Voyager 510, it sounds better than the mic inside the phone.
My opinion is the converse: receive audio is nice too.
Recommended.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RFC
with others, and then sell it to her boss and let *him* sell it to her.
Asterisk will do a *much* better job of recording than anything on the
analog side, I would expect.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer
with their PoE, let me say that every piece of NetGear
kit I have ever touched is still working, solid as a rock, including the 5
port hub in my bag. :-)
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think
(that makes handling text messages within the
framework of the more complicated protocol attractive) is *addressibility*.
If you already have a path to someone, why should you be forced to *discover*
another path to them for some other, simpler protocol?
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth
of that, is this? Can 5 digit number, say, 12345,
be the beginning part of a 10 digit number, say, 1234567890?
And the answer is: do not confuse E.164 addresses with dialling patterns,
grasshopper.
Cheers,
-- jr '1-888-MITSU2008' a
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink
duplicating it
exactly on something with as small a brain as an ATA.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth Associates http://baylink.pitas.com
mechanical royalties.
How those are handled if you record your own arrangement of Hey Jude once and
loop it on music on hold, I'm not clear on.
No, IANAL.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I
? And if not, of course, is Jack something that
connects JACK to Asterisk?
And why should I know all of this already? :-)
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 09:04:57AM -0500, Russell Bryant wrote:
Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
A bit of nomenclature: is Jack the name of an Asterisk application? Or
are you referring to JACK, the Jack Audio Connection Kit, whose name is
all-caps, directly? And if not, of course, is Jack
:-)
Then, as I suspected, I'm failing.
I need to confirm that it's actually provisioned with the carrier, and
which switchtype I'm really on.
Can *you* confirm, off hand, that 1.2 would do TBCT at *all*? Someone on
IRC thinks it wouldn't.
-- j
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink
with asterisk 1.2?
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth Associates http://baylink.pitas.com '87 e24
St Petersburg FL USA
talking be the solution?
And how, again, can I tell what's actually at the other end of the span?
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth Associates
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 12:41:12PM -0400, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
Will I actually need to do PRI debug on that span to tell?
I did a pri debug to a file, I can see the call go, I see no indication
that it actually tried to generate a TBCT/RLT request.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth
the other side.
It was only from reading the other folo to your query that I found out
that *any carrier* *ever* gets CNAM to send it to an FXS by any means
*other* than a database dip, myself.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED
is
pretty easy. Getting the actual status of zap-daddy hardware might be a
little trickier. When I get something together I can pass it along.
$ head -1q /proc/zaptel/*
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer
supervision. So, without active
assistance from the carrier delivering the calls -- who presumably is
doing the billing themselves, if I read you correctly -- no, you cannot
accomplish this.
If you're doing the billing yourself, how to do it should be obvious.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth
that whatever you're using to render his HTML email
into text is doing it -- for me, it's lynx under Mutt.
He probably just needs to find the send HTML email knob and turn it
off.
*Break* it off, by preference, but what can you do.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink
thing. You can't do that on PRI.
Strictly speaking, I don't think that's actually true. I believe some
carriers can put multiple trunk groups on the same PRI.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer
that this implies that if my switch is provisioned
for NI2, and my Asterisk is set to DMS, that things aren't going to work
well at all? :-) (Outbound calls, FWIW, seem to work fine like that...)
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED
.
Sure they are: the only MLM that *sends* them is Mailman, and it uses the
same body copy always.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth Associates
is
7.1.6, and that's blocked by newer versions of FireFox due to a bug.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth Associates http://baylink.pitas.com
issue merely that you're trying to get Asterisk to
pass the CWCID through to a phone that already knows how to do it? Not
that you're trying to get Asterisk itself to deal with it?
If so, how does it behave now?
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 08:36:35PM -0400, SIP wrote:
Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 05:10:35PM -0400, Asterisk wrote:
The shared desktop is available using a Java enabled browser at
???http://callin.xelatec.com/vnc??? with a password of ???aretta???.
Of course you
-7bit-ASCII unless you really
have no other choice?
That's how Mutt rendered your message here.
I *think* those ???'s represent smart-quotes, but I really can't tell...
and I'm probably not alone.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED
line?
