RE: [arr] Re: ARR's Standard Deviation - Part I - Originality

2008-02-02 Thread Dasun Abeysekera
as you may be. Take care, Dasun To: arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 21:03:58 -0800 Subject: Re: [arr] Re: ARR's Standard Deviation - Part I - Originality Dasun/ Chord, I think one of you posed an audio piece

Re: [arr] Re: ARR's Standard Deviation - Part I - Originality

2008-02-02 Thread Padmini Murthy
as final by any means. Let us discuss and debate because I am learning and expanding as much as you may be. Take care, Dasun -- To: arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 21:03:58 -0800 Subject: Re: [arr] Re: ARR's Standard

Re: [arr] Re: ARR's Standard Deviation - Part I - Originality

2008-02-01 Thread Arijit Debnath
are certainly entitled to your opinion; I hope that clarifies my point of view. Good stuff..let's keep expanding. :) Take care, Dasun -- To: arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:05:32 +0530 Subject: Re: [arr] Re: ARR's Standard

Re: [arr] Re: ARR's Standard Deviation - Part I - Originality

2008-02-01 Thread Padmini Murthy
opinion; I hope that clarifies my point of view. Good stuff..let's keep expanding. :) Take care, Dasun -- To: arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:05:32 +0530 Subject: Re: [arr] Re: ARR's Standard Deviation

RE: [arr] Re: ARR's Standard Deviation - Part I - Originality

2008-01-31 Thread Dasun Abeysekera
of view. Good stuff..let's keep expanding. :) Take care, Dasun To: arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:05:32 +0530 Subject: Re: [arr] Re: ARR's Standard Deviation - Part I - Originality Dasun says Roja, along

[arr] Re: ARR's Standard Deviation - Part I - Originality

2008-01-31 Thread Pravinder Sheoran
. Hail ARR! Dasun To: arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 13:15:12 + Subject: [arr] Re: ARR's Standard Deviation - Part I - Originality Actually, let me modify my post a bit. Yes, ARR has

RE: [arr] Re: ARR's Standard Deviation - Part I - Originality

2008-01-31 Thread arr pavan
of view. Good stuff..let's keep expanding. :) Take care, Dasun - To: arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:05:32 +0530 Subject: Re: [arr] Re: ARR's Standard Deviation - Part I - Originality

Re: [arr] Re: ARR's Standard Deviation - Part I - Originality

2008-01-29 Thread Shah Navas
Dasun says Roja, along with the likes of Puthiya Mugham, Uzhavan, and Bombay would qualify as some of the most soulful and brilliantly crafted albums, but, not the most original. Dasun, I request you to elaborate on this. I don't have any music knowledge. But I see 'Thee Thee' from 'Thiruda

[arr] Re: ARR's Standard Deviation - Part I - Originality

2008-01-28 Thread Chord
Actually, let me modify my post a bit. Yes, ARR has lost his youth, freshness, and reblliousness. I agree with you there. There was an energy, innovativeness, and fire to those compositions, which perhaps many are missing today. I feel that he has made up for this loss through more mature

Re: [arr] Re: ARR's Standard Deviation - Part I - Originality

2008-01-28 Thread Moin Ali
agreed to all your comments Chord; but i think he is still as innovative as he was before. however, i think he used to experiment more with synthesizers\instruments before and now he is considering melody and voices more. Chord [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Actually, let me modify my post

[arr] Re: ARR's Standard Deviation - Part I - Originality

2008-01-28 Thread Chord
Wonderful essay. Too bad it doesn't change my opinion that ARR has not lost A THING since the beginning. He is just as brilliant and original as before. Let's agree to disagree and move on. --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, Dasun Abeysekera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Originality The

RE: [arr] Re: ARR's Standard Deviation - Part I - Originality

2008-01-28 Thread Dasun Abeysekera
Subject: [arr] Re: ARR's Standard Deviation - Part I - Originality Actually, let me modify my post a bit. Yes, ARR has lost his youth, freshness, and reblliousness. I agree with you there. There was an energy, innovativeness, and fire to those compositions

[arr] Re: ARR's Standard Deviation - Part I - Originality

2008-01-27 Thread : Avinash :
Hi Dasun.. That's really well thought, in depth writeup man. You really stole my words! :) I was thinking, how to explain 'chord' about defining ARR standards and you perfectly reflected my mind.. :) Keep it flowing.. Thanks.. -Avinash -- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, Dasun Abeysekera

Re: [arr] Re: ARR's Standard Deviation - Part I - Originality

2008-01-27 Thread Gomzy
well I feel thats nonsense. You can see his original works in earth then onto lagaan and then upto swades atleast. Not to mention water ! On Jan 28, 2008 12:08 PM, : Avinash : [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Dasun.. That's really well thought, in depth writeup man. You really stole my words! :)

[arr] Re: ARR's Standard Deviation - Part I - Originality

2008-01-27 Thread Dinesh Vaidya
Dasun, Well worded effort in defining Rahman sound. Please do continue. For a long time there was no discussion on the group worth a challange. I do agree with the concern you and Ronojoy have expressed and there is nothing wrong in a healthy debate. It is essential to for all to understand

[arr] Re: ARR's Standard Deviation - Part I - Originality

2008-01-27 Thread shanavas.chemmamkuzhi
Dasun is talking about 92-96 era. Earth released on 98. --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, Gomzy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: well I feel thats nonsense. You can see his original works in earth then onto lagaan and then upto swades atleast. Not to mention water ! On Jan 28, 2008 12:08 PM,