[Bf-committers] Linux Building: `install_deps.sh` is replaced by `install_linux_packages.py`

Hello everyone, As agreed during January's Blender Admins meeting [1], the `install_deps.sh` script has been removed and replaced by a new tool, `install_linux_packages.py`. You can find more details on this devtalk thread [2] [1]

[Bf-committers] Blender Birds of a Feather at Siggraph Asia 2022

Hi all, Blender will be hosting a Birds of a Feather community meeting at SIGGRAPH Asia in Daegu, South Korea. Feel free to check the post on Blender’s devtalk

Re: [Bf-committers] developer.blender.org account disabled

OK then my bad. I'll re-enable your account, afraid we cannot really recover the original description unfortunately. Much sorry again. Cheers, Bastien On 8/19/22 13:17, Mikhail Rachinskiy via Bf-committers wrote: I did edit the description yesterday, I've added the link to my website. --

Re: [Bf-committers] developer.blender.org account disabled

Hi Mikhail I did disable your account this morning as spam yes, can't be 100% sure (can have made a mistake), but afair it did has bad-looking links on it. Did you edit your profile description yesterday 18th August at around 7:25PM CEST ? If not, then your account was most likely hacked,

Re: [Bf-committers] Handling of user data.

Hi Ray, We already have a task to address this issue: https://developer.blender.org/T61209 But this needs time to be properly handled, and these days we spend everything besides regular maintenance on 'big projects', so... this one and several other relatively small core improvements and

Re: [Bf-committers] Proposal for clarified VFX Reference Platform Support

Hi Sergey and all, and thanks for this proposition. This proposal makes complete sense to me. I do not see any benefit for Blender to stick to a strict compatibility with VFX platform, but indeed ensuring a file-level compatibility seems a good minimum guaranty. I have one question though,

Re: [Bf-committers] Blender 3.1 Preliminary Dates

Hi Dalai, Since BCon2 is a fairly soft limit, and we do not plan to add that many new features in 3.1 (besides incremental improvements), I personally do not see a problem with it happening on 29th December? End of the year is always a fairly low-activity moment anyway, would be nice if

Re: [Bf-committers] Proxy Removal for Blender 3.0

that I tried during production and eventually resorted to local materials because those drivers would fail upon linking the character. Thanks for your reply, have a good evening Hadrien On Wed, 22 Sept 2021 at 10:43, Bastien Montagne via Bf-committers mailto:bf-committers@blender.org>&g

Re: [Bf-committers] Proxy Removal for Blender 3.0

revert to the linked material instead, and the override button was inoperative (greyed out). I will give this a round of testing with latest master tonight, unless there is a specific branch I should check out ? I'm a bit out of the loop. Cheers, Hadrien On Tue, 21 Sept 2021 at 16:32, Bastien

[Bf-committers] Proxy Removal for Blender 3.0

Hi fellow users & developers Now that library overrides gained maturity and are production ready in the 'character animation' case (where they replace the old 'proxy' system), it is time to think about removing those proxies. Plan is to commit in the coming days the following changes:  - Add

Re: [Bf-committers] *** SPAM *** Weekly Development Notes Followup

Hi Ryan, Not sure how you see that as a personal attack? Fact is, I think spending half a day on something does earns it a note in the weekly report. And yes, I was frustrated spending time having to demo the issue after explaining it's cause/source, finding again the exact use case

Re: [Bf-committers] Deprecation of Phabricator

FYI, here is the (exhaustive and extensive) list of gitlab features, with their support in free/premium/ultimate plans: https://about.gitlab.com/features/ On 6/4/21 10:15 AM, Dalai Felinto via Bf-committers wrote: Hi Sebastian, Which features you are referring to? CI/CD? Thanks, -Dalai-

Re: [Bf-committers] VFX reference platform 2022 draft

way of tangible benefits. On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 12:14 AM Bastien Montagne via Bf-committers wrote: Hi, The only info regarding versions availability we have is that sentence: A change in policy to only allow released versions to be included in each year's VFX Reference Platform This is fairly v

Re: [Bf-committers] VFX reference platform 2022 draft

Hi, The only info regarding versions availability we have is that sentence: A change in policy to only allow released versions to be included in each year's VFX Reference Platform This is fairly vague and unclear, since it does not specify any limit date... I asked about why they still

