Re: [Bacula-users] wrong start time stored for Volume Use Duration?

2006-09-14 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Thursday 14 September 2006 19:41, Jo Rhett wrote: > On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 10:20:21AM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > On Thursday 14 September 2006 03:45, Jo Rhett wrote: > > > > > So right now the "Volume Use" start time is set by the start time of &g

Re: [Bacula-users] Tape robot

2006-09-15 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, There are others on this list who can possibly help you, but many of your problems would be resolved by upgrading to 1.38.11. Of course, there is a certain effort and learning code involved. 1.36.2 is *very* old. On Friday 15 September 2006 13:25, Geir Asle Borgen wrote: > I have a wor

Re: [Bacula-users] Tape robot

2006-09-15 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Friday 15 September 2006 14:57, Geir Asle Borgen wrote: > On Fri, 2006-09-15 at 14:14 +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > Hello, > > > > There are others on this list who can possibly help you, but many of your > > problems would be resolved by upgrading to 1.38

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] new issue of packet too long

2006-09-15 Thread Kern Sibbald
You will probably have better luck getting your question answered on the bacula-users list, which I have copied for you. On Friday 15 September 2006 15:36, William Baker wrote: > > I know "packet too long" is in the FAQ. I think this is a new but > related issue. The error is consistant and r

Re: [Bacula-users] Minor complaint about job listings

2006-09-15 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Friday 15 September 2006 15:53, Ryan Novosielski wrote: > Martin Simmons wrote: > >>>>>> On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 22:44:05 +0200, Kern Sibbald said: > >> On Friday 08 September 2006 21:44, Ryan Novosielski wrote: > >>> Here is a sample: > >>>

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] new issue of packet too long

2006-09-15 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Friday 15 September 2006 18:07, William Baker wrote: > (Thanks for kindly pointing me in the right direction, Kern.) > > I have a little bit more info to add to the mix -- and a little more > confusion. Unix clients are behaving the same way. So, the only thing > all these items appear to h

Re: [Bacula-users] vss config issue

2006-09-15 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Friday 15 September 2006 17:09, Mantas Marčiulaitis wrote: > > Im running v1.36.2 on debian sarge 2.6.8-1-686. > Is there any way of making this work without upgrading to a newer version? I don't think we had VSS support until 1.38.0, but you would have to check the logs to verify that. >

Re: [Bacula-users] vss config issue

2006-09-15 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Friday 15 September 2006 17:46, William Baker wrote: > > In a word: No. The docs indicate: > > "In version 1.37.30 and greater, you can turn on Microsoft's Volume > Shadow Copy Service (VSS)." Ah, nice, someone who is much more precise than I am :-) > > bbaker > > >Im running v1.36.2

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] new issue of packet too long

2006-09-15 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Friday 15 September 2006 21:36, William Baker wrote: > > I found the documentation on the heartbeat, configured it for the FD and > SD for 5 sec, restarted the deamons, and ran the test again. On the > primary test machine, the backup is still dying in the same place. I > did notice (a lit

Re: [Bacula-users] Windows restore issues

2006-09-15 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Friday 15 September 2006 23:20, Jeff LaCoursiere wrote: > > On Fri, 15 Sep 2006, Dan Langille wrote: > > > Large volumes on *disk* slow down the restore if you're trying to get > > one file back. GREATLY. Try it. I suggest smaller volumes. e.g. > > 2GB. > > Yup, not only have I tried it, b

Re: [Bacula-users] wrong start time stored for Volume Use Duration?

2006-09-17 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Sunday 17 September 2006 00:29, Jo Rhett wrote: > On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 08:34:41PM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > On Thursday 14 September 2006 19:41, Jo Rhett wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 10:20:21AM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > > > On Thursday 14

Re: [Bacula-users] Purged volumes not getting used

2006-09-17 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Sunday 17 September 2006 21:02, Jo Rhett wrote: > > Bruno Savioli writes: > > > If I am not mistaken, you need to have a "Maximum Volumes" in your Pool > > > directives. Bacula first tries a new volume, if there isn't one, it will > > > look for the purged ones to recycle. > > On Sun, Sep 17,

Re: [Bacula-users] Purged volumes not getting used

2006-09-18 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Monday 18 September 2006 02:27, Francisco Reyes wrote: > Kern Sibbald writes: > > > The algorithm is very clearly described in the manual at: > > http:/www.bacula.org/dev-manual/Automatic_Volume_Recycling.html#SECTION000243000 > > In that url I see: &g

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula BETA version 1.39.22-20060908 released

2006-09-18 Thread Kern Sibbald
7;ve been able to do, seems to work OK. Thanks for the feedback. Glad to hear that it works and almost builds out of the box. :-) > > Kern Sibbald wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I have just released the beta version 1.39.22-20060908 of Bacula to Source > > Forge in th

Re: [Bacula-users] wrong start time stored for Volume Use Duration?

