On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:19 AM, CDR vene...@gmail.com wrote:
Digium is 100% lost in the map. If they would come up with a Paid
version of Asterisk, one that would use the .NET framework in Windows,
something simple to install, they could go public on the product.
Linux has a very steep
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 08:43:01PM -0500, Brian wrote:
On Tue, 10 Dec 2013 23:02:45 +0200
Tzafrir Cohen tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 02:12:41PM -0500, Ruddy Gbaguidi wrote:
I never tought this is become a Linux vs Windows fight.
We have been using asterisk on
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 02:12:41PM -0500, Ruddy Gbaguidi wrote:
I never tought this is become a Linux vs Windows fight.
We have been using asterisk on linux from a long time now and happy
with it.
But some of our customers who has windows in their environment want
to use our call center
On Tue, 10 Dec 2013 23:02:45 +0200
Tzafrir Cohen tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 02:12:41PM -0500, Ruddy Gbaguidi wrote:
I never tought this is become a Linux vs Windows fight.
We have been using asterisk on linux from a long time now and happy
with it.
But some
Digium is 100% lost in the map. If they would come up with a Paid
version of Asterisk, one that would use the .NET framework in Windows,
something simple to install, they could go public on the product.
Linux has a very steep learning curve. A Windows application that
would do exactly the same
That's just disgusting If you want to run your phones on WindBlows
use lync Should be plenty point and click easy for you
On 12/04/2013 09:19 AM, CDR wrote:
Digium is 100% lost in the map. If they would come up with a Paid
version of Asterisk, one that would use the .NET framework
As per that theory 3CX should have been public by now !!
Mitul
On Dec 4, 2013 8:49 PM, CDR vene...@gmail.com wrote:
Digium is 100% lost in the map. If they would come up with a Paid
version of Asterisk, one that would use the .NET framework in Windows,
something simple to install, they could
On 12/04/2013 10:22 AM, Gregory Malsack wrote:
Its beyond disgusting. If it was not for legacy garbage nothing from m$
would be left in my datacenter.
Saying you are an expert Linux user is just a joke when you don't
understand the poor architectural choices that come with windows and why
it
...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of CDR
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 10:19 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [asterisk-users] Asterisk on Windows
Digium is 100% lost in the map. If they would come up with a Paid version of
Asterisk, one that would use
.
-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of CDR
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 10:19 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [asterisk-users] Asterisk on Windows
Digium is 100
On 13-12-04 10:19 AM, CDR wrote:
Digium is 100% lost in the map. If they would come up with a Paid
version of Asterisk, one that would use the .NET framework in Windows,
something simple to install, they could go public on the product.
Linux has a very steep learning curve. A Windows application
, December 04, 2013 10:19 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [asterisk-users] Asterisk on Windows
Digium is 100% lost in the map. If they would come up with a Paid version
of Asterisk, one that would use the .NET framework in Windows, something
simple
On Wednesday 04 December 2013, CDR wrote:
Digium is 100% lost in the map. If they would come up with a Paid
version of Asterisk, one that would use the .NET framework in Windows,
something simple to install, they could go public on the product.
Why would they? They already have it working
On 12/04/2013 11:00 AM, Paul Belanger wrote:
On 13-12-04 10:19 AM, CDR wrote:
Digium is 100% lost in the map. If they would come up with a Paid
version of Asterisk, one that would use the .NET framework in Windows,
something simple to install, they could go public on the product.
Linux has a
I know who is lost here :)
for sure not digium ...
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
Probably feeding the trolls but here it goes.
On 12/04/2013 04:19 PM, CDR wrote:
Digium is 100% lost in the map. If they would come up with a Paid
version of Asterisk, one that would use the .NET framework in Windows,
something simple to install, they could go public on the product.
IIRC
I never tought this is become a Linux vs Windows fight.
We have been using asterisk on linux from a long time now and happy with
it.
But some of our customers who has windows in their environment want to
use our call center software we developed on top of asterisk.
So, the question was :
Did
Use FreeSWITCH !! Thats what you want on your winblows system, so suit
yourself my friend.
Mitul
On Dec 5, 2013 12:43 AM, Ruddy Gbaguidi plugwo...@micnes.com wrote:
I never tought this is become a Linux vs Windows fight.
We have been using asterisk on linux from a long time now and happy with
)
- Original Message -
From: Roderick A. Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2008 7:07 PM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk For Windows ?
Meftah Tayeb wrote:
my friend i
hi,
realy you are helping me!
thanks for your help!
i try this fitur and i respond to you after trying it
thanks!
- Original Message -
From: Tzafrir Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2008 10:11 AM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk For Windows ?
you buntu also has orca.
mike
On Oct 11, 2008, at 9:59 AM, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 06:43:47PM +0100, Meftah Tayeb wrote:
my friend i have a problem with linux accessibility
i dont have (not found) a screen reader
-
From: Tzafrir Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2008 6:59 PM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk For Windows ?
