On Jan 29, 2008 3:31 PM, Matt Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The first thing I see is you do not have the Changer command in the
Autochanger part.
Scratch that. You do have that. I am not sure what the problem is.
Ok, thanks for taking a look tho John, tis appreciated...
Also if you
The first thing I see is you do not have the Changer command in the
Autochanger part.
Scratch that. You do have that. I am not sure what the problem is.
John
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var# tapeinfo -f /dev/sg6
Product Type: Medium Changer
Vendor ID: 'ATL '
Product ID: 'L500 632'
Revision: '0026'
Attached Changer API: No
SerialNumber: 'JF84918284'
SCSI ID: 0
SCSI LUN: 0
Ready: yes
It is /dev/autochanger1 for me because I wrote a udev
Hi John,
Are you 100% sure /dev/sg6 is your autochanger?
Aye..
tapeinfo -f /dev/sg6
will tell you.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var# tapeinfo -f /dev/sg6
Product Type: Medium Changer
Vendor ID: 'ATL '
Product ID: 'L500 632'
Revision: '0026'
Attached Changer API: No
SerialNumber:
Something silly I am doing wrong or a bug ? Any pointers would be
really appreciated :-)
I would start at a lower level than that.
Are you 100% sure /dev/sg6 is your autochanger?
tapeinfo -f /dev/sg6
will tell you.
Here is what I get for my changer:
# tapeinfo -f /dev/autochanger1
Product
# cat /etc/udev/rules.d/55-bacula.rules
SUBSYSTEM==scsi,ATTRS{vendor}==EXABYTE*,ATTRS{type}==8,
SYMLINK+=autochanger1
You will have to replace the vendor with your vendor. And make sure
the type matches. I am not sure this number is universal.
John
BTW, You can figure out this info using
Hi Arno,
You're testing as root. If the SD runs as a restricted user - which
it should - this user might not hold the necessary permissions to
access the device node.
As you're already thinking about udev, just create a rule that sets
proper ownerships.
Othe rthan that, try testing
Hi,
13.01.2008 00:06, Mike Seda wrote:
hi arno,
i have matched up my config to the example that you gave. so now i have:
FD: 20
SD: 20
DIR/Jobs: 1
DIR/Director: 20
DIR/Storage1(Autochanger): 4
but, jobs still seem to run in serial... any thoughts?
Have you reloaded the
hi arno,
please see inline responses:
Arno Lehmann wrote:
Hi,
13.01.2008 00:06, Mike Seda wrote:
hi arno,
i have matched up my config to the example that you gave. so now i have:
FD: 20
SD: 20
DIR/Jobs: 1
DIR/Director: 20
DIR/Storage1(Autochanger): 4
but, jobs still seem to
Hi,
14.01.2008 00:43, Mike Seda wrote:
hi arno,
please see inline responses:
Arno Lehmann wrote:
job concurrency set up but not working:
If that's more than one, you should check the job priorities - Bacula
will only run jobs with identical priority simultaneously.
wow... i think you
hi arno,
i have matched up my config to the example that you gave. so now i have:
FD: 20
SD: 20
DIR/Jobs: 1
DIR/Director: 20
DIR/Storage1(Autochanger): 4
...but, jobs still seem to run in serial... any thoughts?
thx,
mike
Arno Lehmann wrote:
Hi,
10.01.2008 20:34, Mike Seda wrote:
hi
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008, John Drescher wrote:
Using label barcodes and then
selecting drive 1 will allow this to continue while drive 0 is
churning away.
Why do you use label barcodes at all?
I just add the tapes to appropriate pools. Bacula will automagically label
blank tapes the first time
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008, John Drescher wrote:
How do I add blank tapes to a pool? I thought bacula just ignores them.
Inside bconsole, type add and follow the prompts.
Barcodes MUST be present and the required labels MUST match the barcodes.
AB
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008, John Drescher wrote:
I only use label barcodes when I insert new tapes. I just don't have
any new ones now..
Ok.
My procedure is
1) Use a query command to determine which tapes in my archive are
full. Of that I select which ones I want to remove.
2) Then I go to the
On Jan 11, 2008 11:01 AM, Alan Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008, John Drescher wrote:
I am confused at that. I will have to try this the next time I get
some new tapes. I did try the add command all the way to the question
about the number of tapes to add. Since I do not
Barcodes MUST be present and
I got that.
the required labels MUST match the barcodes.
