Re: DIS: DMARC bounces (attn Murphy)

2019-07-02 Thread James Cook
On Thu, 6 Jun 2019 at 02:08, omd wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 6:30 PM James Cook wrote: > > (I'm not suggesting we use Discourse, just that maybe similar options are > > available with the current software.) > > It seems Mailman does support something like that: > >

Re: DIS: DMARC bounces (attn Murphy)

2019-06-06 Thread James Cook
On Thu, 6 Jun 2019 at 02:08, omd wrote: > ...Okay, I've gone ahead and set dmarc_moderation_action to "Munge > From" on all three lists. Changing the From address is annoying > (sorry Murphy), but it only applies to messages from domains with > p=reject DMARC entries, and the alternative is for

Re: DIS: DMARC bounces (attn Murphy)

2019-06-05 Thread omd
On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 6:30 PM James Cook wrote: > (I'm not suggesting we use Discourse, just that maybe similar options are > available with the current software.) It seems Mailman does support something like that: https://wiki.list.org/DEV/DMARC

Re: DIS: DMARC bounces (attn Murphy)

2019-06-05 Thread James Cook
On Wed., Jun. 5, 2019, 21:03 James Cook, wrote: > > Sure, it would fix the DMARC issue, but it would also make it very hard > to > > tell at a glance who sent which message. Modern mailers have a lot of > > features for that, but they’re all based around the from line. > > I just checked the way

Re: DIS: DMARC bounces (attn Murphy)

2019-06-05 Thread James Cook
> Sure, it would fix the DMARC issue, but it would also make it very hard to > tell at a glance who sent which message. Modern mailers have a lot of > features for that, but they’re all based around the from line. I just checked the way Discourse does it (or did it in October 2018). I see for

Re: DIS: DMARC bounces (attn Murphy)

2019-06-04 Thread Aris Merchant
On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 8:46 PM James Cook wrote: > On Wed, 15 May 2019 at 20:22, ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk > wrote: > > Translated to English, this states that the email should not be > > considered valid if the Subject fail was modified in transit. Of > > course, the Subject of the email

Re: DIS: DMARC bounces (attn Murphy)

2019-06-04 Thread James Cook
On Wed, 15 May 2019 at 20:22, ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk wrote: > Translated to English, this states that the email should not be > considered valid if the Subject fail was modified in transit. Of > course, the Subject of the email actually was modified (by the list > software, inserting the BAK:),

DIS: DMARC bounces (attn Murphy)

2019-05-15 Thread ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk
I just received an email from agora-business (the list) to my callforjudgm...@yahoo.co.uk email address warning me that I was bouncing emails, and asking me to confirm that the email was still valid. (The address still works, and I still use it to receive Agoran mail; it's just that I can no