On Wed, December 2, 2009 01:06, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> Kern Sibbald wrote:
>> As far as I am concerned Sun OpenSource software venture stinks. I
think with
>> all the noise about Oracle buying them, and their blunders in
>> implementation
>> of OpenSolaris, MySQL, and VirtualBox, they have littl
On Thu, December 3, 2009 00:18, Kern Sibbald wrote:
[SNIP change in Postgres defaults.]
Bloody typical, after the recent bollocking of MySQL, I was thinking,
"Maybe I should switch over to postgres?"
Hmm, I think I've got some spare Oracle or DB2 licenses floating around...
Now, do I *have* the
Re-sent, may appear twice.
On Thu, December 3, 2009 00:18, Kern Sibbald wrote:
[SNIP change in Postgres defaults.]
Bloody typical, after the recent bollocking of MySQL, I was thinking,
"Maybe I should switch over to postgres?"
Hmm, I think I've got some spare Oracle or DB2 licenses floating arou
On Wed, January 27, 2010 08:28, Phil Stracchino wrote:
[SNIP]
>
> I can check and see if there's a newer Solaris 10 MySQL package. (I'm
> trying to stay as much as possible with original Sun packages on that
> machine.) If it's a known potential issue with a known fix, then that's
> fine. I repo
Kern Sibbald wrote:
[SNIP]
> The purpose of SQL_LIB is to be able to determine if Batch insert will work
> or
> not. SQL_LIB should *never* be returned pointing to a .so file. If it does,
> batch insert will be turned off in *all* cases. So any patch that returns
> a .so for SQL_LIB will bre
On Fri, April 9, 2010 05:09, Richard Scobie wrote:
[snip]
> You may find the XFS mount directive, "filestreams" of benefit here.
And using the 64-bit XFS will also better[1] than the standard 32-bit XFS.
Or the hybrid 32-bit XFS using 64-bit layout rules. (Damn, I only left
SGI at the end of 200
On Fri, April 9, 2010 05:26, Henrik Johansen wrote:
> On 04/ 8/10 07:36 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
>> On 04/08/10 09:13, Craig Ringer wrote:
>>> Phil Stracchino wrote:
I'll be interested to see those results. Which filesystems are you
testing?
>>>
>>> I'm interested in ext3, ext4 and xfs
On Wed, May 5, 2010 15:28, Morty Abzug wrote:
> On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 11:43:32PM +0200, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
>
>> > (1) no way to do a simple client check (AKA amcheck -c.)
>> > (2) no way to do a simple tape check (AKA amcheck -lt)
>> What exactly do you mean with "client check" and "tape c
On Thu, August 19, 2010 17:46, Bruno Friedmann wrote:
[SNIP]
>
> It seems we have to manage that in the configure script, which actually
fail in this task.
Yes, I have a hand-munged configure script for Solaris 10 - static
libraries are deprecated and not supplied anymore, and the Webstack
implemen
On Thu, August 19, 2010 17:46, Bruno Friedmann wrote:
[SNIP]
>
> It seems we have to manage that in the configure script, which actually
> fail in this task.
Yes, I have a hand-munged configure script for Solaris 10 - static
libraries are deprecated and not supplied anymore, and the Webstack
implem
On Wed, September 29, 2010 02:43, Bob Hetzel wrote:
[SNIP]
>
> If I can add another data point into this... I'm running configure for
> bacula 5.0.3 on RedHat Beta Enterprise Linux 6 beta refresh 2. The thread
> safe detection fails for my configure too.
[SNIP]
>
> however as suggested above, doin
On Wed, March 9, 2011 12:22, Phil Stracchino wrote:
[SNIP]
> Now, I said I'd get back to the MySQL issues. I was reading through
> some documents about mySQL on ZFS, and came across (again) a
> recommendation from one MySQL tester that reported the best MySQL
> performance from setting the InnoDB
On 9/06/2012 5:17 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Interesting.
>
> Unfortunately, we cannot use changes to configure because it is "compiled"
> from autoconf/configure.in by the autoconf tools.
