It'd also encourage some interesting attempts at shorthand.
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 8:42 PM, ATMunn wrote:
> Haven't read the rest of the discussion, but what if there was a rule that
> maybe, say, allowed a free pend every week, as long as the proposal is
> under some character count. It might
Haven't read the rest of the discussion, but what if there was a rule
that maybe, say, allowed a free pend every week, as long as the proposal
is under some character count. It might need some tweaking, but it could
work.
On 2/14/2018 6:21 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
I find that, when economic lim
On Wed, 2018-02-14 at 17:36 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I was definitely thinking that once the shinies -> coins stabilized
> we might tweak things like this!
>
> I went back to a 2002 ruleset to see how we coped with a low supply:
OK, what about something like this: proposal supply is limited (b
On Thu, 15 Feb 2018, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-02-14 at 15:24 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > Yes, expensive proposals are a paradigm shift to what you're used to.
> >
> > We played like that (even more expensive, actually) from 2001-2005 or
> > so. It worked fine. I would like to try it
On Wed, 2018-02-14 at 15:24 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Yes, expensive proposals are a paradigm shift to what you're used to.
>
> We played like that (even more expensive, actually) from 2001-2005 or
> so. It worked fine. I would like to try it again and not have it
> sabotaged out of the gate.
Yes, expensive proposals are a paradigm shift to what you're used to.
We played like that (even more expensive, actually) from 2001-2005 or
so. It worked fine. I would like to try it again and not have it
sabotaged out of the gate. So I won't argue that it breaks things
or doesn't. It's a ga
On Wed, 14 Feb 2018, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> That still has the problem of delaying proposals by an additional 4 days,
> which is the exact opposite of what we want to do with controversial ones.
Simple alternative:
Every Office gets one Official proposal (or 1 free pend) per week. SHOULD
be pri
I find that, when economic limits are put on proposals, inevitably it
becomes less "why do I need to pay to propose" and more "why do I need to
pay to fix this typo". It's true that I did pay in this case, but pending a
proposal is very expensive right now (non-officeholders can only propose
3/mont
On Wed, 14 Feb 2018, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> That still has the problem of delaying proposals by an additional 4 days,
> which is the exact opposite of what we want to do with controversial ones.
I feel like review periods are good things, especially when you're specifically
asking Agora if the pro
That still has the problem of delaying proposals by an additional 4 days,
which is the exact opposite of what we want to do with controversial ones.
On Wed, 14 Feb 2018 at 17:44, Nicholas Evans wrote:
> There's always Agoran Consent. We can make it a trivial ratio, such as 1.1.
>
> On Tue, Feb
There's always Agoran Consent. We can make it a trivial ratio, such as 1.1.
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 9:54 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> Sounds fine to me.
>
>
> On Tue, 13 Feb 2018 at 22:48, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Last time we did this, 3 players created a contract so that anyone
> > could
Sounds fine to me.
On Tue, 13 Feb 2018 at 22:48, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> Last time we did this, 3 players created a contract so that anyone
> could act on their behalf to get the support automatically. This
> needs objections or the proposal Economy is completely devalued.
>
> On Wed, 14 Feb
Last time we did this, 3 players created a contract so that anyone
could act on their behalf to get the support automatically. This
needs objections or the proposal Economy is completely devalued.
On Wed, 14 Feb 2018, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> I think that's a lot better for what its trying to do a
I think that's a lot better for what its trying to do actually.
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 4:07 AM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> Proposal: Supportive Proposals (AI=1)
> {{{
> Amend Rule 2445 by replacing "Without Objection" with "With 3 Support".
> }}}
>
> This is intended in part to make the cycle faster,
14 matches
Mail list logo
