unsubscribe

2001-04-03 Thread Ingo Bez
unsubscribe

Re: Failure on W2k client

2001-04-03 Thread David Lloyd
Ummm! added interface ip=128.84.247.9 bcast=128.84.247.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 added interface ip=128.84.247.9 bcast=128.84.247.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 added interface ip=128.84.247.9 bcast=128.84.247.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 added interface ip=128.84.247.9 bcast=128.84.247.255

Re: is my dumpcycle conf ok ?

2001-04-03 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Apr 2, 2001, verdon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I wanted to perform a FULL dump each sunday during 10 weeks Jason is correct that you want "dumpcycle 0" to force the full dumps. I just wanted to add that if these clients are also being backed up with another configuration (e.g. daily),

Re: amanda problems

2001-04-03 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Apr 2, 2001, Sandra Panesso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ? gtar: time_t value 18446744071597657311 too large (max=68719476735) I used to get errors like this with GNU tar 1.13. If that's the one you're using, don't. Use GNU tar 1.13.17 or newer, or go back to 1.12 plus the patch somewhere in

Re: Can I rm if I don't want to amflush?

2001-04-03 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Apr 2, 2001, David Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Steve! Can I just remove the holding disk directories that were created? I don't particularly want to flush these to tape, but I also don't want to break anything. I wouldn't "just remove" them if I were you, especially if the dumps

Re: is my dumpcycle conf ok ?

2001-04-03 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Apr 3, 2001, verdon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: on tape from the config 1 ? or the last level 0 from config 1 ? It will ask for the last level 0 from config 1, but it will fail, because what it really needs is that last level 0 from either config. Note that amandates doesn't play any role at

Re: is my dumpcycle conf ok ?

2001-04-03 Thread verdon
config 1 backup from monday to friday config 2 backup on sunday So evry client as it's own /etc/dumpdates and if i'll try to restore data for thursday, (i suppose backup is a level 1) amanda will need the level 0, ask /etc/amandates, and so ask for two tape the last incremental tape and an

Re: is my dumpcycle conf ok ?

2001-04-03 Thread verdon
Now i suppose that i have to - let amanda doing backup for the week , and i can make an external script that will backup tar and gzip all my client during week-end... or -just use one configuration in which i force full dump during the week-end and then use: "amadmin conf no-reuse

Re: is my dumpcycle conf ok ?

2001-04-03 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Apr 3, 2001, verdon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: well i think i'm going to use the first, what do you think about it? Just set the archive configuration to use `record no', as JJ and the FAQ recommend, and all will be fine. -- Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see

Re: is my dumpcycle conf ok ?

2001-04-03 Thread verdon
so, i have tried to backup data last week so actually all my clients /etc/amandates are wrong if i want to correct all amandates i suppose i had to force a full dump this evening !? right? may i clear all amanda logs on the server to restart backing up client as the first time? Alexandre Oliva

Re: putting disklist entries on 'standby'

2001-04-03 Thread Bill Carlson
On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, John R. Jackson wrote: What's the recommended procedure for temporarily removing a disklist entry? ... My solution is to just comment out the disklist entry, but I'm not sure what effect that has on indexing, amrecover, etc. That's what I do. You won't be able to do an

GNUTAR

2001-04-03 Thread Bernd Zimmermann
Hi All, my GNUTAR ist 'tar-1.13.tar.gz' for sparc Solaris 7 Is ther any second entry to make in amanda.conf or anywhere? Amanda Backup Client Hosts Check ERROR: daphne: [GNUTAR program not available] Client check: 1 host checked in 0.896 seconds, 1 problem

RE: GNUTAR

2001-04-03 Thread Ben Hyatt
Is ther any second entry to make in amanda.conf or anywhere? Make sure gtar is in your path before running 'configure' - assuming you're building from source. Add gtar to your path, re-run configure, make and make install. -Ben

unsubscribe

2001-04-03 Thread Hsaio-ping Lui

No Subject

2001-04-03 Thread Melissa Lawson
unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] winmail.dat

Amanda on Mac OS X

2001-04-03 Thread Greg Troxel
Has anyone used Amanda on OS X release? Given what I've heard about OS X, I would expect the bulk of it to work with some unknown grief level, modulo issues about how the Mac filesystem bits appear in the BSD tree. Thus, my real questions are: Is Amanda on OS X a sufficient backup scheme for

Re: GNUTAR

2001-04-03 Thread John R. Jackson
my GNUTAR ist 'tar-1.13.tar.gz' for sparc Solaris 7 Type "/path/to/gnu/tar --version" and make sure it is at least 1.13.17. Do **not** use anything earlier than that. ERROR: daphne: [GNUTAR program not available] Is ther any second entry to make in amanda.conf or anywhere? As Ben said, just