Re: [Bf-committers] Clang-Tidy: Request for Feedback

Hi, just my two cents, since I did not take part in this project in itself: So here are some questions to the developers: - Do you have a strong feeling about leaving a .clang-tidy file as it is now (where file modification requires manual re-compilation) ? I do not mind having to force clean

Re: [Bf-committers] Tamil Translation request

Hi vanangamudi, We have https://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-translations-dev (and https://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-translations-svn for the commits logs themselves). All this (and more) information is listed/linked from the Translations project on phabricator

Re: [Bf-committers] Blender developer week notes - 2021.02.15

Hi Ray, This is definitively a typo in the mail, we still have one month of BCon1 for 2.93. ;) Regarding 2.92, I'd also like to point out that the 'features' column is still full of tasks [1], when it should have been cleared out weeks ago (when we switched to BCon3). Would be mice if all

[Bf-committers] Blender developer meeting notes - 2021.01.11

Hi, Notes for meeting of Monday, 11 January 2021. 11:00 CET / UTC 10:00 on [#blender-coders](https://blender.chat/channel/blender-coders) on blender.chat. # Announcements ## Corrective Blender 2.91.1 Release It is schedule for this Wednesday 13th. Jeroen Bakker will handle the release, in

[Bf-committers] Blender developer meeting notes - 2021.01.04

Hi, Notes for meeting of Monday, 04 January 2021. 18:00 CET / UTC 17:00 on #blender-coders 8 on blender.chat. Another quiet meeting, the team is just getting out of the Christmas holidays. Announcements   *  Happy New Year to everyone!   * This week is the first bug sprint of 2.92

[Bf-committers] Blender developer meeting notes - 2020.12.28

Hi, Here are the notes from today's developer meeting. Next meeting is Monday, 04 January 18:00 CET / 17:00 UTC, in #blender-coders on blender.chat. For the complete report read it on: https://devtalk.blender.org/t/28-december-2020/16728 Announcements == Was a very short

[Bf-committers] Blender developer meeting notes - 2020.12.21

Hi, Here are the notes from today's developer meeting. Next meeting is Monday, 28 December 11:00 CET / 10:00 UTC, in #blender-coders on blender.chat. For the complete report read it on: https://devtalk.blender.org/t/21-december-2020/16652 Announcements == Nothing exciting this

Re: [Bf-committers] Test mail, please disregard

Test answer :) On 12/8/20 7:49 PM, Dan McGrath via Bf-committers wrote: Hi, Sorry for the spam, but there is a report of a user that they are not able to send mail to the list. There may be several test messages from people, if needed, so apologies for any inconvenience!

Re: [Bf-committers] Proposing a unique ID for Blender objects system, for use with game engines.

itters ___ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org https://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers -- -- Bastien Montagne - bast...@blender.org Blender developer ___ Bf-committers mailing l

Re: [Bf-committers] Proposing a unique ID for Blender objects system, for use with game engines.

Hi, After talking with Brecht we agreed that having optional UUIDs for our data-blocks would be 'nice to have'. A design task was created for that: https://developer.blender.org/T83019 We do not have currently any developer available to work on this project, but we would of course welcome a

Re: [Bf-committers] 2.92 dates revised

Looks good to me. :) On 11/3/20 12:45 PM, Dalai Felinto via Bf-committers wrote: Hi, I was double-checking the dates for 2.92 [1] and for some reason the dates were off by one month (bcon1 was 1 month shorter). I think it was simply an oversight on my end when I calculated the dates. That

Re: [Bf-committers] Monday meetings - feedback wanted

Hi, Forgot to answer to that mail… But I essentially agree with the proposal to make them on a need-to-have basis. Meetings should be useful, otherwise they are loss of time, and indeed those Monday meetings have had less and less presence/activities in the recent years. Think we'd need

Re: [Bf-committers] Blender 2.91 bcon2

Hi, and thanks. Can we already create the 2.92 project as well? Since it means some tasks already need to be (re)scheduled for that release… Cheers, Bastien On 9/18/20 9:41 PM, Dalai Felinto via Bf-committers wrote: Hi, We are now officially in 2.91 bcon2 [1]. "Work to improve, optimize

[Bf-committers] Policies about patches modifying third-parties libraries.