>
> I just checked the ./configure of the latest code that I built last week
> on 8.2 and it has the ECHO = 'pr
Building 7.4.0 for Solaris 10, I found the following problem when
building fstype in src/tools:
bacula-7.4.0/src/tools $ make
/bin/CC -L/opt/webstack/mysql/lib/mysql -R/opt/webstack/mysql/lib/mysql
-L/opt/csw/lib -R/opt/csw/lib -L../lib -L../findlib -o fstype fstype.o
-lbacfind -lbac -lm \
Hi Kern,
On 2/02/2016 4:30 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Martin,
>
> I think you were reporting a different bug from what Gary reported.
>
> Kern
>
I've examined the code further, and played around with it.
As Martin said, the error is caused by there being an add_mtab_entry()
in libbacfind f
On 15/03/2017 21:27, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Hello Phil,
>
> Thanks for the patches and compiler warning output.
>
> I think I have eliminated all the warnings you show below, with one
> exception, which is changing the position of:
>
> extern "C" char *tgoto (const char *, int, int);
>
> As not
On 2017-06-06 21:57, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Hello,
This is to inform you that we have release Bacula BETA version 7.9.2
Hi Kern,
Trying to build on Solaris 10 x64, using Developer Studio 12.3.
Can't disable libtool - oh great, can't work out what is going on
underneath, just ducky.
Configure
Trying to build on Solaris 10 x64, using GCC 5.2.0.
As expected:
Compiling bsys.c
bsys.c: In function 'int baccept(int, sockaddr*, socklen_t*)':
bsys.c:1219:7: error: expected ',' or ';' before 'if'
if (fcntl(fd, F_SETFD, fcntl(fd, F_GETFD) | FD_CLOEXEC) < 0) {
^
Fix, and co
On 07/06/2017 17:59, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Hello,
Bacula does not require g++ to build, but you may need to adjust
things. For example, on FreeBSD Bacula is built with clang. On Solaris
you can use the Solaris compiler. I don't know what Developer Studio
is, so I cannot say. However, you wi
On 07/06/2017 20:43, Gary R. Schmidt wrote:
On 07/06/2017 17:59, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Hello,
Bacula does not require g++ to build, but you may need to adjust
things. For example, on FreeBSD Bacula is built with clang. On
Solaris you can use the Solaris compiler. I don't know what Deve
On 2017-06-11 16:23, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Hello,
Versions of Bacula BETA 7.9.0, 1, 2, and 3, all had what I thought was
a trivial change to the DIR<->SD protocol. It turned out to be a
rather significant change that affected the FD as well. So if you
were running version 7.9.0, 1, 2, or 3 you w
Hi Kern,
On 2017-06-19 02:55, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Hello Gary,
Could you send me a diff -u of your patch or simply the patched lz4.c
file. I think I did the inverse of what is needed -- that is I
removed the pack() on Solaris 10. If I did get it backwards, the code
will obviously not work.
d
On 19/06/2017 18:13, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Hello Gary,
OK, I have now pushed another fix, which I am pretty confident will fix
your build problem on Solaris 10 without breaking any other
architecture. Please pull the latest version of Bacula from the git
repo. It is version 7.9.6 19 June 2017
Hi Kern,
On 19/06/2017 22:48, Kern Sibbald wrote:
You need to checkout Branch-7.9. The code you need is at the HEAD of
that branch and there is as of this moment no specific tag setup for it.
The easiest is to clone the repository then checkout Branch-7.9.
Thanks for that, I got it out event
On 20/06/2017 00:46, Kern Sibbald wrote:
On 06/19/2017 03:23 PM, Gary R. Schmidt wrote:
Hi Kern,
On 19/06/2017 22:48, Kern Sibbald wrote:
You need to checkout Branch-7.9. The code you need is at the HEAD of
that branch and there is as of this moment no specific tag setup for it.
The
On 10/07/2017 21:03, Wanderlei Huttel wrote:
Good Morning
First of all, thanks and congratulations for the new release Kern!
In this weekend I received some messages from friends of our brazilian
group in telegram that tried to compile Bacula 9 in Debian 9 stretch and
didn't work.
[SNIP]
t
On 07/07/2017 22:01, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Release 9.0.0
I am pleased to announce that we have just released Bacula version 9.0.0.
