amoverview

hello, After doing a start backup, of many filesystem, I run amoverview to check the state of the backup, every filesystem is 0 except two of them (the two that failed first write cause of tape space and were successful on second try) that are with EE code. Whats the meaning of that? Is that

Re: want to relabel the tape

If you really, really want to do this, use the -f flag: amlabel -f DailyConfig LABEL Oscar At 03:24 PM 3/18/2002 +0800, Robert SHEN, you wrote: I tried to relabel the tape used previous by another config, and I got the following error: ... rewinding, reading label Monthly-03, tape

amrecover: Unexpected server end of file error

Hi, does anyone know what the following means? # amrecover AMRECOVER Version 2.4.2p2. Contacting server on geko60 ... amrecover: Unexpected server end of file I looked at the Amanda FAQ and followed the 'solution' for this error but it is still not working. Here's what I did:

again: dump larger than tape

Hello mailinglist, some days ago I had a problem with my dump: It was too large to fit on a tape. You told me to compress with server fast or server best. I did so, but the error occurred again. So I tried to backup from one server with rsync and backup the local files with amdump. Again:

problem in recover

Redhat 7.2 Tandberg library TDS 1420 SLR100 Amanda 2.4.3b3 Doing a recover from a remote server 2002-03-18 orasnap/ 2002-03-18 perl.gif 2002-03-18 phpgroupware/ 2002-03-18 powered_by_t.gif 2002-03-18 redhat.gif 2002-03-18 sar/ amrecover add perl.gif Added /perl.gif amrecover extract

Re: Barcode reader

On Sun, 17 Mar 2002, Thomas Hepper wrote: Hi, On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 10:48:24AM -0500, Eric Trager wrote: I added this to the chg-scsi-solaris.conf file I use and the chg-scsi [...] ChgExit in MapBarCode, reason MapBarCode, DB Version does not match You should drop the old

Re: amrecover is kicking my butt......

Thanks I setup a cname for the interim which works well until I test out the hacked amrecover. Looking at the diff..are you basically taking the extrapolation portion for the disk_regex to setup host_regex, so basically redoing the same procedure??? That is what I'm getting from this so far.

Re: Help me understand

This is actually something that Amanda will mostly do for you. There are two issues: the schedule of backups across your dumpcycle, and the process of starting amanda so it can execute those jobs. First, amanda will try to even out your tape usage by automaticallys scheduling an appropriate

Re: amrecover is kicking my butt......

Thanks Jean...your idea works great..why hasn't this been incorporated previously by chance Don Don Potter wrote: Thanks I setup a cname for the interim which works well until I test out the hacked amrecover. Looking at the diff..are you basically taking the extrapolation

--disable-libtool option in the 3b3 build

On a current version of Linux, building 3b3 with the configure option --disable-libtool works OK... It also builds fine without disabling libtool... Can someone please suggest what I should examine to find the problem that is preventing an amanda 3b3 build on Tru64? Whenever the

Tar 1.13.25?

Hi! I've seen on FreeBSD a listing for gtar 1.13.25. However, I can't seem to find the sub-revision number in the sources downloaded from ftp.gnu.org , and the most recent rpm from redhat is for 1.13.19-1. Are the sources on ftp.gnu.org for 1.13.25? Or should I just upgrade the lone gnu/linux

Amanda through translated addresses

We began using NAT addresses on our network a few months ago, but at first we kept all of our systems that were backed up by amanda outside the NAT range. As time moved on we started bringing some of them inside, and it seemed that the easiest way to get both the inside (translated) and outside

Re: Amanda through translated addresses

On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, Lee Parsons wrote: We began using NAT addresses on our network a few months ago, but at first we kept all of our systems that were backed up by amanda outside the NAT range. As time moved on we started bringing some of them inside, and it seemed that the easiest way to

Re: Tar 1.13.25?

On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, Morse, Richard E. wrote: Hi! I've seen on FreeBSD a listing for gtar 1.13.25. However, I can't seem to find the sub-revision number in the sources downloaded from ftp.gnu.org , and the most recent rpm from redhat is for 1.13.19-1. Are the sources on ftp.gnu.org for

Re: --disable-libtool option in the 3b3 build

Can someone please suggest what I should examine to find the problem that is preventing an amanda 3b3 build on Tru64? I'm not ignoring you on this. Just real, real, busy with a ton of other things. I have it on my list to find out why/if --disable-libtool doesn't do what you would think it

Re: Tar 1.13.25?

Hi! I've seen on FreeBSD a listing for gtar 1.13.25. However, I can't seem to find the sub-revision number in the sources downloaded from ftp.gnu.org ... You need to go to alpha.gnu.org. It's beyond me what the GNU folks are doing with tar and why a decent version isn't in their standard ftp

Re: Amanda through translated addresses

Can I use IP addresses in the disklist files rather than the FQDNs? If I could do that then I wouldn't have to worry about DNS to begin with. I haven't seen anything explicitly say we can or cannot but every disklist file I've seen always has the FQDN. Although the other thing I notice i that

Re: problem in recover

Extracting files using tape drive 0 on host backup.intra.it. Note the drive 0 part. Amrecover does not use the Amanda tape changer, so you need to tell it explicitly what drive to use, e.g. -d /dev/nst0 (or whatever the path is for your system). That's also what it was saying in the

amanda

hello all, can anyone throw some light on this problem. 1) i don't have a domain-controller , i only have workgroup, on that workgroup i enabled my samba. now problem is that i am only able to see the samba user's files and nothing more. i have checked with samba configuration and all that