Hello,
For your information.
Until we figure out exactly how to resolve old releases containing the restore
bug, I have hidden most all of the files that we have released on Source
Forge. That means that they still exist (are not deleted), but cannot be
accessed through the normal download
I'm still open on this, but I wouldn't release an official patch
without
having it properly tested, so putting out an untested patch is not
what I
consider a good solution. Even the current patches are not
officially
released but are attached to an open bug report.
Understood.
Can you
Kern,
On Monday 10 September 2007 01:13:45 am Kern Sibbald wrote:
PS: Does this affect spooled simultaneous jobs, or only simultaneous
jobs that are simultaneously writing to storage?
Please re-read item 1 of my announcement (above).
Sorry to say that but since more than one person (that
On Sunday 09 September 2007 23:46:24 Kern Sibbald wrote:
Hello,
I regret to have to announce that there is a rather serious bug in Bacula.
Bacula bug #935 reports that during a restore, a large number of files are
missing and thus not restored. This is really quite surprising because we
On Monday 10 September 2007 08:35, James Harper wrote:
I'm still open on this, but I wouldn't release an official patch
without
having it properly tested, so putting out an untested patch is not
what I
consider a good solution. Even the current patches are not
officially
released
Hi,
10.09.2007 02:23,, Ivan Adzhubey wrote::
Arno,
On Sunday 09 September 2007 08:07:42 pm Arno Lehmann wrote:
Hi,
10.09.2007 00:51,, Ivan Adzhubey wrote::
...
On a related issue: I have asked this question before but never get any
answer.
Documentation states (from Data Spooling
Hi,
10.09.2007 05:12,, Hydro Meteor wrote::
Hello,
In Chapter 6.3.4 of the Bacula User's Guide, with regard to naming
resources, the Guide states that:
Each of your Bacula components must have a unique name.
This is especially necessary when backing up a fleet machines.
I
Hi,
10.09.2007 09:32,, Christoff van Zyl wrote::
...
My 2c thought, is there a possibility to put a notification on the website
about this bug.
I think Kern's working on it.
Arno
--
Arno Lehmann
IT-Service Lehmann
www.its-lehmann.de
Hello,
I have posted the following pre-release files to www.bacula.org/downloads:
2.2.0-restore.patch
2.2.1-restore.patch
2.2.2-restore.patch
bacula-2.2.3.tar.gz
bacula-2.2.3.tar.gz.sig
winbacula-2.2.3.exe
winbacula-2.2.3.exe.sig
The web site does not permit directory listings of that
Hello,
I've downloaded the bacula src.rpm and installed it on a Centos 5
machine. I want to build binaries but am only seeing build options for
rhel4, i know there's a way around this i just can't remember what it is.
any help appreciated.
Thanks.
Dave.
i've now updated to 2.2.3 but the bug still exists.
does nobody besides me run bacula-dir 2.2.x with tls enabled?
lxmipa:/tmp/bacula-2.2.3# src/dird/bacula-dir -c
/etc/bacula/bacula-dir.conf -v -f -d99 -s
bacula-dir: dird.c:156 Debug level = 99
bacula-dir: mysql.c:164 mysql_init done
On Sat, 8 Sep 2007 15:17:17 -0500, Kelly, Brian said:
Martin,
Thanks for the advice. I have an additional file in my /etc/env.d directory
that contains the PYTHONPATH. I've run env-update and source /etc/profile.
My profile.env, ld.so.conf and ld.so.cache files are up to date.
I am
This document contains the technical details of Bug #395.
Bacula bug #935 reports that during a restore, a large number of files are
missing and thus not restored. This is really quite surprising because we
have a fairly extensive regression test suite that explicitly tests for this
Hi,
I am currently struggling to get any kind of reasonable performance out
of Bacula on my LTO 4 tape size. I have done a considerable of testing
and benchmarking, and my hunch is that bacula's block size of 64512
bytes is causing the performance problems.
To test the drive, I used tar, with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ivan Adzhubey wrote:
Kern,
On Monday 10 September 2007 01:13:45 am Kern Sibbald wrote:
PS: Does this affect spooled simultaneous jobs, or only simultaneous
jobs that are simultaneously writing to storage?
Please re-read item 1 of my
On 10 Sep 2007 at 9:32, Christoff van Zyl wrote:
My 2c thought, is there a possibility to put a notification on the website
about this bug.
Kern: I will put a note on the homepage with a link to the mailing
list announcment.
--
Dan Langille - http://www.langille.org/
Available for hire:
Michael Patzer wrote:
what does this damn process do? even with strace i couldn't see
anything.
What exactly do you see when you strace it? Note that you'll need to use
strace -f to see what all of the threads are doing.
--
Frank Sweetser fs at wpi.edu | For every problem, there is a
Hi,
10.09.2007 16:21,, Chris Howells wrote::
Hi,
I am currently struggling to get any kind of reasonable performance out
of Bacula on my LTO 4 tape size. I have done a considerable of testing
and benchmarking, and my hunch is that bacula's block size of 64512
bytes is causing the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Monday 10 September 2007 04:27, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
Kern Sibbald wrote:
At this time, I do not have a patch for 2.0.x versions, and unless there
is some really compelling reason to create one, I would prefer not -- it
Arno Lehmann wrote:
Thanks for your reply.
