On 25 Mrz., 21:07, Fernando Cassia fcas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 4:26 AM, Krischik Martin
martin.krisc...@noser.com wrote:
Did you actually read the terms and conditions for developers and
suppliers? Or are you just an Amazon-Fanboy believing that is must be
good
On Mar 29, 4:19 pm, Kevin TeslaCoil Software ke...@teslacoilsw.com
wrote:
Opera has just launched its own Mobile App Store
And instead of contacting developers to get them to submit their apps
before launch, Opera just populated it with pirated software... Not a
good way to gain developer
On Mar 29, 7:09 pm, Kevin TeslaCoil Software ke...@teslacoilsw.com
wrote:
Some more details, it was WidgetLocker 1.2.2, which is from July 2010
and several versions out of date. It was named WidgetLockr (Pirate
spelling?). It was an unmodified APK signed by me, the one I had
posted to the
I see that Handago offers paid apps for Android, with trial period feature.
Anyone know what kind of licensing scheme / library is behind this?
Do they just point to Market for downloads (like AppBrain, etc.) or have
their own solution (like AndroidPIT)?
-- Kostya
30.03.2011 19:10, Krischik
On Mar 30, 5:27 pm, Kostya Vasilyev kmans...@gmail.com wrote:
I see that Handago offers paid apps for Android, with trial period feature.
Anyone know what kind of licensing scheme / library is behind this?
That is up to you. The offer the ability to upload two version of the
app, one for the
Opera has just launched its own Mobile App Store
And instead of contacting developers to get them to submit their apps
before launch, Opera just populated it with pirated software... Not a
good way to gain developer support or credibility.
-Kevin
On Mar 25, 2:07 pm, Fernando Cassia
On Mar 29, 1:19 pm, Kevin TeslaCoil Software ke...@teslacoilsw.com
wrote:
Opera has just launched its own Mobile App Store
And instead of contacting developers to get them to submit their apps
before launch, Opera just populated it with pirated software... Not a
good way to gain developer
Some more details, it was WidgetLocker 1.2.2, which is from July 2010
and several versions out of date. It was named WidgetLockr (Pirate
spelling?). It was an unmodified APK signed by me, the one I had
posted to the Android Market (no LVL at that time). I contacted Opera
with a DMCA takedown
Ahh... now I begin to see the connections!
Thats the App store that the Viewsonic G-Tablet comes with pre-installed and
its terrible.
That non-google market fact was my second biggest disappointment with that
tablet (the first being the terrible launcher).
If your stuff is in that app store, I
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 4:26 AM, Krischik Martin
martin.krisc...@noser.com wrote:
Did you actually read the terms and conditions for developers and
suppliers? Or are you just an Amazon-Fanboy believing that is must be
good because it is from mighty Amazon?
Luckily for us with an interest in
And your opinion is above other people´s opinions?.
Opinions are like arseholes. Everybody´s got one. So either accept
that or ST*U?.
I certainly won´t criticize or insult others for voicing an opinion.
FC
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 6:41 PM, niko20 nikolatesl...@yahoo.com wrote:
More idiots
I don't know, I've written a lot of j2me apps, and I can't say that I'm sorry
to see it go.
- Brill Pappin
Sixgreen Labs Inc.
On 2011-03-25, at 3:07 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 4:26 AM, Krischik Martin
martin.krisc...@noser.com wrote:
Did you actually read the
Unfortunately, from what I've seen, updates take just as long to go
through their process as any normal submission. I currently have an
update sitting in their system that has been in it for a week already
(I'm almost ready to release the next update). This is definitely
something they need to
I submitted 4, 3 have been under review for 2 months almost.
One went thru in a week.
The under review is a business-NO.
Bezos=Jobs
On Mar 23, 12:38 pm, Matt M matthew.mag...@gmail.com wrote:
To those who have submitted apps to Amazon how long did it take between
submitting and approval?
On 24 Mrz., 11:07, Pent supp...@apps.dinglisch.net wrote:
Larger reach? At the moment it is US only for Buyer. And the payment
conditions for outside US Seller are plain horrible.
I should coco. If that means what I think it means.
Well, I mean that US Bankers Cheques are not helpfully
On 24 Mrz., 15:49, TreKing treking...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 4:03 AM, Krischik Martin
I don't see any advantage apart from the Amazon brand itself. Do you?
