Re: [Asterisk-Users] Do people actually answer questions here?

2004-06-29 Thread Ralf Van Dooren
 Its not that the answers aren't out there, nobody bothers looking for them.

Being a relative new-b on Asterisk, I have to agree most of the
information is available on several Internet pages. However,
information is scattered around on many pages, and for someone who
isn't familiar with stuff like 'codecs' and VoIP in general (and maybe
even Linux for a start), it can be hard to find the right information.

But instead of complaining about the lack of -findable- documentation,
one can try to enhance existing documentation.  That's the power of
Open Source.  As I am not a coder, I'll be trying to help the
community by making the documentation better, especially for 'new
bees' like me.

Bzz,

Ralf
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] RE: Chan_Capi Down

2004-06-29 Thread ePyron Felix Deierlein
Hi all,

are you able to see incoming calls at the isdnlog? I have guessed I have a
problem
with the capi/isdn/card itsself and not really with asterisk.

Felix
 
 Thanks I will give that a try. 
 
 Looks like this may need a bug report? We are all getting the 
 same errors.
 
 Outgoing is fine for me.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 Andreas Anderson
 Sent: 28 June 2004 23:26
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] RE: Chan_Capi Down
 
 Same here :-(
 
 asterisk show's this error in the same moment i'm trying to 
 pick up an incoming call:
 
 Jun 23 13:14:03 ERROR[-1284076624]: chan_capi.c:881 
 capi_write: dont know how to write subclass 64
 
 This problem starts with  cvs update -D 6/21/04 21:00:00 CET
 
 If i revert back to cvs update -D 6/21/04 18:00:00 CET the 
 problem is gone.
 
 -- original message --
 
 I am also having the same problem. Latest CVS  Latest Capi
 
 When it does work and you pick up the phone, CAPI disconnects 
 the call.
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 ePyron Felix Deierlein
 Sent: 28 June 2004 18:34
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Chan_Capi Down
 
 Hi all,
 
 * was running ... I have a WT405P and an AVM C4 with 
 chan_capi 0.3.4a Today chan_capi stopped working, without any 
 changings at the system.
 It seems, that not * is the reason, because isdn-log also 
 shows no calls.
 
 If I try to call * from outside via capi, I only get a busy.
 
 That is the try from inside to outside:
 stern01*CLI
 -- data = @89930:0107901723168212
 -- capi request omsn = @89930
   == found capi with omsn = 89930
   == CAPI Call CAPI[contr1/89930]/2   == CAPI Call 
 CAPI[contr1/89930]/2
 -- CONNECT_CONF ID=003 #0x000d LEN=0014
   Controller/PLCI/NCCI= 0x101
   Info= 0x0
 
   == received CONNECT_CONF PLCI = 0x101 INFO = 0
 -- DISCONNECT_IND ID=003 #0x0002 LEN=0014
   Controller/PLCI/NCCI= 0x101
   Reason  = 0x3302
 
   == DISCONNECT_IND PLCI=0x101 REASON=0x3302
   == Spawn extension (OutDial-Dial, 01723168212, 2) exited 
 non-zero on 'SIP/ePfd-7515'
 -- data = @89930:01079h
 -- capi request omsn = @89930
   == found capi with omsn = 89930
   == CAPI Call CAPI[contr1/89930]/3   == CAPI Call 
 CAPI[contr1/89930]/3
 -- CONNECT_CONF ID=003 #0x000e LEN=0014
   Controller/PLCI/NCCI= 0x101
   Info= 0x0
 
   == received CONNECT_CONF PLCI = 0x101 INFO = 0
 -- DISCONNECT_CONF ID=003 #0x000f LEN=0014
   Controller/PLCI/NCCI= 0x
   Info= 0x2002
 
 -- DISCONNECT_IND ID=003 #0x0003 LEN=0014
   Controller/PLCI/NCCI= 0x101
   Reason  = 0x3302
 
   == DISCONNECT_IND PLCI=0x101 REASON=0x3302
   == Spawn extension (OutDial-Dial, h, 1) exited non-zero on 
 'SIP/ePfd-7515'
 
 
 dmesg shows:
 
 isdn_dc2minor: di(0) ch(-1072539760) invalid
 capidrv-1: now up (2 B channels)
 capidrv-1: D2 trace enabled
 capi: controller 1 up
 kcapi: notify up contr 2
 capidrv: controller 2 up
 isdn_dc2minor: di(1) ch(-1072539760) invalid
 capidrv-2: now up (2 B channels)
 capidrv-2: D2 trace enabled
 capi: controller 2 up
 kcapi: notify up contr 3
 capidrv: controller 3 up
 isdn_dc2minor: di(2) ch(-1072539760) invalid
 capidrv-3: now up (2 B channels)
 capidrv-3: D2 trace enabled
 capi: controller 3 up
 kcapi: notify up contr 4
 capidrv: controller 4 up
 isdn_dc2minor: di(3) ch(-1072539760) invalid
 capidrv-4: now up (2 B channels)
 capidrv-4: D2 trace enabled
 capi: controller 4 up
 
 
 I hope, that you could help me...
 
 Thanks
 
 
 Felix Deierlein
 
 _
 Listen to music online with the Xtra Broadband Channel 
 http://xtra.co.nz/broadband
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] * INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE ASTERISK COMMUNITY - PLEASE READ NOW *

2004-06-29 Thread Olle E. Johansson
Welcome to the Asterisk users community!

Asterisk.org is a fast moving project. New code is added every day.
Asterisk is the leading Open Source Telephony platform,
with support both for classical telephony and IP telephony.
Our community is also growing fast and we're having a lot
of interaction, on the IRC and on the mailing lists.
It's great to have you participating in this Open Source project
- building an Open Source PBX. Here are a few things to know and
remember while working with the project.
** The mailing list is growing
The lead programmer of Asterisk, Mark Spencer at Digium, inc, recently wrote:
The Asterisk community is growing at a remarkable pace.  I know there are
thousands of you out there -- in fact there are over eight *thousand*
subscribers to asterisk-users alone, and almost one *thousand* registered
users on the bug tracker.
This means that everything anyone write to this mailing list, is sent to over
8.000 mailboxes that is already flowing over with messages.
** Think before sending a message, think twice
I would like to stress the fact that you have to think before you send a
message to such a big list. Do *not* send out personal replies on the list.
If you offer services to someone, do *not* CC: or reply to the list, it
will annoy more potential customers than get you new customers. If you
send out a message by mistake, you don't have to apologize to all of us,
we understand you're embarassed. We will get more annoyed by your apology
than over your first message.
** Try finding the answer first, then ask the list
The Asterisk Wiki at http://www.voip-info.org project is an important
knowledge base for the project.
Go there to find your answer first, then search the mailing list
archives (Google or http://search.voip-forum.com) and then
go to the IRC channel. The IRC channel is populated with Asterisk gurus
around the clock (literally) and they'll help you move forward.
* IRC info: http://www.asterisk.org/index.php?menu=support#irc
* There's many links to Asterisk web pages on the documentation
  page at http://www.asterisk.org
* The Asterisk FAQ is found on the wiki
  http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+FAQ
* The Asterisk documentation project (which needs your help)
  is at http://www.asteriskdocs.org
  Their handbook The hitchhiker's guide to Asterisk is already
  well worth reading.
Finally, if you don't find the answer elsewhere, try the list.
** Mailing lists
For developers, there is a developer's list, asterisk-dev.
For BSD users (FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD and OS/X) there's a
list called asterisk-bsd. There is also a business list
for those that want to ask for commercial services and
inform their community about new services.
You'll find all lists on http://lists.digium.com, which is the
site where you manage your subscription to this list as well.
Please, do not crosspost the same message to multiple mailing
lists. It will not help you, it will only add to the mail flow
and get people that read both lists irritated.
** Reporting bugs
If you think you have found a bug, report it. We need bug reports.
Read this document http://www.digium.com/bugtracker.html and then
go to the bugtracker http://bugs.digium.com to file a report.
If you are unsure, find a bug marshal on the IRC channel to help
you. They're appointed to support you with how to handle bugs.
Please check the bugtracker thoroughly before posting a new bug;
often, your bug or feature already exists but is simply slowly
making it's way through the system.  Duplicate reports slow things
down for everyone, so please spend a few minutes searching first.
The bug tracker is also a place where you add your contribution
to Asterisk. If you have coded extra functionality, make sure you
give it back to the project so it can be added to the code base.
This is how Asterisk grows, free contributions and consultants
that are paid to add functionality on a case by case basis.
** Be a community member - contribute!
The Asterisk software growth is very much based on user contributions.
That's really how we all pay for the software - and get revenue back.
If you develop custom functionality, you can rest assured that there
is someone out there that wants it, needs it and will be helped by it.
Don't forget to contribute. Open Source is both giving and taking.
The financial model behind it all is really cooperative in some way.
As one member to the community said to a contractor:
  Hey, I'm paying you to deliver code to me, then I'm giving it
   away to the community. How did this happen?
It's the Open Source business model. And if it didn't work, we
wouldn't have a lot of the software platforms that we all use
in our business systems - Linux, Apache, MySQL, PostgreSQL and
Asterisk.
** Remember: It's Open Source, it's voluntary
Asterisk.org is a Open Source project. This means you can't request
help from people, demand new functions or support. However, there
are many individuals and companies 

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: 'a' and 'o' extensions do not work with app_voicemail.c (was: Newbie needs help)

2004-06-29 Thread Holger Schurig
 As I said, I'm not an expert, so I would strongly recommend against
 committing this as-is... someone please interpret why this works and
 fix the root problem (or help me understand why this works so I can fix
 the root problem).

I'd suggest that you open a bug with you problem and your patch to 
bugs.digium.org.

Please be sure to make it with cvs diff -u or, better, add the line 
diff -u to your ~/.cvsrc file.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] * Busy-Redial ??

2004-06-29 Thread William J Mandra
I was wondering if anyone knew of a way to create a busy-redial feature in
the * dialplan?  For example, you try to call 12125551212 but the number is
busy, so you hang up and dial *XX12125551212 and hangup again, then * would
continue to retry calling the number until either it rings or a timeout is
reached, if it rings * then calls back the exten that made the *XX call and
bridges the two channels (maybe even with a distinctive ring). If anyone has
any suggestions on how to accomplish this please let me know.

  Thanks in advance,

William Mandra
Chief Technology Officer
M-networks.net


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] cannot make app_prepaid

2004-06-29 Thread Hekuran Doli
try to vi the app_prepaid.c and there is a line #include
postgresql/libpq.h and edit it and make #include libpq.h this problem
exist in modifyed app_prepaid only.

Best Regards
Hekuran Doli


 Eureka... i must edit the Makefile hehe... yes correct, i must mantion
 about the psql lib

 -L /usr/local/pgsql/lib

 Thnx.

 Regards,

 Freddy Setiawan

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Joshua
 McClintock
 Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 12:56 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] cannot make app_prepaid


 I believe libpq is a postgres dev library.  You probally need a psql-dev
 package of some sort.

 - Original Message -
 From: Freddy Setiawan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 9:34 PM
 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] cannot make app_prepaid


 hai there, today i tried to implement the prepaid application to my *
 box. I do the step that mantion in to voip-info. i copy the
 app_prepaid.c and Make file to my asteris/apps, then i run the make.
 but it show an error
 like
 :

 gcc -shared -Xlinker -x -o app_prepaid.so app_prepaid.o -lpq
 /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lpq
 collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
 make[1]: *** [app_prepaid.so] Error 1
 make[1]: Leaving directory '/usr/src/asterisk/apps'
 make: *** [subdirs] Error 1

 Any sugestion what should i do?

 Best Regards,

 Freddy Setiawan


 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] H.323 Audio problem UPDATE

2004-06-29 Thread Michael Manousos

Jeremy McNamara wrote:
Michael Manousos wrote:
The performance of the oh323 channel driver is limited by OpenH323.
asterisk-oh323 uses the (more complete) RTP implementation offered by
the library, and not that of Asterisk. Of course there are pros
(adaptive jitter buffer, RTCP implementation) and cons (lower
performance). It's up to the user to select the one that performs
better for his application.

flamePut the crack pipe down./flame
I won't bite. We all know what you have done.
We have gone over this before, asterisk-oh323 is limited by the method 
you implemented to buffer the audio around.

Jeremy McNamara

Michael.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Security Vulnerability in Asterisk

2004-06-29 Thread Michael Manousos

Jim Rosenberg wrote:
--On Monday, June 28, 2004 7:21 PM +0200 Michael Sandee 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Other than that... if these problems are not being published when
fixed... then other distro's do not have a chance to fix it... (think
about distro's that use stable code, but haven't updated to 0.9 because
of problems)

I have to say -- with somewhat less vehemence -- that I'm another user 
who sure never noticed that the stable release of Asterisk had moved 
from 0.7.2 to 0.9x. This should have been an important announcement on 
*SEVERAL* security grounds. As of 0.7.2, the recommend version of 
channel H323 had some very serious vulnerabilities that the OpenH323 
folks had fixed months previously.
The latest versions of asterisk-oh323 use OpenH323 1.13.5, Pwlib 1.6.6.
Why don't you use that one?
This is an opportune time to repeat: H.323 uses ASN.1. ASN.1 is 
fiendishly complex and is a known bad boy in which many security holes 
have appeared over the years. It would be naive to think there won't be 
more. As VOIP hits the big-time and Asterisk joins the ranks of some of 
the other more famous open-source projects, quick response to security 
vulnerabilities will be expected.