I'd suggest to do some tests with Bacula, and after you found your
best settings, clearly mark all tapes with their respective block sizes.
Will do.
Are you basically suggesting that I should use the following sd directives:
Minimum Block Size =
On Monday 10 September 2007 16:27, Dan Langille wrote:
On 10 Sep 2007 at 9:32, Christoff van Zyl wrote:
My 2c thought, is there a possibility to put a notification on the
website about this bug.
Kern: I will put a note on the homepage with a link to the mailing
list announcment.
Well,
thx for the -f hint. it looks like an endless loop...
[pid 21593] read(5, 0x8135fc8, 5) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource
temporarily unavailable)
[pid 21593] select(6, NULL, [5], [5], {10, 0}) = 1 (left {10, 0})
[pid 21593] read(5, 0x8135fc8, 5) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource
temporarily unavailable)
Yes, that is an important point that I forgot to mention. The bug is in the
Storage daemon, so there is no need to change any of the File daemons (or the
Director).
Should the patch fix the auto-restore of previous backups too or is it
still necessary to restore this data manually?
If
Kern Sibbald wrote:
This document contains the technical details of Bug #395.
Bacula bug #935 reports that during a restore, a large number of files are
missing and thus not restored. This is really quite surprising because we
have a fairly extensive regression test suite that
On 10 Sep 2007 at 10:27, Kern Sibbald wrote:
On 10 Sep 2007 at 9:32, Christoff van Zyl wrote:
My 2c thought, is there a possibility to put a notification on the website
about this bug.
Kern: I will put a note on the homepage with a link to the mailing
list announcment.
Done, but
On 10 Sep 2007 at 11:05, DAve wrote:
Kern Sibbald wrote:
This document contains the technical details of Bug #395.
Bacula bug #935 reports that during a restore, a large number of files are
missing and thus not restored. This is really quite surprising because we
have a
* Chris Howells schrieb am 10.09.07 um 16:47 Uhr:
Arno Lehmann wrote:
Thanks for your reply.
I'd suggest to do some tests with Bacula, and after you found your
best settings, clearly mark all tapes with their respective block sizes.
Will do.
Are you basically suggesting that I
Hi,
I don't understand at all where I can grab bacula rpms.
I saw fschwarz announce but can't find any RPM anywhere...
Help would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
--
Adam CECILELinbox / FreeALter Soft
152 rue de Grigy tél: +33 3 87 50 87 95
Technopôle Metz
* Adam Cécile schrieb am 10.09.07 um 17:36 Uhr:
Hi,
I don't understand at all where I can grab bacula rpms.
I saw fschwarz announce but can't find any RPM anywhere...
Help would be appreciated.
You should wait until bacula 2.2.3 is realeased which fixes a
serious restore bug. Kern has
On Monday 23 April 2007 13:54:17 Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
Hi all,
I have built a couple of bacula deb-packages based on the debian SID
packages.
Thanks to John Goerzen for that great work!
My packages are backports of these packages and are available
through our PackMan repository which
On Monday 10 September 2007 16:58, user100 wrote:
Yes, that is an important point that I forgot to mention. The bug is in
the Storage daemon, so there is no need to change any of the File daemons
(or the Director).
Should the patch fix the auto-restore of previous backups too or is it
Resent to both bacula-users and bacula-devel.
--
Dan Langille - http://www.langille.org/
Available for hire: http://www.freebsddiary.org/dan_langille.php
On 10 Sep 2007 at 17:59, Benjamin E. Zeller wrote:
On Monday 23 April 2007 13:54:17 Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
Hi all,
I have built a
Marc Schiffbauer a écrit :
* Adam Cécile schrieb am 10.09.07 um 17:36 Uhr:
Hi,
I don't understand at all where I can grab bacula rpms.
I saw fschwarz announce but can't find any RPM anywhere...
Help would be appreciated.
You should wait until bacula 2.2.3 is realeased which
Hello,
A bit earlier today, I released version 2.2.3 source tar files and the Win32
binaries to the Bacula release area of Source Forge. This release was almost
ready to fix some minor problems with version 2.2.2 when bug #935 was found
so we were able to quickly include a confirmed fix for
On Monday 10 September 2007 16:39, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Monday 10 September 2007 04:27, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
Kern Sibbald wrote:
At this time, I do not have a patch for 2.0.x versions, and unless
there is some really compelling reason to create one, I would
* Kern Sibbald schrieb am 10.09.07 um 18:49 Uhr:
On Monday 10 September 2007 16:39, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Monday 10 September 2007 04:27, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
Kern Sibbald wrote:
At this time, I do not have a patch for 2.0.x versions, and unless
there is
* Adam Cécile schrieb am 10.09.07 um 18:19 Uhr:
Marc Schiffbauer a écrit :
* Adam Cécile schrieb am 10.09.07 um 17:36 Uhr:
Hi,
I don't understand at all where I can grab bacula rpms.
