11/13 12:35 , Sean Hunt wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 3:25 PM, woggle wrote:
>> On 6/10/13 11:01 , Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, 9 Jun 2013, Ed Murphy wrote:
>>>> == CFJ =
idn't mean to used earliest precedence on two numbered rules.
- woggle
!!!" with notice.
I think R2166 permits you to destroy this promise (since you are its owner) by
announcement. Incidentally, this would also simplify that CFJ.
- woggle
On 5/7/13 10:59 , Charles Walker wrote:
> On 5 May 2013, at 15:44, woggle wrote:
>> Rule 2141/6 (Power=3)
>> Role and Attributes of Rules
> [...]
>> Every rule has power between one and four inclusive. It is
>> not possible for a rule to h
nambigiuous. I'm pretty sure that there have
been proposals that have copied text from rules into other rules; it's hard to
see how copying text from promises is substantially different.
- woggle
ule to amend rule by
replacing its text with the text of the promise titled that I created
at least four and not more than five days before resolving this intent.
- I intend, without 3 objections, to cause rule ZZZZ to repeal the rule with
lowest ID number among rules with power
; nix any jump (e.g. "replace any occurrence of scshunt in the
> ruleset with...") while not violating R105's "any unambiguity"
> clause, but then maybe e'd change eir nickname (and the nickname
> in the rule)... and so it goes.
Perhaps secure rule changes at power 1.1?
- woggle
>>
>> VVLOP is defined in Rules 2389-2390.
>
> Well, yeah. However, what does VVLOP *mean*? VCs are Voting Credits,
> but what are VVLOPs? I think that's what was meant by "VVLOP doesn't
> officially stand for anything".
It used to abbreviate "volatile voting limit on ordinary proposals".
- woggle
> 7350 1.5 Ordinary G. Justice Fix
FOR
- woggle
por's report...
>
> There's a recent FLR (January 23). The online versions of the ruleset
> are out of date, but the email version is within the expected time
> limit.
Re: "the online versions", comex's are out of date (AFAIK), but see
https://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/~charles/agora/ .
- woggle
On 1/20/13 2:33 PM, John Smith wrote:
> I cause BuckyBot to ask all the first class players to object to its
> destruction.
BuckyBot is eligible to object to this intent directly per R2360.
- woggle
>
> --
t;> Agora agora-busin...@agoranomic.org 23 Jul 11
>> CoE: The name of this agreement is this sentence. is a player.
>
> It is?
Well, it's probably dependent on the resolution of a CFJ omd made, but
it at least deserves some mention in your report.
- woggle
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 7/30/11 8:20 PM, omd wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 11:00 PM, woggle wrote:
>> I create a Promise in my own possession with the following text and no
>> conditions and immediately cash it: "This is a message sent on behalf
>> of The name of this agreement is this
y that this "first harvest" only applies to proposal harvests.
Same for Lawyer, Surveyor, etc. Also 1 more per digit or 1 more total?
[snip]
- woggle
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
sence of a rule defining "take effect", per R754, we are to use
the mathematical, legal, or ordinary-language definition of the term.
Although this certainly should be more explicit in the rules, I think
the ordinary-language or legal definition of take effect does not break
the game.
- w
On 5/30/11 2:59 PM, Elliott Hird wrote:
> --040006000107010606030609
> Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Oops. Not sure how "compose messages in HTML format" got checked in my
email preferences.
- wogg
29 matches
Mail list logo
