OK.
Firstly, the bad news. ECS is only available in the subscription version of
BIND. That is, versions ending with -S. To get this version you need a (paid)
support contract with ISC. If you are interested, let me know.
Secondly, 9.18.21 is not current. I would recommend that you use
Hello.
Do you mean 9.18-S1?
> On 28 Apr 2024, at 08:06, Yang via bind-users
> wrote:
>
>
> dear admin:
> now, i use bind-9.18-21, i want to use ecs client subnet function; but i
> don't know how to configure it, and i don't get method from google
> ple
dear admin:
now, i use bind-9.18-21, i want to use ecs client subnet function; but i
don't know how to configure it, and i don't get method from google
please give me some example,or document , or google links to learn about
it ;
thanks!
Yang
395096...@qq.com--
Visit https
advertises itself as authoritative
> for 85.191.131.in-addr.arpa
Yep. Both of the resolveable NSes ns102.click-network.com and
fs838.click-network.com claim authority over 191.131.in-addr.arpa,
which they don't have according to the parent zone DNS delegations.
Regards,
- Håvard
--
Trace from my location dies even earlier:
;; Received 915 bytes from 2001:503:c27::2:30#53(j.root-servers.net) in 17 ms
;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
Again just a data point.
> On 24 Apr 2024, at 22.03, tale via bind-users
> wrote:
>
> Hmm, I won
As further data points with BIND as a caching / recursive sometimes it
"works" and provides inconsistent AUTHORITY, although anecdata suggests
this is more prevalent with older versions of BIND. In one case BIND
9.12 reports the AUTHORITY as the parent zone in fact, with the parent's
n
rather than the decision to stuff rabid weasels down your pants in the
first place.
--
Fred Morris
On Wed, 24 Apr 2024, tale wrote:
Hmm, I wonder if qname-minimisation is at issue here.
--
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from
this list
ISC funds
address for 'ns102.click-network.com': not found
--
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from
this list
ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions.
Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.
bind-users
While BIND 9.18.21 with "qname-minimization strict;" SERVFAILs on the
following query, dig with +trace resolves it. Just a data point, and if
they fix their s**t and stop impersonating a signed zone then presumably
the example will resolve itself (pun intended).
dig -x 131.191.85.
> On Mar 11, 2024, at 4:09 PM, John Thurston wrote:
>
> I assume the day is approaching when the packages in the COPR repositories
> will be changed; isc/bind-esv will have 9.18 (instead of 9.16), and ics/bind
> will have 9.20
>
> So that we might start weaving this
I assume the day is approaching when the packages in the COPR
repositories will be changed; isc/bind-esv will have 9.18 (instead of
9.16), and ics/bind will have 9.20
So that we might start weaving this into our maintenance plans, is there
a projected date on which this will happen?
--
Do
On 01/03/2024 11:02, Jim Reid wrote:
On 1 Mar 2024, at 10:37, Greg Choules via bind-users
wrote:
In summary, Do the hard work of traffic steering somewhere else and let your
DNS resolvers deliver the chosen answer. Don't make the resolvers themselves
try to do this on the basis
> On 1 Mar 2024, at 10:37, Greg Choules via bind-users
> wrote:
>
> In summary, Do the hard work of traffic steering somewhere else and let your
> DNS resolvers deliver the chosen answer. Don't make the resolvers themselves
> try to do this on the basis of incomplete infor
e and load to consider. Might your tweaked responses just
> send clients to a nearby but tragically overloaded server?
>
> My preference would be to let those people whose job it is to think
> about this stuff - which, reading this list, clearly they do - get on
> with their job.
>
onses just
send clients to a nearby but tragically overloaded server?
My preference would be to let those people whose job it is to think
about this stuff - which, reading this list, clearly they do - get on
with their job.
Observations welcome of course.
--
73,
Ged.
--
Visit https://lists.isc.o
tu.
Micro$oft random number generator: 0, 0, 0, 4.33e+67, 0, 0, 0...
--
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from
this list
ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions.
Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.
s in the DNS messages, it needs to
be reported as a bug to the respective vendor.
They will be deprecated as of BIND 9.20 and removed in BIND 9.22.
