Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Proto-judgements of CFJs 3722-3725

2019-03-17 Thread ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk
On Sun, 2019-03-17 at 13:15 -0700, Edward Murphy wrote: > twg wrote: > > > Notice of Honour: > > -1 D. Margaux (holding up an important ruleset fix with eir attempt > > at a win) > > +1 Murphy (inadvertently(?) preventing a paradox) > > What did /I/ do? You wrote a report which broke up the

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Proto-judgements of CFJs 3722-3725

2019-03-17 Thread Edward Murphy
twg wrote: Notice of Honour: -1 D. Margaux (holding up an important ruleset fix with eir attempt at a win) +1 Murphy (inadvertently(?) preventing a paradox) What did /I/ do?

Re: DIS: Proto-judgements of CFJs 3722-3725

2019-03-09 Thread Timon Walshe-Grey
Yes, that is in fact exactly what I argue in the judgement to CFJ 3724. :P I expect D. Margaux meant something like "its outcome, _if resolved now_, would be ADOPTED". I imagine e would have resubmitted it with that wording, after realising that the initial wording was wrong, if it hadn't

Re: DIS: Proto-judgements of CFJs 3722-3725

2019-03-09 Thread James Cook
On Sat, 9 Mar 2019 at 05:30, Ørjan Johansen wrote: > It was not published, twg is simply referring jokingly to emself, as e is > the Assessor. Oh, that makes sense. But I'm confused by D. Margaux's CFJ that 8164's outcome is ADOPTED, if there was no message attempting to resolve the decision.

Re: DIS: Proto-judgements of CFJs 3722-3725

2019-03-08 Thread Ørjan Johansen
It was not published, twg is simply referring jokingly to emself, as e is the Assessor. Greetings, Ørjan. On Sat, 9 Mar 2019, James Cook wrote: twg's message says the H. Assessor publish the below tally, but I didn't receive any emails containing it, and I can't find it in the public

Re: DIS: Proto-judgements of CFJs 3722-3725

2019-03-08 Thread James Cook
twg's message says the H. Assessor publish the below tally, but I didn't receive any emails containing it, and I can't find it in the public archives. When was that email sent, and to which list? I don't think it has any bearing on the CFJs. I'm just trying to figure out if I'm missing emails.

Re: DIS: Proto-judgements of CFJs 3722-3725

2019-03-08 Thread Timon Walshe-Grey
On Friday, March 8, 2019 2:50 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > You don't have to worry about the Disclaimer in the ADoP's report - > disclaimers are used all the time to ratify false things, under the guidance > of R2202 you're supposed to use disclaimers when reporting false things > for the purpose of

Re: DIS: Proto-judgements of CFJs 3722-3725

2019-03-07 Thread D. Margaux
Well that is a very, very annoying oversight on my part. Nice catch. > On Mar 7, 2019, at 9:50 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > I was just writing a note to say I'd spotted the Feb 24th ADoP report's > ratification of D. Margaux as Prime Minister as well! > > You don't have to worry about the

Re: DIS: Proto-judgements of CFJs 3722-3725

2019-03-07 Thread Kerim Aydin
I was just writing a note to say I'd spotted the Feb 24th ADoP report's ratification of D. Margaux as Prime Minister as well! You don't have to worry about the Disclaimer in the ADoP's report - disclaimers are used all the time to ratify false things, under the guidance of R2202 you're

DIS: Proto-judgements of CFJs 3722-3725

2019-03-07 Thread Timon Walshe-Grey
Attached as individual text files. Please have a look and let me know what you think... -twg === CFJ 3724 === An Agoran Decision whether to adopt Proposal 8164 was initiated and its outcome is ADOPTED.