I understand also that unconditional branches are faster than conditional
branches. So, which is faster:
BNZ LABEL Branch most frequent
or:
BZ*+8fall through most frequent
B LABEL Unconditional
It might seem naïve but I would assume that 1 branch
Robert,
I know where that is , I dont remember if the Deli is still there.
I worked all over the 'City'. A lot of seriously good Delis..
Scott J Ford
Software Engineer
http://www.identityforge.com/
From: Robert A. Rosenberg a...@rarpsl.com
To:
On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 15:56:33 -0400, Alex Kodat wrote:
The assembler equivalent of Modernizr would be the STORE FACILITY LIST
EXTENDED (STFLE) instruction.
Or use the bits that z/OS stored in the PSA at location 200 (decimal)
using the STFLE instruction.
--
Tom Marchant
After discussions with Jean Snow, the list owner, I have concluded
that my views and, even more, controversial style are incompatible
with her and others' notions of what is proper here.
I am unwilling to conform to these proprieties, and this is therefore
my last post here.
Ave atque vale.
I for one enjoyed much of your style. But as Marshall McLuhan observed,
the medium is the message. If one shouts I love you while snarling,
the words are mostly overridden by the style.
There is an old cartoon, probably from Playboy, showing a portly gentleman
dressed in Renaissance style, at
On 2013-04-18, at 07:45, John Gilmore wrote:
After discussions with Jean Snow, the list owner, I have concluded
that my views and, even more, controversial style are incompatible
with her and others' notions of what is proper here.
I am unwilling to conform to these proprieties, and this is
John Ehrman wrote:
Performance concerns about individual instructions aren't worth much
effort. Things like operand alignment, data and instruction cache
retention, locality of reference, branch frequency etc. can have really
significant effects.
For sure. But for the pathologically curious, if
The two newest processors (z196 and zEC12) do out-of-order processing. Does
that mean that we do not need to 'intermingle' instructions because the
processor will do it for us?
Fred!
Sent from my new iPad
On Apr 18, 2013, at 17:05, Phil Smith III li...@akphs.com wrote:
John Ehrman wrote:
Our loss.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:ASSEMBLER-
l...@listserv.uga.edu] On Behalf Of John Gilmore
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 6:45 AM
To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: TRTE, etc.
After discussions with Jean Snow, the list owner, I
On 18 April 2013 00:26, Robert A. Rosenberg a...@rarpsl.com wrote:
The Kosher Chinese was Mosha Peking which was on 35th or 36th off Broadway
(near MSG).
Doubtless with no pun or food stereotype intended...
Tony H.
What loss? This listserv is for both the experienced and inexperienced. The
inexperienced participants ask questions so they may learn and one day may be
able to impart their knowledge to new inexperienced participants.
I have seen in this listserv where inexperienced participants were
I agree it is an overall loss. Mr. Ashland sometimes came across as
arrogant. But when he stayed on target and not off topic, his posts
were very informative. Even the ones containing words that I had to Google
to understand. I simply accepted this fault of his. I have too many
faults of my own to
Which reminds me, I must look through my desk drawer for that old 'REXX
Bigot' badge...
On 4/18/2013 12:17, John McKown wrote:
(nothing pisses off this enlightened
mainframe bigot like a ignorant Windows bigot grin/).
I for one enjoyed your posts and the expertise you brought to the table. Sorry
to see you go.
Thanks...Guy M. Gates Jr.
System Programmer II
TTI Inc.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:ASSEMBLER-
l...@listserv.uga.edu] On Behalf Of John Gilmore
Sent:
Amem to John Robert
Driving off the inexperienced only hurts our profession.
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: Bodoh John Robert [Contractor]
Sent: 04/18/2013 12:17 PM
What loss? This listserv is for both the experienced and inexperienced. The
inexperienced participants ask
I too, will miss Mr. Gilmore. In addition to technology he gave us much
history, often on non-IT topics, that were usually at least somewhat related
to the original post. Obviously his technical expertise is much beyond my
own. His style never bothered me much. I have yet to look up ad
Regardless of the merits (non-trivial) or negative impacts (also
non-trivial) of Gilmore's past behavior, taking his ball and going home
is a pretty childish response. More productive/professional/grown-up would
be to try to be more
collegialhttp://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/collegial
.
John Gilmore announced:
After discussions with Jean Snow, the list owner, I have concluded
that my views and, even more, controversial style are incompatible
with her and others' notions of what is proper here.
I am unwilling to conform to these proprieties, and this is therefore
my last post
Bill,
I worked in NYC and missed that one dude ..I must be getting old
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
from my IPAD
'Infinite wisdom through infinite means'
On Apr 18, 2013, at 1:49 PM, DASDBILL2 dasdbi...@comcast.net wrote:
I understood immediately the Moshe part of the pun. B ut i t
I, too, hope, that this is not the final decision, because I always
appreciated
the posts of Mr Gilmore. I know from private conversations, that he has
been
working with computers since 1949, so he is like a sort of living legend
for me.
It is not necessary that we share his opinions, and I,
I would love to add the citation for the following quote, which I immediately
glommed upon sight for my FB Favorite Quotations. Mr. Gilmore? Anyone? In
any event, it somehow seems apropos.
Watching people who do not recognize the limitations of their experience
pontificate about what the
I wish I could help, but this is the closest I could come:
The recognition of the insuperable limits to his knowledge ought indeed to
teach the student of society a lesson of humility which should guard him
against becoming an accomplice in men's fatal striving to control society - a
striving
At 17:49 + on 04/18/2013, DASDBILL2 wrote about Re: Happy Gilmore
(was Length question):
I understood immediately the Moshe part of the pun. B ut i t took
me a while to reverse-engineer the MSG pun. Not having spent
significant time in NYC, my brain's first interpretation of MSG is
At 12:15 -0400 on 04/18/2013, Tony Harminc wrote about Re: Happy
Gilmore (was Length question):
On 18 April 2013 00:26, Robert A. Rosenberg a...@rarpsl.com wrote:
The Kosher Chinese was Mosha Peking which was on 35th or 36th off
Broadway (near MSG).
Doubtless with no pun or food stereotype
At 05:05 -0700 on 04/18/2013, Scott Ford wrote about Re: Happy
Gilmore (was Length question):
Robert, I know where that is , I dont remember if the Deli is still
there. I worked all over the 'City'. A lot of seriously good Delis..
Scott J Ford Software Engineer http://www.identityforge.com/
I
25 matches
Mail list logo
