Ryan
On 2021-07-08 06:00 AM, bf-committers-requ...@blender.org wrote:
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2021 01:17:28 -0400
From: Ryan Inch
To:bf-committers@blender.org
Subject: Re: [Bf-committers] Blender 2.93 Released!
Message-ID:<03c07ca6-6ffd-b03a-68c0-19849cbaf...@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; c
After thinking some more on this, I can see why this is appealing,
however, Blender is in the unique position of including add-ons as an
integral part. This makes it more inclusive than other software and
provides a good way to onboard new, Blender, developers. An online
repository for non-bu
No, there are no such plans.
On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 8:47 AM Ryan Inch via Bf-committers <
bf-committers@blender.org> wrote:
> @ The core developers considering this repository idea.
> With this new online add-on repository you are proposing, you have
> talked about unifying add-on distribution,
@ The core developers considering this repository idea.
With this new online add-on repository you are proposing, you have
talked about unifying add-on distribution, so I feel I have to ask, are
there any plans to allow only add-ons from this repository to run in
Blender or any other restrictio
(Apologies for sending this twice, I forgot to change the subject from
the generic digest one for my first attempt at sending this email)
@ Sybren A. Stüvel
I disagree here. Having an online repository would:
- make updating add-ons easier, allowing add-on developersto push
updates faster
Also, maybe of interest: SLSA
https://thehackernews.com/2021/06/google-releases-new-framework-to.html
On Thu, Jun 17, 2021, 11:57 PM Dan McGrath wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just a thought, assuming only non commercial add-ons, but is there any use
> in pushing such a add-on system into the python pip repo
Hi,
Just a thought, assuming only non commercial add-ons, but is there any use
in pushing such a add-on system into the python pip repos?
As long as you own the namespace, like blender-*, for example, you would at
least be able to offload the hosting burden to pip, as well as benefit from
their b
There are certainly challenges implementing such a system, though it's been
done many times in other applications. It's too early to go into such
details, it's not clear this will even happen or when.
On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 10:14 PM Dan McGrath
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For an official online repository
Hello,
The latest release page at https://www.blender.org/download/releases/2-93/
ends with a section called "But Wait, There're More". That section of links
could
easily have one added with a label of "Many Add-on Changes" that links to
https://wiki.blender.org/wiki/Reference/Release_Notes/2.93/A
Hi,
For an official online repository that is integrated into Blender, users
> would not notice much difference compared to bundled add-ons. I think it
> would be valuable to have a way for more developers to share their add-ons
> in the same way.
>
Out of curiosity, where and how were you thinki
f a new add-on.
> Ryan
>
> On 2021-06-12 06:00 AM, bf-committers-requ...@blender.org wrote:
> > Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2021 16:44:40 +0200
> > From: Dalai Felinto
> > To: bf-blender developers
> > Subject: Re: [Bf-committers] Blender 2.93 Released!
> > Message-ID:
>
On Thu, 17 Jun 2021 at 07:51, Ryan Inch via Bf-committers <
bf-committers@blender.org> wrote:
> Bundling does make a difference because it marks the add-ons as
> officially endorsed by Blender, they are available to every blender user
> and these add-ons are universally recognized and frequently m
dd-ons section added to the 'fancy' release
notes?
Ryan
[1]https://www.blender.org/download/releases/2-93/
On 2021-06-07 06:00 AM,bf-committers-requ...@blender.org wrote:
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2021 10:05:36 +0200
From: Dalai Felinto
To: bf-blender developers
Subject: Re: [Bf-committers] Bl
been lacking a section for add-ons recently. So, what
>> is required to have an add-ons section added to the 'fancy' release notes?
>>
>> Ryan
>>
>> [1] https://www.blender.org/download/releases/2-93/
>>
>> On 2021-06-07 06:00 AM, bf-committe
cking a section for add-ons recently. So, what
> > is required to have an add-ons section added to the 'fancy' release
> notes?
> >
> > Ryan
> >
> > [1] https://www.blender.org/download/releases/2-93/
> >
> > On 2021-06-07 06:00 AM, bf-committe
itters-requ...@blender.org wrote:
> > Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2021 10:05:36 +0200
> > From: Dalai Felinto
> > To: bf-blender developers
> > Subject: Re: [Bf-committers] Blender 2.93 Released!
> > Message-ID:
> >zavhavyzc5rws4jbbg1m...@mail.gmail.com>
> > C
the 'fancy' release notes?
Ryan
[1] https://www.blender.org/download/releases/2-93/
On 2021-06-07 06:00 AM, bf-committers-requ...@blender.org wrote:
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2021 10:05:36 +0200
From: Dalai Felinto
To: bf-blender developers
Subject: Re: [Bf-committers] Blender 2.93 Released!
Mes
--
> >
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 19:18:32 +0200
> > From: Dalai Felinto
> > To: bf-blender developers
> > Subject: [Bf-committers] Blender 2.93 Released!
> > Message-ID:
> > <
>
/
On 2021-06-03 06:00 AM, bf-committers-requ...@blender.org wrote:
--
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 19:18:32 +0200
From: Dalai Felinto
To: bf-blender developers
Subject: [Bf-committers] Blender 2.93 Released!
Message-ID:
Hi everyone,
Congrats with the release!
I don't have enough time to watch everything that goes on nowadays - but
each time I check, I see blender.org channels buzzing with activity. The
community of volunteers online who help out is bigger than ever. Virtual
hugs from me for everyone who help
Hi,
Blender 2.93 LTS is officially released.
The release notes are here:
https://www.blender.org/download/releases/2-93/
You can check two great videos with everything 2.93 related:
* Reel: https://youtu.be/fxNlpQYRz7s
* Features: https://youtu.be/mnnMFJ3iWH0
Congratulations everyone!
-Dalai-
--
21 matches
Mail list logo