(Oh yeah: can I backport it to 1.2? :-)
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth Associates http://baylink.pitas.com '87
the customer fills out* that says they're
authorizing you to call, and you have to be able to produce
ink-on-paper if the FTC ever calls you on it.
IANAL. YMMV.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I
that. shudder
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth Associates http://baylink.pitas.com '87 e24
St Petersburg FL USA
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 09:44:50AM -0600, Anthony Francis wrote:
Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 02:15:58AM -0400, Alex Balashov wrote:
I would be curious to know where, in this classification, fall various
telemarketing schemes that are technically not cold-calls
desirable for the user.
Thank ghod. :-)
-- j
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth Associates http://baylink.pitas.com '87 e24
St Petersburg FL
.
I'm in the market for a better station: I don't need the dial, or the
handset, or even the ringer (a neon bulb would be fine), but I *do*
want something more rugged than those Panasonic's. I'm not sure why no
one seems to build a ruggedized agent phone.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth
.
Their CNID was bogus, too.
Gives us legitimate telemarketers a bad damn name. :-)
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth Associates http
an Asterisk instance
*requesting* TBCT from an FXS wrt 2 timeslots on its PRIs?
By version, if you know; I'm still on 1.2.2{47}
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think
, which was:
What is the current state of affairs WRT an Asterisk instance
*requesting* TBCT from an FXS wrt 2 timeslots on its PRIs?
By version, if you know; I'm still on 1.2.2{47}
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED
exempt us.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth Associates http://baylink.pitas.com '87 e24
St Petersburg FL USA http
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 07:35:03AM -0500, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
I'll assume you've watched it on a PRI, so I'll defer, but I wouldn't
expect that myself; I would expect that when you tell the switch to
transfer it, you go immediately from one B channel to 0.
You
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 09:35:10PM -0400, Ron Joffe wrote:
On Saturday 16 August 2008 14:37, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
TBCT is a feature of LEC/IXC edge switches; there isn't much use for it
in any other context. I don't care if you're using Asterisk to be an
edge switch, but it's a *carrier
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 11:58:48PM -0500, Tilghman Lesher wrote:
On Friday 15 August 2008 22:31:18 Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 07:08:33PM +0200, Philipp Kempgen wrote:
True. But lines of varying length with a black background in a
white terminal window don't make it any
other context. I don't care if you're using Asterisk to be an
edge switch, but it's a *carrier* feature, by and large.
Certainly in the specific instance I'm discussing, it is.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer
lighting conditions, you simply can't
read it at all.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth Associates http://baylink.pitas.com
components evenly distributed over all the valid NPA/NXXs in the NANPA,
or
b) that the assigned NPA/NXXs in the NANPA are themselves evenly
distributed over all the valid NPA/NXXs.
Could you clarify the background that brings you to that assumption?
Do you have empirical data?
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R
desksets have
substantially the best audio I have ever come across.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth Associates http://baylink.pitas.com
are Zap/PRI.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth Associates http://baylink.pitas.com '87 e24
St Petersburg FL USA http
at that stage; just
once the call's transferred to me.
But before I inquire of said second party whether they *can* do that, I
wanted to confirm it was possible.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth Associates http://baylink.pitas.com '87 e24
St Petersburg FL USA http://photo.imageinc.us
my original message was pretty clear on. :-)
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth Associates http://baylink.pitas.com '87
what I do, anyway...
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth Associates http://baylink.pitas.com '87 e24
St Petersburg FL USA
of 132 megabytes per second (33 MHz bus with 32-bit
transfers). No quad-T1/E1 card will ever be able to saturate a PCI bus,
especially not PCI-X or PCI-E.
Though, depending on the design of the card and drivers, interrupts/sec
may be an issue -- sometimes a deciding issue.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R
it, in lieu of a formal API for
modifying those tables, you created one of your own, and used it for
all your higher level code -- so that when they rev the tables in a
version upgrade, you only have to track it in one place...
hers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 11:54:23PM -0400, Steve Totaro wrote:
NIC card is redundant ;-)
And you can take that to the ATM machine.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 11:01:46PM -0500, Darrick Hartman wrote:
You can get an adapter for the Plantronics that will plug into the 2.5mm
jack on the phone.
I need the opposite adapter: to plug a 2.5 headset into an RJ-9
Polycom.