2006-09-18 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Monday 18 September 2006 18:39, Ryan Novosielski wrote: > Kern Sibbald wrote: > >> No, I'm not saying that. If that was true, the Firstwritten would be a > >> month earlier. > >> > >> I'm saying exactly what I've been saying in every p

[Bacula-users] Problem with Bacula CVS code

2006-09-19 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, It looks like the most current CVS Bacula code has become a DoS program for Linux, since it "hangs" my 2.6.16.21 kernel. It is pretty clear that it is something in the software since the previously released beta version works fine. Although it is very surprising that a user program can

Re: [Bacula-users] Purged volumes not getting used

2006-09-19 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Tuesday 19 September 2006 15:50, Ryan Novosielski wrote: > Jo Rhett wrote: > > >> - The complete output of a job where recycling failed. > > > > I can't do this without increasing maximum volumes, which I can't do right > > now. But I could set up a test environment for you if you want ... >

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Problem with Bacula CVS code

2006-09-19 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Tuesday 19 September 2006 16:28, Jeffrey L. Taylor wrote: > Quoting Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hello, > > > > It looks like the most current CVS Bacula code has become a DoS program for > > Linux, since it "hangs" my 2.6.16.21 kernel. It

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula-dir problems with -HUP? (was Re: [Bacula-devel] Backtrace Attached: bacula-dir lockups on FreeBSD)

2006-09-19 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Tuesday 19 September 2006 16:39, Bill Moran wrote: > In response to Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > My plan at this point: > > 1) Upgrading to RELENG_6_1 tonight > > 2) See if the problem repeats this Saturday > > 3) If it does, grab another backtrace and put it out on freebsd-hackers@

Re: [Bacula-users] solved migration---> waiting on max storage jobs

2006-09-19 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Tuesday 19 September 2006 16:30, Fred Dussault wrote: > All, > > I finally figured out where my config was wrong, > > my Tape pool didn't have the media type defined. Can you tell me *exactly* where the Media Type was not defined. It sounds like me that Bacula should a little more user fri

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Bacula-dir problems with -HUP? (was Re: Backtrace Attached: bacula-dir lockups on FreeBSD)

2006-09-19 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Tuesday 19 September 2006 17:53, Bill Moran wrote: > In response to Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > However, it occurred to me that the log rotation occurs at about the same > > > time this freeze would occur. This involves sending Bacula a HUP sign

Re: [Bacula-users] "Packet size too big" + xinetd client

2006-09-19 Thread Kern Sibbald
Running clients under xinetd is no longer supported, and I intend to remove the code that permits users to run it in that manner, so you will be better off to run the clients as daemons. On Tuesday 19 September 2006 19:49, Junior Cunha wrote: > Hi > >I recently upgrade all my clients to

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Bacula-dir problems with -HUP? (was Re: Backtrace Attached: bacula-dir lockups on FreeBSD)

2006-09-19 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Tuesday 19 September 2006 20:26, Bill Moran wrote: > In response to Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On Tuesday 19 September 2006 17:53, Bill Moran wrote: > > [snip] > > > > This is new to me. And not intuitive IMHO. Most programs interpret a H

Re: [Bacula-users] Purged volumes not getting used

2006-09-19 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Wednesday 20 September 2006 00:29, Francisco Reyes wrote: > Kern Sibbald writes: > > > - Your version of Bacula > > - What database (MySQL, ...) you are using and its version. I see you mention > > that it is PostgreSQL. > > - A list of all the volumes in the

Re: [Bacula-users] How long should volume pruning take?

