: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 12:50 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Res_fax - FAXOPT(faxdetect)
Hello
Le 17/02/2015 17:00, Administrator TOOTAI a écrit :
Hi,
as stated in the documentation, it's allowed to set
FAXOPT(faxdetect)=yes/no to allow fax detection.
It's
12:50 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Res_fax - FAXOPT(faxdetect)
Hello
Le 17/02/2015 17:00, Administrator TOOTAI a écrit :
Hi,
as stated in the documentation, it's allowed to set
FAXOPT(faxdetect)=yes/no to allow fax detection.
It's done (see below
Hello
Le 17/02/2015 17:00, Administrator TOOTAI a écrit :
Hi,
as stated in the documentation, it's allowed to set
FAXOPT(faxdetect)=yes/no to allow fax detection.
It's done (see below) but still fax detection :-( Extension 300 is
hylafax with iaxmodem.
On the upper Asterisk gw it's the
@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Res_fax - FAXOPT(faxdetect)
Hello
Le 17/02/2015 17:00, Administrator TOOTAI a écrit :
Hi,
as stated in the documentation, it's allowed to set
FAXOPT(faxdetect)=yes/no to allow fax detection.
It's done (see below) but still fax detection
Hi,
as stated in the documentation, it's allowed to set
FAXOPT(faxdetect)=yes/no to allow fax detection.
It's done (see below) but still fax detection :-( Extension 300 is
hylafax with iaxmodem.
On the upper Asterisk gw it's the same, despite the faxdetect set to no
we also have the
On 24/10/2014 12:49 AM, Tim Nelson wrote:
- Original Message -
On 23/10/2014 10:07 PM, Larry Moore wrote:
On 22/10/2014 11:23 AM, Tim Nelson wrote:
Greetings-
Working with the T.38 gateway functionality that is sparsely
documented
[1], I'm attempting to get the following
On 25/10/2014 11:43 PM, Larry Moore wrote:
On 24/10/2014 12:47 AM, Tim Nelson wrote:
- Original Message -
On 22/10/2014 11:23 AM, Tim Nelson wrote:
Greetings-
Working with the T.38 gateway functionality that is sparsely
documented
[1], I'm attempting to get the following
On 24/10/2014 12:47 AM, Tim Nelson wrote:
- Original Message -
On 22/10/2014 11:23 AM, Tim Nelson wrote:
Greetings-
Working with the T.38 gateway functionality that is sparsely
documented
[1], I'm attempting to get the following functional:
What type of endpoint are you using
On 10/22/2014 03:55 PM, Tim Nelson wrote:
- Original Message -
Greetings-
Working with the T.38 gateway functionality that is sparsely
documented [1], I'm attempting to get the following functional:
Asterisk calling system - Asterisk system in T.38 Gateway Mode (box
in question)
On 23/10/2014 3:55 AM, Tim Nelson wrote:
- Original Message -
Greetings-
Working with the T.38 gateway functionality that is sparsely
documented [1], I'm attempting to get the following functional:
Asterisk calling system - Asterisk system in T.38 Gateway Mode (box
in
On 22/10/2014 11:23 AM, Tim Nelson wrote:
Greetings-
Working with the T.38 gateway functionality that is sparsely documented
[1], I'm attempting to get the following functional:
What type of endpoint are you using which is originating the call and is
it T.38 capable?
Larry.
--
On 23/10/2014 10:07 PM, Larry Moore wrote:
On 22/10/2014 11:23 AM, Tim Nelson wrote:
Greetings-
Working with the T.38 gateway functionality that is sparsely documented
[1], I'm attempting to get the following functional:
What type of endpoint are you using which is originating the call
- Original Message -
On 10/22/2014 03:55 PM, Tim Nelson wrote:
- Original Message -
Greetings-
Working with the T.38 gateway functionality that is sparsely
documented [1], I'm attempting to get the following functional:
Asterisk calling system - Asterisk system in
- Original Message -
On 23/10/2014 3:55 AM, Tim Nelson wrote:
- Original Message -
Greetings-
Working with the T.38 gateway functionality that is sparsely
documented [1], I'm attempting to get the following functional:
Asterisk calling system - Asterisk system
- Original Message -
On 23/10/2014 10:07 PM, Larry Moore wrote:
On 22/10/2014 11:23 AM, Tim Nelson wrote:
Greetings-
Working with the T.38 gateway functionality that is sparsely
documented
[1], I'm attempting to get the following functional:
What type of endpoint
- Original Message -
On 22/10/2014 11:23 AM, Tim Nelson wrote:
Greetings-
Working with the T.38 gateway functionality that is sparsely
documented
[1], I'm attempting to get the following functional:
What type of endpoint are you using which is originating the call and
On 24/10/2014 12:49 AM, Tim Nelson wrote:
- Original Message -
On 23/10/2014 10:07 PM, Larry Moore wrote:
On 22/10/2014 11:23 AM, Tim Nelson wrote:
Greetings-
Working with the T.38 gateway functionality that is sparsely
documented
[1], I'm attempting to get the following
- Original Message -
Greetings-
Working with the T.38 gateway functionality that is sparsely
documented [1], I'm attempting to get the following functional:
Asterisk calling system - Asterisk system in T.38 Gateway Mode (box
in question) - SIP Provider
The problem is:
-The
Greetings-
Working with the T.38 gateway functionality that is sparsely documented [1] ,
I'm attempting to get the following functional:
Asterisk calling system - Asterisk system in T.38 Gateway Mode (box in
question) - SIP Provider
The problem is:
-The provider is not initiating a
From: Kevin P. Fleming kpflem...@digium.com
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 3:08 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] res_fax
On 01/27/2011 09:21 AM, Bryant Zimmerman wrote:
Kevin
That is grate. I dove into the code
On 01/31/2011 02:08 PM, Bryant Zimmerman wrote:
*From*: Kevin P. Fleming kpflem...@digium.com
*Sent*: Thursday, January 27, 2011 3:08 PM
*To*: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
*Subject*: Re: [asterisk-users] res_fax
On 01
From: Kevin P. Fleming kpflem...@digium.com
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 5:13 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] res_fax
On 01/31/2011 02:08 PM, Bryant Zimmerman wrote
On 01/31/2011 05:06 PM, Bryant Zimmerman wrote:
I just replaced the res_fax.c file with the one from 304599. Would I
just keep doing that as I step forward on versions of 1.8.x?
If this is the case how would I get any other critical changes to
res_fax.c that may occur after rev 304599?
How
Kevin
That is grate. I dove into the code and tried to add it my self I added
a F option but I have not figured out the right spot to force the
exclusion to shut off the T38.
Where will the patch be posted?
http://svnview.digium.com/svn/asterisk?view=revrev=304342
Kevin
I tried
On 01/27/2011 09:21 AM, Bryant Zimmerman wrote:
Kevin
That is grate. I dove into the code and tried to add it my self I added
a F option but I have not figured out the right spot to force the
exclusion to shut off the T38.
Where will the patch be posted?
From: Kevin P. Fleming kpflem...@digium.com
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 10:31 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] res_fax
On 01/27/2011 09:21 AM, Bryant Zimmerman wrote:
Kevin
That is grate. I dove into the code
On 01/27/2011 09:21 AM, Bryant Zimmerman wrote:
Kevin
That is grate. I dove into the code and tried to add it my self I added
a F option but I have not figured out the right spot to force the
exclusion to shut off the T38.
Where will the patch be posted?
From: Kevin P. Fleming kpflem...@digium.com
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 3:08 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] res_fax
On 01/27/2011 09:21 AM, Bryant Zimmerman wrote:
Kevin
That is grate. I dove into the code
Steve
Are there any undocumented options available with ReceiveFAX and the
res_fax_spandsp module.
I am having issues with getting t.38 to negotiate with Level 3 faxes but if
I force t.30 the fax comes in. But the fax does not fall back t.30 if the
t.38 fails
Thanks
Bryant Zimmerman (ZK
On 01/26/2011 12:42 PM, Bryant Zimmerman wrote:
Steve
Are there any undocumented options available with ReceiveFAX and the
res_fax_spandsp module.
