Can we get more explanation for this? This isn't a version bump. This project
was rewritten from scratch, the old sources are gone. The PKGBUILD was written
from scratch, packagement solutions were upstreamed[1]. Upstream points
specifically to this package[2]. Archlinux repo maintainer wasn't invo
On 04/04/2018 02:41 PM, Jordan Glover via aur-general wrote:
> Can we get more explanation for this? This isn't a version bump. This project
> was rewritten from scratch, the old sources are gone. The PKGBUILD was written
> from scratch, packagement solutions were upstreamed[1]. Upstream points
> s
On April 4, 2018 3:44 PM, Robin Broda via aur-general
wrote:
> On 04/04/2018 02:41 PM, Jordan Glover via aur-general wrote:
>
> > Can we get more explanation for this? This isn't a version bump. This
> > project
> >
> > was rewritten from scratch, the old sources are gone. The PKGBUILD was
>
On 04/04/2018 04:37 PM, Jordan Glover wrote:
> On April 4, 2018 3:44 PM, Robin Broda via aur-general
> wrote:
>
>> On 04/04/2018 02:41 PM, Jordan Glover via aur-general wrote:
>>
>>> Can we get more explanation for this? This isn't a version bump. This
>>> project
>>>
>>> was rewritten from scr
On April 4, 2018 4:49 PM, Robin Broda via aur-general
wrote:
> On 04/04/2018 04:37 PM, Jordan Glover wrote:
> >
> > The point is that the community package which doesn't build manually and
> >
> > point to nonexistent sources is the one which should be deleted instead of
> >
> > the one from
On Wed, 04 Apr 2018 11:23:34 -0400
Jordan Glover via aur-general wrote:
> I'm sorry for the harsh words. If those requests were made AFTER update
> package
> in repo there won't be this conversation. I found situation where killing
> other people
> efforts to make things work, unacceptable with
On April 4, 2018 5:32 PM, Doug Newgard wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Apr 2018 11:23:34 -0400
>
> Jordan Glover via aur-general aur-general@archlinux.org wrote:
>
> > I'm sorry for the harsh words. If those requests were made AFTER update
> > package
> >
> > in repo there won't be this conversation. I f
On Wed, 04 Apr 2018 11:54:33 -0400
Jordan Glover via aur-general wrote:
> On April 4, 2018 5:32 PM, Doug Newgard wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 04 Apr 2018 11:23:34 -0400
> >
> > Jordan Glover via aur-general aur-general@archlinux.org wrote:
> >
> > > I'm sorry for the harsh words. If those requests
AUR is like the wild west. Anyone can upload any packages even if it is
already exist.
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 4:01 PM, Doug Newgard via aur-general <
aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Apr 2018 11:54:33 -0400
> Jordan Glover via aur-general wrote:
>
> > On April 4, 2018 5:32 PM, Doug
On 2018-04-04 11:01:20 (-0500), Doug Newgard via aur-general wrote:
> > Please be specific. We aren't talking about hours and bumping
> > package version. Common sense can be used to know when taking
> > action will make people worse-off.
> > The package was managed so efficiently that even upstre
On 04/04/2018 01:05 PM, alrii via aur-general wrote:
> AUR is like the wild west. Anyone can upload any packages even if it is
> already exist.
They sure can, and we can delete the package -- and the user with it.
...
The dnscrypt-proxy-go-git is pretty obviously a duplicate of
dnscrypt-proxy-gi
11 matches
Mail list logo