I am confused at that. I will have to try this the next time I get
some new tapes. I did try the add command all the way to the question
about the number of tapes to add. Since I do not have a single new
tape
hi arno,
i forgot to mention that i have:
Maximum Concurrent Jobs = 2
should i increase that number? fyi, i just noticed that two concurrent
backup jobs do in fact run, but only for the _same_ host. it is weird.
regards,
mike
Arno Lehmann wrote:
Hi,
08.01.2008 17:34, John Drescher wrote:
ok, for the records, the only right way to use a backup job on a x-Drive
changer is over the changer device, not directly to a drive inside the
changer.
Since the multidrive scheduling now works well (with bacula-2.3.6) I
am pretty much back to sending all jobs to the autochanger device
unless
hi arno,
i forgot to mention that i have:
Maximum Concurrent Jobs = 2
You do know there are 5 places that Maximum Concurrent Jobs can be
set depending on what concurrency you wnat to allow with each daemon?
Although I believe in your case you probably only need it in the main
director config.
Hi,
10.01.2008 20:34, Mike Seda wrote:
hi arno,
i forgot to mention that i have:
Maximum Concurrent Jobs = 2
Where do you have that setting?
should i increase that number? fyi, i just noticed that two concurrent
backup jobs do in fact run, but only for the _same_ host. it is weird.
I'm
John Drescher wrote:
On Jan 8, 2008 11:21 AM, Mike Seda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
all,
i am frustrated beyond belief.
i recently spent $8K for a second tape drive for my library.
all i want is for two bacula backup jobs (one for each tape drive) to
run concurrently. i upgraded the
different pools would be extremely undesirable for me. i currently have
the following pools:
1: Weekly
2: Scratch
3: Migrate
4: Archive
5: Monthly
6: Daily
7: Clone
the aforementioned pools are very well organized, and i would rather
leave them be.
i am willing to put the two jobs i
Michael Short wrote:
I meant for this to hit the list:
On Jan 8, 2008 3:22 PM, Michael Short [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike,
I recommend that you upgrade your FD agents, I have had some trouble
with the volumes produced by 2.0FD-2.2SD/DIR
yikes... i will upgrade the FDs after the
i already have Prefer Mounted Volumes = no set in bacula-dir.conf
One other thing you can do is to use the individual drives in the job
and not the archive device.
Here is what I have for my 2 drive changer:
my bacula-sd.conf
Autochanger {
Name = Magnum224-0
Device = LTO2-0, LTO2-1
Arno Lehmann wrote:
Hi,
08.01.2008 17:34, John Drescher wrote:
On Jan 8, 2008 11:21 AM, Mike Seda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
all,
i am frustrated beyond belief.
i recently spent $8K for a second tape drive for my library.
all i want is for two bacula backup jobs (one for each
Hi John,
Bacula 2.2.6, Adic Scalar 24, 5,5TB Storage
On Mittwoch 09 Januar 2008 22:31:12 wrote:
i already have Prefer Mounted Volumes = no set in bacula-dir.conf
One other thing you can do is to use the individual drives in the job
and not the archive device.
Here is what I have for my 2
On Jan 10, 2008 12:31 AM, Falk Sauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi John,
Bacula 2.2.6, Adic Scalar 24, 5,5TB Storage
On Mittwoch 09 Januar 2008 22:31:12 wrote:
i already have Prefer Mounted Volumes = no set in bacula-dir.conf
One other thing you can do is to use the individual drives in
Hi,
08.01.2008 17:34, John Drescher wrote:
On Jan 8, 2008 11:21 AM, Mike Seda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
all,
i am frustrated beyond belief.
i recently spent $8K for a second tape drive for my library.
all i want is for two bacula backup jobs (one for each tape drive) to
run concurrently. i
I meant for this to hit the list:
On Jan 8, 2008 3:22 PM, Michael Short [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike,
I recommend that you upgrade your FD agents, I have had some trouble
with the volumes produced by 2.0FD-2.2SD/DIR
Sincerely,
-Michael
Andrew J. Millar wrote:
Greetings
Apologies if similar questions have been asked before. I have a Scalar100
autochanger with two tape drives and am running bacula-1.37.30. I have split
the 60 tapes in to two pools, one for filesystem backups, the other for
database backups.
My
Hi
OK, I've increased the Max Concurrent Jobs to 2 in bacula-dir, and run two jobs
- one in the Filesystem pool and one in the Oracle Database pool, however they
again didn't run in parallel, and in fact, when the 2nd job ran, it used the
same tape drive as the first, rather than the other
Hi,
On 20.09.2005 12:34, Andrew J. Millar wrote:
Hi
OK, I've increased the Max Concurrent Jobs to 2 in bacula-dir, and run two jobs
- one in the Filesystem pool and one in the Oracle Database pool, however they
again didn't run in parallel, and in fact, when the 2nd job ran, it used the
32 matches
Mail list logo
