Re: [Aus-soaring] Radio & near collision.

2012-04-21 Thread ian mcphee
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] Radio & near collision. I watch this radio discussion with interest.   Airspace is a big haystack out there and the needles are small.  Some  gliders have FLARM, but powered aircraft don’t.    5, or is it 10, light aircraft pilots need to be aware that there could b

Re: [Aus-soaring] Radio & near collision.

2012-04-21 Thread emilis prelgauskas
On 21/04/2012, at 9:13 PM, john.mcfarlane wrote: Flarm, Power Flarm, SSR/TCAS, Mode C/Mode S, Primary Radar/ATS, ADS-B, Eyeball, VHF, CB, CTAF, CTAF(R) and NOTAM’s Have you guys actually had a look at the shear amount of disparate systems you have mentioned. And then we add into the mix that

Re: [Aus-soaring] Radio & near collision.

2012-04-21 Thread john.mcfarlane
us-soaring-boun...@lists.internode.on.net [mailto:aus-soaring-boun...@lists.internode.on.net] On Behalf Of Alan Wilson Sent: Saturday, 21 April 2012 8:41 PM To: 'Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.' Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] Radio & near collision. I watch this radio discussion with

Re: [Aus-soaring] Radio & near collision.

2012-04-21 Thread Alan Wilson
back to the runway. Then they installed ILS and required instrument rated pilots. From: aus-soaring-boun...@lists.internode.on.net [mailto:aus-soaring-boun...@lists.internode.on.net] On Behalf Of Lucas James Sent: Saturday, 21 April, 2012 11:02 To: aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net Subject:

Re: [Aus-soaring] Radio & near collision.

2012-04-20 Thread Lucas James
On 20/04/2012 21:37, Simon Hackett wrote: In the unlikely event you've not all seen it already, here's one way the outcome could have turned out: http://jeremy.zawodny.com/blog/archives/007288.html I will say that while I appreciate its an issue that more than a few glider pilots seem passion

Re: [Aus-soaring] Radio & near collision.

2012-04-20 Thread Catherine Conway
I recently operated motorglider for AEFs at a large regional airport with RPT and the flying doctor. The aircraft was fitted with a device that was both a flarm and an ADSB (I think). And yes it had a transponder connected. It worked. I spoke to the flying doctor on the ground after we both

Re: [Aus-soaring] Radio & near collision.

2012-04-20 Thread David Long and Cathy Lincoln
riginal Message - From:"Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia." To:"AUS Soaring" Cc: Sent:Fri, 20 Apr 2012 12:03:57 +0000 Subject:Re: [Aus-soaring] Radio & near collision. Scott, There are multiple benefits beyond 'big planes and towers' seeing

Re: [Aus-soaring] Radio & near collision.

2012-04-20 Thread Scott Penrose
On 20/04/2012, at 10:03 PM, Simon Hackett wrote: > ... i.e. ATC will often actively notify other VFR traffic they can see, of > the presence of conflicting traffic they can see. They will happily notify > any little plane about threats they should act to avoid, they are not just > there to hel

Re: [Aus-soaring] Radio & near collision.

2012-04-20 Thread Simon Hackett
Scott, There are multiple benefits beyond 'big planes and towers' seeing you. As I said: I've found that air traffic control is frequently helpful to VFR and IFR aircraft, in that they will call you up proactively and advise of the presence of transponder-equipped unidentified traffic in your

Re: [Aus-soaring] Radio & near collision.

2012-04-20 Thread Scott Penrose
On 20/04/2012, at 9:37 PM, Simon Hackett wrote: > I will say that while I appreciate its an issue that more than a few glider > pilots seem passionately opposed to for their own reasons, the notion of > regularly operating transponders in gliders is one that I personally believe > would be of

Re: [Aus-soaring] Radio & near collision.

2012-04-20 Thread Simon Hackett
In the unlikely event you've not all seen it already, here's one way the outcome could have turned out: http://jeremy.zawodny.com/blog/archives/007288.html I will say that while I appreciate its an issue that more than a few glider pilots seem passionately opposed to for their own reasons, the

Re: [Aus-soaring] Radio & near collision.

