On Sun, 2019-03-17 at 13:15 -0700, Edward Murphy wrote:
> twg wrote:
>
> > Notice of Honour:
> > -1 D. Margaux (holding up an important ruleset fix with eir attempt
> > at a win)
> > +1 Murphy (inadvertently(?) preventing a paradox)
>
> What did /I/ do?
You wrote a report which broke up the para
twg wrote:
Notice of Honour:
-1 D. Margaux (holding up an important ruleset fix with eir attempt at a win)
+1 Murphy (inadvertently(?) preventing a paradox)
What did /I/ do?
Yes, that is in fact exactly what I argue in the judgement to CFJ 3724. :P
I expect D. Margaux meant something like "its outcome, _if resolved now_, would
be ADOPTED". I imagine e would have resubmitted it with that wording, after
realising that the initial wording was wrong, if it hadn't become
On Sat, 9 Mar 2019 at 05:30, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> It was not published, twg is simply referring jokingly to emself, as e is
> the Assessor.
Oh, that makes sense. But I'm confused by D. Margaux's CFJ that 8164's
outcome is ADOPTED, if there was no message attempting to resolve the
decision.
Is
It was not published, twg is simply referring jokingly to emself, as e is
the Assessor.
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On Sat, 9 Mar 2019, James Cook wrote:
twg's message says the H. Assessor publish the below tally, but I
didn't receive any emails containing it, and I can't find it in the
public archives
twg's message says the H. Assessor publish the below tally, but I
didn't receive any emails containing it, and I can't find it in the
public archives. When was that email sent, and to which list?
I don't think it has any bearing on the CFJs. I'm just trying to
figure out if I'm missing emails.
On Friday, March 8, 2019 2:50 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> You don't have to worry about the Disclaimer in the ADoP's report -
> disclaimers are used all the time to ratify false things, under the guidance
> of R2202 you're supposed to use disclaimers when reporting false things
> for the purpose of r
Well that is a very, very annoying oversight on my part. Nice catch.
> On Mar 7, 2019, at 9:50 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> I was just writing a note to say I'd spotted the Feb 24th ADoP report's
> ratification of D. Margaux as Prime Minister as well!
>
> You don't have to worry about the Disc
I was just writing a note to say I'd spotted the Feb 24th ADoP report's
ratification of D. Margaux as Prime Minister as well!
You don't have to worry about the Disclaimer in the ADoP's report -
disclaimers are used all the time to ratify false things, under the guidance
of R2202 you're *suppose
Attached as individual text files. Please have a look and let me know what you
think...
-twg
=== CFJ 3724 ===
An Agoran Decision whether to adopt Proposal 8164 was
initiated and its outcome is ADOPTED.
---
10 matches
Mail list logo
