Crap, brain dead :(
On Sat, 2008-11-08 at 18:07 -0500, Chris Frey wrote:
> ---
>
> kernel/crypto.c |5 -
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/crypto.c b/kernel/crypto.c
> index b82f185..523e6a7 100644
> --- a/kernel/crypto.c
> +++ b/kernel/crypto.c
On Sat, 2008-11-08 at 18:02 -0500, Chris Frey wrote:
> Hi Rick,
>
> Your latest CVS compiles against 2.6.26.5.
>
> I noticed you fixed a couple of errors in my previous patches. Thanks.
>
>
> > We can't return ENODEV if the socket is 0 in desktop_open. In the case
> > of a non-blocking open th
---
kernel/crypto.c |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/crypto.c b/kernel/crypto.c
index b82f185..523e6a7 100644
--- a/kernel/crypto.c
+++ b/kernel/crypto.c
@@ -57,7 +57,10 @@ void blackberry_sha1_init(void)
{
info("%s(%d) - fail
Hi Rick,
Your latest CVS compiles against 2.6.26.5.
I noticed you fixed a couple of errors in my previous patches. Thanks.
> We can't return ENODEV if the socket is 0 in desktop_open. In the case
> of a non-blocking open the socket will not yet have been set, but
> the open must succeed. This
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 5:59 PM, Rick Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-11-08 at 17:20 -0500, Martin Owens wrote:
>> On Sat, 2008-11-08 at 11:56 -0800, Chris Maresca wrote:
>> > Just as a point here, and only because I know far too much about OSS
>> > licensing and have worked closely
On Sat, 2008-11-08 at 17:20 -0500, Martin Owens wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-11-08 at 11:56 -0800, Chris Maresca wrote:
> > Just as a point here, and only because I know far too much about OSS
> > licensing and have worked closely with the Linux Foundation.
> >
> > If you intend to follow kernel mainlin
On Sat, 2008-11-08 at 11:56 -0800, Chris Maresca wrote:
> Just as a point here, and only because I know far too much about OSS
> licensing and have worked closely with the Linux Foundation.
>
> If you intend to follow kernel mainline as decided by Linus, he has
> already stated that ALL mainline
Just as a point here, and only because I know far too much about OSS
licensing and have worked closely with the Linux Foundation.
If you intend to follow kernel mainline as decided by Linus, he has
already stated that ALL mainline code should be GPLv2 only. So I would
strongly suggest that you
On Sat, 2008-11-08 at 04:18 -0500, Rick Scott wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-11-08 at 01:06 -0500, Chris Frey wrote:
> > Hi Rick,
> >
> > I notice that your license text for your kernel module indicates
> > "GPL v2 only" while the code indicates "GPL v2 or later."
>
> That seemed to be what the kernel sou
On Sat, 2008-11-08 at 05:37 -0500, Chris Frey wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 08, 2008 at 05:11:23AM -0500, Rick Scott wrote:
> > > In reading through the code, it appears that the desktop support is not
> > > finished yet. Is this correct?
> >
> > Is software ever really finished :) How so?
>
> :-)
>
> I
On Sat, Nov 08, 2008 at 05:11:23AM -0500, Rick Scott wrote:
> > In reading through the code, it appears that the desktop support is not
> > finished yet. Is this correct?
>
> Is software ever really finished :) How so?
:-)
I saw a desktop_write() but I didn't see a desktop_read(), so I assumed
On Sat, 2008-11-08 at 01:24 -0500, Chris Frey wrote:
> Hi Rick,
>
> Got some questions for you: :-)
>
> In reading through the code, it appears that the desktop support is not
> finished yet. Is this correct?
Is software ever really finished :) How so?
>
> It also looks like the interface, f
On Sat, 2008-11-08 at 01:06 -0500, Chris Frey wrote:
> Hi Rick,
>
> I notice that your license text for your kernel module indicates
> "GPL v2 only" while the code indicates "GPL v2 or later."
That seemed to be what the kernel sources I looked at had, so I wanted
to go with that.
>
> If you rea
On Fri, 2008-11-07 at 21:59 -0500, Chris Frey wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 08:04:54PM -0500, Rick Scott wrote:
> > > I grabbed your latest CVS and noticed you added ifdefs. I was still
> > > having
> > > trouble compiling against 2.6.26.5, so I'm moving the crypto stuff into
> > > its own API
14 matches
Mail list logo