Hi, Under build_files/build_environment/patches we have a bunch of small patches for the libraries we build using make deps. Most of them are about fixing builds for some platform or architecture, which is a bit annoying but acceptable imho. However, today I discovered that Blender cannot

Re: [Bf-committers] 8GB of RAM insufficient for bulding Blender

There's also another solution, using ninja builder instead of make one (ninja should be easy to install from your distro's packages). Once installed, you need to generate a CMake build, specifying ninja as builder (instead of the default, make option), and enabling  WITH_NINJA_POOL_JOBS: cd

Re: [Bf-committers] Blender developer meeting notes - 2020.2.24

On 24/02/2020 11:57, Dalai Felinto wrote: 2.82 * Campbell Barton suggests two fixes could make into an eventual 2.82a release: * T73898: UDIM crash changing form tiled to single rBd6977b5 * T73862: Fluid Sim file handle resource leak rB60890cc * Developers to keep an eye on the

Re: [Bf-committers] OSL / LLVM / Freetype library updates.

install_deps has been updated. Cheers, Bastien On 08/02/2020 22:32, Ray Molenkamp wrote: Fellow Platform devs, Due to various issues in several of the dependencies some of them have been bumped to new versions. OSL 1.10.9 / LLVM 9.0.1 - D6744 FreeType 2.10.1 - D6645 Please update these

Re: [Bf-committers] Moving to bcon3 in a couple of hours.

Hey nathan, Regarding the Start_New_Release_Cycle page, I think there are a couple of hickups in that bcon 3 documentation? Namely: * Missing creating release branch for tools|(||rBDT /source/tools). |* AFAIK we still do not release contrib addons, so why create a release branch for that

Re: [Bf-committers] Moving to Python-3.8

TL;DR Am all for switching to python 3.8 in Blender 2.82. TBH I would not be too much concerned about that VFX reference thing, waiting over ten years until a deprecated technology is finally officially not supported anymore to switch to a new, modern one sounds like a joke to me, especially

Re: [Bf-committers] Committing fixes for releases in stabilizing branch.

branch. I reverted that now, but we should add code on git.blender.org to prevent this. On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 8:25 PM Bastien Montagne wrote: Also, looks like phabricator needs some tweaking, it’s not catching bug fixes and other phab object references from commits to the release branch (e.g

Re: [Bf-committers] Committing fixes for releases in stabilizing branch.

slow to parse commits in new/quiet branches, but after 1h30 I think there is something else at play here. ;) On 11/10/2019 18:45, Bastien Montagne wrote: This has been very badly communicated so far! This mail is fine as "preparation", "warning" one. But now the branch has

Re: [Bf-committers] Committing fixes for releases in stabilizing branch.

This has been very badly communicated so far! This mail is fine as "preparation", "warning" one. But now the branch has actually be created, without **any** message here? Seriously? We need an official "We entered BCon3 NOW, branch blender-v2.81-release has been created, all bug fixes whould

Re: [Bf-committers] Blender SK translation

Hi Andrej, That’s great news. :) Ideally, since Blender is an ever-evolving package, you or your father-in-law could become part of the Translations project [1], then you could commit and keep updating the Slovak translation (the whole process is detailed in links from that main page).

Re: [Bf-committers] Release cycle 2.81: dates and branch proposal

As already said by others, Blender is not a library. We have always tried as hard as possible not to break its API, but this is not, and imho should never be, a *hard* goal, at any point of the release process. Sanity of code and user experience are more important than API stability. That

Re: [Bf-committers] BF coordination meeting notes - 2019.08.19

Hey, just a note about automated processes: would be great if automated building could also handle API doc generation (in addition to i18n stuff)... Might also help catching breakages sooner (currently fighting 'something' that during last week broke the docs building for me...). On

Re: [Bf-committers] Upgrade Python 3.7.0 to 3.7.4

Bumped the numpy version in install_deps.sh script as well (looks like the python ver had already been taken care of here). On 14/08/2019 01:29, Ray Molenkamp wrote: All, Took a bit, but the windows libs have been updated, couple of note worthy things: First: After a brief consult with