Developer Support.
Did you actually read the terms and conditions for developers and
suppliers? Or are you just an
Even if you find the TC unacceptable, you should be happy that this
alternate market exists. Do you want the Google Market to imporve? --
because without competition, it won't.
The lack of customer support in the Google Market is appalling. Wait
until you have to have a problem of your own
On 25 Mrz., 09:15, Zsolt Vasvari zvasv...@gmail.com wrote:
Even if you find the TC unacceptable, you should be happy that this
alternate market exists.
No, my fear is that Amazon will use there (excellent) brand name to
push an inferior product.
Do you want the Google Market to improve? --
On Friday, March 25, 2011 7:26:11 AM UTC, Krischik Martin wrote:
Or are you just an Amazon-Fanboy believing that is must be
good because it is from mighty Amazon?
No, I believe he's *becoming* an Amazon-Fanboy because of the negative
experiences on Google's Market over the last two years,
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 3:33 AM, Krischik Martin
krisc...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
On 25 Mrz., 09:15, Zsolt Vasvari zvasv...@gmail.com wrote:
Even if you find the TC unacceptable, you should be happy that this
alternate market exists.
No, my fear is that Amazon will use there
... and a single point for cracking.
I should not have rebuild for every market!
- Brill Pappin
Sixgreen Labs Inc.
On 2011-03-24, at 5:05 PM, TreKing wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 8:33 PM, Brill Pappin bpap...@sixgreen.com wrote:
Once again, you need to be able to tell which market you
That doesn't make sense.
I'm a little (or more) annoyed that I can't purchase from the store, although I
can still sell to US customers.
However I'm sure that the market will open up as amazon works out the bugs.
- Brill Pappin
Sixgreen Labs Inc.
On 2011-03-24, at 6:40 PM, Indicator
Dude,
making an argument on spelling is a but juvenile don't you think?
- Brill Pappin
Sixgreen Labs Inc.
On 2011-03-24, at 6:42 PM, Indicator Veritatis wrote:
Your argument would be more compelling if you could spell the name of
the market you mention correctly: it is SlideMe.com, not
But thats just it, the point people are making is that despite the problems
with the Google Market, the Amazon Market is even worse (except for the
customer service apparently).
The TOS *is* crappy in this day and age, particularly for non US companies.
Who the hell mails cheques anymore?
* What all these Markets should be doing is making sure that they
interoperate, because us developers *do* want to deploy to all of them, but
we don't need the extra work of maintaining several versions or deployments
for each one.*
In a Utopian society that would be great. And I agree it would
On 2011-03-25 15:43, Brill Pappin wrote:
... and a single point for cracking.
I should not have rebuild for every market!
Exactly my sentiment. I don't mind having a bit of code that determines
currentMarket() at runtime and execute slightly different code, but I
don't want to build it
Their ROI comes from us, the developers.
The more we well the more they make, and I think they should remember that.
If my product is good enough to make me money, then its good enough to make
them money... why would they want to make it difficult for me to deploy to
their app store?
- Brill
Yeah, there is probably Nash Equilibrium in the whole multi-market per
platform world, especially that it isn't zero-sum game yet. Being open
and interoperable would benefit each player in the market game in the
ways that were hard to predict. The market for mobile apps and
smartphones is growing
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Daniel Drozdzewski
daniel.drozdzew...@gmail.com wrote:
TechCrunch reported today that one could buy an app by mistake, when having
one-click payments enabled on their account and there is no way for refunds.
I just ran into this yesterday. Only $2.85, but
I just ran into this yesterday. Only $2.85, but now I have an app I had no
interest in and will never use. I emailed them about it and have not heard
back yet. Even if one has 1-click payment on, an Are You Sure dialog seems
like a no-brainer, especially when the Buy button is next to each
*Their ROI comes from us, the developers.*
*The more we well the more they make, and I think they should remember that.
*
They do. You have to think about it from their side of things. Working
together to make it easier to submit to multiple stores causes them to use
their resources (time and
On Friday, March 25, 2011 8:00:30 AM UTC-7, MagouyaWare wrote:
* What all these Markets should be doing is making sure that they
interoperate, because us developers *do* want to deploy to all of them, but
we don't need the extra work of maintaining several versions or deployments
for
Well, it looks like the Amazon Appstore has had its first stats true-up.