It's nice to know in the case of these format string problems that they 
were in some sense addressed promptly, but we're not all subscribed to 
the dev list. A vulnerability that is fixed in CVS head but not 
back-patched to stable *is not fixed* as far as a large percentage of 
the user base is concerned.
Michael.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] asterisk-oh323, new version 0.6.3

2004-06-29 Thread Michael Manousos
Florin Andrei wrote:
On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 07:45, Michael Manousos wrote:
Hello all,
Bugfix release 0.6.3 is now available. Basically, call indications
should work ok now. Also, the OH323 channel variables for incoming calls
are set properly (they can be used for special authentication purposes).
Download:
http://www.inaccessnetworks.com/projects/asterisk-oh323

Will it work as a H323 gatekeeper?
No, if you want gatekeeper functionality from your Asterisk box,
just run gnugk.
Michael.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] * Busy-Redial ??

2004-06-29 Thread Florian Overkamp
Hi, 

 -Original Message-
 I was wondering if anyone knew of a way to create a 
 busy-redial feature in
 the * dialplan?  For example, you try to call 12125551212 but 
 the number is
 busy, so you hang up and dial *XX12125551212 and hangup 
 again, then * would
 continue to retry calling the number until either it rings or 
 a timeout is
 reached, if it rings * then calls back the exten that made 
 the *XX call and
 bridges the two channels (maybe even with a distinctive 
 ring). If anyone has
 any suggestions on how to accomplish this please let me know.

I have not implemented this, but it should be doable by creating a file in
the spool directory. You really just need to tinker around with contexts and
actions to do 'the right thing' (tm).

An AGI script to generate the spool file would probably do the trick.

Florian

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] P32mxi

2004-06-29 Thread Tim Guy


Can anyone confirm if they have this channel bank running on Asterisk?

There is a post in the archive about having a few niggley problems but
no follow up.

I tried to email the guy but the mail address is bouncing.

I'm not having much luck finding any of the archive recommended channel
banks cheap in the UK.

I really want to try and get someone that someone has already had
success with (being a numpty). I am finding no reference to the 650
/750's that everyone is suggesting.

Ill keep looking, cheers

Tim

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk and Sipura SPA-1000 configs

2004-06-29 Thread tucker
Anyone had any experience here on how to config both ends, asterisk and
the sipura SPA1000

TIA

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] linux kernel 2.6.6

2004-06-29 Thread yaboo
Hi All
trying to compile asterisk under linux kernel 2.6.6.
Currently under zaptel get the following error
make linux26
Link /usr/src/linux-2.6 to your kernel sources first!
make: *** [linux26] Error 1
as going from the readme.
is 2.6 not compatiable with asterisk and should I go back to 2.4.26.
Also has anyone got the sipura 3000 working with asterisk, both fxo and 
the fxs ports on the unit.

regards
Joseph
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Do people actually answer questions here?

2004-06-29 Thread Kevin Walsh
Jean-Yves Avenard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I've only been watching this list for the past 2 days.
 
 And it seems to be an one way street:
 -Tell about your problems and what you would like to do.
 
 Usually no answer.
 
 I have to admit I'm rather disappointed with Asterisk, information is
 probably available but very hard to find ; it seems to be limited to a
 few privileged people for whom their job is setting up VoIP system
 
Personally, I only read about 20% of the articles in this list.
I delete whole threads based solely upon the Subject line, especially
when it's set to (no subject) or has no clear indication of content.

If I've read a couple of articles in a thread and have decided that
I'm not interested, I tend to blindly delete all followups.  This
means that if someone asks a new question by following up to an
existing thread then it'll probably get caught up in my mass delete
and won't be seen by me at all.  I said that I tend to do this,
I don't always do it - obviously. :-)

I also have very little interest in top-posted followups and HTML
emails, and often won't bother read past the first sentence.  This
is a response to the original posters' laziness rather than anything
else, although a couple of them will be of enough interest for me
to ignore these annoying breaches of netiquette and read the entire
article.

This is just my personal policy on the matter, but I suspect that
others do the same.  When you're subscribed to several high volume
mailing lists, there's not enough time to read everything.

Having said all of that, two days is not really enough time to monitor
a mail list before giving up on it.

-- 
   _/   _/  _/_/_/_/  _/_/  _/_/_/  _/_/
  _/_/_/   _/_/  _/_/_/_/_/  _/   K e v i n   W a l s h
 _/ _/_/  _/ _/ _/_/  _/_/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_/   _/  _/_/_/_/  _/_/_/_/  _/_/

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] linux kernel 2.6.6

2004-06-29 Thread Dave Cotton
On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 17:43 +1000, yaboo wrote:
 Hi All
 
 trying to compile asterisk under linux kernel 2.6.6.
 
 Currently under zaptel get the following error
 
 make linux26
 Link /usr/src/linux-2.6 to your kernel sources first!
 make: *** [linux26] Error 1
 
 as going from the readme.

So ln -s /usr/src/your source directory /usr/src/linux-2.6

 is 2.6 not compatiable with asterisk 

No  (2 negatives = positive)

Yes * and 2.6 do work perfectly

 and should I go back to 2.4.26.

Only if you can't follow the above. :)




-- 
Dave Cotton [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] linux kernel 2.6.6

2004-06-29 Thread Kevin Walsh
yaboo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 trying to compile asterisk under linux kernel 2.6.6.
 
 Currently under zaptel get the following error
 
 make linux26
 Link /usr/src/linux-2.6 to your kernel sources first!
 make: *** [linux26] Error 1

Type this:

# cd /usr/src
# ln -s linux linux-2.6

That'll link linux-2.6 to your kernel sources.  Error messages
are your friend.

 
 is 2.6 not compatiable with asterisk and should I go back to 2.4.26.
 
I'm using 2.6.7-gentoo-r6 and it works very well.

I assume you're using the latest Zaptel and Asterisk from CVS.

-- 
   _/   _/  _/_/_/_/  _/_/  _/_/_/  _/_/
  _/_/_/   _/_/  _/_/_/_/_/  _/   K e v i n   W a l s h
 _/ _/_/  _/ _/ _/_/  _/_/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_/   _/  _/_/_/_/  _/_/_/_/  _/_/

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Zap X100P oscillation

2004-06-29 Thread Whisker, Peter
Thanks for the responses.

I have tried it with aggressive cancellation both on and off. I think that
on helps a tiny bit. I'm glad that Mike Benoit as seen something similar,
but of course sorry that he is suffering like me!

It is worse when I have a
Phone-switch-X100P-IAX-Internet-IAX-X100P-switch-Phone link set up. The
other thing which may have helped a bit is using a large set of IAX Jitter
buffers. It may be the latency which is helping though, rather than the
anti-jitter aspects.

Peter

-Original Message-
From: Brian McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 28 June 2004 22:57
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Zap X100P oscillation


Try recompiling your zaptel package without the aggressive echo
cancellation enabled. I have aggressive cancellation help before, I
but I have also seen it hurt things before.

Brian


On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:26:32 +0100, Whisker, Peter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I have tried the latest CVS Head with echotraining=800 set and also
complied
 with the aggressive echo cancelling, but nothing seems to help.
 
 Ideas welcome!
 
 Many thanks
 Peter Whisker
 
 This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended
recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential
information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied,
disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an
intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any
attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you.
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) 
only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject 
to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any 
other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this 
e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] sip to isdn-capi call problem

2004-06-29 Thread Klaus-Peter Junghanns
Hi Tomaz,

make sure you disable the G723.1 codec in your SIP device, asterisk
does not support G723.1. Use G711 (alaw, ulaw)!

best regards

Klaus
-- 
Klaus-Peter Junghanns

CEO, CTO
Junghanns.NET GmbH
Breite Strasse 13a - 12167 Berlin - Germany
fon: (de) +49 30 79705390
fon: (uk) +44 870 1244692
fax: (de) +49 30 79705391
iaxtel: 1-700-157-8753
http://www.Junghanns.NET/asterisk/


Am Mo, 2004-06-28 um 10.52 schrieb Tomaz:
 anyone has idea what problem can be here,
 
 something with codec but i have today CVS version and grandstream phone 
 with 1.5.0 firmware.I try to change codec in phone and also in 
 asterisk-sip.conf but the same.
 What can be problem ?
 
 tnx,
 Tomaz
 
 
 
 
 *CLI -- Executing Dial(SIP/102-767c, CAPI/2:5) in new stack
 -- Called 2:5
 -- CAPI[contr1/2003002]/0 is making progress passing it to SIP/102-767c
 Jun 28 10:51:21 NOTICE[278545]: channel.c:1654 ast_set_read_format: 
 Unable to find a path from G723 to ALAW
 Jun 28 10:51:21 NOTICE[278545]: channel.c:1621 ast_set_write_format: 
 Unable to find a path from ULAW to G723
 -- CAPI[contr1/2003002]/0 is ringing
 Jun 28 10:51:21 WARNING[278545]: chan_sip.c:1788 sip_write: Asked to 
 transmit frame type 4, while native formats is 1 (read/write = 8/4)
 Jun 28 10:51:21 WARNING[278545]: channel.c:1485 ast_prod: Prodding 
 channel 'SIP/102-767c' failed
 Jun 28 10:51:21 NOTICE[278545]: channel.c:1621 ast_set_write_format: 
 Unable to find a path from SLINR to G723
 Jun 28 10:51:21 WARNING[278545]: indications.c:76 playtones_alloc: 
 Unable to set 'SIP/102-767c' to signed linear format (write)
 -- CAPI Hangingup
   == Spawn extension (from-sip, 9, 1) exited non-zero on 'SIP/102-767c'
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Zap X100P oscillation

2004-06-29 Thread Whisker, Peter
I find that if I drop the RX gain too much I start to lose DTMF decoding.

The Asterisk calls lose at least 3-6db end-to-end compared with a normal
call. If I bring the gain up, the symptoms sound exactly like yours.

The gain I am using is more like Rx=-2, Tx=0 but this is still quite quiet.
I guess that line impedance mismatch between US and European standards
accounts for some of the gain loss.

Peter

-Original Message-
From: Mike Benoit [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 28 June 2004 21:59
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Zap X100P oscillation


I wonder if your issue and mine are related somehow. 

I have a asterisk server with 4 FXO cards in it, and when a call comes
in one ZAP channel, then dials out another, I hear what could be
described as a steam engine starting up. It starts off kinda slower/
quiet, then quickly (in about 2-4 seconds) completely over powers the
line. 

The only way I could stop it was by adjusting the gains.

rxgain=-8.5
txgain=4

Seemed to do the trick. As did:

rxgain=-6.5
txgain=1

An rxgain of even -8.0 or -6.0 in either case would result in this
steam engine sound. -8.5 or -6.5 would make it go away completely.

I'm using a CVS checkout from yesterday, and I tried with both
echotraining=800 and turning echo cancellation off completely. Neither
made any difference.

It would be really nice to be able to use a positive rxgain value. I
haven't tried with the echo app, but using just one FXO card works fine
with almost any rx/txgain value. As soon as the call utilizes two FXO
card at the same time, the steam engine sound occurs.


On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 16:26 +0100, Whisker, Peter wrote:
 Has anyone seen this problem before?
 
 I have a server with a single X100P card. The audio level is a low, but if
I
 raise the gain to more than -2db (Rx + Tx) it starts to oscillate in an
echo
 test. Not at a high frequency but with a noise that is best described as a
 steam engine starting up. It then starts to clip and crackle. If I bring
the
 gain down to Rx=-2.0 and Tx=0.0 or lower then it settles down but it is
very
 very quiet.
 
 I have tried the latest CVS Head with echotraining=800 set and also
complied
 with the aggressive echo cancelling, but nothing seems to help.
 
 Ideas welcome!
 
 Many thanks
 Peter Whisker
 
 This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended
recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential
information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied,
disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an
intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any
attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you.
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
-- 
Mike Benoit [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) 
only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject 
to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any 
other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this 
e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] cvs log archive

2004-06-29 Thread Chris Stenton
Ok I'm no cvs expert is there a  cvs command to get a date sequential cvs
log archive for cvs-head or a URL for it. With so many daily changes its
hard to keep track of what the changes are.

Thanks

Chris


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] RE: Chan_Capi Down

2004-06-29 Thread Andreas Anderson
Hiya,
Looks like this may need a bug report? We are all getting the same
errors.
Sure, but i guess a bug to bugs.digium.com will be rejected, chan_capi
is not in CVS. Maybe [EMAIL PROTECTED] could do a fix, :-D PLEEASE :-D?
BTW: kapejod, any chances to disclaim chan_capi to digium? It would safe 
some
troubles if it was in CVS...

