Re: Multiple storage-definitions, generating archive tapes

2022-10-30 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Am 30.10.22 um 16:32 schrieb Exuvo: Are you not supposed to do all the -Letter options before the configuration name? Is that maybe why it does not work? I.e: amflush -o storage=storage1 configurationNameHere No. amflush config -o storage=storage1 works fine so far. My question is: how

Re: Multiple storage-definitions, generating archive tapes

2022-10-30 Thread Exuvo
Are you not supposed to do all the -Letter options before the configuration name? Is that maybe why it does not work? I.e: amflush -o storage=storage1 configurationNameHere Anton "exuvo" Olsson ex...@exuvo.se On 2022-10-24 19:08, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: So far my setups with multiple

Re: Multiple storage-definitions, generating archive tapes

2022-10-24 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
So far my setups with multiple storages work. One of the missing features (or I don't know how): if dumps stay in the holding disk I don't know which storage they would go to via amflush. I start amflush config -o storage=storage1 and then see in amstatus, that all DLEs would go to

Re: Multiple storage-definitions, generating archive tapes

2022-08-24 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Am 23.08.22 um 23:16 schrieb Exuvo: I use two separate backup configurations. One for weekly backups and one for yearly archival. The weekly i start from crontab and the archival one i start manually with "sudo -u amanda amdump archive". Each configuration has its own storage definition with

Re: Multiple storage-definitions, generating archive tapes

2022-08-23 Thread Exuvo
I use two separate backup configurations. One for weekly backups and one for yearly archival. The weekly i start from crontab and the archival one i start manually with "sudo -u amanda amdump archive". Each configuration has its own storage definition with tape names starting with R or A (

Re: Multiple storage-definitions, generating archive tapes

2022-08-23 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Am 10.08.22 um 08:52 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger: What I try: storage1 should leave the lev0 backups in the holding disk after writing to tapes in pool1 storage2 should be allowed to remove them when written to the tapes in pool2 Does noone else use multiple storage definitions? I have

Re: Multiple storage-definitions, generating archive tapes

2022-08-10 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
(resend with correct ML-email) Am 09.08.22 um 16:50 schrieb Jose M Calhariz: On Mon, Aug 08, 2022 at 04:34:11PM +0200, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: Am 04.08.22 um 10:08 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger: (...) combined with flush-threshold-dumped 200 # (or more) flush-threshold-scheduled

Re: Multiple storage-definitions, generating archive tapes

2022-08-09 Thread Jose M Calhariz
On Mon, Aug 08, 2022 at 04:34:11PM +0200, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: > Am 04.08.22 um 10:08 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger: > (...) > > combined with > > flush-threshold-dumped200 # (or more) > flush-threshold-scheduled 200 # (or more) > taperflush200 My experience is this

Re: Multiple storage-definitions, generating archive tapes

2022-08-08 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Am 04.08.22 um 10:08 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger: 1) I would have to "split" a physical tape change into 2 logical changers: 12 tapes for "daily" runs (= storage 1) 12 tapes for "full-only" runs (= storage 2) (How) would amanda handle that? As there is only one tape drive it would have to

Multiple storage-definitions, generating archive tapes

2022-08-04 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Now that I understand a bit better how to use 2 storage-definitions I'd like to improve a setup at a customer. Back then I tried to use amvault, but didn't get the concepts right (reading the old threads I see that I didn't even get the command-options right ...). What is set up right