2006-09-20 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Wednesday 20 September 2006 10:15, Uwe Schuerkamp wrote: > hi folks, > > I am having an issue with automatic volume recycling, esp. with the > time it takes to prune the oldest volume to allow it to be recycled. > > Our setup: > > - bacula 1.38.9 und Debian Linux (compiled from Source) > >

Re: [Bacula-users] Purged volumes not getting used

2006-09-20 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Wednesday 20 September 2006 12:16, Alan Brown wrote: > On Tue, 19 Sep 2006, Francisco Reyes wrote: > > > Jo Rhett writes: > > > >> Sorry, Kern, but this isn't true. Recycling DOES work properly, but > >> "create a new volume" is happening earlier in the decision process > >> than the recycling

Re: [Bacula-users] How long should volume pruning take?

2006-09-20 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Wednesday 20 September 2006 11:34, Uwe Schuerkamp wrote: > On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 11:15:39AM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > > > For your performance problems: > > > > Please read the Catalog Maintenance chapter of the manual: > > > > http://www.bacula.

Re: [Bacula-users] Manual ejection of tape confuses bacula

2006-09-21 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Thursday 21 September 2006 19:08, Sarath Jayewardena wrote: > Hi, > > I am experimenting to see whether bacula would be a good system for me to > backup our department's servers. I am running bacula director and storage > daemon on a Debian (sarge) machine which has a scsi DLT tape drive > atta

Re: [Bacula-users] Minor issue with wxConsole Windows

2006-09-22 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Friday 22 September 2006 16:11, Ryan Novosielski wrote: > I have noticed that frequently when I'm using the Windows version of the > wxConsole, the "command completion" context sensitive help above the > entry line gets polluted with information from the output of a job. For > example, I'll star

Re: [Bacula-users] Minor issue with wxConsole Windows

2006-09-22 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Friday 22 September 2006 17:11, Ryan Novosielski wrote: > Kern Sibbald wrote: > > On Friday 22 September 2006 16:11, Ryan Novosielski wrote: > >> I have noticed that frequently when I'm using the Windows version of the > >> wxConsole, the "command complet

Re: [Bacula-users] how to restore raw partitions

2006-09-22 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Friday 22 September 2006 18:02, jea zam wrote: > Hi, my environment it's: > -debian sarge 3.1 > -Bacula release 1.38.9 implemented > -LVM with a SAN > -UML ( user-mode linux ) > > The copies and all run fine for files of my windows users and restore too > > But now, I want to backup my logic

Re: [Bacula-users] Windows Director/Storage Daemon (was: Minor Issue with wxConsole Windows)

2006-09-22 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Friday 22 September 2006 18:38, Ryan Novosielski wrote: > Kern Sibbald wrote: > > On Friday 22 September 2006 17:11, Ryan Novosielski wrote: > >> Kern Sibbald wrote: > >>> On Friday 22 September 2006 16:11, Ryan Novosielski wrote: > >>>> I have notic

Re: [Bacula-users] Manual ejection of tape confuses bacula

2006-09-22 Thread Kern Sibbald
s completed jobs. But then, when I tried to restore, > it had problems accessing the tape. These are the dangers I am > afraid of. Are there any rescue methods in such cases? Again thank > you very much for the help. > > - Sarath > > > On Thu, 21 Sep 2006, Kern Si

Re: [Bacula-users] Manual ejection of tape confuses bacula

2006-09-22 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Friday 22 September 2006 23:53, Sarath Jayewardena wrote: > > On Fri, 22 Sep 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > > Unfortunately, you are out of luck. You did the unmount/mount *after* you > > ejected the tape, reloaded it in the drive, and started another job, which >

Re: [Bacula-users] How long should volume pruning take?

2006-09-23 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Thursday 21 September 2006 08:41, Uwe Schuerkamp wrote: > On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 03:10:27PM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > > > 10 GB is pretty big, but there are users with databases that large. Take a > > look at src/cats/make_mysql_tables. There are a few

Re: [Bacula-users] Help with DVD storage

2006-09-25 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Sunday 24 September 2006 20:51, Arno Lehmann wrote: > Hi, > > On 9/23/2006 10:37 PM, Jim Peters wrote: > > ... Anyway this new box also has a DVD+RW drive so I thought I would > > experiment with using bacula to write to DVD’s , here is my configuration; > ... > > What have I done wrong or for

Re: [Bacula-users] How long should volume pruning take?

