Hm, those are some good ideas. Perhaps we should also repeal Arcadian
Action 5 to encourage using the more volatile Alternating Land Types
system. Maybe we need to also add more Arcadian Actions that flip the ALT
switch.
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018, 12:44 Corona wrote:
> Well, the thing that comes to
Well, the thing that comes to mind first is to incentivize small groups,
which would in general make the board more lively, e.g. by:
-movement (to same color would cost 2 apples, to different 1 apple)
-making facilities produce less for every other facility in the same-color
"group" (or it could
It's off-topic, but it just occurred to me that it'd be nice if you
(Trigon) could, in the interactive Cartographor report, make some little
ownership flags or w/e display over the land units - clicking on them one
by one to find out who owns what is a little awkward.
~Corona
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018
What's the reason for the 50/50 rule in the first place? It seems like
the current players want plots/little empires whatever, and with upkeep
fees keeping things undeveloped is occasionally useful.
I would personally either change the ratio to allow more ownership, or
maybe just plain old inc
Excuse me, but have you seen how big the groups of contiguous land units
are? Capturing any unit except ATMunn's lone white unit would be nearly
impossible. And it's not like it's gonna stop being that way any time
soon. It only costs one more apple to make a land unit that you can
choose the c
Well, what would you think about reviving my suggestion to incentivize
"capturing" land units with a healthy financial reward?
~Corona
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 7:55 PM, Reuben Staley
wrote:
> In compliance with rule 2004, I run land auctions (almost) every Agoran
> Week. However, I am not to run
6 matches
Mail list logo