Solaris 11, using MySQL:
==
Linking bacula-dir ...
/opt/developerstudio12.5/bin/CC -L/opt/csw/lib/ -R/opt/csw
On 03/08/2017 22:40, Phil Stracchino wrote:
On 08/03/17 06:03, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Hello Martin,
I can confirm that I introduced a bug in 9.0.0 and that adding slot=0
should work around the problem. Thanks for the suggestion.
It was not picked up because of: 1. see below ... 2. most people h
On 12/06/2018 20:36, Kanika Satija wrote:
Hi Wanderlei,
I have run script to update bacula database and re-run this test. But
the issue remains the same.
PFA, the screenshot of Bacula database version.
Please (a) trim your replies, and (b) don't post text as an image.
If bacula-dir leaves
On 2018-10-31 00:52, Phil Stracchino wrote:
Gentoo's Bacula package finally updated, and I'm able to do systemwide
update at last. This includes my storage server which runs Solaris 11.
I did eventually get it to compile, but with many warnings. Is anyone
else here building Bacula on Solaris 1
On 01/11/2018 20:30, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Hello Gary,
The Bacula project uses GCC, and with it we do not get those errors. If
you are using a different compiler (as it seems you are doing), you are
likely to find different "warnings". Since we only use the gnu
compiler, the best way to get r
On 02/11/2018 00:09, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2018/11/01 22:24, Gary R. Schmidt wrote:
(As libtool is used to hide how things are compiled, I have no great
interest in researching the failure.)
FWIW, you can show the command lines with "make NO_ECHO=". I don't know
why it see
On 2019-02-06 20:33, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Hello,
We are pleased to announce the release of Bacula version 9.4.2. It is
already released to Source Forge and bacula.org. Binaries for selected
should be available in the near future.
This is a bug fix release to the prior version (9.4.1) that incl
On 2019-03-01 18:27, Gary R. Schmidt wrote:
[SNIP]
Changing "round" to "bacula_round" fixes this problem, as it is a
static function; on to the next (if there is one).
No errors in the build, but a couple o
On 2019-03-01 23:00, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Hello,
I am quite surprised that the static function did not take precedence.
In any case, I have changed the subroutine name to be bround(), and
will
push it to the git rep this evening.
Thanks for pointing this out,
Kern
I agree, it's strange that
On 2019-03-05 15:18, John Nemeth wrote:
On Mar 4, 10:07am, Kern Sibbald wrote:
}
} abort() is not portable -- it behaves differently on different
} systems.
abort() is part of the C standard, which means that it is
completely portable.
} A segfault is portable, so we use have used it for 2
On 04/04/2019 13:08, Phil Stracchino wrote:
I realized today that I hadn't updated my NAS (which runs a client and
an SD on Solaris 11.3 on amd64 hardware) from 9.4.1 to 9.4.2. So I did
that tonight.'
Hi Phil,
I thought I'd posted my fixes...
There's a lot of anachronism warnings all exactl
On 12/05/2019 02:06, Marc Chamberlin via Bacula-devel wrote:
This may be more of a question for the users group but I may be
experiencing some difficulty with getting the moderators to approve my
postings there and this is also a question for the developers...
I have a file daemon that keeps
On 27/02/2020 22:52, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Hello Phil,
Your suggestion is now applied and is in the git repo. It will be
released in the next version. If you get a chance, please pull the
repo and let me know if the problem is resolved.
Thanks,
Kern
On 2/26/20 6:32 PM, Phil Stracchino wrot
On 29/05/2020 11:15, Phil Stracchino wrote:
Hey folks,
Have not filed an issue yet because I don't know whether this is a
problem only with the Gentoo ebuild. I've spent three days tearing my
hair out trying to diagnose build problems with half a dozen packages
totally unrelated to Bacula, all
Argh! Re-sending to list.