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 06:43:47PM +0100, Meftah Tayeb wrote:
my friend i have a problem with linux accessibility
i dont
realy you are helping me!
thanks for your help!
i try this fitur and i respond to you after trying it
thanks!
- Original Message -
From: Tzafrir Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2008 10:11 AM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 09:44:30AM +0100, Meftah Tayeb wrote:
hi my friend,
thank you for this id
now i have a screen reader named orca working with all OS tha have GNOME
Desktop
i decided to work with debian or UBUNTU
please, provide to me a best / reliable / easy to use linux distribution
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk For Windows ?
realy you are helping me!
thanks for your help!
i try this fitur and i respond to you after trying it
thanks!
- Original Message -
From: Tzafrir Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Sunday
hi for asterisk users,
please any asterisk distribution (or Trixbox) for windows ?
(except for the Asterisk Win32)
bicose asterisk for Win32 have a Free (limited) PBX Manager
and i have a problem with it:
1. the asterisk Windows Service is not installed by default
2. unable to connect to it (no
hi for asterisk users,
please any asterisk distribution (or Trixbox) for windows ?
(except for the Asterisk Win32)
Why use Windows?
If you want something free and easy to use, download a pre-built
Asterisk Linux CD.
You could try download a Trixbox .iso and give it a go. I'm sure
they're
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 05:13:50PM +0100, Meftah Tayeb wrote:
hi for asterisk users,
please any asterisk distribution (or Trixbox) for windows ?
(except for the Asterisk Win32)
Trixbox is a complete linux distribution that includes Asterisk, among
other software components.
It might be
- Original Message -
From: Tzafrir Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2008 6:27 PM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk For Windows ?
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 05:13:50PM +0100, Meftah Tayeb wrote:
hi for asterisk users,
please
-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2008 5:33 PM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk For Windows ?
hi for asterisk users,
please any asterisk distribution (or Trixbox) for windows ?
(except for the Asterisk Win32)
Why use Windows?
If you want
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 06:43:47PM +0100, Meftah Tayeb wrote:
my friend i have a problem with linux accessibility
i dont have (not found) a screen reader for Gnome or KDE
this is the reason tha i use windows
but linux is realy best / fast / easy
Isn't text-mode better for a screen reader?
you buntu also has orca.
mike
On Oct 11, 2008, at 9:59 AM, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 06:43:47PM +0100, Meftah Tayeb wrote:
my friend i have a problem with linux accessibility
i dont have (not found) a screen reader for Gnome or KDE
this is the reason tha i use windows
but
: Saturday, October 11, 2008 5:33 PM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk For Windows ?
hi for asterisk users,
please any asterisk distribution (or Trixbox) for windows ?
(except for the Asterisk Win32)
Why use Windows?
If you want something free and easy to use, download a pre-built
El sáb, 11-10-2008 a las 11:07 -0700, Roderick A. Anderson escribió:
A quick search using Google gave me
http://live.gnome.org/Orca
Sound isn't working right now on my workstation so I can't test it
but
it is installed by default on my CentOS 5 workstation.
I've installed it
Hi,
I've found quite some docs on this, but many of them deprecated...
I'm curious what is the latest window messenger version that works as
registered client to Asterisk... I've tried 4.7, but it registers only if I
leave password empty.
Am I missing something or is there any better way to
Trywindows messenger 5
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=16F3A735-FE18-4DF8-9A19-5C6C721CE715displaylang=en
Regards,
Umair Bari
On 11/18/05, Robert Rozman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,I've found quite some docs on this, but many of them deprecated...I'm curious what is
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=a8d9eb73-5f8c-4b9a-940f-9157a3b3d774DisplayLang=en
sorry about that link, that was a doc. try the link above.
regards,
Umair
On 11/18/05, Robert Rozman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,I've found quite some docs on this, but many of them
PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.2 - Windows Messenger ?
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1;
reply-type=original
Hi,
I've
That doesn't make it a better plastform than Linux, but them ITC managers
just don't know there's something out there that is more stable, more
reliable, less costly, etc.
Yes but it doesn't have GENUINE ADVANTAGE :-)
___
--Bandwidth and
Matt wrote:
Extremely good point... I myself am a Linux person, but manage several
Windows machines (several meaning 25 or so). There is definately a
time and place for Windows.. I'm just not sure a real-time-VoIP server
is the time or place.Being semi-half serious about the GUI there
Christopher Dobbs wrote:
Matt wrote:
Extremely good point... I myself am a Linux person, but manage several
Windows machines (several meaning 25 or so). There is definately a
time and place for Windows.. I'm just not sure a real-time-VoIP server
is the time or place.Being semi-half
On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 17:27 -0400, Paul wrote:
As for X on the same box as *, it only seems to affect calls when I do
something that uses enough cpu. I can be logged in with a gnome or kde
desktop without causing problems. It's a P4 2.4 with 1 gb DDR 333.