2006-09-25 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Monday 25 September 2006 10:00, Uwe Schuerkamp wrote: > On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 09:30:20PM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > > > I'm not convinced the indexes are the same. Some people say yes, some say no, > > and it seems to be also dependent on whether one is talki

Re: [Bacula-users] Manual ejection of tape confuses bacula

2006-09-25 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Monday 25 September 2006 15:37, Alan Brown wrote: > On Fri, 22 Sep 2006, Sarath Jayewardena wrote: > > > How about if I had not started a new > > backup after re-inserting the tape, yet? > > You would probably be ok. > > > Will an unmount/mount before > > running any jobs make bacula accept t

Re: [Bacula-users] Restoring file from volume

2006-09-25 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Tuesday 26 September 2006 00:23, Ryan Novosielski wrote: > Daniel Hoeving wrote: > > Mike, > > > > Thank you, I've discovered the issue. Who ever set our back-ups up > > originally set a file retention period of thirty days and a job > > retention period of 365 so while I can see the job, the fi

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula File Storage - disk-changer - how to split File volumes ?

2006-09-26 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Tuesday 26 September 2006 10:32, Arno Lehmann wrote: > Hello, > > On 9/26/2006 12:23 AM, Claudinei Matos wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have a bacula setup on my network using File as Storage device. > > Well, everything works fine and I used to write the files on CD or DVD > > but now the FULL b

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula File Storage - disk-changer - how to split File volumes ?

2006-09-26 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, I would recommend that you ask on the bacula-users list. They are better than I am at answering these things. However, you must also permit labeling in your SD Device resource. Kern On Tuesday 26 September 2006 15:28, Claudinei Matos wrote: > > Kern Sibbald wrote: > > O

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 1.38.11 wants tape to be in the "other" drive in autochanger

2006-09-26 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Wednesday 20 September 2006 17:26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'm running into a situation where Bacula wants a given volume to be > in one drive of our autochanger, and it doesn't seem to find the volume when > it's already in the other drive. I saw similar situations under Bacula 1.38.9, >

Re: [Bacula-users] restoring file to a logical volume

2006-09-26 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Tuesday 26 September 2006 21:31, Arno Lehmann wrote: > Hi, > > didn't you notice Kerns reply to your mail from September 22? > > I thought he explained things quite clearly... Thanks. :-) The error message is now suppressed in the current CVS code. > > Arno > > On 9/26/2006 6:11 PM, lordj

Re: [Bacula-users] ERR=Cannot allocate memory when mounting a tape from an autochanger.

2006-09-26 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Tuesday 26 September 2006 21:24, John Drescher wrote: > version > fileserver-dir Version: 1.38.11 (28 June 2006) > > When at a prompt, entering a period cancels the command. > > run job="dev2-outlook" fileset="Outlook" level=Full client="dev2-fd" > pool="UserBackup-LTO2" when="2006-09-26 15:17

Re: [Bacula-users] Fwd: ERR=Cannot allocate memory when mounting a tape from an autochanger.

2006-09-26 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Tuesday 26 September 2006 22:15, John Drescher wrote: > -- Forwarded message -- > From: John Drescher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Sep 26, 2006 4:12 PM > Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] ERR=Cannot allocate memory when mounting a tape > from an autochanger. >

Re: [Bacula-users] More newbie whining

2006-09-26 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Wednesday 27 September 2006 01:41, Richard White wrote: > As part of my exercise to get Bacula 1.38 running with full GUI toys, I have installed SLES 10 on a computer, downloaded and installed the latest MysQL, downloaded Bacula 1.38.11 with the bacula-gui-bimagemgr, then downloaded and extra

Re: [Bacula-users] Double mount required for just-recycled media

2006-09-26 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Wednesday 27 September 2006 04:54, Ryan Novosielski wrote: > I've noticed this happen a couple of times. Here's what I did to cause > it both times. > > 1) No media available to run a job. > 2) Purge a volume that has data on it. > 3) Run a mount. > > The version of Bacula is 1.38.11 on the di

Re: [Bacula-users] Compression ratio

2006-09-26 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Wednesday 27 September 2006 08:15, Janco van der Merwe wrote: > On my previous e-mail that I sent to the forum I showed you the amount of data that was backed up to a single LTO3 tape and I received a request from the management to see if I, or rather Bacula, can't give the compression ratio

Re: [Bacula-users] migration vs. replication

2006-09-27 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Wednesday 27 September 2006 17:26, Jeff Dickens wrote: > No comment? It would at least be nice to know if I was wide of the mark. This has been discussed before on either this list or the developer's list. Bottom line: what you want isn't so easy. > > Jeff Dickens wrote: > > I was just look