My order/download stats just dropped by around 60% at this last update.
Yes, that includes purchases as well. So, either people found a way to get
a refund or the Appstore has been counting orders incorrectly thus far.
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 11:56 AM, TreKing treking...@gmail.com wrote:
I just ran into this yesterday. Only $2.85, but now I have an app I had no
interest in and will never use. I emailed them about it and have not heard
back yet.
Update, they refunded my accidental purchase. Goddamn I love
On Mar 25, 11:20 am, TreKing treking...@gmail.com wrote:
Update, they refunded my accidental purchase. *** I love these people.
Well, gee, there goes my one sale! ;)
Nathan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Android Developers group.
To post to
Some things I like:
1. The client is MUCH better, can actually search and FILTER based on
ratings.
2. Ratings require 25 words. This forces users to actually put
something meaningful instead of crap or some other useless comment.
3. Nice developer dashboard.
4. REAL PEOPLE respond to your issues
So far I've made $27 in sales, that's actually not too shabby for only
just starting the store out.
-nik
On Mar 25, 1:37 pm, Nathan critter...@crittermap.com wrote:
On Mar 25, 11:20 am, TreKing treking...@gmail.com wrote:
Update, they refunded my accidental purchase. *** I love these
I think we should not forget, that we as the people who write the software, we
actually have a lot more power over this than we ever actually use.
- Brill Pappin
Sixgreen Labs Inc.
On 2011-03-25, at 1:19 PM, Justin Anderson wrote:
Their ROI comes from us, the developers.
The more we
Well I knew this was coming, and sure enough here we go: More FUD:
http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2011/03/amazon-app-store-security/
More idiots feeling that they need to share their opinion.
-nik
On Mar 25, 4:34 pm, Brill Pappin bpap...@sixgreen.com wrote:
I think we should not forget, that
Well I knew this was coming, and sure enough here we go: More FUD:
http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2011/03/amazon-app-store-security/
More idiots feeling that they need to share their opinion.
-nik
On Mar 25, 4:34 pm, Brill Pappin bpap...@sixgreen.com wrote:
I think we should not forget,
Even though I find working on this stuff extremely fun and rewarding, i'm not
spending as much time as I am on it for free. Its just not going to happen,
because life is too busy.
I have to agree on the purpose of the app store and the market. its about being
competitive (although in googles
Well I knew this was coming, and sure enough here we go: More FUD:
http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2011/03/amazon-app-store-security/
More idiots feeling that they need to share their opinion.
-nik
On Mar 25, 4:34 pm, Brill Pappin bpap...@sixgreen.com wrote:
I think we should not forget,
Well I knew this was coming, and sure enough here we go: More FUD:
http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2011/03/amazon-app-store-security/
More idiots feeling that they need to share their opinion.
-nik
On Mar 25, 4:34 pm, Brill Pappin bpap...@sixgreen.com wrote:
I think we should not forget,
On Mar 25, 11:37 am, Nathan critter...@crittermap.com wrote:
On Mar 25, 11:20 am, TreKing treking...@gmail.com wrote:
Update, they refunded my accidental purchase. *** I love these people.
Well, gee, there goes my one sale! ;)
Nathan
I guess it wasn't Treking.
This one person says that
Sorry for the spam, the interet wasn't working right
On Mar 25, 6:13 pm, Nathan critter...@crittermap.com wrote:
On Mar 25, 11:37 am, Nathan critter...@crittermap.com wrote:
On Mar 25, 11:20 am, TreKing treking...@gmail.com wrote:
Update, they refunded my accidental purchase. *** I love
On Mar 25, 4:13 pm, Nathan critter...@crittermap.com wrote:
On Mar 25, 11:37 am, Nathan critter...@crittermap.com wrote:
On Mar 25, 11:20 am, TreKing treking...@gmail.com wrote:
Update, they refunded my accidental purchase. *** I love these people.
Well, gee, there goes my one sale!
I have once or twice needed to deploy an update hours after a deployment
because of sill setting i forgot to deploy, or some bug on a particular
platform that I missed during testing.
If it took two weeks for my customers to get an update, I think I'd have lost
them.