2012-04-20 Thread Stuart & Kerri FERGUSON
Behalf Of Scott Penrose Sent: Friday, 20 April 2012 2:55 PM To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia. Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] Radio & near collision. On 20/04/2012, at 2:07 PM, Tim Shirley wrote: "Cessna XXX 10 miles SE Benalla maintaining 4500 ft overf

Re: [Aus-soaring] Radio & near collision.

2012-04-20 Thread emilis prelgauskas
An excellent example of differing management styles: - by rote, - by priorityand then there is - by objective On 20/04/2012, at 1:49 PM, Peter F Bradshaw wrote: It would be better to reasonably comply with all rules. On Fri, 20 Apr 2012, Tim Shirley wrote: I listen as

Re: [Aus-soaring] Radio & near collision.

2012-04-20 Thread emilis prelgauskas
How do we get the spirit of this across to other aviators, public and media?: On 20/04/2012, at 1:37 PM, Tim Shirley wrote: the operational characteristics of gliders makes information provided by radio far less useful in a predictive sense than the same information given by a powered aircraf

Re: [Aus-soaring] Radio & near collision.

2012-04-19 Thread Scott Penrose
On 20/04/2012, at 2:07 PM, Tim Shirley wrote: > "Cessna XXX 10 miles SE Benalla maintaining 4500 ft overflying for Mangalore" > "Cessna XXX glider YYY, be aware there are approximately 6 gliders operating > in the vicinity of the airfield up to 6000ft" > "YYY this is XXX, please give locations o

Re: [Aus-soaring] Radio & near collision.

2012-04-19 Thread Peter F Bradshaw
Hi; It would be better to reasonably comply with all rules. On Fri, 20 Apr 2012, Tim Shirley wrote: > Hi all, > . . . > > I have a simple rule for the radio. I listen as much as possible and I > talk as little as I can get away with while still complying with all > reasonable rules. > > Cheers

Re: [Aus-soaring] Radio & near collision.

2012-04-19 Thread Tim Shirley
Hi all, It's not quite right to suggest that it is only glider pilots who need training. A recent radio exchange at Benalla went something like this: "Cessna XXX 10 miles SE Benalla maintaining 4500 ft overflying for Mangalore" "Cessna XXX glider YYY, be aware there are approximately 6 glide

Re: [Aus-soaring] Radio & near collision.

2012-04-19 Thread Stuart Cassidy
The ATSB report states "The pilot of MST did not recall hearing a call from ULZ and was unaware of ULZ’s position until the incident" And in the news article the pilot states he was changing the radio and "preparing for landing" I would say he was too distracted by knobs, dials, gauges and passenge

Re: [Aus-soaring] Radio & near collision.

2012-04-19 Thread Mark Newton
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 11:12:20AM +0930, Stuart Cassidy wrote: > A more accurate title would be "teen pilot nearly causes accident" > I think it is poor form when passengers are maintaining a better lookout > than the pilot. The ATSB says the glider pilot saw the Cessna at about 2 miles dista

Re: [Aus-soaring] Radio & near collision.

2012-04-19 Thread Stuart Cassidy
A more accurate title would be "teen pilot nearly causes accident" I think it is poor form when passengers are maintaining a better lookout than the pilot. On Apr 20, 2012 9:47 AM, "Mark Newton" wrote: > On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 09:31:21AM +1000, Christopher Mc Donnell wrote: > > > > http://www.

Re: [Aus-soaring] Radio & near collision.

2012-04-19 Thread Mark Newton
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 09:31:21AM +1000, Christopher Mc Donnell wrote: > http://www.thechronicle.com.au/story/2012/04/20/teenage-pilots-quick-response-avoids-collision/ The actual ATSB report referenced by the article is here: http://www.atsb.gov.au/media/3548648/ab-2012-019.pdf#page=47 I'm s

[Aus-soaring] Radio & near collision.

2012-04-19 Thread Christopher Mc Donnell
http://www.thechronicle.com.au/story/2012/04/20/teenage-pilots-quick-response-avoids-collision/___ Aus-soaring mailing list Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net To check or change subscription details, visit: http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/a