Re: [Bacula-users] newbie using bacula

2006-09-27 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Wednesday 27 September 2006 19:00, Max Amani wrote: > Hi kern , > I hope I am not bugging you . It is always better to ask the list as they are better at this than I am. > I am new to bacula and I have been having problem with my backup . I set up bacula on Freebsd 6.1 to backup couple w

[Bacula-users] CVS warning

2006-09-27 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, I've narrowed down the "kernel" crash that I have been seeing in code *after* the 1.39.22 beta version was released (the beta is OK). The problem is in bscan, and for the moment seems to be limited to bscan. If for some reason you are using the current CVS, I recommend not using a bs

Re: [Bacula-users] Problem starting bacula-dir with Enable VSS

2006-09-27 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Wednesday 27 September 2006 19:56, Attila Fülöp wrote: > Bill Moran wrote: > > In response to "Attila Fülöp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > >> Enable VSS = "yes" > >> > >> works for me. FreeBSD / 1.38.5 from ports. > > To be more precise > > FileSet { >Name = "WinXP" >Enable VSS = "yes"

[Bacula-users] Bacula status

2006-09-28 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, Well, for the moment, the Bacula project is dead in the water. My machine now crashes on virtually any tape operation, which means I am unable to run my normal regression scripts that I run prior to commits. These crashes appear to be quite severe because they only occassionally produc

Re: [Bacula-users] More newbie whining

2006-09-28 Thread Kern Sibbald
on you aren't using the already-created RPM packages (ie. no > installation headaches). > > Richard White wrote: > >>>> On 9/26/2006 at 11:22 PM, in message > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > > Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Wed

[Bacula-users] Bacula status update + you can help

2006-09-29 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, After having been totally frustrated chasing this kernel crash for the last few weeks (I really could not believe that it was not a Bacula bug), I have finally found a work around and at the same time, proven that it is a SuSE problem. Last night, I loaded the Fedora FC4 kernel from m

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula status update + you can help

2006-09-29 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Friday 29 September 2006 12:31, Alan Brown wrote: > On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > > After having been totally frustrated chasing this kernel crash for the last > > few weeks (I really could not believe that it was not a Bacula bug), I have > > finally

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula status update + you can help

2006-09-29 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Friday 29 September 2006 13:43, Alan Brown wrote: > On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > >> One of the reason we dumped SLES on our production machines in favour of > >> RHEL was that SUSE was consistently shipping with mismatching dynamic and > >> st

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula status update + you can help

2006-09-29 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Friday 29 September 2006 14:39, Alan Brown wrote: > On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > >> Centos is _very_ stable. RHEL can be licensed quite cheaply if you don't > >> buy the support package (about US$10/machine) > > > > The last time I

[Bacula-users] Email bounces

2006-09-29 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, Someone on this list appears to be "bouncing" email back causing it to get delivered several times to the bacula-devel list. This seems to happen only for email sent to both bacula-users and bacula-devel at the same time. If you have recently subscribed or changed your email setup pleas

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula status update + you can help

2006-09-29 Thread Kern Sibbald
ho voted for the bug report I filed -- the last time I looked there were 18 votes! The good news as of a couple of minutes ago is that their 10.2 kernel 2.6.18-rc5-git6-2-bigsmp does not have the bug, so at least I have an all SuSE solution :-) > > cmr > > On Friday 29 September

Re: [Bacula-users] about manual and rejected volumes

2006-09-29 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Friday 29 September 2006 18:43, m listus wrote: > hi list, > > 1st there's a recurrent bug in the manual, you can't > use latex commands (\bf) inside a verbatim section. > i think there's an alternative section type where you > can do that. There should not be any {\bf ...} inside a verbatim.

Re: [Bacula-users] Console messages and ACLs

2006-09-29 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Friday 29 September 2006 23:19, Michael Brennen wrote: > > I just logged into Bacula from a client machine that has tighly restricted > access. It can only access its own pools, jobs, etc. > > When I logged in with wx-console I was surprised by a sudden flood of queued > console messages fo

Re: [Bacula-users] Console messages and ACLs

2006-09-29 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Friday 29 September 2006 23:19, Michael Brennen wrote: > > I just logged into Bacula from a client machine that has tighly restricted > access. It can only access its own pools, jobs, etc. > > When I logged in with wx-console I was surprised by a sudden flood of queued > console messages fo

Re: [Bacula-users] CVS multiple drives (was Console messages and ACLs)