Re: [Bf-committers] Design process meeting notes - 2019.08.13

Forwarded Message Subject:Re: [Bf-committers] Design process meeting notes - 2019.08.13 Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 09:25:20 +0200 From: Bastien Montagne To: Brecht Van Lommel Ah OK, thanks for the precision, was wondering a bit what was that 'design' module

Re: [Bf-committers] *** SPAM *** Re: Blender 2.80 release, commits to port over

Well, thing is that RC's are tested/used by maybe 5 to 10% of our user base, at the very most? So as always, we know that we'll get another train of reports only when we actually call it 'final' release. Inluding some critical ones that would never have been reported with only RC's, even if we

Re: [Bf-committers] Blender 2.80 Release AHOY

Hi, Py API doc has been updated. Cheers, Bastien On 29/07/2019 16:53, Brecht Van Lommel wrote: Hi all, We are ready for the final release build for Blender 2.80. Information for platform maintainers: - Build from the blender-v2.80-release branch, SHA

Re: [Bf-committers] Blender 2.80 Release Candidate 2 AHOY

Hi, API doc has been updated for RC2 as well. Cheers, Bastien On 18/07/2019 16:58, Brecht Van Lommel wrote: Hi all, We are ready for the second Release Candidate for the Blender 2.80 release. Information for platform maintainers: - Build from the blender-v2.80-release branch, SHA

[Bf-committers] UN-subversionned versionning code in release branch (for RC1 of v2.80)

Hi devs, Just noticed that we forgot to properly add a last subversion bump to take into account the 'orphanned' versionning code at the end of our 2.80 doversion monster. ;) This is not dramatic, but not ideal either, for releases we should have everything properly "guarded" by a version

Re: [Bf-committers] Blender 2.80 Release Candidate 1 AHOY

Hi, Yes, it has been the case (mostly) since several months already… Additional changes are always possible, even breaking ones, but we try to avoid them at all cost (i.e. would only happen if we really cannot do otherwise, in practice there is *very* little chance to see this happen).

Re: [Bf-committers] Blender 2.80 Release Candidate 1 AHOY

Hi, API doc for 2.80 has been uploaded at the usual place. Cheers, Bastien On 10/07/2019 18:16, Sergey Sharybin wrote: Hi, We are ready for the first Release Candidate for Blender 2.80 release. Information for platform maintainers: - Build from the blender-2.80-release branch, SHA

[Bf-committers] Remainders about changes affecting RNA/API

Hey fellow devs, Please remember to run some grep over the whole code base (including add-ons) when doing changes in RNA/API (especially removing something, in that case). That would avoid unecessary noise in tracker, we already have enough to handle there (see

[Bf-committers] Fwd: Re: Error after Updates to developer/git/svn/buildbot

Forwarded Message Subject: Re: [Bf-committers] Error after Updates to developer/git/svn/buildbot Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2019 22:27:29 +0100 From: Bastien Montagne To: Dan McGrath Yep, seems to be working fine again, thanks! :) On 02/02/2019 22:20, Dan McGrath wrote

Re: [Bf-committers] Error after Updates to developer/git/svn/buildbot

Can confirm same issue here as well (debian64 testing). On 02/02/2019 18:36, Ray Molenkamp wrote: Same issue here, anonymous usage seems to work git clone git://git.blender.org/blender.git works, however authenticated users git clone g...@git.blender.org:blender.git fail with the error

Re: [Bf-committers] Update openCollada to 1.6.68

Done for install_deps. :) On 05/12/2018 10:54, Gaia Clary wrote: Hi, Platform maintainers :) Please update the subversion repository libraries to OpenCollada 1.6-68 This allows us to add support for importing Animation clips. The Release sources recommended by OpenCollada can be found here:

Re: [Bf-committers] Library updates for Blender 2.8

Don’t think we are in urgent hurry here, we can give it a few more weeks and see whether 3.7.1 emerges in time for us (would say dead line for libs update would be end of September?) On 03/08/2018 10:57, Sergey Sharybin wrote: One thing which is raising my attention in 3.7.1 release log is:

[Bf-committers] Blender developers meeting notes - 2018-05-28

Hi all, Here are the notes from today's 16 UTC (18 CET) meeting in irc.freenode.net #blendercoders. Reminder: meetings are on Mondays, next meeting is 04th June, 08 UTC (10 CET). 1) Blender 2.8 (and code quest!) - Antonio Vazquez completed requested changes on new GreasePencil branch,

[Bf-committers] Blender developers meeting notes - 2018-03-19

.28March_12th_-_16th.29 -- Clément Foucault: https://wiki.blender.org/index.php/User:Hypersomniac/Foundation/2018#Week_61:_12th_-_18th_March -- Campbell Barton: http://download.blender.org/ftp/ideasman42/donelist/2018.html#week-365-march-12 -- Bastien Montagne: https://wiki.blender.org/index.php

Re: [Bf-committers] Do we accept to have infinite recursive RNA layout patterns?