I am having issues with getting t.38 to negotiate with Level 3 faxes but
if I force t.30 the fax comes in. But the fax does not fall back t.30 if
On 01/26/2011 1:49 PM, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
snip
Steve did not write res_fax (which where SendFAX and ReceiveFAX come
from)
snip
I am personally a little confused here, because I have a ReceiveFAX
application when I unload the res_fax module and res_fax_digium module
and load the
On 01/26/2011 01:12 PM, Tom Rymes wrote:
On 01/26/2011 1:49 PM, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
snip
Steve did not write res_fax (which where SendFAX and ReceiveFAX come
from)
snip
I am personally a little confused here, because I have a ReceiveFAX
application when I unload the res_fax module and
From: Kevin P. Fleming kpflem...@digium.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 1:50 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] res_fax
On 01/26/2011 12:42 PM, Bryant Zimmerman wrote:
Steve
Are there any undocumented options
On 01/26/2011 2:16 PM, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
On 01/26/2011 01:12 PM, Tom Rymes wrote:
On 01/26/2011 1:49 PM, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
snip
Am I correct to infer that using app_fax.so is no longer recommended and
that res_fax.so with res_fax_spandsp.so -OR- res_fax_digium.so is now
the way
On 01/26/2011 01:21 PM, Tom Rymes wrote:
On 01/26/2011 2:16 PM, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
On 01/26/2011 01:12 PM, Tom Rymes wrote:
On 01/26/2011 1:49 PM, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
snip
Am I correct to infer that using app_fax.so is no longer recommended and
that res_fax.so with
On 01/26/2011 01:19 PM, Bryant Zimmerman wrote:
*From*: Kevin P. Fleming kpflem...@digium.com
*Sent*: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 1:50 PM
*To*: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
*Subject*: Re: [asterisk-users] res_fax
On 01
From: Kevin P. Fleming kpflem...@digium.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 2:29 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] res_fax
On 01/26/2011 01:19 PM, Bryant Zimmerman wrote
On 01/26/2011 03:14 PM, Bryant Zimmerman wrote:
Is there a way for me to force t.38 off for a call but to allow t.38 for
other calls. What I am thinking is if a t.38 fails to flag the next call
from that number to g711 audio. This would at least let me work arround
the issue for now where t.38
From: Kevin P. Fleming kpflem...@digium.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 4:52 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] res_fax
On 01/26/2011 03:14 PM, Bryant Zimmerman wrote:
Is there a way for me to force t.38 off
From: Kevin P. Fleming kpflem...@digium.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 5:21 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] res_fax
On 01/26/2011 04:16 PM, Bryant Zimmerman wrote
On 01/26/2011 04:36 PM, Bryant Zimmerman wrote:
*From*: Kevin P. Fleming kpflem...@digium.com
*Sent*: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 5:21 PM
*To*: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
*Subject*: Re: [asterisk-users] res_fax
On 01
Kevin
That is grate. I dove into the code and tried to add it my self I added
a F option but I have not figured out the right spot to force the
exclusion to shut off the T38.
Where will the patch be posted?
http://svnview.digium.com/svn/asterisk?view=revrev=304342
On 01/21/2011 08:37 PM, Tom Rymes wrote:
On Jan 20, 2011, at 8:52 PM, Steve Underwood wrote:
A comparison wouldn't be complete without mentioning Hylafax. Hylafax has a
great infrastructure - tools for integrating with Windows clients, and so on.
Neither spandsp or the Digium FAX code can
On 01/21/2011 8:59 AM, Steve Underwood wrote:
On 01/21/2011 08:37 PM, Tom Rymes wrote:
On Jan 20, 2011, at 8:52 PM, Steve Underwood wrote:
[snip]
Its easy to set up some t38modem channels and some iaxmodem channels for
receiving FAXes. Transmit is more problematic. With this split config,
On 01/19/2011 02:30 PM, Bryant Zimmerman wrote:
On 01/19/2011 02:05 PM, Bryant Zimmerman wrote:
I am working on some fax tools for some of my users. I am reading the
https://wiki.asterisk.org docs for faxing.
Is see Application_SendFax and Application_SendeFax has one been
discondinued?
On 01/20/2011 11:11 PM, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
On 01/19/2011 02:30 PM, Bryant Zimmerman wrote:
On 01/19/2011 02:05 PM, Bryant Zimmerman wrote:
I am working on some fax tools for some of my users. I am reading the
https://wiki.asterisk.org docs for faxing.
Is see Application_SendFax and
On 01/20/2011 11:47 AM, Steve Underwood
On 01/20/2011 11:11 PM, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
On 01/19/2011 02:30 PM, Bryant Zimmerman wrote:
On 01/19/2011 02:05 PM, Bryant Zimmerman wrote:
I am working on some fax tools for some of my users. I am reading the
https://wiki.asterisk.org docs for
On 01/21/2011 06:46 AM, Bryant Zimmerman wrote:
On 01/20/2011 11:47 AM, Steve Underwood
On 01/20/2011 11:11 PM, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
On 01/19/2011 02:30 PM, Bryant Zimmerman wrote:
On 01/19/2011 02:05 PM, Bryant Zimmerman wrote:
I am working on some fax tools for some of my users. I am
On Jan 20, 2011, at 8:53 PM, Steve Underwood
On 01/21/2011 06:46 AM, Bryant Zimmerman wrote:
On 01/20/2011 11:47 AM, Steve Underwood
On 01/20/2011 11:11 PM, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
On 01/19/2011 02:30 PM, Bryant Zimmerman wrote:
On 01/19/2011 02:05 PM, Bryant Zimmerman wrote:
I am
On Jan 19, 2011, at 3:18 PM, Jason Parker wrote:
On 01/19/2011 02:05 PM, Bryant Zimmerman wrote:
I am working on some fax tools for some of my users. I am reading the
https://wiki.asterisk.org docs for faxing.
Is see Application_SendFax and Application_SendeFax has one been
discondinued?
There was a typo in the res_fax documentation. Application_SendeFax
should be the correct documentation. I don't know where Application_SendFax
is coming from - it's probably old. When the next import happens,
Application_SendFax should be replaced by the correct version (then I'll try
to
51 matches
Mail list logo
