Re: DIS: Some minor reforms

Sure - I think the weekly report is 14+ days late so you can deputize to publish it whenever (will still push ahead with the changing cards to blots, so if that goes through it will be a little more currency-tracking-like). On Thu, 1 Mar 2018, Cuddle Beam wrote: > I confused Referee with

Re: DIS: Some minor reforms

I confused Referee with Arbitor lol, sorry. One of the multiple positions G. has (I dunno if he wants it or not though) Referee seems subjective-based/easy (people frequently just suggest the Cards anyway too) so I guess I can do it. On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 6:04 AM, Aris Merchant <

Re: DIS: Some minor reforms

Apart from not removing judges, Murphy is doing a pretty good job, and it's not terribly friendly to remove an active-ish officer. It's also a ton of work. Might I suggest something a bit easier for your first go (say Registrar or Reportor)? -Aris On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 9:01 PM Cuddle Beam

Re: DIS: Some minor reforms

I'll take Arbitor I guess. Already set up for deputizing for it. On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 5:52 AM, Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > I agree. There are ton of vacant or semi-vacant offices right now that you > could take, what with G. being in like 3 things he doesn't

Re: DIS: Some minor reforms

I agree. There are ton of vacant or semi-vacant offices right now that you could take, what with G. being in like 3 things he doesn't want and Alexis having just left. There are probably more offices than players at the moment, and we're struggling to fill holes. This is a good way of encouraging

Re: DIS: Some minor reforms

I disagree—many offices involve a lot of work, so it's only fair to reward it, and for a reward to be meaningful if needs to be relevant. It's not unfair; if you want piece of the pie, vacancies come up fairly frequently. Gaelan > On Feb 28, 2018, at 8:27 PM, Cuddle Beam

Re: DIS: Some minor reforms

How about we tie this into the "religious" gameplay we had cooking in that other thread? Offices working for the "greater good" and all. (I'm not too comfortable with Offices gaining currency of the 'main game' because I feel like that subverts gameplay, it's like if the Banker in Monopoly got

Re: DIS: Some minor reforms

I never actually read the Parties proposal, but I just looked at the Complexity system and I actually quite like it. If we decide to go with a idea-1-like system, then I'll just use that instead. On 2/28/2018 5:25 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: Tend to agree. It may be useful to keep it around

Re: DIS: Some minor reforms

Tend to agree. It may be useful to keep it around permanently, rather than renacting it every time we need it, -Aris On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 2:51 PM Madeline wrote: > If you wanna do "X-paying Jobs", just reenact Complexity from the party > we had. > > On 2018-03-01 07:03,

Re: DIS: Some minor reforms

If you wanna do "X-paying Jobs", just reenact Complexity from the party we had. On 2018-03-01 07:03, Reuben Staley wrote: Not that I'm in this for the fictional currency, but honestly, 3 coins a month for all this recordkeeping is not enough. I'm not writing up any ruletext yet, but I will

Re: DIS: Some minor reforms

That's a good start. Anything else you'd like to add? El 28 feb. 2018 13:07, "Gaelan Steele" escribió: > You have arbitor twice, but no treasuror. > > Gaelan > > > On Feb 28, 2018, at 12:03 PM, Reuben Staley > wrote: > > > > Not that I'm in this for

Re: DIS: Some minor reforms

You have arbitor twice, but no treasuror. Gaelan > On Feb 28, 2018, at 12:03 PM, Reuben Staley wrote: > > Not that I'm in this for the fictional currency, but honestly, 3 coins a > month for all this recordkeeping is not enough. I'm not writing up any > ruletext yet,

DIS: Some minor reforms

Not that I'm in this for the fictional currency, but honestly, 3 coins a month for all this recordkeeping is not enough. I'm not writing up any ruletext yet, but I will talk about 2 ideas I had for an office reform. First idea: 1. Players have a Job Points switch which can only be 5. 2. Sort all