Outgoing is fine for me.
yes, no problem with outgoing.
bye.
aa
_
Need more speed? Get Xtra JetStream  @ http://xtra.co.nz/jetstream
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Customized Call Parking

2004-06-29 Thread Adnan Shah
Hi !

I need a solution to park incoming calls
to an extension of my choice where a special
announcement is played, park subsequent calls
to specific pools so that they listen to announcements
of my choice.

any ideas ?

Shah. 


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] 1 user 2 VM boxes?

2004-06-29 Thread WipeOut
Hi,
Would be interestd in anyones ideas for this problem..
We are starting a new division to our company, the people in this new 
division will be the same people who are on the old division..

Calls for each division come in on seperate numbers and go through 
seperate menus but ring to common extensions, this is easy enough..

The problem is with Voicemail..
I need to have seperate VM boxes for each division so that the user will 
be able to distinguish between the messages for each division..

Basically the only ways I can think of to make this work is to teach the 
users how to access each seperate VM box with a seperate VM box number 
and password or I could use VM contexts and have two identical VM boxes 
in each context but then the user will have to access VoiceMailMain 
differently (eg 100 for division1 VM and 101 for division2 VM) for each 
VM box..

Can anyone think of any easier ways?
later..
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom IP600 stops to send/receive calls

2004-06-29 Thread Russ Beaupre, P.E.
Jorge Mendoza wrote:
Hi,
I'm testing a Polycom IP600.
With firmware version 1.1 the phone reboots at any time.
With firmware version 1.2, the first reboot was an endless reboot. Then 
I moved the phone to another lan port, then it worked fine. Then I 
installed again in the initial lan port and the phone works well. 
However after some time of inactivity (1 hour?), the IP600 stops to send 
and receive calls. After a reboot is works fine again.
We have a * box with many BT101 and softphones working for months 
without any problem.
I'm missing something? it is a bad config file? or it is a phone bug?

We had one do the same thing.  Changing the registration timeout in the 
phone.cfg file down to 20 seems to have fixed the problem.

-rb
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] 1 user 2 VM boxes?

2004-06-29 Thread Senad Jordanovic

 Can anyone think of any easier ways?
 
How about if you put second division on different server, and then share
VM storage on the network between two asterisk boxes?

SJ
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To
UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users 


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] cvs log archive

2004-06-29 Thread Holger Schurig
 Ok I'm no cvs expert is there a  cvs command to get a date sequential
 cvs log archive for cvs-head or a URL for it. With so many daily
 changes its hard to keep track of what the changes are.

You can use GUI tools like cervisia. Or use cvs2log script or so. Just 
do your usual google searching or look for third-party apps on CVS's home 
page.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] 1 user 2 VM boxes?

2004-06-29 Thread WipeOut
Senad Jordanovic wrote:
Can anyone think of any easier ways?
   

How about if you put second division on different server, and then share
VM storage on the network between two asterisk boxes?
SJ
 

The single server works fine for the two divisions making and recieving 
calls..

Its that each extension needs two VM boxes (one for each division) thats 
the problem and I want to make it as simple as possible for the users to 
access the two seperate VM boxes from the one extension..
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Ruggedised IP Phone

2004-06-29 Thread Matt
Hi all,

I want to use my * box to control entry to a building.  I was wondering who else has 
done this and what phones they might recommend.

The phone itself needs to be externally mounted so will have to be durable.
Functionally I would like it to just dial and extension when picked up.

Any comments on your experiences would be very much appriciated.

Best regards

Matt
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] cvs log archive

2004-06-29 Thread Kevin Walsh
  Ok I'm no cvs expert is there a  cvs command to get a date sequential
  cvs log archive for cvs-head or a URL for it. With so many daily
  changes its hard to keep track of what the changes are.
 
 You can use GUI tools like cervisia. Or use cvs2log script or so. Just
 do your usual google searching or look for third-party apps on CVS's home
 page. 
 
You'll find that the log comments are not a lot of use.  You generally
have to dive into the actual change to find out what oops means this
time.

-- 
   _/   _/  _/_/_/_/  _/_/  _/_/_/  _/_/
  _/_/_/   _/_/  _/_/_/_/_/  _/   K e v i n   W a l s h
 _/ _/_/  _/ _/ _/_/  _/_/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_/   _/  _/_/_/_/  _/_/_/_/  _/_/

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] 1 user 2 VM boxes?

2004-06-29 Thread Jason Williams
At 11:40 29/06/2004 +0100, you wrote:
Senad Jordanovic wrote:
Can anyone think of any easier ways?

How about if you put second division on different server, and then share
VM storage on the network between two asterisk boxes?
SJ
The single server works fine for the two divisions making and recieving 
calls..

Its that each extension needs two VM boxes (one for each division) thats 
the problem and I want to make it as simple as possible for the users to 
access the two seperate VM boxes from the one extension..
Why not front the VM access number with an IVR press 1 for Division 1 press 
2 for division 2

Jason 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Voip Account over H323

2004-06-29 Thread Johannes van Hulst








I have a VOIP account including a telephone number in another
country.

The connection uses the H323 connection to connect to the
remote PBX.



Can I learn Asterisk to use that connection for outgoing calls
and also that he can handle my incoming calls?





Johannes












Re: [Asterisk-Users] 1 user 2 VM boxes?

2004-06-29 Thread WipeOut
Jason Williams wrote:
At 11:40 29/06/2004 +0100, you wrote:
Senad Jordanovic wrote:
Can anyone think of any easier ways?

How about if you put second division on different server, and then 
share
VM storage on the network between two asterisk boxes?

SJ
The single server works fine for the two divisions making and 
recieving calls..

Its that each extension needs two VM boxes (one for each division) 
thats the problem and I want to make it as simple as possible for the 
users to access the two seperate VM boxes from the one extension..

Why not front the VM access number with an IVR press 1 for Division 1 
press 2 for division 2


Thats not a bad idea.. Then have two identical VM boxes in seperate VM 
contexts with the same password..

That should work..
Now I just have to customise the email thet is sent to tell the user 
which divisions mailbox is the one with the message but that should be 
easy..

Thanks to all..
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Compiling libiax2 on windows

2004-06-29 Thread Joaquin Cuenca Abela
Hi! I'm trying to compile libiax2 on windows using
msvc6.

In the libiax2\src\iax.c file, line 670, I'm getting
a:
 
error C2229: struct __unnamed has an illegal
zero-sized array
 
It seems to complain due to the last member of
iax_frame. Does anybody knows what should I do to make
it compile?

FWIW, it compiles fine using gcc on cygwin.

Thank you in advance for any tips!

Cheers,


=
Joaquin Cuenca Abela
e98cuenc at yahoo dot com



__
Do you Yahoo!?
Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail 
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Ruggedised IP Phone

2004-06-29 Thread Johnson-Perkins, Robert
Matt,

After much searching, I could not find any Ruggedised IP Phone's out of
the box...

I am now looking at using a Stunning Art Deco (:-) Dorfone (GBP300) from
www.spicecommunications.co.uk/shop/Door_Entry_Systems.htm
This range of speaker entry-phones, sit between your BT line and handsets;
when the buzzer is pushed the handsets ring.
I am guessing that this can be connected to a FXO module on my TDM400P.

My other option, was to cannibalise a broken Cisco 7940, putting the innards
into a cheap entry phone
e.g. stock number 227-7892 from www.rswww.com for GBP50
Connecting up the mic, speaker and one of the speed-dial buttons!
Though, I guess, if this worked, it might make a neat niche product

Rgds,
Robert

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Matt
Sent: 29 June 2004 11:43
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Ruggedised IP Phone


Hi all,

I want to use my * box to control entry to a building.  I was wondering who
else has done this and what phones they might recommend.

The phone itself needs to be externally mounted so will have to be durable.
Functionally I would like it to just dial and extension when picked up.

Any comments on your experiences would be very much appriciated.

Best regards

Matt
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


PLEASE READ: The information contained in this email is confidential
and intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you are not an intended
recipient of this email you must not copy, distribute or take any 
further action in reliance on it and you should delete it and notify the
sender immediately. Email is not a secure method of communication and 
Nomura International plc cannot accept responsibility for the accuracy
or completeness of this message or any attachment(s). Please examine this
email for virus infection, for which Nomura International plc accepts
no responsibility. If verification of this email is sought then please
request a hard copy. Unless otherwise stated any views or opinions
presented are solely those of the author and do not represent those of
Nomura International plc. This email is intended for informational
purposes only and is not a solicitation or offer to buy or sell
securities or related financial instruments. Nomura International plc is
regulated by the Financial Services Authority and is a member of the
London Stock Exchange.


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Ruggedised IP Phone

2004-06-29 Thread Matt Bridges

I am now looking at using a Stunning Art Deco (:-) Dorfone (GBP300) from
www.spicecommunications.co.uk/shop/Door_Entry_Systems.htm
This range of speaker entry-phones, sit between your BT line and handsets;
when the buzzer is pushed the handsets ring.
I am guessing that this can be connected to a FXO module on my TDM400P.

Cheers Robert, I'll give them a call and see just how the phones work.  I
was interested in the SlimLine Version beneath the Dorphone on the URL you
mention.

I'm looking for a solution for a large house, the gate is about 25 meters
from the main house.  I was hoping to set the system up so that an extension
could be dialled when someone picks up the phone; that extension rings in
the main house and also in surrounding outbuildings.

Matt
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Matt
Sent: 29 June 2004 11:43
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Ruggedised IP Phone


Hi all,

I want to use my * box to control entry to a building.  I was wondering who
else has done this and what phones they might recommend.

The phone itself needs to be externally mounted so will have to be durable.
Functionally I would like it to just dial and extension when picked up.

Any comments on your experiences would be very much appriciated.

Best regards

Matt
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


PLEASE READ: The information contained in this email is confidential
and intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you are not an intended
recipient of this email you must not copy, distribute or take any 
further action in reliance on it and you should delete it and notify the
sender immediately. Email is not a secure method of communication and 
Nomura International plc cannot accept responsibility for the accuracy
or completeness of this message or any attachment(s). Please examine this
email for virus infection, for which Nomura International plc accepts
no responsibility. If verification of this email is sought then please
request a hard copy. Unless otherwise stated any views or opinions
presented are solely those of the author and do not represent those of
Nomura International plc. This email is intended for informational
purposes only and is not a solicitation or offer to buy or sell
securities or related financial instruments. Nomura International plc is
regulated by the Financial Services Authority and is a member of the
London Stock Exchange.


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Routing incoming H.323 calls to specific contexts.

2004-06-29 Thread Low, Adam
Hi,

We've been working a lot with Asterisk in SIP for over 6 months but I've finally 
succumb to the pressure of H.323. I need to find a way to do what we do with SIP but 
with H.323. That is to have calls from H.323 peers placed into their own unique 
context (unique to the endpoint placing the call into Asterisk) within Asterisk so 
this is obviously done using REGISTER's within SIP but trying to do this with H.323 
seems more challenging. I've installed GNUGK and have successfully had a H.323 device 
authenticate with the GNUGK and place calls onwards to Asterisk but I am unable to 
figure out how to place those calls into a unique context per H.323 
endpoint/device/account without using their CLI to do so.

I'm sure the community have solved this issue before, any help would be much 
appreciated and example configs would be perfect.

Thank you in advance,
Adam


* DISCLAIMER * 

This message and any attachment are confidential and may be privileged or otherwise 
protected from disclosure and may include proprietary information. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please telephone or email the sender and delete this message and 
any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you must not 
copy this message or attachment or disclose the contents to any other person 


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] h323 audio problem (next)

2004-06-29 Thread administrator tootai
Hello everybody,
we updated yesterday the full cvs version which include the h323 
modification NoFastStart = TRUE in ast_h323.cpp So call to our GK EP are 
again working. But we also connect to a gw which need FastStart. So 
there, calls are still without audio.

Thanks for any hint
--
Daniel
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Do people actually answer questions here?

2004-06-29 Thread Andrew Kohlsmith
On Tuesday 29 June 2004 02:42, Ralf Van Dooren wrote:
 But instead of complaining about the lack of -findable- documentation,
 one can try to enhance existing documentation.  That's the power of
 Open Source.  As I am not a coder, I'll be trying to help the
 community by making the documentation better, especially for 'new
 bees' like me.

This is where I have a problem.

The documentation is centered on voip-info.org and on Asterisk's plainly 
marked Documentation link.  It's been 32000 messages since I've signed up 
but I am *positive* that BOTH links are provided on the autoresponder when 
you sign up to this list.

How crystal-effing-clear must things be for people to go and look for 
themselves before complaining on this list?  Must we make the list moderated 
and autorespond with pre-fab Google searches that the asker simply has to 
click on and save themselves the trouble of writing the query into Google's 
search window themselves?

I'm serious here -- voip-info.org's search engine works.  Google works.  For 
newbies yes they may have some trouble with the incantations but that's why 
they should not be diving in headfirst and then bitterly complaining that 
nothing works on the list.  READ, dig around voip-info and asterisk's site.  
There's a WEALTH of knowlege there and most of it is not cryptic.  A lot of 
it is even geared to newbies.