Cheers,
--
Ondřej Surý (He/Him)
ond...@isc.org
My working hours and your working hours may be different. Please do not feel
obligated to reply outside your no
We are working intensively at Red Hat to finally fix that version. A
huge thanks goes to ISC, which kindy provided complex backport into 9.11
version, which they do not support for a long time.
It was discovered those changes require also changes to bind-dyndb-ldap
used in freeipa and also
The BIND 9.16 release branch is approaching EOL as of April, 2024. We encourage
users running 9.16 or (gasp) 9.11, to upgrade to 9.18.
The 9.18 branch has consistently out-performed the 9.16 branch, and we are
confident that it is more stable than 9.16. One of our support engineers has
Hi there,
On Fri, 16 Feb 2024, Semra T?rkkal Nazl?mo?lu wrote:
Our bind version seems below. How can we upgrade bind version?
And if we upgrade bind version, is there any problem?
Recently I upgraded from 9.11.26 (not 9.11.36) to 9.18.24 using the
source from the ISC Website.
It's a very
Hi,
You don't need to use the RHEL version of BIND. ISC supplies packages
that you can add as described here:
https://kb.isc.org/docs/isc-packages-for-bind-9
Thank you,
Darren Ankney
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 8:02 AM Marco Moock wrote:
>
> Am 15.02.2024 schrieb Semra Türkkal Nazl
Am 15.02.2024 schrieb Semra Türkkal Nazlımoğlu
:
> Our bind version seems below. How can we upgrade bind version?
It comes from the OS you are using.
Upgrade to the current RHEL release.
If you prefer bleeding-edge versions, use Fedora instead.
> And if we upgrade bind version, is the
Hello,
Our bind version seems below. How can we upgrade bind version?
And if we upgrade bind version, is there any problem?
[root@ns2 ~]# named -v
BIND 9.11.36-RedHat-9.11.36-11.el8_9 (Extended Support Version)
Thanks
Semra
--
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
o reply outside your normal working hours.
> On 22. 12. 2023, at 16:44, William D. Colburn wrote:
>
> Your build system did say to manually change it. I used an environment
> variable, but thought (still think actually) that yhour build system
> should honor pkgconfig for findi
On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 05:43:09PM +0100, Ond??ej Surý wrote:
>No, you missed my point - I asked why do you pretend to run stuff on RHEL 6
>while in fact you do not because all the critical libraries are self-compiled.
>
>You can run BIND 9 in a container (on RHEL 6) using a stil
Please keep Cc when responding to a message from the mailing list. Re-added,
but redacted most of your email.
No, you missed my point - I asked why do you pretend to run stuff on RHEL 6
while in fact you do not because all the critical libraries are self-compiled.
You can run BIND 9
hours and your working hours may be different. Please do not feel
obligated to reply outside your normal working hours.
> On 22. 12. 2023, at 16:14, William D. Colburn wrote:
>
> I'm compiling bind 9.18.21 on RHEL 6.10. I had to make my own libuv and
> openssl packages (and I still nee
I'm compiling bind 9.18.21 on RHEL 6.10. I had to make my own libuv and
openssl packages (and I still need a jemalloc package). I told bind
about them via the PKG_CONFIG_PATH variable, which mostly works. The
problem is in bind-9.18.21/doc/misc which doesn't seem to receive any
information from
zing for, why, and how?
In this case, merely optimizing for the number of things we on the BIND
development team need to test and maintain. I really don't think anyone's
using these knobs, so they might as well not be there.
They were added during the development process for serve-stale, which
to see
it played out on this list (if the Ps that B think it appropriate).
--
73,
Ged.
--
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from
this list
ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions.
Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact
ing we can from statistics provided by DNS
Shotgun [1], BIND statistics channel [2], and system resource monitoring
[3].
[1] https://dns-shotgun.readthedocs.io/en/stable/
[2]
https://bind9.readthedocs.io/en/v9.19.18/reference.html#namedconf-statement-statistics-channels
[3]
https://gitlab.i
it should be limited to
that use case? Why aren't there tuning / configuration options around
this? (Won't be surprised if there are for at least some implementations.)
If this resonates with you, feel free to reach out. If you use the
trualias morris.dns.systems.thinking@m3047.net that will help
et Systems Consortium
--
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from
this list
ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions.
Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc
imizing for, why, and how?
Thanks...
--
Fred Morris
--
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from
this list
ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions.
Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.
bind-users ma
They are not thought to be useful in a production environment,
and we know of no operators using them. (Please let us know if this is
incorrect!)
Our plan is to mark these options as deprecated in BIND 9.16 and 9.18,
and to remove them as of BIND 9.20.
--
Evan Hunt -- e...@isc.org
Internet Systems Consor
an.
> >
> >Can I upgrade BIND DNS Server manually? Will it cause problems with
> >Virtualmin / Webmin?
>
>
> I think this is question for webmin/virtualmin, but from what I know about
> webmin it tends to edit local configuration, so I guess it will edit primary
>
On 22.11.23 23:44, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote:
I have Virtualmin / Webmin web hosting server control panel. I have 2
Virtual Private Servers in Germany and 1 Virtual Private Server in
Japan.
Can I upgrade BIND DNS Server manually? Will it cause problems with
Virtualmin / Webmin?
I
Subject: Question on ISC BIND DNS Server
Good day from Singapore,
I have Virtualmin / Webmin web hosting server control panel. I have 2
Virtual Private Servers in Germany and 1 Virtual Private Server in
Japan.
Can I upgrade BIND DNS Server manually? Will it cause problems with
Virtualmin
So here is a theory if a client asks a query and bind goes out for that
query and the reply is delayed but you get the answer then for what ever
reason the reply to the client from bind is delayed more! So the quicker
the answer the quicker the answer to the client.
Why? I have no idea
and this from dig maybe a routing iusse why it take so long for me?
C:\Program Files\ISC BIND 9\bin>dig @213.227.191.1
router14.teamviewer.com +norecurs
; <<>> DiG 9.16.45 <<>> @213.227.191.1 router14.teamviewer.com +norecurs
; (1 server found)
;; global
This is the thing the setup works for many site fast just this
Teamviewer and their DNS servers are a problem and bind does reply to
192.168.53.19 all be it 26 seconds later! but Teamviewer trys over and
over then it connects yet the for the WAN side took under 4 seconds to
get the answer WAN
are going, whether you receive ICMP unreachables
or retries etc.
Also do some tests. If you have BIND you should also have dig. If you don't
have dig, use Windows nslookup in interactive mode and send queries to the
teamviewer NSs.
Right now I would prove that the network is clean first. I see no reason to
This might show the problem even more on two interfaces WAN side and LAN
you can see 192.168.53.19 ask for routerpool8 #60 then bind goes out #62
gets a answer # 75 and no reply back to 192.168.53.19
https://ufile.io/v8oob3jg
--
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
On starting Teamviewer it can say no connection when bind does the
lookup with this delay it cause bind to not reply LAN side sometimes
which causes the app to fail yet with a bind on Ubuntu there is no problem.
--
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from
I'm just using bind to do my DNS look ups with no forwarders thats all
Teamviewer app uses DNS to find its servers from what I can tell it can
take over 4000ms to get a answer.
The following seems to help in bind
resolver-retry-interval 5000;
I think if I can then find a setting in windows
Hi there.
Can you send some information, for those unfamiliar with what you're trying
to do?
- Full BIND config
- IP addresses of relevant things, like interfaces of the servers on which
you are running BIND and of Teamviewer.
- What does Teamviewer need from DNS? What kinds of queries
Now its not working fast again! I don't know now must be Teamviewer DNS
delaying replies causing windows bind to fail in some way.
--
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from
this list
ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions
So more tests and the problem has come back but I think I know why
thinking internet sharing was the problem I found a way to disable it
because it bind shared access for port 53 on 0.0.0.0 so that the problem
I think now after testing with it on.
For any interested MS has made it really hard
I'm by no means an expert in DNS or how it fully works so I can't be of
any more help about this problem then I already have. But it seems
Teamviewer have rebooted their DNS servers and now windows bind allows
the Teamviewer to load faster
--
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind
Hey,
BIND 9.16 is in security-and-critical-only mode, so this won’t get fixed in any
case.
However, your message is incomprehensible. If you want to get anything fixed,
we will need more clarity in the report - describe your setup (clients,
recursive servers, authoritative servers
I don't know if this will be fixed before EOL for windows bind but here
is the problem
Teamviewer (and maybe other sites too) when you do the recursion when no
answer under 1000ms it tries again which is trigged by client windows
(not the one running bind) which also tries again for a answer
missing something.
