Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 09:10:17 -0300
From: Fernando de Oliveira fam...@yahoo.com.br
To: BLFS Development List blfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: [blfs-dev] lsb_release configuration [Was: ... Iced Tea 2.4.1 and
iced tea 2.4.5 sed unknown option to `s']
Em 17-02-2014 07:53, Fernando de
On 17/02/2014 16:21, akhiezer wrote:
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 09:10:17 -0300
From: Fernando de Oliveira fam...@yahoo.com.br
To: BLFS Development List blfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: [blfs-dev] lsb_release configuration [Was: ... Iced Tea 2.4.1 and
iced tea 2.4.5 sed unknown option to
Em 17-02-2014 11:21, akhiezer escreveu:
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 09:10:17 -0300
From: Fernando de Oliveira fam...@yahoo.com.br
To: BLFS Development List blfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: [blfs-dev] lsb_release configuration [Was: ... Iced Tea 2.4.1 and
iced tea 2.4.5 sed unknown option to
Em 17-02-2014 12:25, Gregory H. Nietsky escreveu:
On 17/02/2014 16:21, akhiezer wrote:
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 09:10:17 -0300
From: Fernando de Oliveira fam...@yahoo.com.br
To: BLFS Development List blfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: [blfs-dev] lsb_release configuration [Was: ... Iced
Em 17-02-2014 14:34, Pierre Labastie escreveu:
I do not know the icedtea installer, so I do not know how
it gets its information about the LSB. But I think the best
would be to consider that everything, which is in LFS, is installed
(including /etc/lsb-release), and that lsb-release
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 12:58:05 -0300
From: Fernando de Oliveira fam...@yahoo.com.br
To: BLFS Development List blfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org,
Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] lsb_release configuration [Was: ... Iced Tea 2.4.1
and iced tea 2.4.5 sed unknown option to `s']
Em 17-02-2014 11:21,
Em 17-02-2014 15:32, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu:
Em 17-02-2014 14:34, Pierre Labastie escreveu:
I do not know the icedtea installer, so I do not know how
it gets its information about the LSB. But I think the best
would be to consider that everything, which is in LFS, is installed
Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
Em 17-02-2014 14:34, Pierre Labastie escreveu:
I do not know the icedtea installer, so I do not know how
it gets its information about the LSB. But I think the best
would be to consider that everything, which is in LFS, is installed
(including /etc/lsb-release),
On 02/17/2014 08:33 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
Em 17-02-2014 14:34, Pierre Labastie escreveu:
I do not know the icedtea installer, so I do not know how
it gets its information about the LSB. But I think the best
would be to consider that everything, which is in LFS,
Em 17-02-2014 16:33, Bruce Dubbs escreveu:
Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
icedtea install OK without lsb_release
icedtea does not install OK if lsb_release accidentally was installed,
but the user did not configure it in LFS.
Problem is the divide in configuring before installing, in LFS
Armin K. wrote:
The simple fix is just to link to LFS page and say that /etc/lsb-release
must be set up using the instructions in LFS.
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter09/theend.html
Yup. Done.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
11 matches
Mail list logo
