5 Ağustos 2020 Çarşamba tarihinde Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) <
mtk.li...@gmail.com> yazdı:
> On 8/5/20 7:12 PM, Oğuz via austin-group-l at The Open Group wrote:
> > 5 Ağustos 2020 Çarşamba tarihinde Robert Elz via austin-group-l at The
> Open
> > Group yazdı:
> >
> >> Date:Wed, 05
6 Ağustos 2020 Perşembe tarihinde Oğuz yazdı:
>
>
> 5 Ağustos 2020 Çarşamba tarihinde Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) <
> mtk.li...@gmail.com> yazdı:
>
>> On 8/5/20 7:12 PM, Oğuz via austin-group-l at The Open Group wrote:
>> > 5 Ağustos 2020 Çarşamba tarihinde Robert Elz via austin-group-l at The
The suggestions here so far are cumbersome and tend to be ambiguous. The
old m-word and sl-word, and also "client" and "server" could potentially be
interpreted backwards from the conventional intent. (You can think about it
as the sl-word/client actually being in control: telling the
Michael Kerrisk via austin-group-l at The Open Group wrote in
:
|Elliot Hughes and I both noticed a point from "Minutes of the 3rd August \
|2020
|Teleconference":
..
|On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 5:52 PM Andrew Josey wrote:
...
|> * General news
|>
|> We discussed terminology usage, in
Harald van Dijk wrote, on 31 Jul 2020:
>
> Take the previous example glibc's cy_GB.UTF-8 locale, but with a different
> collating element: in this locale, "dd" is a single collating element too.
> Therefore, this must be matchable by bracket expressions.
Incorrect.
I think you overlooked these
The slave side is ancillary to the master, sorry, as physical terminals are
ancillary to the processor hardware, imo. Inverting the relationship makes it
look like it is the intent of the slave side to source the majority of the
data, when more often it is only monitoring output data sourced
Steffen Nurpmeso wrote, on 05 Aug 2020:
>
> Michael Kerrisk via austin-group-l at The Open Group wrote in
> :
> |Elliot Hughes and I both noticed a point from "Minutes of the 3rd August \
> |2020
> |Teleconference":
> ..
> |On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 5:52 PM Andrew Josey wrote:
> ...
> |> *
Elliot Hughes and I both noticed a point from "Minutes of the 3rd August 2020
Teleconference":
[[
On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 5:52 PM Andrew Josey wrote:
>
> All
> Enclosed are the minutes of yesterdays teleconference
> regards
> Andrew
[...]
> * General news
>
> We discussed terminology usage, in
On 05/08/2020 15:54, Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group wrote:
Harald van Dijk wrote, on 31 Jul 2020:
Take the previous example glibc's cy_GB.UTF-8 locale, but with a different
collating element: in this locale, "dd" is a single collating element too.
Therefore, this must be
5 Ağustos 2020 Çarşamba tarihinde Robert Elz via austin-group-l at The Open
Group yazdı:
> Date:Wed, 05 Aug 2020 11:28:45 -0400
> From:"Paul Smith via austin-group-l at The Open Group" <
> austin-group-l@opengroup.org>
> Message-ID:
On Wed, 2020-08-05 at 08:00 -0700, Donn Terry via austin-group-l at The
Open Group wrote:
> The suggestions here so far are cumbersome and tend to be ambiguous.
> The old m-word and sl-word, and also "client" and "server" could
> potentially be interpreted backwards from the conventional intent.
shwaresyst wrote, on 05 Aug 2020:
>
> On Wednesday, August 5, 2020 Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group
> wrote:
>
>> My own thoughts up to now had been that, since the slave side is the
>> side that is intended to be used as a terminal in the normal way, the
>> slave should be
Date:Wed, 05 Aug 2020 11:28:45 -0400
From:"Paul Smith via austin-group-l at The Open Group"
Message-ID: <1d8c5e6e96fbdd47ce143a566b57db2c803d4898.ca...@gnu.org>
| do you consider the pseudoterminal as providing to the terminal, or the
| terminal as providing to
Date:Tue, 4 Aug 2020 19:57:22 +0100
From:"Andrew Josey via austin-group-l at The Open Group"
Message-ID: <08605dfa-f6c7-4eb8-9275-6511fbd37...@opengroup.org>
| I will be monitoring and we can revert if it causes issues
It causes issues, and is hideous. Please
On Wed, 2020-08-05 at 23:38 +0700, Robert Elz wrote:
> | do you consider the pseudoterminal as providing to the terminal, or the
> | terminal as providing to the pseudoterminal.
>
> How did anyone ever get to a question like that?
In the part of my message you elided I was arguing that using the
[Restoring the CC, which seems to have got lost along the way; it's best if
we keep it, since some people who are involved on the Linux/Glibc side may
not be on the Austin list.]
Hello Geoff and Steffen,
Thanks for your feedback.
On 8/5/20 4:20 PM, Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open
On 8/5/20 7:12 PM, Oğuz via austin-group-l at The Open Group wrote:
> 5 Ağustos 2020 Çarşamba tarihinde Robert Elz via austin-group-l at The Open
> Group yazdı:
>
>> Date:Wed, 05 Aug 2020 11:28:45 -0400
>> From:"Paul Smith via austin-group-l at The Open Group" <
>>
[again restoring the CC]
On 8/5/20 5:28 PM, Paul Smith via austin-group-l at The Open Group wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-08-05 at 08:00 -0700, Donn Terry via austin-group-l at The
> Open Group wrote:
>> The suggestions here so far are cumbersome and tend to be ambiguous.
>> The old m-word and sl-word,
18 matches
Mail list logo