Is there some other mechanism to achieve this end result (sharing zones between
different user populations without loading multiple copies of the zone into
memory)?
I am currently running BIND 9.16.44 by the way.
Thanks for any advice!
--
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/list
engineering in the first place.
Ondřej
--
Ondřej Surý — ISC (He/Him)
My working hours and your working hours may be different. Please do not feel
obligated to reply outside your normal working hours.
> On 6. 11. 2023, at 3:04, Prasanna Mathivanan (pmathiva) via bind-users
> wrote:
>
>
://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from
this list
ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions.
Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman
NS ns2.bcc.gov.bd.
> > couldn't get address for 'ns1.bcc.gov.bd': not found
> > couldn't get address for 'ns2.bcc.gov.bd': not found
> > dig: couldn't get address for 'ns1.bcc.gov.bd': no more
> > root@ns1:/etc/bind#
>
> So you got this this point and that is sayi
s for 'ns2.bcc.gov.bd': not found
> dig: couldn't get address for 'ns1.bcc.gov.bd': no more
> root@ns1:/etc/bind#
So you got this this point and that is saying that the lookup of
the addresses of the nameservers is failing. The next step would to
do a 'dig +trace' or a 'dig +trace +all' of tho
> Am 30.10.2023 um 16:59 schrieb Michael Martinell via bind-users
> :
>
> Thanks to all who responded. Putting qname-minimization disabled; in
> named.conf resolves the issue in my testing.
>
> I did try specifying relaxed (which appears to be the default), but that
, but it will take a large company to push them to do so.
Michael Martinell
Network/Broadband Technician
Interstate Telecommunications Coop., Inc.
From: bind-users On Behalf Of Paul Stead
Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2023 11:35 AM
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: 9.18 BIND not iterated
for 'ns2.bcc.gov.bd': not found
dig: couldn't get address for 'ns1.bcc.gov.bd': no more
root@ns1:/etc/bind#
I can resolve them, but only A records exist.
Please try it again.
dig a ns2.bcc.gov.bd
When encountering these sorts of errors, particularly if not a DNS
expert, the easiest diagnostic
ain:
mofa.gov.bd.86400 IN NS ns1.bcc.gov.bd.
mofa.gov.bd.86400 IN NS ns2.bcc.gov.bd.
couldn't get address for 'ns1.bcc.gov.bd': not found
couldn't get address for 'ns2.bcc.gov.bd': not found
dig: couldn't get address for 'ns1.bcc.gov.bd': no more
root
': not found
> dig: couldn't get address for 'ns1.bcc.gov.bd': no more
> root@ns1:/etc/bind#
I can resolve them, but only A records exist.
Please try it again.
dig a ns2.bcc.gov.bd
--
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from
this list
ISC fun
Hi
Recently I installed BIND 9.18 in the debina12 server and everything is
working fine except .gov.bd sites. Following are some reports attached for
your reference.
Kindly help me to identify the reason.
[image: image.png]
root@ns1:/etc/bind# dig mofa.gov.bd +trace
; <<>> DiG 9.18.
are seem to follow Postel's Law
> moreso than BIND.
>
> I agree this perpetuates bad practices but end users aren't interested in
> technical reasoning, especially when "it works everywhere else, you must be
> broken"
>
> Paul
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 28, 2023,
not a new requirement. It has been this waysince the very beginning.The bank needs to fix what they publish.MarkOn 28 Oct 2023, at 02:36, Michael Martinell via bind-users <bind-users@lists.isc.org> wrote:Hello, At this point I am hoping that somebody might have a workaround so that we can exclud
As a previous ISP admin I too have come across similar situations and
frustrations.
I can only say that Google and Cloudflare seem to follow Postel's Law
moreso than BIND.
I agree this perpetuates bad practices but end users aren't interested in
technical reasoning, especially when "it
the very beginning.
>
> The bank needs to fix what they publish.
>
> Mark
>
>> On 28 Oct 2023, at 02:36, Michael Martinell via bind-users
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>> At this point I am hoping that somebody might have a workaround so that we
>>
n they should expect lookups to fail. The NS records on both sides
of a zone
cut are supposed to be IDENTICAL. This is not a new requirement. It has been
this way
since the very beginning.