Re: putting disklist entries on 'standby'

2001-04-03 Thread John R. Jackson
I make a special dump-type, "skip" with the 'ignore' option. ... Ahh, that's a good idea. And with 2.4.2, you can build dumptypes "on the fly" in the disklist, so it could be done like this without messing with amanda.conf: client.my.domain /first/disk a-normal-dumptype

Amanda and Onstream DI-30

2001-04-03 Thread Jason Clark
Well, I've looked through the archives and it appears that some people are having success with this driver. I am not one of them. I'm currently running redhat 6.2 with a 2.2.16 kernel. I can get the drive to work with the ide-tape module patched according to onstream and access it as /dev/ht0

Re: GNUTAR

2001-04-03 Thread Mark L. Chang
On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Phil Stracchino wrote: All mine reports is 1.13. No minor version. What, hypothetically speaking, would happen if one used tar 1.13.17? It won't work. I built a Slack 7 box with 1.13 and it just didn't work. Okay, to be more specific, it didn't create the index files

Re: Failure on W2k client

2001-04-03 Thread John R. Jackson
... I've noticed that amanda-2.4.2p1 doesn't like broadcasts at all and will fail dismally even though smbclient will cope. ... Huh? How can Amanda fail and smbclient work when Amanda is doing nothing more than call smbclient? What, exactly, does "fail dismally" mean, i.e. what kinds of

Re: FW: Welcome to amanda-users

2001-04-03 Thread John R. Jackson
I am a beginner ... Welcome! I am trying to understand this file. ... You might read http://www.backupcentral.com/amanda.html. It is an online chapter specifically about Amanda from a book about backups in general. There is also information at the main Amanda web site, www.amanda.org.

Re: Amanda on Mac OS X

2001-04-03 Thread John R. Jackson
Has anyone used Amanda on OS X release? ... I just spent some time with my local Mac wizard and he says getting Amanda working is probably not too hard (he gave me an account on his machine, but I haven't decide whether to thank or curse him for that :-). Getting a backup program that Amanda

DUMP Error

2001-04-03 Thread Ken Huang
Does anyone know what is the error mean? Does it mean the tape is bad? DUMP: Date of this level 0 dump: Fri Mar 30 23:45:28 2001 | DUMP: Date of last level 0 dump: the epoch | DUMP: Dumping /dev/sda8 (/u1 (dir /app/apache/product/1.3.12)) to standard output | DUMP: Label: none | DUMP:

Re: DUMP Error

2001-04-03 Thread John R. Jackson
Does anyone know what is the error mean? Does it mean the tape is bad? Well, you're not using a tape, so no :-). At this point Amanda is running dump to a socket back to the holding disk. It probably means the file system was active and dump got confused. Just let it try again. John R.

Re: Failure on W2k client

2001-04-03 Thread David Lloyd
The error I see is: "Host is down or invalid password" Essentially my guess is that Amanda via smbclient attempts to use a local wins server to resolve the Netbios name which didn't work because I didn't have a wins server configured. Hence, rather than wait for the broadcast to function (it

Re: Failure on W2k client

2001-04-03 Thread Marty Shannon, RHCE
David Lloyd wrote: The error I see is: "Host is down or invalid password" In some sense, that is the final answer. More explicitly (and has been stated in the FAQ, and on this mailing list inumerable times): if smbclient can't get to the windows host, Amanda is not involved. You must

Re: Failure on W2k client

2001-04-03 Thread David Lloyd
Marty! I suggest you put your asbestos, flame resistant suit on... Again: THIS IS NOT AMANDA'S FAULT! IT IS SMBCLIENT'S FAULT! You obviously cannot understand what I am saying, or you have not followed this thread. If you cannot understand English I will have this translated into any other

amcheck error

2001-04-03 Thread Mariko Tagawa
Hi, I'm using SUN StorEdge L9 ( DLT autochenger). After installing Amanda, I execute amcheck then I got the following error message. I'm wandering it's amanda configuration problem or L9 hardware problem or DLT tape error. Is there anyone who had same error message?

LSM - Logical Storage Manager Drives

2001-04-03 Thread walterz
Has anybody any experience with backing up LSM drives using Amanda? I have configured the system so that amcheck is happy, but amdump reports disk is offline. I have set the device permissions like so: brw-r root system /dev/vol/rootvol (logical volume) crw-r root system

Missing

2001-04-03 Thread wschroed
I have not been able to get amanda to back anything up. amcheck is fine. amdump hangs (days) and I get an email that has MISSING under the dumper stats . I am just trying to back up /home on the local machine. Any thoughts before I give up and just use dump.? amanda-2.4.2p1 OpenBSD 2.8

(no subject)

2001-04-03 Thread Ingo Bez
unsubscribe amanda-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]