- Brill Pappin
Sixgreen
On 22 Mrz., 11:47, Zsolt Vasvari zvasv...@gmail.com wrote:
I have one word to sum it up as: Hooray!!
Which Hooray? Open to US only and with condition which turn
independent developers into serf. Thanks, but no thanks.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Congrats on the compelling issues :-)
Pent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Android Developers group.
To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
On 23 March 2011 21:52, David Williams dwilli...@dtw-consulting.com wrote:
Hope you can get beers for a dollar a piece ;)
With ease. But not in US though :)
Regards,
Marcin Orlowski
Tray Agenda http://bit.ly/trayagenda - keep you daily schedule handy...
--
You received this message
On Thursday, March 24, 2011 6:29:51 AM UTC, Krischik Martin wrote:
Which Hooray? Open to US only and with condition which turn
independent developers into serf. Thanks, but no thanks.
If you don't like it, you don't have to list your apps there. That's the big
hooray IMHO: *choice*. There's
On 24 Mrz., 09:21, String sterling.ud...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thursday, March 24, 2011 6:29:51 AM UTC, Krischik Martin wrote:
Which Hooray? Open to US only and with condition which turn
independent developers into serf. Thanks, but no thanks.
If you don't like it, you don't have to
Better conditions? For the Buyer: yes. For the Seller: No - the most
horrible condition of them all.
My favourite is 'we can undercut your own app listed on other markets
whenever we like at your own expense, good eh ?'.
Larger reach? At the moment it is US only for Buyer. And the payment
Second update: Amazon updated my app's title and descriptions and they're
still edited but *much* more in line with what I submitted in the
description. I'm a happy panda now. Hot damn I love these people. Developer
support rules!
Something that you need to check is your Keywords. I
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 4:03 AM, Krischik Martin
martin.krisc...@noser.comwrote:
Well, this has made me have a look on how credible the alternative we
already had for month? More apps? No Amazon is middle field here:
Google: 150'000 Android Apps
SlimeME: 7'600 Android Apps
pdassi: 4'000
Good tip about the keywords. It appears that apps aren't searchable on terms
in the description, only name and keywords. And as you said, my apps either
had ridiculously general keywords (for one it was app application), or
none at all.
String
--
You received this message because you are
Have you all noticed a big discrepancy between the order counts on the
Amazon AppStore home dashboard and what is shown in the Reports page?
The counts for me on the home page are about one third of what shows
in the reports page
-Gregg
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
Is anyone noticing a sales jump from the Amazon store? I know it's early
and hard to really judge for long term. However, with the launch getting so
much buzz, I would expect people to be getting decent downloads relative to
their Market numbers.
--
Chris Stewart
http://chriswstewart.com
On
Yes, when you submit your app you can check the DRM checkbox or not, just
like you used to do with googles market.
There does not appear to be any LVL type of library for Amazon (that I was
able to find). All a crack will need to do is crack the Amazon market and
all apps you download are
Have to say i'm not to happy about that myself.
in fact I'd say they don't have the right, but then i guess its their app
store... it concerns me that they will simply rewrite it without you
reviewing it though. Despite the appearance of them caring with their
customer support, their actions
Laugh!!
so much for getting a better market :)
- Brill Pappin
Sixgreen Labs Inc.
On 2011-03-24, at 2:18 PM, Gregg Reno wrote:
Have you all noticed a big discrepancy between the order counts on the
Amazon AppStore home dashboard and what is shown in the Reports page?
The counts for me
At least they are consistent with all of their different stores though...
The main things people are complaining about are that the descriptions get
edited and they essential have full control over price.
They also do this with anything else that is listed on their website... If
they changed it
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 8:33 PM, Brill Pappin bpap...@sixgreen.com wrote:
Once again, you need to be able to tell which market you installed from in
order to adjust your links to the correct market.
All that takes is a single compile-time flag.
Now that I have seen this complaint, I feel the need to treat with
greater skepticism ANY claim that any of the markets are treating
developers as serfs.
On Mar 23, 11:29 pm, Krischik Martin martin.krisc...@noser.com
wrote:
On 22 Mrz., 11:47, Zsolt Vasvari zvasv...@gmail.com wrote:
I have one
Your argument would be more compelling if you could spell the name of
the market you mention correctly: it is SlideMe.com, not
SlimeMe.com!