On 29/05/2020 13:39, Phil Stracchino wrote:
Yeah, it is totally a meson bug. It's reproducible in at least two
different packages that use meson to build, and neither of them has one
single thing to do with Bacula and neither has any reason on earth to be
looking at b
On 03/07/2020 05:21, Phil Stracchino wrote:
[SNIP]
OK, just rebuilt with:
CFLAGS = -xarch=generic -xtarget=generic -xcache=generic -m64 -g
-xkeepframe=%all
pstack output doesn't look any different. I'm wishing I'd thought to
install dbx when I did my last successful install of Developer Stud
On 20/07/2020 23:00, Phil Stracchino wrote:
On 2020-07-20 06:39, Martin Simmons wrote:
On Sat, 18 Jul 2020 10:20:25 -0400, Phil Stracchino said:
Just found this this morning. Seems like an awful lot of failed DROPS.
I haven't read far enough through the code yet to see why Bacula is so
many
On 15/12/2020 20:41, Sven Hartge wrote:
On 15.12.20 10:33, Sven Hartge wrote:
On 15.12.20 10:00, Eric Bollengier via Bacula-devel wrote:
This release of Bacula uses a new catalog format. We provide a set of
scripts that permit to convert a 9.x and earlier versions to the new
11.0.0 format (1
On 16/12/2020 04:48, Phil Stracchino wrote:
On 12/15/20 12:10 PM, Eric Bollengier via Bacula-devel wrote:
Hello,
Compilation fails on Solaris 11.3 using Solaris Studio 12.6.
I would recommend to compile with GCC, it is free and available on all
platforms. Of course, patches are welcome to
On 07/02/2021 04:17, Eric Bollengier via Bacula-devel wrote:
Hello,
We are pleased to announce the release of Bacula version 11.0.1. This is
a minor release of the new stable version.
[SNIP]
11.0.1 is a minor bug fix release.
- Add PGSQL detection for macOS and MacPorts.
- BEE Backport b
On 09/02/2021 02:09, Martin Simmons wrote:
On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 09:36:41 -0500, Phil Stracchino said:
On 2/8/21 9:17 AM, Gary R. Schmidt wrote:
I can't see the fix for the short strcpy() problem that vexed Phil, and
has kept me from updating for a few versions.
Has that mistake been to
On 09/02/2021 02:40, Sven Hartge wrote:
On 08.02.21 15:17, Gary R. Schmidt wrote:
I can't see the fix for the short strcpy() problem that vexed Phil,
and has kept me from updating for a few versions.
Has that mistake been totally rolled back, only partially applied, or
forgotten?
Tha
On 01/03/2021 22:00, Radosław Korzeniewski wrote:
[SNIP]
Bacula configure script is checking for typeof() and sets HAVE_TYPEOF if
found. I think the proper fix should use:
#ifdefHAVE_TYPEOF
...
#else
...
#endif
More correctly, autfsckup should look for typeof, __typeof, and
__typeof__, defin
On 03/06/2021 23:29, Dan Langille wrote:
Hello,
https://www.bacula.org mentions 11.0.5 and
https://www.bacula.org/bacula-release-11-0-5/ exists.
However, the release is not at
https://sourceforge.net/projects/bacula/files/bacula/
What's up?
They're here: https://www.bacula.org/source-downl
On 25/03/2022 09:31, Phil Stracchino wrote:
On 3/24/22 13:50, Eric Bollengier via Bacula-devel wrote:
Hello,
We are pleased to announce the first BETA release of the next major
Bacula
version 11.3.2 to both the Bacula website (www.bacula.org) and to
SourceForge.
Just noting that due to a h
On 25/03/2022 17:16, Eric Bollengier wrote:
Hello,
On 3/25/22 01:48, Gary R. Schmidt wrote:
On 25/03/2022 09:31, Phil Stracchino wrote:
On 3/24/22 13:50, Eric Bollengier via Bacula-devel wrote:
Hello,
We are pleased to announce the first BETA release of the next major
Bacula
version 11.3.2
On 27/10/2024 19:09, Osama AbdElHamid via Bacula-devel wrote:
Hello,
Does Bacula supports RHEL S390x arch ?
Need to install Bacula on RHEL v9.3 on system z (s390x arch), where to
find the right rpm backage or source code and the related installation
documentation.
Thanks,
Osama
https://www.b
53 matches
Mail list logo