2006-09-30 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, On Saturday 30 September 2006 00:26, Michael Brennen wrote: > On Friday 29 September 2006 04:36 pm, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > > By the way, the current CVS has ACLs covering all the various restore > > options. > > I noted today on current cvs that the last 20 job

Re: [Bacula-users] CVS multiple drives (was Console messages and ACLs)

2006-09-30 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, Thanks for providing the specific cvs commands. I have now added them to the developer's manual and also updated it a bit since it was out of date. For those interested, please see: http://www.bacula.org/developers/index.html Regards, Kern On Saturday 30 September 2006 00:39, m listu

Re: [Bacula-users] syslog and btape

2006-09-30 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Saturday 30 September 2006 02:09, m listus wrote: > hi, > > i'm using 1.36.2 on sarge. > i get this kernel message on dmesg on a per job basis > i think: > st0: MTSETDRVBUFFER only allowed for root. I've now suppressed that in 1.39.23. The ioctl() will only be done if you are running the SD

Re: [Bacula-users] CVS multiple drives (was Console messages and ACLs)

2006-09-30 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Saturday 30 September 2006 13:55, Michael Brennen wrote: > On Sat, 30 Sep 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > > On Saturday 30 September 2006 00:26, Michael Brennen wrote: > >> On Friday 29 September 2006 04:36 pm, Kern Sibbald wrote: > >> > >> I am glad you

Re: [Bacula-users] CVS multiple drives (was Console messages and ACLs)

2006-09-30 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Saturday 30 September 2006 00:26, Michael Brennen wrote: > On Friday 29 September 2006 04:36 pm, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > > By the way, the current CVS has ACLs covering all the various restore > > options. > > I noted today on current cvs that the last 20 jobs lis

Re: [Bacula-users] "Fatal error:..is busy writing on .."

2006-09-30 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Saturday 30 September 2006 13:32, Roger Håkansson wrote: > I'm backing up 20 machines over the internet using file storage with > "Maximum Volume Jobs = 1" and have a recurring problem. > > Whenever a job fails due to a "network error", the next job finishes > without any problem, but all fol

[Bacula-users] Bacula status

2006-09-30 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, Now that version 1.39.x is nearing the end of the development cycle (hopefully to be released in the second half of November), I am starting to think about what I am going to do next. The major projects I have in mind for myself are: 1. Development of a good, complete GUI interface. 2

[Bacula-users] GUI interface

2006-09-30 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, As I previously wrote, working on a GUI solution is now one of my top priorities. We have discussed the problems and possible solutions for getting a good GUI interface for Bacula a number of times. I've thought about all the possibilities, and there are a lot of them. Previously, I ha

Re: [Bacula-users] syslog and btape

2006-09-30 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Saturday 30 September 2006 22:15, m listus wrote: > > I've now suppressed that in 1.39.23. The ioctl() > > will only be done if you are > > running the SD as root. > ok. what is it supposed to do anyway? MTSETDRVBUFFERS -- sets/clears two eof marks, and fast find end of tape. > > > Two volu

Re: [Bacula-users] [Fwd: Re: GUI interface]

2006-09-30 Thread Kern Sibbald
tember 30, 2006 5:13 pm > Címzett: "Kern Sibbald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- > > hi, > > > and easy to program. Unfortunately, I haven't found any really good IDE > > (integrated de

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] GUI interface

2006-09-30 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Saturday 30 September 2006 18:07, Peter L. Buschman wrote: > > One of the things that is sorely missing in enterprise backup > frameworks is an embedded dynamic language. > C and C++ APIs tend to be rather inaccessible to users who find > themselves limited to which API functions > the progra

Re: [Bacula-users] GUI interface

2006-09-30 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Saturday 30 September 2006 21:56, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Sat, 2006-09-30 at 09:47, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > > Another idea that I have abandoned is developing a web application. There are > > two reasons: 1. I find no user interface design tools for web based > &g

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] GUI interface

2006-10-02 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Saturday 30 September 2006 17:28, Jo wrote: > Kern Sibbald schreef: > > Hello, > > > > As I previously wrote, working on a GUI solution is now one of my top > > priorities. We have discussed the problems and possible solutions for > > getting a good GUI inter

