...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Dianne Hackborn
Sent: 13 April 2009 22:51
To: android-developers@googlegroups.com
Cc: Xavier Ducrohet
Subject: [android-developers] Re: SDKs comparison with the iPhone
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Al Sutton a...@funkyandroid.com wrote:
We're 6 months
] On Behalf Of Michael Elsdörfer
Sent: 13 April 2009 22:16
To: android-developers@googlegroups.com
Subject: [android-developers] Re: SDKs comparison with the iPhone
it would be done on a discussion list, which would fit in with many
open source projects I've worked on where pre-release versions
Subject: [android-developers] Re: SDKs comparison with the iPhone
Which are exactly what Ralf is saying. You can build an SDK out of some
random change # of the tree, and we are going to make it clear to people
that it is not official, because:
(1) We don't know what was done to build it, and thus
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Al Sutton a...@funkyandroid.com wrote:
Now before I start on the iPhone comparison I'm going to pre-empt the
normal
But Android is open source. response by saying lets be honest and
admit it as it stands Android is not an open source project because the
11:14
To: android-developers@googlegroups.com
Subject: [android-developers] Re: SDKs comparison with the iPhone
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Al Sutton a...@funkyandroid.com wrote:
Now before I start on the iPhone comparison I'm going to pre-empt
the normal
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Al Sutton a...@funkyandroid.com wrote:
Dave,
I'm not after G1 device images, I would be happy if I could get access to a
fully working cupcake emulator, but no one in the public development
community can. I said before the G1 launch I see Android as the
@googlegroups.com
Subject: [android-developers] Re: SDKs comparison with the iPhone
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Al Sutton a...@funkyandroid.com wrote:
Dave,
I'm not after G1 device images, I would be happy if I could get access to a
fully working cupcake emulator, but no one in the public
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Al Sutton a...@funkyandroid.com wrote:
Are you really expect that one or two weeks is enough for every app written
to go through a testing procedure to check for problems?
Of course not. We know that the current situation is far from perfect,
but we aren't
Xav,
We're 6 months in and on the 3rd firmware release, lessons should have been
learnt already.
Personally I don't care whether it's intentional or not. The end result is the
same for me in that Google are once again involved in the release of some new
Android related functionality and once
it would be done on a discussion list, which would fit in with many
open source projects I've worked on where pre-release versions are
circulated and then developers say Yay or Nay to whether it's good
enough to call a production release,
I'm not sure what Open Source projects work like
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Al Sutton a...@funkyandroid.com wrote:
We're 6 months in and on the 3rd firmware release, lessons should have been
learnt already.
We had the first preview SDK for the 1.0 release out almost a year before
that release, so clearly that one doesn't count as the
[mailto:android-develop...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Ralf
Sent: 12 April 2009 03:04
To: android-developers@googlegroups.com
Subject: [android-developers] Re: SDKs comparison with the iPhone
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 12:34 AM, Al Sutton a...@funkyandroid.com wrote:
Now before I start on the iPhone
: [android-developers] Re: SDKs comparison with the iPhone
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 12:34 AM, Al Sutton a...@funkyandroid.com wrote:
Now before I start on the iPhone comparison I'm going to pre-empt the
normal But Android is open source. response by saying lets be
honest and admit
Hi Al,
I think my response might best have been posted to android-discuss, but I'll
reply here anyway.
Pre-empting a debate about whether Android is open source with the argument
...let's be honest... isn't adequate. I don't know whether there are
established metrics for measuring a degree to
Al, I hope it's not that bad and that over time things will get better and
more open. Look at the sorry state of the Android Market. I am not being
polemic here when I say that this cannot be so bad on purpose. So there is
hope.
On the other hand, the issues of Android moving to open source and/or
-developers@googlegroups.com
Subject: [android-developers] Re: SDKs comparison with the iPhone
Hi Al,
I think my response might best have been posted to android-discuss, but I'll
reply here anyway.
Pre-empting a debate about whether Android is open source with the argument
...let's be honest... isn't
If its any consolation you are not alone in this. We have all been
sucked in by Google. I just get the feeling we have already been spat out!
While Google continue to make billions of $$$ what they need is
additional resource to test their code, the grunt work. That is where
we come in.
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 12:34 AM, Al Sutton a...@funkyandroid.com wrote:
Now before I start on the iPhone comparison I'm going to pre-empt the normal
But Android is open source. response by saying lets be honest and
admit it as it stands Android is not an open source project because the
18 matches
Mail list logo