FYI, decided to go with a somewhat ugly, but safe and non-API-breaking solution for now, see https://developer.blender.org/rB0301df40e5b6c51575d7f9013a1a28b901063829 Bastien On 16/03/2018 15:50, Bastien Montagne wrote: Hi devs, So, was investigating a weird issue today found while doing

[Bf-committers] Do we accept to have infinite recursive RNA layout patterns?

Hi devs, So, was investigating a weird issue today found while doing some static override tests, and ended up finding the someone, at some era lost in the mist of times, had the genius idea of creating a sort of infinite recursion in  PointCache RNA struct (defined in rna_object_force.c).

[Bf-committers] Blender developers meeting notes - 2018-03-05

#Week_8_.28February_26th_-_2nd.29 -- Clément Foucault: https://wiki.blender.org/index.php/User:Hypersomniac/Foundation/2018#Week_60:_26th_-_4th_March -- Campbell Barton: http://download.blender.org/ftp/ideasman42/donelist/2018.html#week-363-february-26 -- Bastien Montagne: https://wiki.blender.org

[Bf-committers] Blender developers meeting notes - 2018-02-19

Barton: http://download.blender.org/ftp/ideasman42/donelist/2018.html -- Bastien Montagne: https://wiki.blender.org/index.php/User:Mont29/Foundation/2018#Week_231_-_02.2F10_to_02.2F16 3) GSoC Blender is in this year again, now is time for students to get in touch with the team, proposals

Re: [Bf-committers] 2.79a release - proposed list of commits

16:39, Bastien Montagne wrote: Thanks, done. Le 03/01/2018 à 14:24, Gaia Clary a écrit : Maybe we can add https://developer.blender.org/rB26f98446b17f418a633a1420a491e5ad0b59b988 I do not know if this change breaks anything. At least i am not aware of issues for now. If it really breaks

Re: [Bf-committers] [GSoC 2018]Project -- Testing for Core Libraries

@Ricardo thanks for spotting the broken link, should be fixed now. Bastien Le 13/02/2018 à 12:38, Ricardo Nunes a écrit : https://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Dev:Ref/GoogleSummerOfCode/2018/Students You'll probably want to start there (And especially pay attention to the application process

Re: [Bf-committers] ?==?utf-8?q? Blender developers meeting notes - 2018-02-12

that now, it should have much better handling of libs, and you do not even need to save & reload your file! Cheers, Bastien Le 13/02/2018 à 09:24, Manuel Rais a écrit : Le Lundi, Février 12, 2018 20:01 CET, Bastien Montagne <montagn...@wanadoo.fr> a écrit:  Hi all,1) Blender 2.79 'a' rel

[Bf-committers] Blender developers meeting notes - 2018-02-12

of CoW Depsgraph core work is now done, lots of testing, fixing and polishing remains for coming weeks. - Bastien Montagne is working on polishing asset-engine branch to get it ready for blender2.8 merge. - Weekly reports: -- Sergey Sharybin: https://wiki.blender.org/index.php/User:Nazg-gul

[Bf-committers] Blender developers meeting notes - 2018-02-05

/User:Dfelinto/Foundation18#Week_5_.28January_29th_-_2nd.29 -- Clément Foucault: https://wiki.blender.org/index.php/User:Hypersomniac/Foundation/2018#Week_56:_29th_-_5th_February -- Campbell Barton: http://download.blender.org/ftp/ideasman42/donelist/2018.html#week-359-january-29 -- Bastien Montagne: https