For smaller volumes of calls (10-20
Hiyall,
been following this for a while, just thought I would add a bit to the
debate, but doesn't the Cisco system (Call Manager?) run on an Windows
2000 based server - if it was that bad why would Cisco choose to run it?
Also 3Com use NT/2000 to run the H323 gateway. Admittedly the call
On Sun, 2005-10-02 at 10:21 +0100, Wayne wrote:
Hiyall,
been following this for a while, just thought I would add a bit to the
debate, but doesn't the Cisco system (Call Manager?) run on an Windows
2000 based server - if it was that bad why would Cisco choose to run it?
Politics and
Cisco seem to be moving their CCM users to Linux. At least I have heard
of a few users going that way, after Cisco recommended it.
CCM doesn't usually handle anything near to hard real-time, so it is a
lot less demanding than something like Asterisk.
Regards,
Steve
Wayne wrote:
Hiyall,
difficult.
Dan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wayne
Sent: Sunday, October 02, 2005 2:22 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk on windows
Hiyall,
been following this for a while
On Sun, 2005-10-02 at 10:21 +0100, Wayne wrote:
Hiyall,
been following this for a while, just thought I would add a bit to
the
debate, but doesn't the Cisco system (Call Manager?) run on an
Windows
2000 based server - if it was that bad why would Cisco choose to run
it?
Politics and
Steve wrote:
Cisco seem to be moving their CCM users to Linux. At least I have
heard
of a few users going that way, after Cisco recommended it.
There have been unofficial statements that CCM would move to a
Unix-like OS, but that would be in the next major release, still
some time off. Over
On Sun, October 2, 2005 12:07, Patrick said:
On Sun, 2005-10-02 at 10:21 +0100, Wayne wrote:
Hiyall,
been following this for a while, just thought I would add a bit to the
debate, but doesn't the Cisco system (Call Manager?) run on an Windows
2000 based server - if it was that bad why would
Wayne wrote:
Hiyall,
been following this for a while, just thought I would add a bit to the
debate, but doesn't the Cisco system (Call Manager?) run on an Windows
2000 based server - if it was that bad why would Cisco choose to run
it? Also 3Com use NT/2000 to run the H323 gateway.
Any of the more current Win32 systems can be programmed to handle near
real-time events (eg, sip, rtp) just like linux, bsd, and other O/S's.
Obviously, Call Manager is one such system. It's really not an O/S
religious war/discussion, but rather a lack of knowledge (on any O/S
that a poster might
Good explanation Rich. Unix was built for the riggers of the Telecomm
industry. You won't find Windows running the PSTN. Unix and Linux are
used where their needed for real time processing and the highest
reliably. Windows is a productively OS that is easy to use for non
technical people. I
Quit aware of the telecomm industry; spent
21 years in buried in techie detail as an engineer and had
a ton of fun. Not sure the overall
programming community would agree with real-time vs productivity
assessment; lots of folks out there
writing production systems on Win32 systems that
On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 23:17 +0800, Steve Underwood wrote:
[snip]
An effective DOS attack on a $300,000 Alpha running NT I used to use was
wiggle the mouse :-) I never really understood how that brought a
multi-CPU machine to a standstill, but it did.
Reminds me of an Internet Call Diversion
Patrick wrote:
On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 23:17 +0800, Steve Underwood wrote:
[snip]
An effective DOS attack on a $300,000 Alpha running NT I used to use was
wiggle the mouse :-) I never really understood how that brought a
multi-CPU machine to a standstill, but it did.
Reminds me of an
On Sat, 2005-10-01 at 08:31 -0400, Julio Arruda wrote:
[snip]
One thing interesting, coming from data background, seeing the
requirements in carrier voice networks. Is a quite distinct ball-game.
Devices that require 'hot-software-upgrades', still not that often seen
in data. How is this
Patrick wrote:
On Sat, 2005-10-01 at 08:31 -0400, Julio Arruda wrote:
[snip]
One thing interesting, coming from data background, seeing the
requirements in carrier voice networks. Is a quite distinct ball-game.
Devices that require 'hot-software-upgrades', still not that often seen
in data.
why can't we compile the asterisk coading in windows, it's done in c++ so it
should work in windows as well
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
On Wednesday 28 September 2005 14:14, Kanishka Somaratne wrote:
why can't we compile the asterisk coading in windows, it's done in c++ so
it's written in C... have you bothered to look at the source code?
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by
Why on earth would you want to run it on Windows? First off, your
performance is going to go down because of the GUI... oh your call
quality just went down the toilet? Yeah sorry the screen saver just
kicked in. Having issues making calls? Oh sorry we had to reboot
for a critical update.