The bank needs to fix what they publish.
Mark
> On 28 Oct 2023, at 02:36, Michael Martine
server and responsible party records are not resolvable.
Maybe someone with more knowledge of DNS and the use of .local. domain
name can shed some light on this.
Lyle Giese
On 10/27/23 10:36, Michael Martinell via bind-users wrote:
Hello,
At this point I am hoping that somebody might have
Hello,
At this point I am hoping that somebody might have a workaround so that we can
exclude domains from this behavior if they are broken on the far end. Does
anybody have a workaround for this?
We are a small ISP and run BIND compiled from source. We currently run 9.16.x
Every time we try
You are using an end-of-life BIND 9 on end-of-life Ubuntu. Start with that…There is no point in debugging a version with unfixed bugs and security vulnerabilities.Ondřej --Ondřej Surý — ISC (He/Him)My working hours and your working hours may be different. Please do not feel obligated to reply
000=AFQjCNGMxIuHSHsD3qO6y5JddpEZ0S592A>
--
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from
this list
ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions.
Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.
bind-users mailing list
bind
| ruby on rails[
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from
this list
ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions.
Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more inform
Paul van der Vlis via bind-users wrote:
> But how could I refresh the key without loosing the IP?
I was in a similar situation. I managed my zone files mostly manually,
but a few records needed to be updated automatically. Either manual
changes would obliterate automatically updated reco
o refresh my
> certificates.
Not perfect? What issues did you see? Thanks!
--
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from
this list
ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions.
Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for m
exclusive dynamic update. This isn't perfect, but it works
well enough to allow dns-01 (certbot/LetsEncrypt) to be able to refresh my
certificates.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from
this list
ISC funds
me find the reason. See my other message.
>
> With regards,
> Paul
>
>
> --
> Paul van der Vlis Linux systeembeheer Groningen
> https://vandervlis.nl/
--
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from
this list
ISC funds the development
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from
this list
ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions.
Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org
Op 06-10-2023 om 10:28 schreef Paul van der Vlis via bind-users:
Hello,
I try to give a dynamic IP to a name, using nsupdate. This works fine,
but after some hours the IP is gone from the master (which I update).
Something like this:
Host home.customer.nl not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
The IP
You need to figure out what is updating the zone. This isn’t named.
--
Mark Andrews
> On 6 Oct 2023, at 19:28, Paul van der Vlis via bind-users
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I try to give a dynamic IP to a name, using nsupdate. This works fine, but
> after some hour
about the removal in the logs. But I saw a "freeze"
and a "thaw" in the logs for the domain.
Any idea why the IP removes after some time?
With regards,
Paul van der Vlis
--
Paul van der Vlis Linux systeembeheer Groningen
https://vandervlis.nl/
--
Visit https://lis
Hi there
On 02/10/2023 11:06, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
In the light of the recent exim security issues[1,2]
I'm trying to find out if bind 9.18.19, if used as resolver,
does enough validation to shield exim instances from CVE-2023-42119 ?
I added 'check-names response fail;' to the internal view
original responses from upstream, unless it cached it already. So with
BIND it should be better, but no guarantees given. Local validating
resolver should help in any case. But without more detailed information
about the vulnerability, we are just guessing.
Best Regards,
Petr
On 02. 10. 23
On 02. 10. 23 11:06, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
Hi!
In the light of the recent exim security issues[1,2]
I'm trying to find out if bind 9.18.19, if used as resolver,
does enough validation to shield exim instances from CVE-2023-42119 ?
As details and reproducers for the CVE are not available
Hi!
In the light of the recent exim security issues[1,2]
I'm trying to find out if bind 9.18.19, if used as resolver,
does enough validation to shield exim instances from CVE-2023-42119 ?
As details and reproducers for the CVE are not available, this is a
more general question. Pointers on where
Unsubscribe
From: bind-users On Behalf Of
bind-users-requ...@lists.isc.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2023 4:02 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] bind-users Digest, Vol 4327, Issue 1
Send bind-users mailing list submissions to bind-users@ lists. isc. org To
subscribe
but I'd rather not have fire drills (and it's not just
> me it's people / projects downstream of me).
>
> FTR, I've always used an IP address with RNDC.