Re: [Bf-committers] Blender 2.79a Release Candidate AHOY

b8c4f22 - Locale revision: 1bbc9bdabe4ed26c164aef8a43ef39657dc23cfb - Libraries SVN tag: blender-2.79a-release Suggested name: blender-2.79a-rc- Make sure you're using 2.79a tag for libraries. Put builds to usual location and let me know when they are ready., Special thanks to Bastien Montagne

Re: [Bf-committers] Blender 2.79a Release Candidate AHOY

they are ready., Special thanks to Bastien Montagne for coordinating 2.79a, and everyone else who invested their time on porting fixes to the branch! ___ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org https://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf

Re: [Bf-committers] How to maintain for master and blender2.8 in parallel?

a change to master also expected to do the merge of those changes to blender2.8, or do the "several times a day" merges naturally pick up all changes committed to master recently? On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 7:02 AM Bastien Montagne <montagn...@wanadoo.fr> wrote: Hi Gaia, You sh

Re: [Bf-committers] How to maintain for master and blender2.8 in parallel?

Hi Gaia, You should just commit to master, and then merge master in blender2.8, that’s how we deal with fixes that should go to both. In fact, blender2.8 remains totally based on master for now, we do merges several times a day usually, to ensure it keeps manageable. :) Cheers, Bastien

[Bf-committers] Blender developers meeting notes - 2018-01-22

/User:Dfelinto/Foundation18#Week_3_.28January_15th_-_19th.29 -- Clément Foucault: https://wiki.blender.org/index.php/User:Hypersomniac/Foundation/2018#Week_54:_15th_-_21st_January -- Campbell Barton: http://download.blender.org/ftp/ideasman42/donelist/2018.html#week-357-january-15 -- Bastien

[Bf-committers] Blender developers meeting notes - 2018-01-15

Vazquez reports from Grease Pencil meeting with the team that GP still needs some design work for its integration in render process, design doc should follow soon. - Sergey Sharybin has been working on consolidating DEG code further. - Bastien Montagne kept working on Static Overrides and Asset

[Bf-committers] Blender developers meeting notes - 2018-01-08

://download.blender.org/ftp/ideasman42/donelist/2018.html#week-355-january-1 -- Bastien Montagne: https://wiki.blender.org/index.php/User:Mont29/Foundation/2018#Week 225_-_12.2F30_to_01.2F05 Thanks, Bastien ___ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org https

Re: [Bf-committers] 2.79a release - proposed list of commits

. Also in case of failure the workaround is simple: The user can set the export option manually in the export panel instead of relying on Blender to decide what is correct and what not. cheers, Gaia On 03.01.2018 12:36, Bastien Montagne wrote: For the record, created a phab task to track

Re: [Bf-committers] 2.79a release - proposed list of commits

For the record, created a phab task to track the release status (thanks to Campbell for the suggestion): https://developer.blender.org/T53683 Le 27/12/2017 à 12:05, Bastien Montagne a écrit : So… looks like our list of commits to backport is too long, even the ML server does not want

Re: [Bf-committers] 2.79a release - proposed list of commits

Thanks Brecht, updated lists of commits: http://pasteall.org/745702 Le 01/01/2018 à 18:02, Brecht Van Lommel a écrit : Thanks, I've backported my commits with merge conflicts, and a couple more that were excluded initially. On Mon, Jan 1, 2018 at 4:44 PM, Bastien Montagne <mont

Re: [Bf-committers] 2.79a release - proposed list of commits

! :) Bastien Le 27/12/2017 à 12:05, Bastien Montagne a écrit : So… looks like our list of commits to backport is too long, even the ML server does not want to swallow it. :) Here is the list we gathered, Sergey and I: http://pasteall.org/737326 First part are commits we think should be included

Re: [Bf-committers] 2.79a release - proposed list of commits

overwrites default prefs rB855799ecc Fix T53430: Cut at the strip end fails w/ endstill rB4a734325f bl_app_override: support empty UI layout items rB7a58ff928 Math Lib: signed versions of quaternion angle rBe418c858 3D View: use shortest angle between quaternions On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 10:05 PM, Bastien

Re: [Bf-committers] 2.79a release - proposed list of commits

Thanks, done. Le 27/12/2017 à 16:01, Gaia Clary a écrit : hi. I believe this one (Collada - crash during export) should be added: rB1f95347882 ( Fix T53322 ) But maybe Campbell should decide. cheers, Gaia On 27.12.2017 12:05, Bastien Montagne wrote: So… looks like our list of commits