Re: [Bacula-users] unneccesarry Error reports in VolumeToCatalog Verifies

2006-10-02 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Monday 02 October 2006 15:40, Tobias Tiederle wrote: > Hi, > > we have some unneccessary error reports after verifies (VolumeToCatalog): > > 01-Oct 21:36 FOO-dir: The following files are missing: > 01-Oct 21:36 FOO-dir: /home/ > 01-Oct 21:36 FOO-dir: /usr/ > 01-Oct 21:36 FOO-dir:

Re: [Bacula-users] Doc updates on log rotation and signal handling (WAS: Re: [Bacula-devel] Bacula-dir problems with -HUP? (was Re: Backtrace Attached: bacula-dir lockups on FreeBSD))

2006-10-03 Thread Kern Sibbald
common ones in signal(3): > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=signal&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=FreeBSD+6.1-RELEASE&format=html > > - SIGHUP (normally reload config and restart jobs) > - SIGINFO (normally print a status report to log/stdout) > - SIGTE

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] GUI interface

2006-10-03 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Tuesday 03 October 2006 15:30, Lucas Di Pentima wrote: > Kern Sibbald wrote: > > > Well, I probably didn't explicitly state it in my email, but yes, this is a > > project I would like to do, but I certainly don't mean to discourage any > > other GUI. In f

Re: [Bacula-users] btape won't autoload for TL892 on Solaris 10?

2006-10-03 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Tuesday 03 October 2006 21:58, Alan Davis wrote: > > Self update on problem #1 - multiple causes and maybe a "non-problem" > ie: > > The btape autochanger test works perfectly, the fill command fails to > autoload the tapes. > > The mtx-changer command had some issues with the "list" and > w

Re: [Bacula-users] Binding to source IP address

2006-10-05 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Thursday 05 October 2006 11:02, James Ray wrote: > All, > I am wanting the communications from bacula to come out of the same IP > address I have DirAddress set as in the Director {} resource. This is > not the default system address. > > I have just tried to do this with IPTables and sou

Re: [Bacula-users] Binding to source IP address

2006-10-05 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Thursday 05 October 2006 14:01, Dan Langille wrote: > On 5 Oct 2006 at 12:34, James Ray wrote: > > > Jonas Björklund wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, James Ray wrote: > > > > > >> All, > > >> I am wanting the communications from bacula to come out of the > > >> same IP

[Bacula-users] Bacula BETA 1.39.24.20061002 source + Win32 binaries release to Source Forge

2006-10-05 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, I have just released Bacula BETA 1.39.24.20061002 source and the Win32 binaries to Source Forge. This is very likely to be the last beta release or next to last release before the official 1.40 production release in the second half of November. There are quite a number of areas of this

Re: [Bacula-users] Binding to source IP address

2006-10-05 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Thursday 05 October 2006 15:03, James Ray wrote: > Kern Sibbald wrote: > > On Thursday 05 October 2006 11:02, James Ray wrote: > >> All, > >>I am wanting the communications from bacula to come out of the same IP > >> address I have DirAddress set as

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula BETA 1.39.24.20061002 source + Win32 binaries release to Source Forge

2006-10-05 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Thursday 05 October 2006 22:40, Michael Brennen wrote: > On Thursday 05 October 2006 08:14, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > > I have just released Bacula BETA 1.39.24.20061002 source and the Win32 > > binaries to Source Forge. This is very likely to be the last beta release &

Re: [Bacula-users] Regress scripts / Multi-drive use

2006-10-06 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Friday 06 October 2006 02:21, Michael Brennen wrote: > > Per Kern's request I've been trying to get the regress scripts set up to find > a bug in multi-drive usage. In a 4 tape autochanger library only one tape is > being used. Up to and including the 9/9/2006 beta multiple drives were b

Re: [Bacula-users] Slow down with MySQL as a backend

2006-10-06 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Friday 06 October 2006 08:27, Dirk H. Schulz wrote: > Hi folks, > > I have started testing Bacula and do have a peculiar phenomen. > > I am using Bacula 1.36.x because it comes with Debian Sarge stable > (compiling the current version comes after the first testing phase). The > data I use fo

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula BETA 1.39.24.20061002 source + Win32 binaries release to Source Forge

2006-10-06 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Friday 06 October 2006 12:14, Heinz Ulrich Stille wrote: > On Thursday 05 October 2006 15:14, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > I have just released Bacula BETA 1.39.24.20061002 source and the Win32 > > binaries to Source Forge. This is very likely to be the last beta release > > or