Just press Ctrl-Alt-Del
Usual on windows ;)
Olivier
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Matt
Envoyé : mercredi 28 septembre 2005 15:22
À : Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Objet : Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk
On Wednesday 28 September 2005 14:14, Kanishka Somaratne wrote:
why can't we compile the asterisk coading in windows, it's done in c++ so
it should work in windows as well
oh, and did you try google? how about this:
http://www.digium.com/index.php?menu=astwind
it's a bit of a cheat though
Or even . http://www.asteriskwin32.com/
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update
Matt wrote:
Why on earth would you want to run it on Windows? First off, your
performance is going to go down because of the GUI... oh your call
quality just went down the toilet? Yeah sorry the screen saver just
kicked in. Having issues making calls? Oh sorry we had to reboot
for a
Why on earth would you want to run it on Windows? First off, your
performance is going to go down because of the GUI... oh your call
quality just went down the toilet? Yeah sorry the screen saver just
kicked in. Having issues making calls? Oh sorry we had to reboot
for a critical
Personally, I could care less which O/S the stuff runs on as long as
it runs reliably, and the sys admin understands how to manage whatever
sytem he/she is responsible for.
Extremely good point... I myself am a Linux person, but manage several
Windows machines (several meaning 25 or so).
to the open source revolution.
Seshu Kanuri
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 11:00 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk on windows
Matt wrote:
Personally, I could care less which O/S the stuff runs on as long as
it runs reliably, and the sys admin understands how to manage whatever
sytem he/she is responsible for.
Extremely good point... I myself am a Linux person, but manage several
Windows machines (several
Sounds like an IRQ conflict!
On 9/28/05, Steve Underwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt wrote:
Personally, I could care less which O/S the stuff runs on as long as
it runs reliably, and the sys admin understands how to manage whatever
sytem he/she is responsible for.
Extremely good
Personally, I could care less which O/S the stuff runs on as long as
it runs reliably, and the sys admin understands how to manage whatever
sytem he/she is responsible for.
Extremely good point... I myself am a Linux person, but manage several
Windows machines (several meaning 25 or
Personally, I could care less which O/S the stuff runs on as long as
it runs reliably, and the sys admin understands how to manage whatever
sytem he/she is responsible for.
Extremely good point... I myself am a Linux person, but manage several
Windows machines (several meaning 25 or so).
[me shrugs]
I read an interesting quote the other day, can't remember where:
A religious zealot subconsiously realizes his position is fundamentally
irrational, so he tries to convert
other people to religion in order to validate that position
:%s/religion/linux/g
Far as I'm concerned, right
-Original Message-
From: Rich Adamson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 7:43 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk on windows
Why on earth would you want to run it on Windows? First
Rich Adamson wrote:
Both probably resulted from some untested/unexpected activity the
developer never addressed for whatever reason.
Moving the mouse?? lol.
Actually I remember this problem on NT4.. the mouse driver used to drag
the system down completely.. it was a complete resource
Why on earth would you want to run it on Windows? First off, your
performance is going to go down because of the GUI... oh your call
quality just went down the toilet? Yeah sorry the screen saver just
kicked in. Having issues making calls? Oh sorry we had to reboot
for a
Hoyle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 9:59 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk on windows
Rich Adamson wrote:
Both probably resulted from some untested/unexpected activity the
developer never
-Original Message-
From: Colin Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 8:41 AM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk on windows
[me shrugs]
I read an interesting quote the other day
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colin
Anderson
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 11:57 AM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk on windows
Not to mention NT on Alpha and CHRP was a joke, the GUI was not native
code
and proper
The religious Zealot was catholic or more accurately speaking, a
Zehova's witness
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of canuck15
So how does that explain muslims blowing themselves up and taking as
many non-believers with them as possible?
So how does that explain muslims blowing themselves up and taking as many
non-believers with them as possible? I don't see any of them trying to
convert anyone. Is this a bug in Linux?
Duuno if you're trying for subtle humor there, otherwise...
**whoosh**
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk on windows
I disagree - I ran exchange 5.5 on a digital alpha using windows nt. At
the time it was the most reliable NT system I had ever seen and it ran
faster than any i386 system. Personally I wish
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there, i have a working Microsoft ISA firewall with buildin H.323
Gatekeeper
So Far, i got registerd the asterisk on the M$ Gatekeeper...
here is the h.323 configuration:
; Open H.323 driver configuration
;
[general]
port = 1720
bindaddr =
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
reacend wrote:
| Hi there, i have a working Microsoft ISA firewall with buildin
| H.323 Gatekeeper So Far, i got registerd the asterisk on the M$
| Gatekeeper...
|
|
| here is the h.323 configuration:
|
| ; Open H.323 driver configuration ;
83 matches
Mail list logo