Re: [Bf-committers] 2.79a release - proposed list of commits

should be each developer's own responsibility, and bugfix releases would be less disruptive to the development process. Thanks, Brecht. On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Bastien Montagne <montagn...@wanadoo.fr> wrote: I just happen to have finished gathering add-ons commits and send the list

Re: [Bf-committers] 2.79a release - proposed list of commits

for example. Cheers, Julien On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Sybren A. Stüvel <syb...@stuvel.eu> wrote: On 27/12/17 12:05, Bastien Montagne wrote: First part are commits we think should be included, please double-check yours though. [...] You may also suggest other commit of course, jus

[Bf-committers] 2.79a release - proposed list of commits

So… looks like our list of commits to backport is too long, even the ML server does not want to swallow it. :) Here is the list we gathered, Sergey and I: http://pasteall.org/737326 First part are commits we think should be included, please double-check yours though. Second part are commits

[Bf-committers] No IRC for me

Hey guys, Since yesterday 8pm, I cannot connect to freenode at all (getting a cryptic "Notice -- You need to identify via SASL to use this server")… From some googling, it could be related to recent spambots attacks maybe? Anyway, just so that you know (and hopping this gets fixed soon).

[Bf-committers] Blender developers meeting notes - 2017-12-11

quot; made groups and proxies to work. Some Spring shots can now be opened and played-back fine in 2.8. A bit slow though, COW made it to re-evaluated IDs too much, needs more refined behavior. - Bastien Montagne worked on various minor tasks related to Asset engine and Static override (also some

[Bf-committers] Blender developers meeting notes - 2017-11-27

. Next week he’ll have to solve issues of the whole scene evaluation when something is changing when having copy-on-write enabled (that would imply adding more granular update tagging, which then can be used for tools, and make tools to work!). - Bastien Montagne hopes to merge static ID override

[Bf-committers] Blender developers meeting notes - 2017-11-13

- Campbell Barton added new design/proposal to rework our notifier system, and address its current limitations (long-standing project, but now essential to finish manipulators, see https://developer.blender.org/T53308). - Bastien Montagne should have static ID override ready for review and 2.8

[Bf-committers] Blender developers meeting notes - 2017-10-16

) Blender 2.8 projects - Not much to report, works keeps on going. - Campbell Barton did tool system proposal (with proof of concept patch), see https://developer.blender.org/T53047. http://download.blender.org/ftp/ideasman42/donelist/2017.html#week-343-october-9 - Bastien Montagne keeps working

Re: [Bf-committers] Using wheels in blender addons

Yes, using threading in py scripts in Blender is perfectly valid - as long as you do not touch Blender data itself at all (nor try to call some operators from a thread, etc.). If you use your own code on your own data, no problem with threading at all (i18n messages generation script e.g. uses

Re: [Bf-committers] Library update: libsndfile 1.0.28

We did not have any control over libsndfile version in install_deps, assuming any half-decent distro has reasonably recent version of it, would rather keep it that way (otherwise, we can also check for versions of all image libs, etc. - would become endless). ;) Cheers, Bastien Le

Re: [Bf-committers] Library update: Python 3.6.2

Updated install_deps for python 3.6.2 and numpy 1.13.1. Le 19/09/2017 à 11:44, Campbell Barton a écrit : Hi, after 2.79 released we planned to bump Python to 3.6. Could platform maintainers update Python builds to 3.6.2 in the next week or two, we can switch. Scripts should not need updating,

Re: [Bf-committers] Blender 2.79 Release Candidate 2 AHOY

<r...@lazydodo.com> wrote: windows builds are ready. --Ray On 9/11/2017 4:50 AM, Bastien Montagne wrote: Hi, We are ready for the 2.79 final release! Information for platform maintainers: - Build from the blender-2.79-release branch, SHA 5bd8ac9abfa2fa5db8ddfef393fc2c4dc82ba22d -

[Bf-committers] Blender 2.79 Release Candidate 2 AHOY

Hi, We are ready for the 2.79 final release! Information for platform maintainers: - Build from the blender-2.79-release branch, SHA 5bd8ac9abfa2fa5db8ddfef393fc2c4dc82ba22d - Addons revision: f1c6cfa21594e7c8b7a43cd1e0653d8a812929c6 - Locale revision: 1bbc9bdabe4ed26c164aef8a43ef39657dc23cfb