Anyone know where I can find that?
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R
can it be a card if it's
on the mobo.
Cheers,
-- jr 'the Joke Explainer' a
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth Associates http://baylink.pitas.com
to your question is... though
probably not for this exact reason. :-)
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth Associates http
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 11:10:10PM -0500, Darrick Hartman wrote:
Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 11:01:46PM -0500, Darrick Hartman wrote:
You can get an adapter for the Plantronics that will plug into the 2.5mm
jack on the phone.
I need the opposite adapter: to plug
? Are you billing the user (e.g. 1 second or the minimum fee) if
the call is ANSWERED even if Asterisk reports 0 seconds?
Seems to me that's a policy issue; ie: why are you asking *us*? :-)
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer
release
you're running, and my intuition says if you have to ask, you're not
the guy to set it up; pay someone.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth
On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 04:12:26PM -0700, bilal ghayyad wrote:
CRM: Customer Record Module which is any kind of application.
Well, no; CRM means Customer Relationship Management...
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer
in the slave channel, not in the master
Question 1:
And the award for Best Illustration of a Point goes to...
Tilghman Lesher!
Mr Lesher has been nominated for this award 4 times; this is his first
win.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL
hell getting carriers to do
physically diverse entry into your building, especially if it's
not really large.
And if you *don't* get it, then the rest of your investment in HA is
pretty much for naught.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED
that Sprint went through the 7 layers
of hell necessary to port QChat to EV-DO and make it interoperate with
the old iDen Direct Connect system, in observance of Metcalfe's Law.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer
Connect
service from the custom iDen backbone originally built for it... to
Qualcomm's QChat, which is, effectively, a voice-capable Instant
Messaging and Presence client that runs over their EVDO backbone.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL
fronters per box, and
one closer box with 77 seats on it; 4 channelbanks but no T-spans.
Our DBMS is a separate Quad-Opteron with 16GB and we have a smattering
of other boxes in the datacenter; our current server count is 41.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink
trying to take the E1 that they've *converted into 100BT* for
you and plug it into an E1 port?
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth Associates
://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth Associates http://baylink.pitas.com '87 e24
St
,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth Associates http://baylink.pitas.com '87 e24
St Petersburg FL USA http://photo.imageinc.us
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 01:56:23PM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
An output of 'head -n 1 /proc/zaptel/*' after the fact might help us help
you. Did you re-run ztcfg after editing zaptel.conf ?
On a sidebar, let me suggest head -1q; it's neater.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth
. The -1 means first instance of a call on this
channel, a -2 would be seen in you answer a 2nd call for call waiting.
Ah. Got it. Thanks.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 10:57:49PM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 01:54:21PM -0400, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 04:35:33PM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
What's wrong with plain old Zap/NN ?
[test]
exten = _6XXX.,1,Dial(Zap/{EXTEN:1:3}/${EXTEN:4
Zap/2-1, using all PRI's on Digium and Sangoma cards.
I would have *expected* that it might behave the way you suggest, but
it appears not to. Unless it has something to do with the way my
zaptel presents the spans to Asterisk...
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 09:34:29PM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 01:12:42PM -0400, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 10:57:49PM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 01:54:21PM -0400, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 04:35
on no particular
configuration we gave it (there are lots of others, but they could just
be repeating an argument they were passed; mostly Application
messages).
We do in fact, see that zt_request message, but it's not like we made
*up* the whole 73-1 thing... :-)
Cheers,
- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth
, so it cannot be
that.
See? I *knew* I mentioned it.
Note that Mike Cargile at VICIdial looked over that dialplan, and he
didn't seem to have a problem with the -1; I'm pretty sure it's in the
VICIdial standard dialplans.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink
Trying to dial to Zap/11-1 instead of to Zap/11 is like trying to
SIP/101cathy-0824cda0 installed of dialing to SIP/101cathy
So, clearly, I'm not smart enough; precisely what are the semantics of
the 'Something' in Technology/Channel-Something?
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth
, Joseph, is how does your
Meridian connect to the PSTN?
Is it a T-1 now, or analog?
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth Associates http
,Hangup
Which I just retested and it works.
Now to figure out how to do it across IAX channels from one server to
another.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RFC
is it?