I saw fschwarz announce but can't find any RPM anywhere...
Help would be appreciated.
On 10 Sep 2007 at 18:28, Kern Sibbald wrote:
This code passes the regression tests on both CentOS 5 (RHEL 5 compatible)
and
SuSE 10.2. At the moment, the test results are not yet complete for the
other ports (Solaris, FreeBSD, Mac OS X).
Bacula 2.2.3 has been committed to the FreeBSD
On 10 Sep 2007 at 18:28, Kern Sibbald wrote:
This code passes the regression tests on both CentOS 5 (RHEL 5 compatible)
and
SuSE 10.2. At the moment, the test results are not yet complete for the
other ports (Solaris, FreeBSD, Mac OS X).
Only the 2drive-3pool-disk failed on FreeBSD 7.x
Michael Patzer wrote:
thx for the -f hint. it looks like an endless loop...
[pid 21593] read(5, 0x8135fc8, 5) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource
temporarily unavailable)
[pid 21593] select(6, NULL, [5], [5], {10, 0}) = 1 (left {10, 0})
It looks like the same symptoms are present in the regression
Hello,
I have released 2.0.3-restore.patch to the bacula-patches 2.0.3 download area
of Source Forge. This patch fixes bug #935 (failure to restore files) here.
However, please test it carefully as it is not as well tested as the fixes to
version 2.2.x
I recommend that if at all possible to
So, I have been playing with cloning and I have it working, where i have
a job that sends the clone to a volume in a different pool using the
line below in a job directive, and that seems to work ok.
Run = host1 level=$l since=\$s\ Pool=DefaultClone
The schedule for this job is a Full on
On 9/9/07, Arno Lehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
10.09.2007 05:12,, Hydro Meteor wrote::
Hello,
In Chapter 6.3.4 of the Bacula User's Guide, with regard to naming
resources, the Guide states that:
Each of your Bacula components must have a unique name.
This is
On 10 Sep 2007 at 13:43, Dan Langille wrote:
On 10 Sep 2007 at 18:28, Kern Sibbald wrote:
This code passes the regression tests on both CentOS 5 (RHEL 5 compatible)
and
SuSE 10.2. At the moment, the test results are not yet complete for the
other ports (Solaris, FreeBSD, Mac OS X).
Hello all,
I'm not sure if this is a bug or not, but I'm running Bacula 2.2.1 (granted
I see that 2.2.3 just came out today so I'll download and install to see how
it works), but after going through the Bacula Tutorial (and I'm using
PostgreSQL 8.1.9), running drop_bacula_tables (after I had
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have the regress.tar.gz from 2.0.3 if you need it. I'm not sure if
that helps or not.
=R
Kern Sibbald wrote:
Hello,
I have released 2.0.3-restore.patch to the bacula-patches 2.0.3 download area
of Source Forge. This patch fixes bug #935
On Monday 10 September 2007 22:08, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
I have the regress.tar.gz from 2.0.3 if you need it. I'm not sure if
that helps or not.
Yes, could you email it to me off list. That would save me the trouble of
tracking it down.
Many thanks.
Kern
=R
Kern Sibbald wrote:
Hello,
we did our test:
- first we used the current version we have running now (2.1.28), just
to assure we can reproduce it always (probably). Run 4 concurrent
jobs, after restore 2 of them (that are larger) failed as usual with
missing files and error messages that some restored files have
I already have recycle=yes in each of my pools, and I'm running LVM and
have extended the volume as much as I have space for. But I still ended
up running out of space, largely because I messed with some of the file
set definitions that triggered new full backups. So...
I've already done
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Doytchin Spiridonov wrote:
Hello,
we did our test:
- first we used the current version we have running now (2.1.28), just
to assure we can reproduce it always (probably). Run 4 concurrent
jobs, after restore 2 of them (that are larger) failed
Hi Arno,
On Monday 10 September 2007 04:18:49 am Arno Lehmann wrote:
Hi,
10.09.2007 02:23,, Ivan Adzhubey wrote::
Arno,
On Sunday 09 September 2007 08:07:42 pm Arno Lehmann wrote:
Hi,
10.09.2007 00:51,, Ivan Adzhubey wrote::
...
On a related issue: I have asked this question
I've downloaded the bacula src.rpm and installed it on a Centos 5
machine. I want to build binaries but am only seeing build options for
rhel4, i know there's a way around this i just can't remember what it is.
any help appreciated.
I built it on CentOS5 using CentOS4 option. Works
Adam Cécile schrieb:
I don't understand at all where I can grab bacula rpms.
I saw fschwarz announce but can't find any RPM anywhere...
What distribution do you use?
For Fedora {6,7} you can just do yum install bacula-client (do yum search
bacula to see the other available packages).
For
Dave schrieb:
I've downloaded the bacula src.rpm and installed it on a Centos 5
machine. I want to build binaries but am only seeing build options for
rhel4, i know there's a way around this i just can't remember what it is.
any help appreciated.
The fastest method getting a CentOS
54 matches
Mail list logo
