On Sunday, May 24, 2020 3:58:05 PM CDT you wrote:
> > Grok's "Cantus Counterscam" (which has the author and co-author values
> > that
> > are incorrectly listed for "a Proposed Contract") is missing.
>
> I believe that e retracted it.
Oh, looks like you're correct.
--
nch
On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 4:57 PM nchagora--- via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Sunday, May 24, 2020 3:42:06 PM CDT Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> > ID Author(s)AITitle
> > ---
> > 8388f
On Sunday, May 24, 2020 3:42:06 PM CDT Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
wrote:
> ID Author(s)AITitle
> ---
> 8388f nch 1.0 The Webmastor
> 8389# G. 2.0
On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 1:43 PM Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> Here's my weekly draft.
>
> -Aris
>
> ---
> I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
> Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal
> pool. For this decision, the vote collect
Here's my weekly draft.
-Aris
---
I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal
pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the
quorum is 8, the voting method is AI-majority, and the valid
option
Here's a draft. While I obviously can't declare a deadline under the
current rules, it would be highly appreciated if people could refrain
from changing things for the next 24 hours or so.
-Aris
---
I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
Decision of whether to adopt it, a
I am the author of "Not so indestructible now, eh?". This is correct in
the table but not correct in the text of the proposal.
Jason Cobb
On 6/11/19 7:31 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
Given how long it's been, and how many proposals there are, I'd like
to send out a draft rather than just getting e
Given how long it's been, and how many proposals there are, I'd like
to send out a draft rather than just getting everything wrong. Here's
that draft. There will be a small reward (plus my appreciation) for
any corrections!
-Aris
---
I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
Would someone look over this? I have a feeling I may be missing
something, but it's possible activity has just been really low.
-Aris
---
I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal
pool. For this decision, the
TTttDF
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, 10 September 2018 00:46, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> Crap, you're right. I even wrote the resolution message, just never clicked
> send. My bad.
>
> -twg
>
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> On Monday, 10 September 2018 00:41, Aris Merc
Was Proposal 8089 ever resolved? I can't seem to find an resolution,
which would make quorum 2 from Proposal 8087.
Also, I have only a week to add them back to the pool, and that time
has been expended. We could add them back by proposal though. I'll
write one to do that.
On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 a
I make quorum 4. Voters on proposal 8089 were Aris, G., Murphy, Trigon, twg and
Kenyon, making 6 valid ballots.
Also, Aris, it would be helpful if you could redistribute proposals 8082-8089,
except 8086 which doesn't exist. (8077A-8081A haven't met quorum yet either,
but the CFJ on whether you
On Sun, 9 Sep 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
> quorum is 7.0, the voting method is AI-majority, and the valid
quorum is 3 I think.
Does this look right to everyone? It's been a while (entirely my
fault), so I'm probably missing something, but this is the best I've
got right now.
With apologies,
Aris
---
I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the p
In the full-text-of-proposals section, proposal 8085's title is incorrect.
Also, you missed the proposal Kenyon submitted here:
https://www.mail-archive.com/agora-business@agoranomic.org/msg32486.html
Otherwise, it looks good to me!
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On August 10, 2018 6:4
This is a draft report. Corrections are appreciated, as always. I have
marked the proposals that are being distributed a second time A,
as noted in the key. This identifies the distribution; the proposal is
still the same and thus has the same ID. The distribution-qualified
form should be useful fo
Here's my intermittent weekly draft.
-Aris
---
I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal
pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the
quorum is 6.0 and the valid options are FOR and AGAINS
o. is a co-author of I Demand Faster Auctions, which you do not list here.
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:57 AM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> Also my two proposals about the mailing lists.
>
> On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 at 09:17 Alexis Hunt wrote:
>>
>> I believe my high power cleanup proposal is missing.
>>
>> On
Also my two proposals about the mailing lists.
On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 at 09:17 Alexis Hunt wrote:
> I believe my high power cleanup proposal is missing.
>
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017, 09:11 ATMunn ., wrote:
>
>> Looks good to me.
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 2:14 AM, Aris Merchant <
>> thoughtsoflifea
I believe my high power cleanup proposal is missing.
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017, 09:11 ATMunn ., wrote:
> Looks good to me.
>
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 2:14 AM, Aris Merchant <
> thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Just a draft to make sure I haven't messed something up again.
>>
>> -Aris
Looks good to me.
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 2:14 AM, Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Just a draft to make sure I haven't messed something up again.
>
> -Aris
>
> ---
> I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
> Decision of whether to adopt it, and
Just a draft to make sure I haven't messed something up again.
-Aris
---
I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal
pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the
quorum is 8.0 and the valid
On Fri, 1 Sep 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> To be clear, I think your proposed fix of "making lots of simple ways to
> earn shinies" would work just as well as a fixed basic income, as long as
> there are enough of those things from the beginning for non-officer players
> to do, that they can have s
On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, Nic Evans wrote:
> On 08/31/17 16:50, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, Nic Evans wrote:
> >>> I'm opposed to anything that doesn't scale with need. A regular payday
> >>> would mostly benefit the already successful players.
> > This is where I disagree, primari
I withdraw the proposal titled Debts.
On Sep 1, 2017 1:21 AM, "Aris Merchant"
wrote:
> nichdel, is debts being pulled? I should be releasing fairly soonish (as
> in the next day or two).
>
> -Aris
>
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 3:30 PM Nic Evans wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 08/31/17 16:50, Kerim Aydin wro
nichdel, is debts being pulled? I should be releasing fairly soonish (as in
the next day or two).
-Aris
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 3:30 PM Nic Evans wrote:
>
>
> On 08/31/17 16:50, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, Nic Evans wrote:
> >>> I'm opposed to anything that doesn't scale wit
On 08/31/17 16:50, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, Nic Evans wrote:
>>> I'm opposed to anything that doesn't scale with need. A regular payday
>>> would mostly benefit the already successful players.
> This is where I disagree, primarily. We've never had a system that didn't
> allow
On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, Nic Evans wrote:
> > I'm opposed to anything that doesn't scale with need. A regular payday
> > would mostly benefit the already successful players.
This is where I disagree, primarily. We've never had a system that didn't
allow a base level of activity on a weekly or month
On 08/31/17 16:17, Nic Evans wrote:
> (I've been a bit distracted lately but I'm keeping up with conversation.)
>
> The current economy was designed with the idea of coupling economics
> closely to productivity. Creating work costs, and resolving work pays.
> It's intentionally difficult to profi
On 08/29/17 13:00, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>> On Aug 29, 2017, at 10:54 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, 29 Aug 2017, Owen Jacobson wrote:
IDAuthor(s) AI Title
---
pp1 nichdel, o, gr
> On Aug 29, 2017, at 10:54 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, 29 Aug 2017, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>>> IDAuthor(s) AI Title
>>> ---
>>> pp1 nichdel, o, grok, Aris 3.0 Debts
>>> pp2 nichdel
On Tue, 29 Aug 2017, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> > IDAuthor(s) AI Title
> > ---
> > pp1 nichdel, o, grok, Aris 3.0 Debts
> > pp2 nichdel 1.0 Better Accounting
>
> I pend each of these pr
I'm trying something new with my draft this week. I have attempted
pleading, and begging and the like, and my previous reports have still
had occasional errors. I check all my reports numerous times, and then
do this whole drafting thing. Still occasional errors. So this week, I
decided to threaten
33 matches
Mail list logo