Though I have to say: that latter would make a good name for a website
with a rather different purpose, such as spreading slimey accusations
of people...
On
On Mar 24, 9:34 pm, Justin Anderson magouyaw...@gmail.com wrote:
The main things people are complaining about are that the descriptions get
edited and they essential have full control over price.
Personally, I rather prefer their descriptions of my apps to their
own. I can understand why one
Not that I am surprised too much. Frankly, what surprised me most, was the
fact that you got no influence on how DRM is applied to your app. With LVL
you could at least mess with checking code to some degree, which makes
automated attacks futile. With Amazon's approach you got one ring to rule
How do all of you take into account:
- C2DM (push messaging only available on Android Market)
- House-ads via AdMob that links to apps in the Android Market
- In-app purchasing that is coming soon on the Android Market
- Links to additional content in Android Market from your app
Are you all
On Mar 23, 12:00 pm, Christer Nordvik cnord...@gmail.com wrote:
- C2DM (push messaging only available on Android Market)
Haven't used this, but are you sure this is a feature limited to the
Android market?
- House-ads via AdMob that links to apps in the Android Market
You could always add in
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 7:30 AM, Michael A. michael.aki...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 23, 12:00 pm, Christer Nordvik cnord...@gmail.com wrote:
- C2DM (push messaging only available on Android Market)
Haven't used this, but are you sure this is a feature limited to the
Android market?
The device
Ah well, if it's just a matter of the device _having_ Android market
installed, it shouldn't be much of a problem - most phones will still
have that, after all. One should probably ensure that the code
degrades gracefully, though, since such devices are probably likely to
become more common in
A device manufacturer can only preinstall Market on their device is it
passes Android certification tests.
So a device without Market, at this point, may have all kinds of
incompatible implementation weirdness (and many do - e.g. Android-based
book readers). Installing a 3rd party application
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Kostya Vasilyev kmans...@gmail.com wrote:
A device manufacturer can only preinstall Market on their device is it
passes Android certification tests.
So a device without Market, at this point, may have all kinds of
incompatible implementation weirdness (and
Um... which is why I recommended ensuring the app degrades gracefully.
In this respect, distributing the app through the amazon market is no
different than any other independent app market. Assuming the presence
of the Android market is probably never a good idea.
Regards,
Michael A.
On Mar
Arrg!
I just went to try and deploy one of our apps, but they seem to be
using the old style (DRM?) licensing.
Now i have to break my apps just to deploy them or maintain separate
code copies or even separate apps!
So far I'm more impressed with the lame-but-improving Google Market.
Does anyone
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Marcin Orlowski
webnet.andr...@gmail.comwrote:
On 22 March 2011 16:00, TreKing treking...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Marcin Orlowski
webnet.andr...@gmail.com wrote:
Did sad panda mail amazon staff about that?
Not yet, but I will.
Hope you can get beers for a dollar a piece ;)
David Williams
Check out our WebOS mobile phone app for the Palm Pre and Pixi:
http://www.dtw-consulting.com/GolfCaddie Golf Caddie
http://www.dtw-consulting.com/GolfCaddie |
On Mar 23, 5:37 am, Mark Murphy mmur...@commonsware.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Kostya Vasilyev kmans...@gmail.com wrote:
A device manufacturer can only preinstall Market on their device is it
passes Android certification tests.
So a device without Market, at this point,
Do you mean they use Android's deprecated copy protection?
Do they have anything similar to the LVL for licensing checks, or is it if
it was allowed to download, it must have been paid for?
23.03.2011 23:16 пользователь Brill Pappin bpap...@sixgreen.com написал:
Arrg!
I just went to try and
Side-note, I sold my first Amazon copy of my app (bringing the total up to
an incredible ONE!) and am $2.10 richer! Woot! I'm hitting the dollar store
after work and splurging on TWO things! =P
LOL, you could (almost) ride the CTA once with that kind of cash...
--
You received this message
I agree with the week or 2 for Paid apps, but I have a Free app that's
been in the queue for several weeks - I'm thinking they're giving
review preference to the Paid ones, which would make sense, of course.
On Mar 23, 1:38 pm, Matt M matthew.mag...@gmail.com wrote:
To those who have submitted
I'm not that happy about Amazon changing the descriptions without me
reviewing it first, but they have been very responsive to my
requests. I usually get something back from them the same day.