Perhaps a glossary would be helpful but every day I start to think that basic 
research skills should be a prerequisite before being allowed to play with 
any OSS project.  It's frustrating for the newbie, frustrating for the 
experts and all around a bad thing.  You'll never have enough documentation 
to satisfy some people because they don't want to educate themselves; they 
want to ask questions and get personalized answers.  We do that too, for a 
price.  That's what consulting is all about.

-A.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk and Sipura SPA-1000 configs

2004-06-29 Thread Jeremy Hall
tucker  scribbled on Tuesday, June 29, 2004 2:37 AM:

 Anyone had any experience here on how to config both ends, asterisk
 and the sipura SPA1000 

There is accurate information out there if you do a google search.  The
first hit or two will have what you need.  I don't remember if the
example I used as a base is on the wiki or another site.  I can try to
remember to look at my bookmark list when I get home if you do a search
and can't find what you need.  All in all, it is pretty straight
forward, I only used the example to to see if there were any oddball
settings I needed.  Just set up your peer/user/friend (whichever you are
doing) in your sip.conf as you would with any other SIP device.  Punch
in your Asterisk connection and authentication settings on the SPA's
management page, and you should be set.

Let me know if you can't get it working, and I can send you the relevant
portions of my sip.conf and screenshots of the admin page on the device
itself.  If you need this, send an e-mail to my home address hall.jeremy
at gmail dot com.

Jeremy
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Call dropping out after 5s: Solution!

2004-06-29 Thread Jean-Yves Avenard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello
I'm the one who posted a message about the fact that nobody answer 
anymore to questions asked.

I posted two days ago a problem I was facing that calls made over the 
Internet to my Asterisk gateway would hang-up after just 5s (no NAT 
were involved)
Answer I got was: it's your config

Well, it wasn't (as I was expecting).
I compiled Asterisk under a Linux RedHat 9 PC, I copied across all the 
config files from the FreeBSD server to the Linux PC.
Started asterisk, registered the phone: all worked fine first go, and 
guess what?? No drop after 5s.

I guess the FreeBSD support is just not up to scratch. So if anybody is 
having this problem, just try to find an old PC somewhere load linux 
and up you go. This will raise the cost of our Asterisk installation as 
we now have to include an extra PC (all our servers are FreeBSD).

Many people have responded to my complaint that there was a lot of 
information available and basically people should just read it. My 
point is: do not always assume people did not read available 
documentation. For the past 4 days I've read the almost entire wiki 
site ; I looked at almost all messages sent to this distribution list 
that was somehow related to my problem: no luck.

I also faced another problem today. Encouraged by the progress with the 
Linux server, I configured the TDM03B (3 FXO ports). Loaded the kernel 
module, no problem card was recognized. Started asterisk, tried to make 
a call:
- - -Can start Zap channel

try about a dozen different configuration ; no luck. As I ran into 
similar problem with my FreeBSD box, I thought: there's no way it can 
be the driver this time (TDM driver on FreeBSD is an early beta)
So I opened the Linux PC, moved the card from one PCI slot to another.
Tried again as above: no luck.

Open the PC again, move the card into the third and last PCI slot. 
Disabled the USB 2.0 host controller that was sharing the same IRQ (7).
Start asterisk, dial: It works!

So now which PCI slot your card is in makes a difference! Something 
very fishy here.

Was this documented? I didn't find anything like that whatsoever. I 
guess this could be added somewhere

Jean-Yves
- ---
Jean-Yves Avenard
Hydrix Pty Ltd - Embedding the net
www.hydrix.com | fax +61 3 95093717 | phone +61 3 9509 3724
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFA4XByXeDVKqIr3GURAj5tAJ9mpDhS5kq/us6IY4nAUAGxe2yBKgCggr+u
z9j5LzrCucUO9obZsrTQ/Eo=
=F9Ge
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] How to test E1 interfacing?

2004-06-29 Thread Scott Stingel
Hi Tony-

Two E1's running on a TE405P should be a better choice, as the TE405 is
capable of bus mastering which gives better performance.  Besides, you
only use one PCI slot in this configuration.  However, of course you lose
board redundancy.

You can run 1 E1 port to another by using a crossover cable, as follows:

1 -- 4
2 -- 5
4 -- 1
5 -- 2

You can then use the outbound call generation capability of asterisk (see
the file called sample.call) to generate calls on 1 span, and receive them
on the other with the normal dialplan.  I've done this many times for load
testing.  You can do it on one machine no problem.

There's a little more information about this on the Wiki:

http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+dimensioning

Regards,
Scott


Scott M. Stingel
President,
Emerging Voice Technology, Inc.
Palo Alto California  London England
www.evtmedia.com 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Mountifield
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 2:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] How to test E1 interfacing?

Hi,

I have a project coming up which will need to interface Asterisk to
E1 trunks in the UK. I have a couple of questions which I hope someone can
answer, or give me some pointers:

1. If I want two E1 trunks, is there anything to choose, performance-wise,
   between using two ports on a single TE405P, and using two E100P cards?

2. How can I test the E1 operation in the lab, which doesn't have an
   E1 line available, before taking the unit to the installation site?
   Can I run two Asterisks back-to-back? Can I run one port into another
   on a single TE405P?

I couldn't find anything on the above in the Wiki; if I didn't look hard
enough, please tell me where I missed. Thanks.

Any advice would be gratefully received!

Cheers
Tony
--
Tony Mountifield
Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.softins.co.uk
Play: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://tony.mountifield.org
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] cvs log archive

2004-06-29 Thread Eric Wieling
On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 04:43, Chris Stenton wrote:
 Ok I'm no cvs expert is there a  cvs command to get a date sequential cvs
 log archive for cvs-head or a URL for it. With so many daily changes its
 hard to keep track of what the changes are.

Go to http://lists.digium.com/ pick the link that says Asterisk-Cvs CVS
Updates to Asterisk and the Core Components.  Subscribe or just browse
the archives.

-- 
  Eric Wieling * BTEL Consulting * 504-899-1387 x2111
In a related story, the IRS has recently ruled that the cost of Windows
upgrades can NOT be deducted as a gambling loss.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] General advice on confs and setup for new users

2004-06-29 Thread Jeremy Hall
tucker scribbled on Sunday, June 27, 2004 8:56 AM:

 This is what I want to do, however I am not sure how to achieve it,
 can you help?
 
 Asterisk is running with X100P card to local PSTN
 Allow incoming calls over the internet to Asterisk
 Allow internet calls to dial out (restricted) using X100P
 Allow incoming calls via X100P to dial extension over the internet
 Allow incoming calls via X100P to be directed to internet extension N
 after set time and/or on no reply

This is actually a pretty simple configuration.  Do you already have
your X100P card installed and set up in your system?  If you do, use the
'make samples' or similar command that Asterisk points you to when you
compile.  Go through the config files you will need for your setup.
zaptel.conf for your X100P, sip.conf and/or iax.conf for your remote
extensions, and extensions.conf for your dialplan.  Make sure you
understand what the samples are doing, and look for other examples to
confirm your understanding.  Then start modifying it to meet your needs.
 
 There is so much to read, not sure where best to start

That is a very common complaint from people starting out.  Like I said
above, just start out simple.  Use the wiki and google, and take it
slow.  Make it so when a call comes in on the PSTN, it calls one local
extension.  Then add another.  Then set it up to allow one remote
extension to dial out local calls only, and another to do long distance.
Then set up a basic IVR (voice menu) asking the caller to press 1 for
your first phone, or 2 for your second one.

One of the biggest complaints I have about newbies, is their
expectations of installing it, and having it work out of the box for
their specific hardware and situation with little to no learning and
configuration.  I've seen people here and in the IRC channel that
complained when they practically want a multiple server clustered call
center system to work with their BrandX telephony hardware, when they
have never used Asterisk at all.  Most of the time the hardware they
want to use is not supported, and there is plenty of documentation on
the archive stating as such.

Like I said, you have a very simple system to start out with, which is
good.  If you run into snags, feel free to ask me on IRC (jjhall is my
nick) or just ask the channel in general.  I'm on about half the
evenings out of the week, and usually try to at least monitor here and
there throughout the day while at work.  Just /msg me if I am on and I
will answer when I get a chance. 

Jeremy


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Ruggedised IP Phone

2004-06-29 Thread Eric Wieling
On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 05:42, Matt wrote:
 I want to use my * box to control entry to a building.  I was wondering who else has 
 done this and what phones they might recommend.
 
 The phone itself needs to be externally mounted so will have to be durable.
 Functionally I would like it to just dial and extension when picked up.
 
 Any comments on your experiences would be very much appriciated.

http://www.google.com/search?hl=enie=UTF-8q=site%3Alists.digium.com+doorphonebtnG=Google+Search

-- 
  Eric Wieling * BTEL Consulting * 504-899-1387 x2111
In a related story, the IRS has recently ruled that the cost of Windows
upgrades can NOT be deducted as a gambling loss.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Call dropping out after 5s: Solution!

2004-06-29 Thread Eric Wieling
On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 08:36, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:

 I posted two days ago a problem I was facing that calls made over the 
 Internet to my Asterisk gateway would hang-up after just 5s (no NAT 
 were involved)
 Answer I got was: it's your config

[snip]

 So now which PCI slot your card is in makes a difference! Something 
 very fishy here.
 
 Was this documented? I didn't find anything like that whatsoever. I 
 guess this could be added somewhere

cat /proc/interrupts will tell you what IRQ your card is on and if any
other devices are on the same IRQ.  Usually calls dropping is caused by
callprogress=yes or busydetect=yes (the beaten, bloody, dead horse is in
the archives).  If your card was sharing IRQs then the expected symptom
would be poor audio quality, not dropped calls.

-- 
  Eric Wieling * BTEL Consulting * 504-899-1387 x2111
In a related story, the IRS has recently ruled that the cost of Windows
upgrades can NOT be deducted as a gambling loss.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Outgoing CallerID on PRI problems

2004-06-29 Thread McInnis, JP

For outgoing calls made on our PRI circuit we are setting the Caller ID
using the format

Exten = _9XXX,1,SetCallerID(1601XXX)

The monitor shows that the CallerID is being set to the specified
number, but yet when the call is received on the user end the ID is
always the base number of our DID.  For example we have 8600-8650 as
DID's but the callerid is always 8600 regardless of the extension that
makes the outgoing call.

We have tried using the variable SetCallerID(${BYEXTENSION}) but still
get the same results.

Any suggestions?
 

JP McInnis, Director of Technology
Copiah Lincoln Community College
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Call dropping out after 5s: Solution!

2004-06-29 Thread John Fraizer
Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
I posted two days ago a problem I was facing that calls made over the 
Internet to my Asterisk gateway would hang-up after just 5s (no NAT were 
involved)
Answer I got was: it's your config

Well, it wasn't (as I was expecting).
I compiled Asterisk under a Linux RedHat 9 PC, I copied across all the 
config files from the FreeBSD server to the Linux PC.
Started asterisk, registered the phone: all worked fine first go, and 
guess what?? No drop after 5s.

I guess the FreeBSD support is just not up to scratch.
I would consider the operating system under which you are trying to run 
part of the overall config.  On that note: which part of Asterisk - The 
Open Source LINUX PBX do you not understand?


Many people have responded to my complaint that there was a lot of 
information available and basically people should just read it. My point 
is: do not always assume people did not read available documentation. 
For the past 4 days I've read the almost entire wiki site ; I looked at 
almost all messages sent to this distribution list that was somehow 
related to my problem: no luck.
Problems running Asterisk on [non-Linux] are regularly documented.  I 
guess your search-foo isn't as strong as your bitch/moan-foo.



I also faced another problem today. Encouraged by the progress with the 
Linux server, I configured the TDM03B (3 FXO ports). Loaded the kernel 
module, no problem card was recognized. Started asterisk, tried to make 
a call:
snip
Open the PC again, move the card into the third and last PCI slot. 
Disabled the USB 2.0 host controller that was sharing the same IRQ (7).
Start asterisk, dial: It works!

So now which PCI slot your card is in makes a difference! Something very 
fishy here.

Was this documented? I didn't find anything like that whatsoever. I 
guess this could be added somewhere

This comes up on the list at LEAST once per month.  Please refer to 
search-foo vs bitch/moan-foo above.


Jean-Yves
- ---
Jean-Yves Avenard
Hydrix Pty Ltd - Embedding the net
   ^
Just not READING it obviously.
--
John
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Get back a failed transfered call

2004-06-29 Thread Isamar Maia

Hi Folks,

I have the following situation:

I received an inbound call in my extension A and transferred it to the
extension B. But B was busy and I want to capture the call back to my
extension. How should I proceed?

Thanks,

Isamar


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Outgoing CallerID on PRI problems

2004-06-29 Thread Andrew Kohlsmith
On Tuesday 29 June 2004 10:13, McInnis, JP wrote:
 The monitor shows that the CallerID is being set to the specified
 number, but yet when the call is received on the user end the ID is
 always the base number of our DID.  For example we have 8600-8650 as
 DID's but the callerid is always 8600 regardless of the extension that
 makes the outgoing call.

Your telco is restricting your outgoing caller ID.  I'd contact your sales 
rep, as this is something only the telco can fix.

