Re: License Draft: Tortured text re obligations...

Le 17 déc. 2006 à 11:24, Bob Wyman a écrit : There is, I think a bit of tortured text in James Snell's otherwise useful License ID[1]. 1.3. Terminology bob wyman [1] http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-snell-atompub-feed- license-10.txt +1 -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org

Re: Atom and bidi (was: Re: Atom Syndication Format To Draft Standard?)

5.0.0 http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode5.0.0/ Tue, 29 Aug 2006 17:33:36 GMT Maybe Martin or Richard can give us more information about it. -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/ *** Be Strict

Re: atom license extension (Re: [cc-tab] *important* heads up)

information is good. Encouraging a *legal* fallback mechanism is bad, very bad. IMHO, when the implementors do not understand the licenses, they have no rights to do things with content (because it's highly dependant of local laws) -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance

Re: Atom license link last call

is the scope nature of link, not necessary if it's right or not to license a republished content with difference license. Here it fells in the legal part of it, which has to been handle by the civic society. -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager, QA

Re: Copyright, licensing, and feeds

? (As I understand it's not the purpose of this draft). -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/ *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***

Re: Copyright, licensing, and feeds

Le 06-06-08 à 19:40, A. Pagaltzis a écrit : * Karl Dubost [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-06-08 04:30]: Which will not remove abuse :) Well, will anything short of not publishing your content? I think the point of such an effort is to make life easier for third parties who want to respect your

Re: Copyright, licensing, and feeds

). There are efforts in this direction for Open DRMs http://www.openmediacommons.org/ http://odrl.net/ Which will not remove abuse :) -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA

Re: Don't Aggregrate Me

, etc. should display the license in the search results. That would be a first step. * Second step would be to not use the content in a commercial activity if it has been marked as such. (data mining, marketing profile, etc.) -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance

Re: Don't Aggregrate Me

for that purpose? -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***

Re: Don't Aggregrate Me

Le 05-08-26 à 17:53, Bob Wyman a écrit : Karl Dubost wrote: - How one who has previously submitted a feed URL remove it from the index? (Change of opinions) If you are the publisher of a feed and you don't want us to monitor your content, complain to us and we'll filter you out. Folk

Re: Don't Aggregrate Me

for an application and not suitable for aggregation. :/ Many issues. -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***

Re: Don't Aggregrate Me

Yahoo! Slurp The Bad Blogdigger Bloglines fastbuzz Feedster Crawler LiveJournal.com NIF PubSub Oddbot Syndic8 Technoratibot -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***

Re: Don't Aggregrate Me

Bob, Thanks for the explanation. Much appreciated. Le 05-08-25 à 15:59, Bob Wyman a écrit : Karl Dubost wrote: One of my reasons which worries me more and more, is that some aggregators, bots do not respect the Creative Common license (or at least the way I understand

Re: geolocation in atom:author?

the photos is taken, or the location of (one or more) regions in the photos. It's not that easy to answer at any level. -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***

Re: Protocol Action: 'The Atom Syndication Format' to Proposed Standard

Le 2005-08-17 à 13:14, The IESG a écrit : The IESG has approved the following document: - 'The Atom Syndication Format ' draft-ietf-atompub-format-11.txt as a Proposed Standard Congratulations for the good work. -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager

Re: Media extensions

or not IETF standardization makes sense. FYI: Comparing Media RSS formats http://www.w3.org/2005/07/media-and-rss You can send comments, suggestions to improve the table. -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***

Re: Major backtracking on canonicalization

a default feature/behaviour but it seems something like a flag that you have to give. -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***

Re: Review of Atom 0.8 Spec against W3C QA Specification Guidelines

Le 05-05-25 à 13:13, Mark Pilgrim a écrit : On 5/24/05, Karl Dubost [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Validation is something very precise. It can be validated against a DTD, or against a Schema or another grammar language, etc. At least the Feed validator could become a Feed checker which develops

Re: Review of Atom 0.8 Spec against W3C QA Specification Guidelines

Le 05-05-23 à 18:04, Robert Sayre a écrit : Hi Karl. Thanks for the review. Some thoughts inline. my pleasure On 5/23/05, Karl Dubost [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Requirement 01: Include a conformance clause. I tend to agree with Paul wrt conformance levels: http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax

Re: Review of Atom 0.8 Spec against W3C QA Specification Guidelines

, I'm replying to the questions. :) -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***

Re: Review of Atom 0.8 Spec against W3C QA Specification Guidelines

no place on this list. -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***

Atom 08 - HTML Version

April 18, 2005 The Atom Syndication Format draft-ietf-atompub-format-08 ]]] - http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-atompub- format-08.txt -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager

Review of Atom 0.8 Spec against W3C QA Specification Guidelines

Practice 22: Identify obsolete features. N/A. Good Practice 23: Define an error handling mechanism. YES. -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***

Re: Atom 08 - HTML Version

with IETF specification is that we can't give precise references to the text. I have used the text version instead. I'm sending another mail. -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***

Re: Atom 1.0?

and it's now a mess for tools developers. +1 to the suggestion of Atom 1.0 -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***

Re: Posted PaceLangSpecific

Le 14 fvr. 2005, 23:19, Tim Bray a crit : On Feb 7, 2005, at 8:36 AM, Graham wrote: On 7 Feb 2005, at 8:29 am, David Powell wrote: Implementations MUST preserve the language context of language sensitive constructs. I have no idea what I'm being asked to do. Equally mystified by that sentence.