Re: [aur-general] [PRQ#11055] Deletion Request for dnscrypt-proxy-go | [PRQ#11056] Deletion Request for dnscrypt-proxy-go-git

On 04/05/2018 08:19 AM, Jordan Glover via aur-general wrote: > It's even easier to forgot that Arch users community is unpaid and > passionate as well and throw their work out of the window just because > you can. Did AUR maintainer benefited from uploading his package there? > Not at all. They

Re: [aur-general] [PRQ#11055] Deletion Request for dnscrypt-proxy-go | [PRQ#11056] Deletion Request for dnscrypt-proxy-go-git

On April 5, 2018 12:50 AM, David Runge wrote: > > While being in line with what Doug wrote on the topic, I agree, that it > > took quite some time to upgrade, but behold! dnscrypt-proxy 2.0.8 is now > > in community-testing (btw: no, not just c/p) [1]. > > I do understand

Re: [aur-general] [PRQ#11055] Deletion Request for dnscrypt-proxy-go | [PRQ#11056] Deletion Request for dnscrypt-proxy-go-git

On 04/04/2018 01:05 PM, alrii via aur-general wrote: > AUR is like the wild west. Anyone can upload any packages even if it is > already exist. They sure can, and we can delete the package -- and the user with it. ... The dnscrypt-proxy-go-git is pretty obviously a duplicate of

Re: [aur-general] [PRQ#11055] Deletion Request for dnscrypt-proxy-go | [PRQ#11056] Deletion Request for dnscrypt-proxy-go-git

On 2018-04-04 11:01:20 (-0500), Doug Newgard via aur-general wrote: > > Please be specific. We aren't talking about hours and bumping > > package version. Common sense can be used to know when taking > > action will make people worse-off. > > The package was managed so efficiently that even

Re: [aur-general] [PRQ#11055] Deletion Request for dnscrypt-proxy-go | [PRQ#11056] Deletion Request for dnscrypt-proxy-go-git

AUR is like the wild west. Anyone can upload any packages even if it is already exist. On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 4:01 PM, Doug Newgard via aur-general < aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > On Wed, 04 Apr 2018 11:54:33 -0400 > Jordan Glover via aur-general wrote: > > > On

Re: [aur-general] [PRQ#11055] Deletion Request for dnscrypt-proxy-go | [PRQ#11056] Deletion Request for dnscrypt-proxy-go-git

On Wed, 04 Apr 2018 11:54:33 -0400 Jordan Glover via aur-general wrote: > On April 4, 2018 5:32 PM, Doug Newgard wrote: > > > On Wed, 04 Apr 2018 11:23:34 -0400 > > > > Jordan Glover via aur-general aur-general@archlinux.org wrote: > > > >

Re: [aur-general] [PRQ#11055] Deletion Request for dnscrypt-proxy-go | [PRQ#11056] Deletion Request for dnscrypt-proxy-go-git

On April 4, 2018 5:32 PM, Doug Newgard wrote: > On Wed, 04 Apr 2018 11:23:34 -0400 > > Jordan Glover via aur-general aur-general@archlinux.org wrote: > > > I'm sorry for the harsh words. If those requests were made AFTER update > > package > > > > in repo there won't

Re: [aur-general] [PRQ#11055] Deletion Request for dnscrypt-proxy-go | [PRQ#11056] Deletion Request for dnscrypt-proxy-go-git

On Wed, 04 Apr 2018 11:23:34 -0400 Jordan Glover via aur-general wrote: > I'm sorry for the harsh words. If those requests were made AFTER update > package > in repo there won't be this conversation. I found situation where killing > other people > efforts to make

Re: [aur-general] [PRQ#11055] Deletion Request for dnscrypt-proxy-go | [PRQ#11056] Deletion Request for dnscrypt-proxy-go-git

On April 4, 2018 4:49 PM, Robin Broda via aur-general wrote: > On 04/04/2018 04:37 PM, Jordan Glover wrote: > > > > The point is that the community package which doesn't build manually and > > > > point to nonexistent sources is the one which should be deleted

Re: [aur-general] [PRQ#11055] Deletion Request for dnscrypt-proxy-go | [PRQ#11056] Deletion Request for dnscrypt-proxy-go-git

On 04/04/2018 04:37 PM, Jordan Glover wrote: > On April 4, 2018 3:44 PM, Robin Broda via aur-general > wrote: > >> On 04/04/2018 02:41 PM, Jordan Glover via aur-general wrote: >> >>> Can we get more explanation for this? This isn't a version bump. This >>> project

Re: [aur-general] [PRQ#11055] Deletion Request for dnscrypt-proxy-go | [PRQ#11056] Deletion Request for dnscrypt-proxy-go-git

On April 4, 2018 3:44 PM, Robin Broda via aur-general wrote: > On 04/04/2018 02:41 PM, Jordan Glover via aur-general wrote: > > > Can we get more explanation for this? This isn't a version bump. This > > project > > > > was rewritten from scratch, the old sources

Re: [aur-general] [PRQ#11055] Deletion Request for dnscrypt-proxy-go | [PRQ#11056] Deletion Request for dnscrypt-proxy-go-git

On 04/04/2018 02:41 PM, Jordan Glover via aur-general wrote: > Can we get more explanation for this? This isn't a version bump. This project > was rewritten from scratch, the old sources are gone. The PKGBUILD was written > from scratch, packagement solutions were upstreamed[1]. Upstream points >