>
> On Tue, 12 Sep 2023, Ondřej Surý wrote:
>>
>> [...] The support for Unix
>> Domain Sockets is already non
an IP address with RNDC.
On Tue, 12 Sep 2023, Ondřej Surý wrote:
[...] The support for Unix
Domain Sockets is already non-operational since BIND 9.18.0 and it is a fatal
error in named. This is properly documented in BIND 9.18.0 release notes and
known issues.
We are now proceeding to complete
Hello,
in line with out deprecation policy, I am notifying the mailing list about
deprecation
of the 'unix' clause in the controls {} configuration block. The support for
Unix
Domain Sockets is already non-operational since BIND 9.18.0 and it is a fatal
error in named. This is properly
Hello,
in line with out deprecation policy, I am notifying the mailing list about our
preliminary
intent to deprecate the 'dnssec-must-be-secure' option. The option will be
marked as
deprecated (causing warning from named-checkconf) in BIND 9.18 and 9.20 and
it will be removed in BIND 9.21
Right, BIND 9.18 now enforces Section 2.2 of RFC 5936, specifically, this:
"The AXFR server MUST copy the
Question section from the corresponding AXFR query message into the
first response message's Question section. For subsequent messages,
it MAY do the same or leave the Que
.
On 1 Sep 2023, at 09:23, Ian Bobbitt wrote:
I have a system running BIND 9.18.17 that needs to transfer a zone from
djbdns/axfrdns. I receive FORMERRs, and haven't been able to get any log
messages indicating the problem.
xfer-in: info: zone example.net/IN: Transfer started.
xfer-in: info
023, at 09:23, Ian Bobbitt wrote:
>
> I have a system running BIND 9.18.17 that needs to transfer a zone from
> djbdns/axfrdns. I receive FORMERRs, and haven't been able to get any log
> messages indicating the problem.
>
> xfer-in: info: zone example.net/IN: Transfer sta
I have a system running BIND 9.18.17 that needs to transfer a zone from
djbdns/axfrdns. I receive FORMERRs, and haven't been able to get any log
messages indicating the problem.
xfer-in: info: zone example.net/IN: Transfer started.
xfer-in: info: transfer of 'example.net/IN' from 198.51.100.1
shed Engineer
--
This communication may not represent the ACM or my employer's views,
if any, on the matters discussed.
On 21-Aug-23 18:56, bind-users-requ...@lists.isc.org wrote:
Send bind-users mailing list submissions to
bind-users@lists.isc.org
To subsc
: vendredi 4 août 2023 07:34
À : RAHAL Sami SOFRECOM
Cc : bind-users@lists.isc.org
Objet : Re: monitoring BIND
> On 3 Aug 2023, at 17:07, sami.ra...@sofrecom.com wrote:
>
> Hello comunity
> please what is the most recommended tool for BIND monitoring and especially
> displa
SOFRECOM
Cc : bind-users@lists.isc.org
Objet : Re: monitoring BIND
Maybe start with https://kb.isc.org/docs/monitoring-recommendations-for-bind-9
On Thu, Aug 3, 2023 at 9:07 AM
mailto:sami.ra...@sofrecom.com>> wrote:
Hello comunity
please what is the most recommended tool for BIND moni
> On 3 Aug 2023, at 17:07, sami.ra...@sofrecom.com wrote:
>
> Hello comunity
> please what is the most recommended tool for BIND monitoring and especially
> display response time and latency thank you in advance.
For latency, your friend is Dnstap. The implementation on Bind
Maybe start with
https://kb.isc.org/docs/monitoring-recommendations-for-bind-9
On Thu, Aug 3, 2023 at 9:07 AM wrote:
>
>
> Hello comunity
>
> please what is the most recommended tool for BIND monitoring and
> especially display response time and latency thank you in advance
Hello comunity
please what is the most recommended tool for BIND monitoring and especially
display response time and latency thank you in advance.
Regards Sami
--
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from
this list
ISC funds the development of this software
rvers, into clusters
for the benefit of servers that only have intermittent connectivity
to the internet. This is no longer a common enough scenario to justify
the added code complexity.
They will be deprecated as of BIND 9.20 and removed in BIND 9.22.
--
Evan Hunt -- e...@isc.org
Internet Sys
1 - 100 of 6373 matches
Mail list logo
