Hi ,
When I created delegated NS record. Bind 9.7.1 p3 is giving SERVFAIL , when
i queried for NS delegated record with NS.
Could you please clarify me or is it bug in 9.7?
Thanks & Regards,
Ramesh
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
h
We are also facing the same issue that AJ wrote previously.
We are trying to upgrade from bind version 9.4.3-P3 to 9.7.2-P2 using with
chroot environment on a Solaris 9.
It never see the following warning message when bind 9.4.3-P3 running on a
our solaris 9 server, but 9.7.1-P2, 9.7.2rc1 and 9
In message <1285805733.5799.857.ca...@karl>, Karl Auer writes:
> On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 19:51 -0400, Tristan Goguen wrote:
> > We would like to take some action when domain authority transfers take =20
> > place. Can we configure dig to return the name server list based =20
> > exclusively on a que
On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 19:51 -0400, Tristan Goguen wrote:
> We would like to take some action when domain authority transfers take
> place. Can we configure dig to return the name server list based
> exclusively on a query to the root / TLD servers? Can local name
> servers be ignored?
dig
In message , Tristan Goguen writ
es:
>
> Hi all,
>
> We have been using dig to retrieve a domain's name servers for years.
> Unfortunately, the dig syntax we normally use does not work when name
> servers are misconfigured. Currently, dig is returning an empty name
> server list for domain
Hi all,
We have been using dig to retrieve a domain's name servers for years.
Unfortunately, the dig syntax we normally use does not work when name
servers are misconfigured. Currently, dig is returning an empty name
server list for domain ilap.ca:
dig +short ilap.ca ns
< emp
In message <62426.10.0.66.17.1285784847.squir...@interact.purplecow.org>, Denni
s Clarke writes:
>
> I am trying to track down a bit of strange behavior. Not sure if anyone
> else sees this.
>
> I tend to run named in the foreground and in debug level 2 for a while
> after I compile it. If all l
> Can someone explain when BIND sets DO flag and when it won't? Most of my
> client workstations are XPSP3, and NONE of the queries coming from those
> clients have DO flag set.
The DO bit is part of the EDNS option record, and some servers (and more to
the point, some firewalls) are broken and do
On 29/09/10 10:30 PM, "Kevin Oberman" wrote:
>> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:51:55 -0400
>> From: "Taylor, Gord"
>> Sender: bind-users-bounces+oberman=es@lists.isc.org
>>
>>
>> We recently ran into an intermittent problem sending queries to a
>> business partner. Turns out they had CheckPo
> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:51:55 -0400
> From: "Taylor, Gord"
> Sender: bind-users-bounces+oberman=es@lists.isc.org
>
>
> We recently ran into an intermittent problem sending queries to a
> business partner. Turns out they had CheckPoint firewalls with
> SmartDefense turned of for DNS traff
On 9/29/2010 12:37 AM, SW wrote:
Hi everyone...
I am rather new to the world of DNS so I'm hoping to get some of your
expertise...
Is there a way to make BIND respond DNS query in sequence? For
example, if I assign 2 IP addresses to an A record, is it possible to
have it respond like...
We recently ran into an intermittent problem sending queries to a
business partner. Turns out they had CheckPoint firewalls with
SmartDefense turned of for DNS traffic. This was blocking traffic going
to them with DO flag enabled. I could duplicate the problem from a
command line by issuing "dig @
Do you need anything other than libgssapi installed for GSS-TSIG to work. Are
any of these required as well:
cyrus-sasl-gssapi.i386 2.1.22-5.el5_4.3 rhel-x86_64-client-5
cyrus-sasl-gssapi.x86_64 2.1.22-5.el5_4.3 rhel-x86_64-client-5
libgssapi.i386
Hi
What I have found is that while dig +trace gets and displays the information
directly from the name servers along the way the resolver is also queried
and the resolver's result overrides the trace result. This can cause great
frustration as you see the trace looks correct but if the cache i
I am trying to track down a bit of strange behavior. Not sure if anyone
else sees this.