-A.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Outgoing CallerID on PRI problems

2004-06-29 Thread Bruce Komito
Regardless of what you send in callerid, your PRI has a phone number
associated with it that you don't see, but is used for billing.  This is
so you cannot spoof the LD company into thinking the call came from
somewhere other than from you.  I believe the PRI provider can provision
the PRI to use either this hard-wired callerid , or the one you provide.
It sounds to me like your PRI is provisioned as the former.  I would talk
to your PRI provider and see if they agree and are willing to change this.

Bruce Komito
High Sierra Networks, Inc.
www.servers-r-us.com
(775) 236-5815


On Tue, 29 Jun 2004, McInnis, JP wrote:


 For outgoing calls made on our PRI circuit we are setting the Caller ID
 using the format

 Exten = _9XXX,1,SetCallerID(1601XXX)

 The monitor shows that the CallerID is being set to the specified
 number, but yet when the call is received on the user end the ID is
 always the base number of our DID.  For example we have 8600-8650 as
 DID's but the callerid is always 8600 regardless of the extension that
 makes the outgoing call.

 We have tried using the variable SetCallerID(${BYEXTENSION}) but still
 get the same results.

 Any suggestions?


 JP McInnis, Director of Technology
 Copiah Lincoln Community College
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Outgoing CallerID on PRI problems

2004-06-29 Thread Eric Wieling
Drop the leading 1

On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 09:13, McInnis, JP wrote:
 For outgoing calls made on our PRI circuit we are setting the Caller ID
 using the format
 
 Exten = _9XXX,1,SetCallerID(1601XXX)
 
 The monitor shows that the CallerID is being set to the specified
 number, but yet when the call is received on the user end the ID is
 always the base number of our DID.  For example we have 8600-8650 as
 DID's but the callerid is always 8600 regardless of the extension that
 makes the outgoing call.
 
 We have tried using the variable SetCallerID(${BYEXTENSION}) but still
 get the same results.
 
 Any suggestions?
  
 
 JP McInnis, Director of Technology
 Copiah Lincoln Community College
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
-- 
  Eric Wieling * BTEL Consulting * 504-899-1387 x2111
In a related story, the IRS has recently ruled that the cost of Windows
upgrades can NOT be deducted as a gambling loss.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Re: SIP Softphone

2004-06-29 Thread Stefan Tichy
Hi,

On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 11:00:43PM +0200, Arve Rasmussen wrote:
 What is the best SIP softphone to use with Asterisk?

Really don't know what is the best SIP softphone but I am
using linphone with alaw codec and dtmfmode rfc2833. Did not try
low bandwidth codecs until now. 

http://www.linphone.org/
http://simon.morlat.free.fr/download/0.12.2/source/linphone-0.12.2.tar.gz


-- 
Stefan Tichy   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Re: Do people actually answer questions here?

2004-06-29 Thread Randy Bush
 we point people to the wiki

problem is that wikiware search sucks caterpillar snot, and
this particular wiki is a bit light on content and heavy on
links.  one can spend massive time following links seemingly
relevant to a subject and never get to actual content about
it.  often google yields better results.

randy

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Outgoing CallerID on PRI problems

2004-06-29 Thread Robinson Tim-W10277
Some telcos require you only to send a certain number of digits.  Try
sending fewer and fewer digits and see if it starts working.  E.g.
instead of sending 1601abcdefg try sending 601abcdefg or abcdefg or defg
or even fg

If this doesn't work, from the CLI type pri debug span x and see what
you get in the SETUP message.

Other possiblities are in zapata.conf - you may need to set the correct
parameters for your type of PRI.  Best thing might be to ask your telco
how your line is configured.

Please report back with success/failure.  We all like to hear of
people's successes as well as problems!

Rgds
Tim


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of McInnis, JP
Sent: 29 June 2004 15:13
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Outgoing CallerID on PRI problems



For outgoing calls made on our PRI circuit we are setting the Caller ID
using the format

Exten = _9XXX,1,SetCallerID(1601XXX)

The monitor shows that the CallerID is being set to the specified
number, but yet when the call is received on the user end the ID is
always the base number of our DID.  For example we have 8600-8650 as
DID's but the callerid is always 8600 regardless of the extension that
makes the outgoing call.

We have tried using the variable SetCallerID(${BYEXTENSION}) but still
get the same results.

Any suggestions?
 

JP McInnis, Director of Technology
Copiah Lincoln Community College
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Playing the invalid extension input

2004-06-29 Thread Isamar Maia

I'm trying to do the following:

exten =  i,1,Saydigits(${EXTEN})

My intention is to play the invalid input to the user, but it doesn't
work.

Any suggestions?

Thanks,

Isamar


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Sip Debugging

2004-06-29 Thread Brent Franks
Hello,

When I enable SIP debugging I receive:

Peer RTP is at port 10.10.60.16:0

Shouldn't the RTP port be a number between 1 - 2?

- Brent

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Re: Do people actually answer questions here?

2004-06-29 Thread Steven Critchfield
DO NOT USE GROUP REPLY!!!
DO NOT USE GROUP REPLY!!!
DO NOT USE GROUP REPLY!!!
DO NOT USE GROUP REPLY!!!
DO NOT USE GROUP REPLY!!!
DO NOT USE GROUP REPLY!!!
DO NOT USE GROUP REPLY!!!

Got that...
DO NOT USE GROUP REPLY!!!

I will get a copy from the list server just fine without a personal copy
to me directly.

On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 09:39, Randy Bush wrote:
  we point people to the wiki
 
 problem is that wikiware search sucks caterpillar snot, and
 this particular wiki is a bit light on content and heavy on
 links.  one can spend massive time following links seemingly
 relevant to a subject and never get to actual content about
 it.  often google yields better results.

Booo whh, use better tools. Find out how to use Mozilla and tabbed
browsing. Tabbed browsing can be set up to make a new tab for any link
that goes to a different site. It can also be configured to create new
tabs for those annoying popups.

Plain and simple, this is a complex subject matter, it WILL take time to
learn. There may not be quick answers for you unless it is to hire
someone else to do it for you. This is a fact of life. Learning is not
always easy. Many of us have spent a LARGE sum of money on tools and
documentation, and then there is the amount of time.

If you knew how much time and how much money both of my personal
fincances and my employers was put into the knowledge I have currently,
you would start to understand why I am so annoyed that you don't seem to
want to spend the time it takes to learn.
-- 
Steven Critchfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Do people actually answer questions here?

2004-06-29 Thread Umar Sear
Hi Andrew, 

I sympathise with your opinion. However if someone was
to analyse the messaged in the list they would find
that the most basic of questions get most replies. I
mean those questions that would take a few minutes to
answer searching through the wiki or google. 

Where questions that are not so straighr forwared get
ignored. 

In my own experiance, every question that I have
posted (after hours if not days of searching) has gone
ignored.

I must add, at no stage though have I felt a reason to
complain, as even without answering any of my
questions, this list has given me a wealth of
knowledge. 

Thanks

Umar.


--- Andrew Kohlsmith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:  On Tuesday 29 June 2004 02:42, Ralf Van
Dooren
 wrote:
  But instead of complaining about the lack of
 -findable- documentation,
  one can try to enhance existing documentation. 
 That's the power of
  Open Source.  As I am not a coder, I'll be trying
 to help the
  community by making the documentation better,
 especially for 'new
  bees' like me.
 
 This is where I have a problem.
 
 The documentation is centered on voip-info.org and
 on Asterisk's plainly 
 marked Documentation link.  It's been 32000
 messages since I've signed up 
 but I am *positive* that BOTH links are provided on
 the autoresponder when 
 you sign up to this list.
 
 How crystal-effing-clear must things be for people
 to go and look for 
 themselves before complaining on this list?  Must we
 make the list moderated 
 and autorespond with pre-fab Google searches that
 the asker simply has to 
 click on and save themselves the trouble of writing
 the query into Google's 
 search window themselves?
 
 I'm serious here -- voip-info.org's search engine
 works.  Google works.  For 
 newbies yes they may have some trouble with the
 incantations but that's why 
 they should not be diving in headfirst and then
 bitterly complaining that 
 nothing works on the list.  READ, dig around
 voip-info and asterisk's site.  
 There's a WEALTH of knowlege there and most of it is
 not cryptic.  A lot of 
 it is even geared to newbies.
 
 Perhaps a glossary would be helpful but every day I
 start to think that basic 
 research skills should be a prerequisite before
 being allowed to play with 
 any OSS project.  It's frustrating for the newbie,
 frustrating for the 
 experts and all around a bad thing.  You'll never
 have enough documentation 
 to satisfy some people because they don't want to
 educate themselves; they 
 want to ask questions and get personalized answers. 
 We do that too, for a 
 price.  That's what consulting is all about.
 
 -A.
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   

http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  





___ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - 
so many all-new ways to express yourself http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Do people actually answer questions here?

2004-06-29 Thread Gregory Junker
Then it sounds like the Wiki is being mis/under-used. The great thing
about a Wiki is that if someone has an authoritative answer/solution to
a problem, they can just post it up. 

Personally, I have found the Wiki to have plenty of relevant content
within its bounds; more esoteric topircs or one-off issues probably
won't be found there easily, especially if someone doesn't think to post
up an article on their successes.

Greg

On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 07:39 -0700, Randy Bush wrote:
  we point people to the wiki
 
 problem is that wikiware search sucks caterpillar snot, and
 this particular wiki is a bit light on content and heavy on
 links.  one can spend massive time following links seemingly
 relevant to a subject and never get to actual content about
 it.  often google yields better results.
 
 randy
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Modems behind Asterisk - how?

2004-06-29 Thread Andrew Yager
Hi,
Looks like your message got lost in the thread.
On 29/06/2004, at 8:47 AM, John Vogel wrote:
1. Use 4 Sipuras (approx. $400). Only problem is, I can't get this to 
work! Sipura says use the G711 codec but it's not working for me. 
Anybody have this working?
I haven't got any Sipura's to test, but I tried and failed with 
Grandstream 286's. My general experience (and advice I have been given) 
is that transferring modem data across a network is a bad thing - any 
jumps in the call, and any lag at all will cause the whole thing to 
fail. It's generally OK for fax, but remember that fax works at a 
significantly lower speed to modem transfer.

2. Use 8 FXS ports (approx. $700). Haven't tried this yet but it is 
more expensive.

I have managed to get a single FXO to FXS working for a dialup modem, 
although I was only getting 24000bps. I am told (although I haven't had 
the opportunity to try yet) that when I connect to a digital ISDN line 
for the incoming calls, I will get better throughput (closer to 56k). 
That said, this is probably your best option.

Andrew


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


[Asterisk-Users] Re: Do people actually answer questions here?

2004-06-29 Thread Randy Bush
 DO NOT USE GROUP REPLY!!!

fat effing chance.  fix your mail system.  see a very large number
of threads.  but as you seem unable to look up archives:-), try
this in your .procmailrc

# prevent dupes
#
:0 Wh: msgid.lock
| formail -D 65536 msgid.cache

 Booo whh, use better tools. Find out how to use Mozilla and
 tabbed browsing.

been doing that for some years.  it can not make up for a bad
archive or weak search tools.

 Plain and simple, this is a complex subject matter, it WILL take
 time to learn. There may not be quick answers for you unless it
 is to hire someone else to do it for you. This is a fact of
 life. Learning is not always easy. Many of us have spent a LARGE
 sum of money on tools and documentation, and then there is the
 amount of time.

this is the cult of this is a very complex area.  you need to pay
us gurus to do it for you.  in my 40 years of computing i can not
count the fields where i have seen the guru-friendly products and
technologies go one of two ways, marginalization and failure or
takeover by the massive companies who then marginalize the
engineers.  i suggest you have another career path planned.

 If you knew how much time and how much money both of my personal
 fincances and my employers was put into the knowledge I have
 currently, you would start to understand why I am so annoyed that
 you don't seem to want to spend the time it takes to learn.

nice of you to turn my comment on the difficulty of the tools into
an attack on my knowledge.  particularly amusing if you knew more.

there are reasons there are so many repeated questions on this
list.  some of the reasons are weakness in the documentation.  we
can pretend this is not a problem and attack the questioners or
those who try to discuss the weaknesses, or we can discuss how we
might address them.  clearly you have made your choice.

randy

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Blank faxes with RxFAX

2004-06-29 Thread Chris Hirsch
Patrick J. Conroy wrote:
Hello All,
I have finally pulled CVS HEAD and built it with app_rxfax and app_txfax to
try to solve the problem that I was having with blank faxes.  Fortunately, I
am finally getting logs from rxfax.  Unfortunately, I am still not receiving
faxes correctly.  Here is the log that was produced.  If anyone has any
thoughts on what might going, I would greatly appreciate it.
 

I'm actually getting *some* blank faxes too...it seems that I can 
receive from an older crappy fax machine but not from a newer one like 
an HP all-in-one...how do you get debugging information so I can 
possibly help with this problem too?