What I am happy about are my sales numbers. Not sure if this is just
a first day thing, but my sales
Took about 1 week each for both the original version and for the
updated version of the app. This was prior to the appstore being
launched so those time durations may have since changed.
On Mar 23, 10:38 am, Matt M matthew.mag...@gmail.com wrote:
To those who have submitted apps to Amazon how
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Zsolt Vasvari zvasv...@gmail.com wrote:
Side-note, I sold my first Amazon copy of my app (bringing the total up
to
an incredible ONE!) and am $2.10 richer! Woot! I'm hitting the dollar
store
after work and splurging on TWO things! =P
LOL, you could
Amazon almost always introduces new services on their home turf first. Other
countries will come.
I'm just happy that, at the moment, one of my apps is #1 in its category.
Open in the USA only is better than not open at all!
String
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
Angry Birds Rio is getting a lot of 1-star reviews form non-US users
who are unable to get the app. I have even seen a review from an iPad
user who was unable to download the app via Safari.
How on earth is it possible that these users can review the app! It is
the Android Market all over again.
On 22 March 2011 13:52, webmonkey webmonke...@gmail.com wrote:
Angry Birds Rio is getting a lot of 1-star reviews form non-US users
who are unable to get the app. I have even seen a review from an iPad
user who was unable to download the app via Safari.
How on earth is it possible that these
Yes giving the developers a 1-star rating is not nice. On the other hand I
understand the frustration: It's the worldwide internet we are connect
to. Apps a virtual goods transfered via the inter-tubes. Payment is done
with worldwide operating credit card companies. For a potential customer in
Well crap, my apps' description is entirely missing for some reason.
Well that's the Amazon experience I've been having all along with this
thing...really feels half assed pretty much always...
-n
On Mar 22, 8:35 am, Justin Giles jtgi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hm, I do not see anythink like that for
On 2011-03-22 14:42, niko20 wrote:
Well crap, my apps' description is entirely missing for some reason.
Well that's the Amazon experience I've been having all along with this
thing...really feels half assed pretty much always...
Well, one of my apps was refused since I had a reference to
Do you guy's apps have the original descriptions and bullet points you
submitted? It seems like Amazon just wrote their own marketing descriptions
...
-
TreKing
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 9:09 AM, TreKing treking...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you guy's apps have the original descriptions and bullet points you
submitted? It seems like Amazon just wrote their own marketing descriptions
...
Wow. I just noticed that mine was modified as well. It actually make
Do you guy's apps have the original descriptions and bullet points you
submitted? It seems like Amazon just wrote their own marketing descriptions
...
Wow. I just noticed that mine was modified as well. It actually make
it sound more polished, but some of the concepts are wrong.
In fairness, they did say they were going to edit the descriptions:
http://www.amazonappstoredev.com/2011/02/when-submitting-the-assets-for-your-app-to-the-amazon-appstore-developer-portal-youll-have-the-opportunity-to-write-a-de.html
This has been done for all but one of my apps.
String
--
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 9:23 AM, String sterling.ud...@googlemail.comwrote:
In fairness, they did say they were going to edit the descriptions:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 9:23 AM, String sterling.ud...@googlemail.comwrote:
In fairness, they did say they were going to edit the descriptions:
True. But feels more like rewrite than an edit. My description does not
match what I submitted at all, save for th general idea.
Also, I call my free
Indeed today I found that the description for my app was rewritten too
by Amazon, and in my case I do not really mind the more polished
style, although I take no responsibility for any flaws or too much
hype in the modified description.
Regards,
The vOICe for Android
On 22 March 2011 15:34, TreKing treking...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, I call my free version TreKing (Chicago) 4 Free (har har, get it!?)
- they changed the title to TreKing (Chicago) Lite. I flipping hate the
lite moniker.
I am a sad panda.
Did sad panda mail amazon staff about that?
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Marcin Orlowski
webnet.andr...@gmail.comwrote:
Did sad panda mail amazon staff about that?
Not yet, but I will. And I'll get a response from a human being!
-
An initial look at the reporting indicates that the stats are delayed a few
hours, but it looks like it updates periodically throughout the day. Some
items are a bit confusing as there's a discrepancy between downloads and
orders. I guess orders are total number of click to download items and
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