Re: [Bf-committers] [Bf-python] 2.79 release commits backport list

@Campbell done :) Le 11/09/2017 à 09:33, Campbell Barton a écrit : @Bastien, recent commits are safe to include: f56fea3d6b481b70e5ca518e41dab8c00bc26251 7e5687977287a0a8551a3593ebe60733b1c14af7 On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 4:55 PM, Bastien Montagne <montagn...@wanadoo.fr> wrote: @Ca

Re: [Bf-committers] [Bf-python] 2.79 release commits backport list

Sep 8, 2017 at 2:48 PM, Sergey Sharybin <sergey@gmail.com> wrote: I've committed fix to the 2.79 branch. Unfortunately, original bug i couldn't reproduce, so can not doublecheck it fixes T52635. Would like Brecht to run test on his machine prior to AHOY. On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 12:47 PM

Re: [Bf-committers] [Bf-python] 2.79 release commits backport list

Oki, noted. Le 08/09/2017 à 12:36, Sergey Sharybin a écrit : Hi, We need some time to deal with https://developer.blender.org/T52635 Please do not AHOY before it's solved or reverted in the release branch. On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 12:09 PM, Bastien Montagne <montagn...@wanadoo.fr>

Re: [Bf-committers] [Bf-python] 2.79 release commits backport list

Here's updated list of backports. http://pasteall.org/549912 Plan is to ahoy this afternoon, so it's last moments in case you'd like to include some more commits ;) Bastien Le 06/09/2017 à 09:51, Bastien Montagne a écrit : Hi, Backported requested changes, up-to-date list of backported

Re: [Bf-committers] 2.79 release commits backport list

09/2017 à 14:48, Sergey Sharybin a écrit : Bastien, here is a fix for regression: 71f0c32dad8 Fix T52522: VSE renders with alpha transparent PNG image incorrectly Technically, it should be included into 2.79, but some extra tests are needed. On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 2:19 PM, Bastien Montagne

Re: [Bf-committers] 2.79 release commits backport list

, here is a fix for regression: 71f0c32dad8 Fix T52522: VSE renders with alpha transparent PNG image incorrectly Technically, it should be included into 2.79, but some extra tests are needed. On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 2:19 PM, Bastien Montagne <montagn...@wanadoo.fr> wrote: Thanks

Re: [Bf-committers] Addons 2.79 release backports

Thanks for the list, cherry-picked those commits from rBA master already: 3c6eef90704eOscurart Tools: Remove duplicate bl_idname entry 9c8805a7af58Cloud Generator: Fix typo with operator return e66713cfad6efix T52642: math_vis - avoid eror message when defining an empty array in

Re: [Bf-committers] 2.79 release commits backport list

sometimes freaks out when the curve has a parent On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 1:04 PM, Bastien Montagne <montagn...@wanadoo.fr> wrote: @Antonio and Joshua thanks, all four commits have been added. Le 04/09/2017 à 12:54, Joshua Leung a écrit : Hi, c6719730921 (Fix: GPencil Sequence Interpo

Re: [Bf-committers] 2.79 release commits backport list

PM, blendergit <blender...@gmail.com> wrote: Hi, It’s not a big issue, but you could add: 4d8e3b649ba8 Fix T52483: Fill is incorrect for interpolated strokes. Cheers, Antonio Vazquez De: Bastien Montagne Enviado: lunes, 4 de septiembre de 2017 12:42 Para: bf-blender developers Asunt

[Bf-committers] 2.79 release commits backport list

Hi, Last Sunday meeting we decided to do final 2.79 release instead of a third RC (basically because this is dragging for too long, and RC's never get the kind of testing a real release gets anyways). Here is a first list of proposed commits to backport, please check yours and report if you

Re: [Bf-committers] CMake version bump for blender2.8

Hi, I don’t see why we'd make install_deps also handle custom installation of cmake! This is turning a bit (a lot) ridiculous. CMake 3.0 is **three** years old alreay! I remember we were switching to recent versions of CMake much, much more quickly back in the days of CMake 2.8 area, as

  1   2   3   4   5   >