I tend to run named in the foreground and in debug level 2 for a while
after I compile it. If all looks good then I can run it as a service
daemon in the usual way.
This means I run it like so :
bash-3.00# /
On 29 Sep 2010, at 15:53, Anand Buddhdev wrote:
> Anyway, I discussed this with my colleague here, and we came up with a
> solution that works. We have created 2 views of the master name servers:
Nice one, and useful to have in the mailing-list archive!
/Niall
__
On 29/09/2010 12:09, Niall O'Reilly wrote:
> On 29 Sep 2010, at 09:34, Anand Buddhdev wrote:
>
>> Now, I have been given 2 keys, t1 and t2, to use for transferring z1 and
>> z2 respectively.
>
> [Wandering off topic, perhaps]
>
> That seems to me a back-to-front way to do things.
>
-- Original Message --
From: "Len Conrad"
Reply-To: lcon...@go2france.com
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:58:13 +0200
>FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE
>
>BIND 9.6.0-P1
>
>resolv.conf:
>nameserver 127.0.0.1
>
>
>machine is postfix MX relay-only gateway
>
>on a separate mach
FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE
BIND 9.6.0-P1
resolv.conf:
nameserver 127.0.0.1
machine is postfix MX relay-only gateway
on a separate machines, zen.dnsbld.domain.net on IPs 10.1.60.1 & 10.1.60.2,
rbldnsd is running a local copy of zen.spamhaus
nmap shows 10.1.60.1 and 10.1.60.2 with port 53 UDP open.
2010/9/29 Eivind Olsen
> Does anyone know if there are any benchmarks out in the public, which
> could give some insight into how well BIND 9 scales with multithreading?
> I've tried looking on this list, and googling, but haven't found anything
> yet.
>
> To be a bit more specific - I'm not sure
On 29 Sep 2010, at 09:34, Anand Buddhdev wrote:
> Now, I have been given 2 keys, t1 and t2, to use for transferring z1 and
> z2 respectively.
[Wandering off topic, perhaps]
That seems to me a back-to-front way to do things.
If the organization running the master is conc
I did some benchmarking on this about 1.5 yrs ago, here's a graph
representing the results: http://sedoss.com/bind.png
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 10:37 AM, wrote:
> Hi
>
> i read that 'old' bind version where better when threading was disabled. Load
> balancing
> between 2 processe was better. Is
Hi
i read that 'old' bind version where better when threading was disabled. Load
balancing
between 2 processe was better. Is this always the case ?
http://zaphods.net/~zaphodb/high-performance-bind9.html
some interesting links for DNS performance :
http://kb.linuxvirtualserver.org/wiki/Build
Hello BIND users,
I'm using BIND 9.7.1-P2. I have the following configuration in my
named.conf:
masters "m" { ip1; ip2; ip3; ip4; };
zone "z1" {
type slave;
file "z1";
masters { m; };
};
zone "z2" {
type slave;
file "z2";
masters { m; };
};
Now,
Bind-dlz(the latest Berkeley DB as a back-end),Services can start correctly,
but DNS is not returned to the correct value.
Related data:
dbsql> .tables
dns_client dns_datadns_xfr dns_zone
dbsql> select * from dns_client;
test.com|192.168.146.155
test.com|127.0.0.1
dbsql> select * from
Does anyone know if there are any benchmarks out in the public, which
could give some insight into how well BIND 9 scales with multithreading?
I've tried looking on this list, and googling, but haven't found anything
yet.
To be a bit more specific - I'm not sure what a good option for server
hardw
> Is there a way to make BIND respond DNS query in sequence?
Someone else can probably give a more authoritative answer. My
understanding is that BIND will rotate the answers it gives out when
there's more than one similar record in a rrset. And yes, this can help
spread the load a bit.
Whether t
27 matches
Mail list logo