--
Happiness Is Seeing Your Mother-in-law on a Milk Carton.
http://ccicolorado.org
Exceptional Dogs for Exceptional People - Help Out Today!
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] DLink mgcp phone and CVS HEAD

2004-06-29 Thread Alexei Chetroi
 Hi,

 I'm playing around with Asterisk and DPH-100M (Dlink mgcp phone) on my
debian box. I've got stable version of Asterisk (packaged for debian)
working with dlink phone and 7910 from cisco (minimalistic
extensions.conf and chan_skinny for 7910) Everything works fine.

 Now I'm trying to get CVS HEAD working with MGCP. I want to test
chan_sccp (http://sourceforge.net/projects/chan-sccp/) and this compiles
for head only. I've successfuly compiled CVS version and installed it.
Chan_sccp works as I see, but strange things happens to dlink phone.
When I pick-up the phone I hear nothing, but after some period I hear
fast busy (or how is it called). If I press hook for very short period
(flash), than I can hear tone, but unable to dial extensions.

 Anybody experienced this? May mgcp debug be posted on list? 

 Thanks in advance.

-- 
Alexei Chetroi
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk and dial-up modems

2004-06-29 Thread John Vogel
Title: Asterisk and dial-up modems








Anybody connecting to on-premise modems by dialing in to Asterisk and using an extension to reach the modem? How? Sipuras, FXO cards, other?




Re: [Asterisk-Users] Playing the invalid extension input

2004-06-29 Thread Eric Wieling
On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 09:53, Isamar Maia wrote:
 I'm trying to do the following:
 
 exten =  i,1,Saydigits(${EXTEN})
 
 My intention is to play the invalid input to the user, but it doesn't
 work.

At that pint ${EXTEN} is i.  Try using ${INVALID_EXTEN}

-- 
  Eric Wieling * BTEL Consulting * 504-899-1387 x2111
In a related story, the IRS has recently ruled that the cost of Windows
upgrades can NOT be deducted as a gambling loss.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Grandstream CFG file generator

2004-06-29 Thread Tomas Prybil
Stephen R. Besch wrote:
snip

This is the install package for the program. Running setup will 
install the program into Program Files\SachsLab\GSConfigure and put a 
shortcut in the start menu under Phones. The sources are installed 
to the application directory in a folder named Source.  If you have 
never installed a VB6 setup package, then wyou will very likely get 
the following message:

Setup cannot continue because some system files are out of date on 
your system. Click OK if you would like setup to update these files 
for you now. You will need to restart Windows before you can run setup 
again. Click cancel to exit setup without updating these system files.

You can safely click OK to update these files.  Also, during the 
install process, if any of the files already on your system are newer 
than those in the package (you will be notified), you should opt to 
keep the ones already on your system. If by chance you happen to 
already have Bruce McKinney's Windows type library on your machine, 
then you should install the one that comes with this package, since it 
includes some constant definitions that are not in the original. If, 
in the extremely unlikely event that you have your owm custiomized 
version of the type library, then you should contact me off list if 
you want to play with the sources.
However, the files doesn't gets updated or something else. The install 
process allways ends with that out of date message.

Looking at you SETUP.LST the following files are missing from my PC:
[Bootstrap Files]
[EMAIL PROTECTED],$(WinSysPathSysFile),,,7/15/00 12:00:00 
AM,101888,6.0.84.50
File2=OK
[EMAIL PROTECTED],$(WinSysPathSysFile),$(TLBRegister),,6/3/99 12:00:00 
AM,17920,2.40.4275.1
File4=OK
[EMAIL PROTECTED],$(WinSysPathSysFile),$(DLLSelfRegister),,3/8/99 
12:00:00 AM,164112,5.0.4275.1
[EMAIL PROTECTED],$(WinSysPathSysFile),$(DLLSelfRegister),,4/12/00 
12:00:00 AM,598288,2.40.4275.1
File7=OK

BR
/t
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Re: Do people actually answer questions here?

2004-06-29 Thread Steven Critchfield
On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 10:11, Randy Bush wrote:
  DO NOT USE GROUP REPLY!!!
 
 fat effing chance.  fix your mail system.  see a very large number
 of threads.  but as you seem unable to look up archives:-), try
 this in your .procmailrc
 
 # prevent dupes
 #
 :0 Wh: msgid.lock
 | formail -D 65536 msgid.cache

Maybe you need to think about the fact that when you do that, you toss
the second copy. The second copy is the one from the mailing list and
therefore the one with the mailing list headers that are sorted by. You
could just be considerate and do things The Right Way(tm)

  Plain and simple, this is a complex subject matter, it WILL take
  time to learn. There may not be quick answers for you unless it
  is to hire someone else to do it for you. This is a fact of
  life. Learning is not always easy. Many of us have spent a LARGE
  sum of money on tools and documentation, and then there is the
  amount of time.
 
 this is the cult of this is a very complex area.  you need to pay
 us gurus to do it for you.  in my 40 years of computing i can not
 count the fields where i have seen the guru-friendly products and
 technologies go one of two ways, marginalization and failure or
 takeover by the massive companies who then marginalize the
 engineers.  i suggest you have another career path planned.

This isn't my career path. The problem is either you will have to spend
your time and money learning or your will spend your money on someone
else to do it for you. I prefer you learn it yourself, but your
impatience proves you probably won't.

 there are reasons there are so many repeated questions on this
 list.  some of the reasons are weakness in the documentation.  we
 can pretend this is not a problem and attack the questioners or
 those who try to discuss the weaknesses, or we can discuss how we
 might address them.  clearly you have made your choice.

Repeat questions in the same day are due to people not spending _ANY_
time on their research. repeat questions in the same month is the same
problem.  
-- 
Steven Critchfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Hold Button on FireFly does not launch MusicOnHold on *?

2004-06-29 Thread shabanip
I'm using version 1.9.1 build 3908
- next problem is that the text messages won't reach by another firefly 
client

- Original Message - 
From: Steven Critchfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Randy Bush [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 7:31 PM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Do people actually answer questions here?


DO NOT USE GROUP REPLY!!!
DO NOT USE GROUP REPLY!!!
DO NOT USE GROUP REPLY!!!
DO NOT USE GROUP REPLY!!!
DO NOT USE GROUP REPLY!!!
DO NOT USE GROUP REPLY!!!
DO NOT USE GROUP REPLY!!!
Got that...
DO NOT USE GROUP REPLY!!!
I will get a copy from the list server just fine without a personal copy
to me directly.
On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 09:39, Randy Bush wrote:
 we point people to the wiki
problem is that wikiware search sucks caterpillar snot, and
this particular wiki is a bit light on content and heavy on
links.  one can spend massive time following links seemingly
relevant to a subject and never get to actual content about
it.  often google yields better results.
Booo whh, use better tools. Find out how to use Mozilla and tabbed
browsing. Tabbed browsing can be set up to make a new tab for any link
that goes to a different site. It can also be configured to create new
tabs for those annoying popups.
Plain and simple, this is a complex subject matter, it WILL take time to
learn. There may not be quick answers for you unless it is to hire
someone else to do it for you. This is a fact of life. Learning is not
always easy. Many of us have spent a LARGE sum of money on tools and
documentation, and then there is the amount of time.
If you knew how much time and how much money both of my personal
fincances and my employers was put into the knowledge I have currently,
you would start to understand why I am so annoyed that you don't seem to
want to spend the time it takes to learn.
--
Steven Critchfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Re: Do people actually answer questions here?

2004-06-29 Thread Randy Bush
 From: Steven Critchfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Randy Bush [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

ROFL!

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Playing the invalid extension input

2004-06-29 Thread Steven Critchfield
On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 09:53, Isamar Maia wrote:
 I'm trying to do the following:
 
 exten =  i,1,Saydigits(${EXTEN})
 
 My intention is to play the invalid input to the user, but it doesn't
 work.

Second time in 2 days, What extention are you at exten = i?

If you want to readback and invalid number you will have to first
capture the number with a patternmatch then do something like a macro to
then read it back.
-- 
Steven Critchfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Vonage and Asterisk integration

2004-06-29 Thread Jay Milk
I do.  I decided not to bother with Vonage's sub-par and unmotivated
customer service(*) and plugged my ATA186 into an FXO port.

(*) Examples: Had three lines on two ATAs.  Asked if I can moved one of
the lines off to a third (new) ATA -- they couldn't do it.  Asked if I
can move an existing number to a Softphone line.  Nope, couldn't do
it.  Can I make an existing number a virtual number?  Nope, can't do.
Apparently, they can utilize LNP to move numbers from you CLEC to
themselves, but they can't move numbers around inside Vonage.  Ba!  It
cost them two lines and about $45/month in services.

-Original Message-
From: Jerry Roy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 12:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Vonage and Asterisk integration


All,
 
I have been thru the archives and all the relevant URL's sent to me. I
have sent e-mail to those who have gone before me and are attempting to
accomplish the same goal - no one has it working?. Doesn't anyone have a
WORKING asterisk pbx that hooks into vonage?
 
Thanks,
 
Jerry Roy
562-305-9545

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] chan_sip.c max number of retries

2004-06-29 Thread Robb Meredeth



never mind, new server + upgrades on the phones 
sofware+ latest asterisk cvs = :)

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Robb 
  Meredeth 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: Friday, June 25, 2004 6:59 PM
  Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] chan_sip.c 
  max number of retries
  
  One thing I forgot to mention in the first 
  post. I also can call sip-sip on the old server but not on the new 
  server, however I can call from sip-zap on the new. When I dial from one 
  sip to the other I get no ringback on the calling set and the called phone 
  doesn't ring either. After a short time the calling set gives up and 
  goes to voicemail. I'm sure I'm doing something dumb or I've screwed up 
  a config I'm not thinking of right now. I've googled and deja searches, 
  but I'mstumped. I even reloaded theoson the new 
  machine and I get the exact same error. 
  
  Thanks again,
  Robb
  


Has anyone who's gotten this message managed to 
figure it out and fix it? I've been scouring the mailing list for 
clues but I'm still no closer. 

I have 2 asterisk servers, old and new. 
I'm trying to switch to the new server. I am using a 2.4 kernel 
on the new and a 2.6 on the old. I am running 0.9.0 on the old and my 
sip phones work fine, on the new Ihave tried 0.9.0, 0.9.1, and current CVS 
builds. I never see this error on th eold machine and always on the 
new machine. I have copied all my configs directly and they are 
plugged into the same switch as each other and the phones. the 
only difference (aside from hardware) is the kernels (I had to drop back to 
get zaptel to compile) and the new has an X100pfxo 
card. The only change I have made to the phones (zultys 
4x4's) is to change thetftp server and the SIP Proxy. If anyone 
can give me a direction to look in or any advice at all, I would appreciate 
it greatly.

Thanks!
Robb


RE: [Asterisk-Users] * Busy-Redial ??

2004-06-29 Thread Chris A. Icide
On 01:04 AM 6/29/2004, Florian Overkamp wrote:
Hi,
snip
 busy, so you hang up and dial *XX12125551212 and hangup again, then * would
 continue to retry calling the number until either it rings or a timeout is
 reached, if it rings * then calls back the exten that made the *XX call and
 bridges the two channels (maybe even with a distinctive ring). If 
anyone has
 any suggestions on how to accomplish this please let me know.

I have not implemented this, but it should be doable by creating a file in
the spool directory. You really just need to tinker around with contexts and
actions to do 'the right thing' (tm).

An AGI script to generate the spool file would probably do the trick.


Doing this using an analog Zap channel x100p, tdm400..  will be 
problematic, as Asterisk's ability to determine if the line has been 
answered on an analog zap channel is less than perfect.  You could easily 
implement a feature where you could preform redial on busy when using a 
channel that provides signalling to indicate the call progress, especially 
if you didn't mind having the calling channel staying connected.

.call files might be able to work, but I still can't think of a method to 
allow the call to progress until the far end begins to ring BEFORE inviting 
the originating channel from the first transaction.

And finally, what kind of call handling do you want if the far end answers 
before the originating end picks up?  Music on hold, special message, or 
just ringing?

While asterisk is quite flexible, and you can almost always find a way to 
do something, I suspect to make this work in a way that handles the whole 
process in an understandable and acceptable manner is going to be quite 
complex and probably a masterpiece of duct tape and bubblegum.

This is a feature that would probably best be designed as an Asterisk 
application, and yet even then, the analog channels will be problematic.

-Chris
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Playing the invalid extension input

2004-06-29 Thread Whisker, Peter
Maybe it is trying to say i as a digit?

You could have an [invalid] context with

[invalid]
exten = _.,1,Saydigits(${EXTEN})

and then include it at the very end of the [default] context (or wherever
you want to use it). That would then pick up anything that drops through. If
you do it any other way it will get sorted to the top and you will have
trouble!

Peter

-Original Message-
From: Isamar Maia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 June 2004 15:54
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Playing the invalid extension input



I'm trying to do the following:

exten =  i,1,Saydigits(${EXTEN})

My intention is to play the invalid input to the user, but it doesn't
work.

Any suggestions?

Thanks,

Isamar


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) 
only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject 
to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any 
other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this 
e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] MGCP and call waiting, doesn't work.

2004-06-29 Thread Duane Cox



Hey guys, can you shead some light on 
this?

I will copy my mgcp.conf and post below, but here 
is the problem.

I can't get call waiting to work with my MGCP 
device. I already have one call going, and I can hear the second call come 
in, I flash over to it, but all I get is a dial tone, * puts the 1st call on 
mute/hold, but I never get the second, and it terminates. I flash back 
over and pick up the first.. Here is some debug info


*CLI set verbose 10 -- 
Accepting call from '9003796075' to '9003790612' on channel 0/1, span 
1 -- Executing Dial("Zap/1-1", "MGCP/aaln/[EMAIL PROTECTED]|30|tr") 
in new stack -- MGCP mgcp_request(aaln/[EMAIL PROTECTED]) 
-- MGCP cw: -1, dnd: 0, so: 0, sno: 0 -- MGCP mgcp_new(MGCP/aaln/[EMAIL PROTECTED]) created 
in state: Down -- Called aaln/[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
-- MGCP/aaln/[EMAIL PROTECTED] is 
ringing -- Endpoint 'aaln/[EMAIL PROTECTED]' observed 
'hd' -- MGCP/aaln/[EMAIL PROTECTED] answered 
Zap/1-1 -- Accepting call from '2172026046' to 
'9003790612' on channel 0/2, span 1 -- Executing 
Dial("Zap/2-1", "MGCP/aaln/[EMAIL PROTECTED]|30|tr") 
in new stack -- MGCP mgcp_request(aaln/[EMAIL PROTECTED]) 
-- MGCP cw: -1, dnd: 0, so: 1, sno: 0 -- MGCP mgcp_new(MGCP/aaln/[EMAIL PROTECTED]) created 
in state: Down -- Called aaln/[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
-- MGCP/aaln/[EMAIL PROTECTED] is 
ringingJun 29 09:46:58 NOTICE[98310]: chan_mgcp.c:2268 handle_response: 
Terminating on result 400 from aaln/[EMAIL PROTECTED] == No 
one is available to answer at this time -- Endpoint 'aaln/[EMAIL PROTECTED]' observed 
'hf' -- Swapping 1 for 0 on aaln/[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
-- MGCP Muting 1 on aaln/[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
-- MGCP mgcp_new(MGCP/aaln/[EMAIL PROTECTED]) created 
in state: Down -- Endpoint 'aaln/[EMAIL PROTECTED]' observed 
'hf' -- Swapping 0 for 1 on aaln/[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
-- We didn't make one of the calls FLIPFLOP 0 and 1 on aaln/[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
-- MGCP Muting 0 on aaln/[EMAIL PROTECTED]Jun 29 09:47:08 
WARNING[278545]: pbx.c:1892 ast_pbx_run: Timeout, but no rule 't' in context 
'pstn-in' -- Hungup 'Zap/2-1' -- 
Endpoint 'aaln/[EMAIL PROTECTED]' 
observed 'hu' == Spawn extension (pstn-in, 9003790612, 1) exited 
non-zero on 'Zap/1-1' -- Hungup 'Zap/1-1'



Here is my MGCP.conf

[10.252.240.2]context=mainhost=10.252.240.2nat=nocallerid 
= "Kevin Osterbur" 
9003790610callwaiting=yesthreewaycalling=notransfer=nocancallforward=nocanreinvite=noline 
= aaln/1context=mainhost=10.252.240.2nat=nocallerid = "Duane 
Cox" 
9003790612callwaiting=yesthreewaycalling=notransfer=nocancallforward=nocanreinvite=noline 
= aaln/2


Any ideas?




RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk and dial-up modems

2004-06-29 Thread Todd Lieberman
Title: Asterisk and dial-up modems



Look 
at the ZapRAS 'show application ZapRAS' this only work w/a PRI. 
TL

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of John 
  VogelSent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 11:24 AMTo: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 
  and dial-up 
  modems
  Anybody connecting to on-premise modems by dialing 
  in to Asterisk and using an extension to reach the modem? How? Sipuras, FXO 
  cards, other?


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Vonage and Asterisk integration

2004-06-29 Thread Steve Kalcevich
Jay Milk wrote:
I do.  I decided not to bother with Vonage's sub-par and unmotivated
customer service(*) and plugged my ATA186 into an FXO port.
 

I never worked with vonage, is there tech support that bad?
--
Regards, 

Steve Kalcevich, 



This electronic message contains information from Primus Telecommunications
Canada Inc. (PRIMUS) , which may be legally privileged and confidential.
The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) or entity
named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any
disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information
is prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please
notify us by telephone or e-mail (to the number or address above)
immediately. Any views, opinions or advice expressed in this electronic
message are not necessarily the views, opinions or advice of PRIMUS.
It is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that
any attachments are virus free and PRIMUS bears no responsibility
for any loss or damage arising in any way from the use
thereof.The term PRIMUS includes its affiliates.

Pour la version en français de ce message, veuillez voir
http://www.primustel.ca/fr/legal/cs.htm

begin:vcard
fn:Steven  Kalcevich, CCNA, CCDA
n:Kalcevich;Steven 
org:Primus Canada;Commercial Sales
adr:Suite 400;;5343 Dundas St W;Toronto;ON;M9B 6K5;Canada
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Account Executive
tel;work:416-207-4613
tel;fax:1-800-861-3035
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://www.primustel.ca/
version:2.1
end:vcard



[Asterisk-Users] channel.c:1508 ast_set_read_format: Unable to find a path from ULAW to UNKN

2004-06-29 Thread Matt Davies | MattDavies.Net
Hello all-

This is probably easy, but I am trying to figure out why I cannot use app
record. In fact, the problem seems to extend to when using a sip soft phone
also. I always get this error, and haven't been able to find much about it.

I have a number coming in from nufone. I have tryied setting the codec and
also leaving it out. See config below:

; answer the line
exten = number,1,SetVar(SIP_CODEC=ulaw)
exten = number,2,Wait(2)
exten = number,3,Answer
exten = number,4,ResponseTimeout(15)
exten = number,5,Background(pls-wait-connect-call)

I then have a recording section:
exten = 205,1,Wait(2)
exten = 205,2,Playback(all-your-base)
;exten =
205,2,Playback(/usr/local/asterisk/var/lib/asterisk/sounds/hello-recording)
exten =
205,3,Record(/usr/local/asterisk/var/lib/asterisk/sounds/hello-recording:gsm
,2)
exten = 205,4,Wait(1)
exten =
205,5,Playback(/usr/local/asterisk/var/lib/asterisk/sounds/hello-recording)
exten = 205,6,Wait(1)
exten = 205,7,Hangup

I always get the following error:
channel.c:1508 ast_set_read_format: Unable to find a path from ULAW to UNKN

In iax.conf I have
disallow=all
allow=ulaw



I have tried replacing all references to ulaw with gsm. Same results.


I have used cvs head and also 0.9.0.

Ideas?

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Vonage and Asterisk integration

2004-06-29 Thread Doug Harris
Vonage does not allow any other device other than their own to be hooked up
to their system, period. There are whole bunch of service providers who
allow you to hook-up your own device. So why split hairs, use someone else
other than Vonage. Their is nothing extraordinary about Vonage, except they
have some advertising dollars.

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jay Milk
 Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 8:54 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Vonage and Asterisk integration


 I do.  I decided not to bother with Vonage's sub-par and unmotivated
 customer service(*) and plugged my ATA186 into an FXO port.

 (*) Examples: Had three lines on two ATAs.  Asked if I can moved one of
 the lines off to a third (new) ATA -- they couldn't do it.  Asked if I
 can move an existing number to a Softphone line.  Nope, couldn't do
 it.  Can I make an existing number a virtual number?  Nope, can't do.
 Apparently, they can utilize LNP to move numbers from you CLEC to
 themselves, but they can't move numbers around inside Vonage.  Ba!  It
 cost them two lines and about $45/month in services.

 -Original Message-
 From: Jerry Roy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 12:51 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Vonage and Asterisk integration


 All,

 I have been thru the archives and all the relevant URL's sent to me. I
 have sent e-mail to those who have gone before me and are attempting to
 accomplish the same goal - no one has it working?. Doesn't anyone have a
 WORKING asterisk pbx that hooks into vonage?

 Thanks,

 Jerry Roy
 562-305-9545




___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] nat problem

2004-06-29 Thread Webn1
hello,

i have trouble with nat + sip outgoing call.when make an outgoing call to a
sip gateway, i have no sound.

i have 2 sip gateway, one is asterisk.

asterisk is on public ip and private ip
other sip gateway is on public ip
phone are cisco and grandstream on private ip on the same subnet as
asterisk.
phone are connected by sip to asterisk (i have try with or without nat=yes)

incoming call from sip gateway to asterisk : no problem
outgoing call from asterisk to sip gateway : no sound

no sip error
if i put a phone on public ip, incoming and outgoing call work fine

i haven't make any port translation since phone and asterisk are on the same
private subnet.
phone register on the private ip of asterisk

i have zaphfc connected to isdn and incoming and outgoing call work fine
(with phone on public or private ip)

any idea what's wrong or try to fix this problem ?

thanks for help




___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Modifyed Prepaid Aplication!

2004-06-29 Thread Hekuran Doli
Hello
I have succesfully installed app_prepaidCID and populated the database. I
can send calls, but the only problem is that after call finish it does not
update the billing ballance on card. can any one help me about this?

Best Regards
Hekuran Doli


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Blank faxes with RxFAX

2004-06-29 Thread Patrick J. Conroy
I wasn't able to get debugging information the first time around either.
After pulling the latest asterisk from CVS, I was able to build and see
debugging information when I started asterisk to test using
asterisk -vvgc.  But I noticed today that I do not get the same
debugging information when I started asterisk using safe_asterisk.  So, I
don't know that rebuilding asterisk did any good.  If you started asterik
using safe_asterisk, I would shut it down, restart using
asterisk -vvgc from a shell prompt and it may give you debugging
information from the CLI.

Hope that helps.

Patrick

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Chris Hirsch
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 11:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Blank faxes with RxFAX


Patrick J. Conroy wrote:

Hello All,

I have finally pulled CVS HEAD and built it with app_rxfax and app_txfax to
try to solve the problem that I was having with blank faxes.  Fortunately,
I
am finally getting logs from rxfax.  Unfortunately, I am still not
receiving
faxes correctly.  Here is the log that was produced.  If anyone has any
thoughts on what might going, I would greatly appreciate it.



I'm actually getting *some* blank faxes too...it seems that I can
receive from an older crappy fax machine but not from a newer one like
an HP all-in-one...how do you get debugging information so I can
possibly help with this problem too?

--
Happiness Is Seeing Your Mother-in-law on a Milk Carton.


http://ccicolorado.org
Exceptional Dogs for Exceptional People - Help Out Today!


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content, and is believed to be clean.


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content, and is believed to be clean.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Complaining Emails

2004-06-29 Thread Andrew Yager
Hi Everyone,
I'm one of those newbie users that really doesn't know what is going 
on. And in stark contrast to the posts you may read, I do actually 
think that when you post on this list, you get a reply. In fact, I know 
you do. I have had a quite nice run setting up asterisk, when I've had 
problems I've looked at the Wiki or Google, and then when I can't find 
an answer, then I'll post - and everyone has been very helpful in 
getting my system running.

Of course - I've made my fair share of mistakes. Not all lists work 
quite the same way... and at time's I've been a bit over eager, and 
over zealous. And I'm sure I've had my posts simply marked as read or 
deleted by many people - some without opening.

But I have a strategy for dealing with the people who see fit to 
complain:

Don't reply.
It's that simple. If some people want to insult the intelligence or 
care of the people on this list, there is little we can do about it - 
except ignore them.

Then, when they complain about people not replying, we can simply say 
to ourselves - it's there own fault. And it benefits those of us who do 
use the list regularly, because there is fewer messages to sift 
through.

The other issue that was mentioned was that of people not bothering to 
do their research before hand. In reality - the mailing list does exist 
to allow people to provide personalized answers to other people's 
questions. And a lot of these will be duplicate. I don't know - but I 
think the best strategy is to answer the question, and then point 
people to the Wiki as the place to look.

I don't want the Steve's, Kevin's or Eric's to leave this list. (Those 
are plural apostrophes btw). We all appreciate their help - hey - I 
appreciate their help. Maybe one day, I'll be fortunate enough to know 
as much as they do about this software, and be able to provide the same 
level of help to other people. Let's not spoil what we have.

Just my 2 cents...
Andrew
_
Andrew Yager
Real World Technology Solutions
Real People, Real SolUtions (tm)
ph: (02) 9945 2567 fax: (02) 9945 2566
mob: 0405 15 2568
http://www.rwts.com.au/
_
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Playing the invalid extension input

2004-06-29 Thread Olle E. Johansson
Eric Wieling wrote:
On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 09:53, Isamar Maia wrote:
I'm trying to do the following:
exten =  i,1,Saydigits(${EXTEN})
My intention is to play the invalid input to the user, but it doesn't
work.

At that pint ${EXTEN} is i.  Try using ${INVALID_EXTEN}
Eric,
Thank you, I've added that variable to the Wiki.
/O
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Hold Button on FireFly does not launch MusicOnHold on *?

2004-06-29 Thread Nik Martin
You replied to a message with the subject of:
Re: Do people actually answer questions here?
And then changed the subject and started typing.  This has wreaked havoc on
everybody's threaded readers, and made your question impossible to reply to.
You need to start a new message in your mail app and start from scratch.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of shabanip
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 10:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Hold Button on FireFly does not launch MusicOnHold
on *?


I'm using version 1.9.1 build 3908
- next problem is that the text messages won't reach by another firefly
client

- Original Message -
From: Steven Critchfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Randy Bush [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 7:31 PM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Do people actually answer questions here?


 DO NOT USE GROUP REPLY!!!
 DO NOT USE GROUP REPLY!!!
 DO NOT USE GROUP REPLY!!!
 DO NOT USE GROUP REPLY!!!
 DO NOT USE GROUP REPLY!!!
 DO NOT USE GROUP REPLY!!!
 DO NOT USE GROUP REPLY!!!

 Got that...
 DO NOT USE GROUP REPLY!!!

 I will get a copy from the list server just fine without a personal
 copy to me directly.

 On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 09:39, Randy Bush wrote:
  we point people to the wiki

 problem is that wikiware search sucks caterpillar snot, and this
 particular wiki is a bit light on content and heavy on links.  one
 can spend massive time following links seemingly relevant to a
 subject and never get to actual content about it.  often google
 yields better results.

 Booo whh, use better tools. Find out how to use Mozilla and tabbed
 browsing. Tabbed browsing can be set up to make a new tab for any link
 that goes to a different site. It can also be configured to create new
 tabs for those annoying popups.

 Plain and simple, this is a complex subject matter, it WILL take time
 to learn. There may not be quick answers for you unless it is to hire
 someone else to do it for you. This is a fact of life. Learning is not
 always easy. Many of us have spent a LARGE sum of money on tools and
 documentation, and then there is the amount of time.

 If you knew how much time and how much money both of my personal
 fincances and my employers was put into the knowledge I have
 currently, you would start to understand why I am so annoyed that you
 don't seem to want to spend the time it takes to learn.
 --
 Steven Critchfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users





___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Do people actually answer questions here?

2004-06-29 Thread Bob Knight
Leif Madsen wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 11:08:43 +1000, Jean-Yves Avenard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have to admit I'm rather disappointed with Asterisk, information is
probably available but very hard to find ; it seems to be limited to a
few privileged people for whom their job is setting up VoIP system

Based on your statement, I would presume that you have never even
attempted to search for documentation.  I can think of at least 3
excellent resources:
http://www.voip-info.org
http://www.fnords.org/~eric/asterisk/
http://www.asteriskdocs.org
Plus using
site:lists.digium.com and site:voip-info.org in Google is an excellent resource.
Don't forget the most important link of all at the bottom of every 
email.  The unsubscribe link!

--
Bob Knight
[-w] the work option
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
925-449-9163
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Dead Budgetone-101?

2004-06-29 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Sun, 27 Jun 2004, Max Lock wrote:

 
  Hi Folks,
 
  Since there isn't a grandstream forum AFAIK I guess someone here may be able to 
 shed some light on this. Apologies if this is viewed as offtopic..
 
  I think I may have killed the firmware on my Grandstream Budgetone 101. I found a 
 source for the 1.0.5.30 firmware and made the files available over tftp. The phone 
 downloaded the files but now doesn't boot and hangs with a blank screen, although 
 the keypad lights blink occasionally.
 
  After that I tried to go back to the 1.0.4.55 firmware I was running previously, 
 but the tftp transfer no longer seems to work, the phone sends a tftp request, but 
 doesn't seem to get the files?!
 
  Has anyone else seen this? is there a way to access the phone via the internal PCB 
 edge connector?
 
  -Cheers Max

Call GrandStream technical support. They can help you UnBrick your phone, 
provided the Ethernet port still works.

-- 
Vice President of N2Net, a New Age Consulting Service, Inc. Company
 http://www.n2net.net Where everything clicks into place!
 KP-216-121-ST



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Customized Call Parking

2004-06-29 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On 29 Jun 2004, Adnan Shah wrote:

 Hi !
 
 I need a solution to park incoming calls
 to an extension of my choice where a special
 announcement is played, park subsequent calls
 to specific pools so that they listen to announcements
 of my choice.
 
 any ideas ?

Put up a bounty on it of a reasonable amount, and I'm sure that someone 
could code up an app to do it.

-- 
Vice President of N2Net, a New Age Consulting Service, Inc. Company
 http://www.n2net.net Where everything clicks into place!
 KP-216-121-ST



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] T100P-E100P circuit board differences

2004-06-29 Thread Scott Stingel
Hi-
 
Perhaps someone with an E100P in hand can answer this:

 
I just received an E100P from Digium (I normally buy quad boards)

I noticed that the circuit board says T100P on it, and I assume that the
T100P and E100P both use the same circuit board.

Can someone please confirm that their E100P says T100P on the artwork?

Thanks
Scott
 
 

Scott M. Stingel 
Emerging Voice Technology Inc.
Palo Alto, California and London, England

Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
URL:www.evtmedia.com   


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] ldap-lookup

2004-06-29 Thread Andreas Bayer
hi, 

is there a ldap-lookup for asterisk ??

i am seraching for asterisk app which i can give a name and a phone-type (sip, 
iax, cellphone, work, home.) and get phonenumber back. And where i can 
give a number and get the name.

Is there anything like that?

bye
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Getting Asterisk to automatically dialout

2004-06-29 Thread Andrew Elchuk
Hi,
I'm trying to get asterisk to auto-dail out.  I created a *.call file 
with the the top of it being Channel: Zap/1/2609944, which should have 
connected to Zap channel 1 and dial out to 2609944, but It did not do 
so, asterisk would say a call was completed to Zap/1/2609944 but I never 
heard that phone ring.  So I tried just putting Channel: Zap/1 at the 
top of the call file so it would connect to Zap channel 1, then in the 
*.call file connect it to an outgoing context in extensions.conf which 
looked like:
[outgoing]

exten = s,1,Wait(1)
exten = s,2,Dial(Zap/1/2609944)
exten = s,3,Wait(2)
exten = s,4,Playback(soundfile)
exten = s,5,Hangup
But when it ran this, asterisk told me it was unable to create a channel 
of type Zap, but then that a call was still completed to Zap/1.  I've 
read everything about auto-dialout on voip-info.org and read digium faqs 
and everything and have been unable to find a solution.  If someone out 
there has had a similar problem and figured it out or knows what might 
be wrong with what I'm trying to do it would be greatly appreciated if 
you could help me out.  Thanks.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] linux kernel 2.6.6

2004-06-29 Thread Robert Withrow
On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 05:10, Kevin Walsh wrote:
 I'm using 2.6.7-gentoo-r6 and it works very well.
 I assume you're using the latest Zaptel and Asterisk from CVS.

Do you have CVS ebuilds?  That would make it a lot easier for us Gentoo
folks.

Thanks!

-- 
Robert Withrow, [EMAIL PROTECTED], +1 978 288 8256, ESN 248

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Ruggedised IP Phone

2004-06-29 Thread James H. Thompson

- Original Message - 
From: Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 12:42 AM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Ruggedised IP Phone


 Hi all,

 I want to use my * box to control entry to a building.  I was wondering who else has 
 done this and
what phones they might recommend.

 The phone itself needs to be externally mounted so will have to be durable.
 Functionally I would like it to just dial and extension when picked up.

See:
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+phone+door

Please add any new info you find.


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Vonage and Asterisk integration

2004-06-29 Thread Jay Milk
Like I said, they just seem to be lazy and/or badly organized.  If they
can do LNP, why can't they change a hardline into a softphone, break
one number out onto a different ATA, etc?  I basically laid it out for
them, saying If you can't move my 2nd line from this ATA to a new ATA,
then I'll need to cancel that line... I no longer have that line.  Not
being able to something this simple cost them over $500/year from me...
I wonder how many other Vonage users will drop them because of such
things.

 -Original Message-
 From: Steve Kalcevich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 11:01 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Vonage and Asterisk integration
 
 
 Jay Milk wrote:
 
 I do.  I decided not to bother with Vonage's sub-par and unmotivated 
 customer service(*) and plugged my ATA186 into an FXO port.
 
 I never worked with vonage, is there tech support that bad?
 
 -- 
 Regards, 
 
 
 Steve Kalcevich, 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom IP600 stops to send/receive calls

2004-06-29 Thread Tor Roberts
Jorge,
That sounds strange to me. I have 12 IP 600s running without any of the 
problems that you are having. My first guess would be that they are 
configured wrong. Is the phone registering with asterisk? Is the phone 
dowloading it's config files from the FTP server? If you want to post 
your phone1.cfg  and sip.conf, I can try to see if there is anything 
wrong with it.

-Tor
Jorge Mendoza wrote:
Hi,
I'm testing a Polycom IP600.
With firmware version 1.1 the phone reboots at any time.
With firmware version 1.2, the first reboot was an endless reboot. 
Then I moved the phone to another lan port, then it worked fine. Then 
I installed again in the initial lan port and the phone works well. 
However after some time of inactivity (1 hour?), the IP600 stops to 
send and receive calls. After a reboot is works fine again.
We have a * box with many BT101 and softphones working for months 
without any problem.
I'm missing something? it is a bad config file? or it is a phone bug?

Thank You for your time.
Jorge Mendoza
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Play Music on hold until a ZAP channel frees up.

2004-06-29 Thread Daniel Jimenez
[answeringsvc]
exten = 0,1,Wait,1
exten = 0,2,Dial(ZAP/g1/7135551212,${RING_TIMEOUT},r)
exten = 0,3,Dial(ZAP/g1/7135551212,${RING_TIMEOUT},mr)
exten = 0,103,Goto(0,3)
exten = 0,104,Goto(0,3)
This should call 713-555-1212. If there are no ZAP lines available it 
should kick back around and play music on hold until a zap line is 
available, correct? I'd like the music-on-hold to be continuous until 
the Zap line answers.

TIA,
--
Daniel Jimenez djimenez[at]pobox[dot]com
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Vonage and Asterisk integration

2004-06-29 Thread Eric Wieling
On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 11:06, Doug Harris wrote:
 Vonage does not allow any other device other than their own to be hooked up
 to their system, period. There are whole bunch of service providers who
 allow you to hook-up your own device. So why split hairs, use someone else
 other than Vonage. Their is nothing extraordinary about Vonage, except they
 have some advertising dollars.

And unlimited calling plans (not something most people will care about
if they do the math), and one of the best coverage areas when it comes
to DIDs.  Packet8 is similar to Vonage in the good and the bad ways.
-- 
  Eric Wieling * BTEL Consulting * 504-899-1387 x2111
In a related story, the IRS has recently ruled that the cost of Windows
upgrades can NOT be deducted as a gambling loss.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Getting Asterisk to automatically dialout

2004-06-29 Thread Greg Hill
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004, Andrew Elchuk wrote:

 I'm trying to get asterisk to auto-dail out.  I created a *.call file

did you create the file in /var/spool/asterisk/outgoing/, or did you
create it elsewhere and then move it to that directory? The docs mention
that if the file is created in the outgoing directory, * may read the file
before you've finished writing it. But if you create the file elsewhere
and then move it, the entire contents are guaranteed to be in the
filesystem when * finds it. This might explain the difficulty you're
having..

Greg


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Customized Call Parking

2004-06-29 Thread Mike Benoit
This sounds like it should be relatively simple to do in theory.

Couldn't you just create specific extensions that set the MusicOnHold
context (to play your different announcements) then transfers the call
to the parkext in parking.conf?  

However, what do you want to happen when the announcement is finished?
If you park the call there is no way to know when the announcement is
finished so you can return to the call later (if thats what you want to
do).

Perhaps just creating a sort of menu you transfer the calls to, that
plays the announcement of your choice, then when its done, it could
automatically transfer the call back to the originating extension, or
park the call, or put it on hold, or hang up, etc...

I think what your looking for is definitely possible without writing a
custom application for it.

On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 15:06 +0600, Adnan Shah wrote:
 Hi !
 
 I need a solution to park incoming calls
 to an extension of my choice where a special
 announcement is played, park subsequent calls
 to specific pools so that they listen to announcements
 of my choice.
 
 any ideas ?
 
 Shah. 
 
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
-- 
Mike Benoit [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] nat problem

2004-06-29 Thread administrator tootai
Webn1 a écrit :
hello,
i have trouble with nat + sip outgoing call.when make an outgoing call to a
sip gateway, i have no sound.
i have 2 sip gateway, one is asterisk.
asterisk is on public ip and private ip
other sip gateway is on public ip
phone are cisco and grandstream on private ip on the same subnet as
asterisk.
phone are connected by sip to asterisk (i have try with or without nat=yes)
incoming call from sip gateway to asterisk : no problem
outgoing call from asterisk to sip gateway : no sound
no sip error
if i put a phone on public ip, incoming and outgoing call work fine
i haven't make any port translation since phone and asterisk are on the same
private subnet.
phone register on the private ip of asterisk
i have zaphfc connected to isdn and incoming and outgoing call work fine
(with phone on public or private ip)
any idea what's wrong or try to fix this problem ?
 

codec?
thanks for help
 

--
Daniel
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


  1   2   >