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth Associates http://baylink.pitas.com '87 e24
St Petersburg FL USA http
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 09:39:42AM -0400, Doug Lytle wrote:
Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
So I have these 4 new PRIs turning up tomorrow. Anyone have any
suggestions on some dialplan that I could use to allow me to manually
dial calls out over each channel for testing?
I use:
exten
specify the channel number
directly in the dialplan and make 24 trunkgroups there with a
dialpattern for each one? (I know enough to be dangerous, but not
quite enough to implement without a little help. :-)
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL
The
Newbies. :-)
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth Associates http://baylink.pitas.com '87 e24
St Petersburg FL USA http
assume because we
don't want to talk to you if you rev is too old. :-)
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth Associates http
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 10:44:12AM -0500, Tilghman Lesher wrote:
On Wednesday 23 July 2008 10:15:18 Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 06:39:28PM -0500, Tilghman Lesher wrote:
On Tuesday 22 July 2008 18:32:21 Chento Arohuanca wrote:
My * version: 1.4.17
Please upgrade
.
Tell us how you /really/ feel.
:-)
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth Associates http://baylink.pitas.com '87 e24
St
.
They did seem kind of cheaply made...
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth Associates http://baylink.pitas.com '87 e24
St
. :-)
If there are any specific questions you have, lay 'em on me.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth Associates http://baylink.pitas.com
, Ciarcia's Circuit Cellar magazine has an ad this month for
a TCP to RS-232 box for something like 69 bucks; you could probably use
the RTS line to drive a relay.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I
than you can buy a phone. What gives?
Production quantity S-curve
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth Associates http://baylink.pitas.com
I'm about to go off and try to write a script that parses the output of
show channels concise so that I can get something readable (since show
channels doesn't help me much either)...
unless someone else has already done somethign similar and wants to
share?
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth
.
Nope. mu-law, and it's European counterpart, a-law, are standard PCM
lin-log compression algorithms that date back to the beginning of T-1
service, if not even further...
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer
...
Lack of space, lack of need, lack of having another RJ21X in the truck are
just a few other obvious reasons that this might be done.
True.
Your netmon link is 404, BTW.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer
. :-)
I hope that answers the question, as I am not entirely sure what a
shelf or smartjack are. Though I will feel really stupid if you say a
shelf is something you store stuff on.
See above. :-)
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL
the hangup issue.
Aha!
Good luck with that.
Cheers,
- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth Associates http://baylink.pitas.com '87
? Or just the smartjack?
-- j
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth Associates http://baylink.pitas.com '87 e24
St Petersburg FL USA http
:
http://telecom-info.telcordia.com/site-cgi/ido/index.html
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth Associates http://baylink.pitas.com
anything useful.
Good luck. The strong possibility exists, though, that you'll find the
customer-exposed API doesn't have a path to set the bits you need.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I
the Adit's are a
bear to break into.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth Associates http://baylink.pitas.com '87 e24
St Petersburg
effective), assuming approximately 80 isn't more than 72. :-)
If that's not enough ports, then yeah, you'll probably be best served
going to a Ethernet gateway; I personally have never liked the idea of
stuffing that much FXS inside a PC chassis.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth
.
The issue is that the 4th digit is actually interrupting the playback of the
name, which is why they're not hearing it. Simple training issue.
Or alternatively, you could play the name with DTMF-cut-through
disabled, assuming that's not down inside C code...
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 03:49:01PM -0500, Tilghman Lesher wrote:
On Thursday 19 June 2008 13:38:05 Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 05:27:04PM -0500, Tilghman Lesher wrote:
Annoying that people aren't following the directions and only entering
3 digits, but we've had some
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 12:00:18PM -0400, C F wrote:
On 6/16/08, Jay R. Ashworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 11:13:31PM -0400, C F wrote:
Happens in the commercial world all the time; it's a common way to get
cash out of the corporation -- a business's building
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 01:05:59PM -0400, Steve Totaro wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Jay R. Ashworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 12:00:18PM -0400, C F wrote:
On 6/16/08, Jay R. Ashworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 11:13:31PM -0400, C F
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 01:25:18PM -0400, Alex Balashov wrote:
Is there a contradiction between them?
Naw; Steve's just showin' his ass again.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think
1 - 100 of 418 matches
Mail list logo