Re: [Bacula-users] TLS support for tray-monitor

2006-10-06 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Friday 06 October 2006 12:43, Silver Salonen wrote: > I just tried configuring tray-monitor to connect with bacula-dir and bacula-sd > over TLS, but bacula-tray-monitor says me "TLS Enable" is not supported in > these resources. > > I found Landon Fuller's mail "Re: TLS Support" (2005-04-22

Re: [Bacula-users] Split Volume Files

2006-10-06 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Friday 06 October 2006 17:43, Dan Langille wrote: > On 6 Oct 2006 at 17:34, Rudolph Bott wrote: > > > does anybody know if it is possible to let bacula split volume files > > when you use disk storage? We think it might have a big impact on > > performance when you tell bacula to have several

Re: [Bacula-users] Split Volume Files

2006-10-06 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Friday 06 October 2006 18:18, Rudolph Bott wrote: > Dan Langille wrote: > > On 6 Oct 2006 at 17:34, Rudolph Bott wrote: > > > >> does anybody know if it is possible to let bacula split volume files > >> when you use disk storage? We think it might have a big impact on > >> performance when yo

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula BETA 1.39.24.20061002 source + Win32 binaries release to Source Forge

2006-10-08 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Friday 06 October 2006 15:02, Sebastien Guilbaud wrote: > > > I have just released Bacula BETA 1.39.24.20061002 source and the Win32 > > binaries to Source Forge. This is very likely to be the last beta release or > > next to last release before the official 1.40 production release in the

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula BETA 1.39.24.20061002 source + Win32 binaries release to Source Forge

2006-10-09 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Monday 09 October 2006 11:21, Sebastien Guilbaud wrote: > > > You need to read the ReleaseNotes *very* carefully as there are a number of > > changes/difficult areas to get it to load the first time mainly if you have > > an older version of Bacula running. > > > > The Win32 section of the

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] GUI interface

2006-10-09 Thread Kern Sibbald
> [0] http://indico.cern.ch/contributionDisplay.py?contribId=33&sessionId=41&confId=44 > [1]http://wiki.python.org/moin/PyQt > [2] http://www.riverbankcomputing.co.uk/pyqt/ > [3] http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/Docs/PyQt4/pyqt4ref.html > [4] http://www.fwbuilder.org/ >

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula BETA 1.39.24.20061002 source + Win32 binaries release to Source Forge

2006-10-09 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Friday 06 October 2006 21:13, Heinz Ulrich Stille wrote: > On Friday 06 October 2006 14:11, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > On Friday 06 October 2006 12:14, Heinz Ulrich Stille wrote: > > > In some circumstances the director process eats all available memory and > > > then

Re: [Bacula-users] Feature req: don't offline on shutdown/error

2006-10-09 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Friday 06 October 2006 21:36, Heinz Ulrich Stille wrote: > Hi! > > I usually administer our backups remotely, and someone else does change > tapes. Now that I've found out how "always open", "close on poll" and > "offline on unmount" work, I'm quite happy with the normal workflow. > > The only

Re: [Bacula-users] I can't get a tape out of the box

2006-10-09 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Saturday 07 October 2006 22:22, Gert Udby Nielsen wrote: > Hi > > We have at Dell storage tape backup with bacula version 1.36.1 The first thing that I recommend that you do is to upgrade to Bacula version 1.38.11 (note you must do a database upgrade). Your current Bacula version is very ol

Re: [Bacula-users] Binding to source IP address

2006-10-09 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Monday 09 October 2006 16:17, James Ray wrote: > Ryan Novosielski wrote: ... > > Unfortunately that is not possible in my case. So as I understand the > rest of this thread, yes my assumption is right, but no bacula can't > (Kern, and won't?) support binding to a source IP address for out going

Re: [Bacula-users] Still non-ideal handling of hard link recoveries

2006-10-09 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Monday 09 October 2006 16:38, James Ray wrote: > All, > So after another recover on some hard linked files I have yet another > question and problem. > > So recovering user 's directory that has hard links to user 's > directory bacula does the right thing of spotting the ha

[Bacula-users] bacula: backup is slow

2006-10-09 Thread Kern Sibbald
>From the statistics you show, the backup does not appear slow to me. The reason you might think it is slow is because you are comparing apples and oranges. On the one hand, you measure the time to to a non-compressed tar on a local machine sending the output down an extremely hi-speed bit b

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >