Yesterday I tried to send a message to blfs-dev mailing list, but I got
It's awaits moderator approval - suspicious headers. I have registered
there nicely, mail.com server supports authentification, I tried both
with webmail and icedove (Debian Thunderbird), always same message.
What's worse
On 02/11/2012 03:00 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 02:43:30PM +0100, Armin K. wrote:
Yesterday I tried to send a message to blfs-dev mailing list, but I got
It's awaits moderator approval - suspicious headers. I have registered
there nicely, mail.com server supports
On 02/11/2012 03:12 PM, Andrew Benton wrote:
On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 15:02:27 +0100
Armin K.kre...@email.com wrote:
Well, yes. It came through. But I tried to send that one few times,
always same message.
What did you do differently in the one that got through?
Do you think I got that because
On 11.2.2012 15:53, Andrew Benton wrote:
On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 15:15:00 +0100
Armin K.kre...@email.com wrote:
Now I tried again, but failed with same message from mail system. Here
is original mail:
Hello there. I have noticed lot of commits to blfs book lately. Good
job team, just keep it
On 11.2.2012 18:52, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 02:53:35PM +, Andrew Benton wrote:
On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 15:15:00 +0100
Armin K.kre...@email.com wrote:
[ replying more to some points in the original than to Andy's reply]
Now I tried again, but failed with same message from
On 02/11/2012 11:55 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 11:23:42PM +0100, Armin K. wrote:
On 11.2.2012 18:52, Ken Moffat wrote:
fcron works for me - what do you get from cronie that isn't
available from fcron ?
Well, I like it's PAM and SELinux support.
Hmm. We don't do
On 02/12/2012 06:01 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 01:02:52AM +0100, Armin K. wrote:
On 02/11/2012 11:55 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
Yet libsoup depends on glib-networking and that one isn't even in
the book. See for yourself:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/basicnet
On 02/27/2012 10:44 PM, Andrew Benton wrote:
On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 06:24:41 -0500
Armin K.kre...@email.com wrote:
First, you welcome.
Anyways, I think I got gnucash to work with guile 2.0.5 ... (For some values
of work)
http://i39.tinypic.com/2cpqfbk.jpg
I'm attaching patch here if
I've been looking at BLFS Trac today, and boy - it's a mess. There are 5
year old bugs there, yet some solved long time ago, but still on there.
It could help if someone would tidy it up.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
On 03/02/2012 04:59 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Armin K. wrote:
I've been looking at BLFS Trac today, and boy - it's a mess. There are 5
year old bugs there, yet some solved long time ago, but still on there.
It could help if someone would tidy it up.
I've been trying. You should have seen
On 03/02/2012 07:18 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Armin K. wrote:
On 03/02/2012 04:59 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Armin K. wrote:
I've been looking at BLFS Trac today, and boy - it's a mess. There are 5
year old bugs there, yet some solved long time ago, but still on there.
It could help if someone
On 03/02/2012 09:47 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Armin K. wrote:
Thank you for trusting me the work. For now, I think that I've respond
to most of the already fixed issues. However, many of them remain, and I
am not unable to handle them all. Anyways, as I see, there are lots of
requests
I have been looking at the book. Also as Ken mentioned, there are too
many packages in the book which makes it hard to maintain. Anyways, here
is my oppinion on which and why some of the packages could be possibly
removed from the book.
Heimdal-1.4 or MIT Kerberos V5-1.6 - I don't know about
I was thinking about upgrading wireless-tools for first. Now, I see two
version available.
The latest stable version of Wireless Tools is version 29
The main features of the latest beta is support for non-ASCII ESSIDs
(such as localised ESSID), support for displaying Scanning Capabilities,
I attached update to xchat in the book. Someone please review it and if
possible apply it.
Index: BOOK/xsoft/other/xchat.xml
===
--- BOOK/xsoft/other/xchat.xml (revision 9574)
+++ BOOK/xsoft/other/xchat.xml (working copy)
@@ -6,10
I attached updates for nss and nspr as well as refreshed patches for
them. Also, I attached patch for wireless tools 29 upgrade. Someone
please review them and if possible, apply them.
I have been checking some instructions lately. For example, gstreamer
base plugins don't require liboil
+
+# Begin cyrus-sasl
+#
+# Description : Cyrus SASL Boot Script
+#
+# Authors : Armin K. kre...@email.com
+#
+# Version : BLFS SVN
+#
+# Notes : Not enabled by default.
+#
+
-# Based on sysklogd
Added section about pam configuration and commented out adding new
user because it isn't required for a long time now.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Added section about pam configuration and commented out adding new
user because it isn't required for a long time now.
Sorry, forgot to attach patch in first message.
Index: BOOK/postlfs/security/polkit.xml
===
---
On 03/04/2012 07:06 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 02:23:58PM +0100, Armin K. wrote:
I attached updates for nss and nspr as well as refreshed patches for
them. Also, I attached patch for wireless tools 29 upgrade. Someone
please review them and if possible, apply them.
I
On 03/04/2012 05:20 PM, Armin K. wrote:
Here is update for cyrus sasl in the book. I've rewritten boot script
using template from latest lfs bootscripts and also added seperate
configuration file /etc/sysconfig/cyrus-sasl to configure package.
Someone please review it and if possible apply
On 03/04/2012 09:14 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Armin K. wrote:
Mmmm ... svn diff failed to create good patch for bootscripts.
You have to go up a directory to BLFS/trunk and do the `svn diff` there
to get everything.
-- Bruce
I did that - see patch attached in first mail. But it didn't
Here are some more updates - p11-kit, gnutls and iptables. New version of
p11-kit is required for latest gnutls version. Please review them, and if
possible apply them.
gnutls.patch
Description: Attachment: gnutls.patch
iptables.patch
Description: Attachment: iptables.patch
p11-kit.patch
On 03/05/2012 01:14 PM, Andrew Benton wrote:
On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 23:08:02 +0100
Armin K.kre...@email.com wrote:
HAL-0.5.14 - Discussed earlier. It's unmaintained and obsoleted by
udisks/upower/gvfs/whatever.
I've just started trying to remove Hal and it's marked as required by 2
of the
On 03/05/2012 01:47 PM, Andrew Benton wrote:
On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 23:08:02 +0100
Armin K.kre...@email.com wrote:
packagekit-0.7.1 - Absolutely not necesary - neither lfs nor blfs use
any package management. Also, all applications can be made not to even
require it's libraries.
Gnome
On 03/05/2012 03:03 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 02:22:00PM +0100, Armin K. wrote:
On 03/05/2012 01:47 PM, Andrew Benton wrote:
On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 23:08:02 +0100
Armin K.kre...@email.com wrote:
packagekit-0.7.1 - Absolutely not necesary - neither lfs nor blfs use
any
On 03/05/2012 05:42 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Armin K. wrote:
Here are some more updates - p11-kit, gnutls and iptables. New
version of p11-kit is required for latest gnutls version. Please
review them, and if possible apply them.
Armin,
Please hold any additional patches for a couple
not to give my last name in the public. That's
why I've set Armin K. - where K is first letter of my last name.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
I'd like to upgrade mplayer, but latest release was 1.0~rc4 wich I am
unable to build. Now I am asking someone if he could put a svn snapshot
on anduin. svn snapshots are recommended by mplayer folks and are
buildable and useable. One thing that's needed is ffmpeg git checkout.
svn checkout
On 03/08/2012 01:20 AM, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 12:47:39AM +0100, Armin K. wrote:
I'd like to upgrade mplayer, but latest release was 1.0~rc4 wich I am
unable to build. Now I am asking someone if he could put a svn snapshot
on anduin. svn snapshots are recommended by mplayer
On 03/08/2012 10:13 AM, Ragnar Thomsen wrote:
We're down to under 100 active tickets for BLFS now!
I have continued my review of the tickets and suggest we resolve the
following tickets as invalid:
2333 (5 yr old): MythTV: DVR application.
3262 (3 mnths old): Cronie, another cron
On 03/08/2012 11:32 PM, Pierre Labastie wrote:
Le 08/03/2012 01:42, Armin K. a écrit :
libdrm is fine for now. But MesaLib has 2 drivers for nouveau, dri and
gallium drivers. DRI one (nouveau_vieux.so - the one which my card uses)
is not enabled by default,
I'm amazed. Worked for me
On 03/09/2012 01:49 PM, Ragnar Thomsen wrote:
I can see that we still use --enable-nntp for Evolution-3.2.2.
Since I don't use Gnome, can someone please check if the option is still
needed,
so we can close this ticket?
-Ragnar-
It is not present in
On 03/09/2012 11:37 PM, Andrew Benton wrote:
On Fri, 09 Mar 2012 18:58:02 +
kre...@linuxfromscratch.org wrote:
Modified: trunk/BOOK/x/lib/gtk+3.xml
===
--- trunk/BOOK/x/lib/gtk+3.xml 2012-03-09 18:28:16 UTC (rev 9654)
On 03/10/2012 12:48 AM, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 12:03:47AM +0100, Armin K. wrote:
With or without packagekit installed, it will still say: Enable
Packagekit: Yes ... and later it will look for it through dbus
interface. No package links against packagekit nor gnome
As you can see I've updated shadow package today. But that's not all.
I've also modified some instructions and probably simplified environment
configuration. I'd like someone to test it and report any errors if
encountered. Also, I noticed there is pam_securetty module, and
according to that
On 03/11/2012 02:47 PM, Andrew Benton wrote:
On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 13:18:16 +
Armin K.kre...@email.com wrote:
Also, I noticed there is pam_securetty module, and
according to that module documentation, it looks for /etc/securetty file
to check from which tty's is root user allowed to
On 03/11/2012 03:33 PM, Qrux wrote:
On Mar 11, 2012, at 6:54 AM, Armin K. wrote:
On 03/11/2012 02:47 PM, Andrew Benton wrote:
On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 13:18:16 +
Armin K.kre...@email.com wrote:
Also, I noticed there is pam_securetty module, and
according to that module documentation
Hello there. Here are some Gnome recommendations.
First and one that has been disturbing me since first time I tried to
build gnome with BLFS instructions (where I always failed, of course) is
Let's remove $GNOME_SYSCONFDIR ... Let everything be installed in /etc,
not in /etc/gnome/version.
On 03/11/2012 04:01 PM, Qrux wrote:
On Mar 11, 2012, at 7:47 AM, Armin K. wrote:
On 03/11/2012 03:33 PM, Qrux wrote:
On Mar 11, 2012, at 6:54 AM, Armin K. wrote:
On 03/11/2012 02:47 PM, Andrew Benton wrote:
On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 13:18:16 +
Armin K.kre...@email.comwrote:
Also, I
On 03/11/2012 06:36 PM, Andrew Benton wrote:
On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 15:49:44 +
Armin K.kre...@email.com wrote:
Fifth one is also about Gnome 3.4. I think that I've also mentioned this
one, but let's revise. Gnome 3.4 has been working on replacing
ConsoleKit sessin management with systemd
On 03/11/2012 06:34 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Armin K. wrote:
Hello there. Here are some Gnome recommendations.
First and one that has been disturbing me since first time I tried to
build gnome with BLFS instructions (where I always failed, of course) is
Let's remove $GNOME_SYSCONFDIR ... Let
On 03/11/2012 06:34 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Armin K. wrote:
Hello there. Here are some Gnome recommendations.
First and one that has been disturbing me since first time I tried to
build gnome with BLFS instructions (where I always failed, of course) is
Let's remove $GNOME_SYSCONFDIR ... Let
On 03/11/2012 08:03 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Armin K. wrote:
/etc/bash_completion.d
I really dislike this one. It's not a configuration file, it is a
library file. The user/admin will never change these entries. Ant I
don't like the implementation anyway because bash puts everything
On 03/11/2012 07:59 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
TO all editors:
The xml handles the structure:
!ENTITY acl-download-http http://tar.gz;
!ENTITY acl-download-ftp
listitem
paraDownload (HTTP):ulink url=acl-download-http;//para
/listitem
listitem
paraDownload (FTP):ulink
On 03/11/2012 08:34 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Armin K. wrote:
It is not about systemd, it is about ConsoleKit ... ConsoleKit has been
discontinued in favour of systemd-logind (new user seat manager), and it
is just question of time when we will have to add it in the book for
that sake
On 03/11/2012 08:43 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Armin K. wrote:
On 03/11/2012 07:59 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
TO all editors:
The xml handles the structure:
!ENTITY acl-download-http http://tar.gz;
!ENTITY acl-download-ftp
listitem
paraDownload (HTTP):ulink url=acl-download-http
On 03/11/2012 09:25 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Armin K. wrote:
On 03/11/2012 08:34 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Startup finished in 1s 655ms 874us (kernel) + 19s 811ms 430us
(userspace) = 21s 467ms 304us.
On Pentium 4 2.8GHz and 1024MB of RAM with lots of services.
acpid, avahi, cronie, rsyslog
On 03/11/2012 10:08 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Armin K. wrote:
On 03/11/2012 09:25 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Armin K. wrote:
On 03/11/2012 08:34 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Startup finished in 1s 655ms 874us (kernel) + 19s 811ms 430us
(userspace) = 21s 467ms 304us.
On Pentium 4 2.8GHz and 1024MB
On 03/11/2012 09:48 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Armin K. wrote:
Sorry, it rendered an empty space on my machine, so I commented it out.
Hmm. That shouldn't happen.
The entity needs to be a single space, , not a null string .
See stylesheets/lfs-xsl/xhtml/lfs-mixed.xsl lines 22-49
On 03/11/2012 11:24 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Armin K. wrote:
On 03/11/2012 09:48 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Armin K. wrote:
Sorry, it rendered an empty space on my machine, so I commented it out.
Hmm. That shouldn't happen.
The entity needs to be a single space, , not a null string .
See
I guess you have heard about tor. For those who haven't , visit
https://www.torproject.org/
Now, I tought adding it into book, any obligations? I think one or no
external deps are needed for it.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~krejzi/xf86-video-nouveau-0.0.16+git20120306.tar.xz
md5sum: b3d85c79ae059832741828c6b38072b2
I would like from anyone of you to put it somewhere else since I was
planing to add it in next Xorg revision.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
On 03/17/2012 03:12 PM, Pierre Labastie wrote:
Le 17/03/2012 11:48, Armin K. a écrit :
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~krejzi/xf86-video-nouveau-0.0.16+git20120306.tar.xz
md5sum: b3d85c79ae059832741828c6b38072b2
I would like from anyone of you to put it somewhere else since I was
planing
On 03/18/2012 09:10 AM, DJ Lucas wrote:
Need to either correct the archives lib path with a sed, or drop the
--libdir switch and just move the so files after install on both packages.
-- DJ Lucas
As for this one, I switched it recently. It is easiest way for it, since
it installs
On 03/18/2012 08:21 AM, DJ Lucas wrote:
On 03/11/2012 08:14 AM, Armin K. wrote:
As you can see I've updated shadow package today. But that's not all.
I've also modified some instructions and probably simplified environment
configuration. I'd like someone to test it and report any errors
On 03/18/2012 08:36 AM, Nathan Coulson wrote:
I could be wrong, but I believe we disabled ZLIB as hal was unable to
handle gzipped pci.id files.
Assuming I am not completely wrong, perhaps we can reenable this.
I think that udev still uses uncompressed ones ... So reenabling
compressed
On 03/18/2012 09:03 AM, Nathan Coulson wrote:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/general/gobject-introspection.html
pkg-config dependency shows #pkg-config in the ahref
Fixed, thanks
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ:
On 03/18/2012 09:11 AM, DJ Lucas wrote:
On 03/18/2012 02:21 AM, DJ Lucas wrote:
On 03/11/2012 08:14 AM, Armin K. wrote:
As you can see I've updated shadow package today. But that's not all.
I've also modified some instructions and probably simplified environment
configuration. I'd like
On 03/18/2012 09:55 AM, Nathan Coulson wrote:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/general/usbutils.html
http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/u/usbutils/usbutils_004.orig.tar.bz2
no longer exists at this path and now it only has 005
005 does not have configure, it looks like
On 03/19/2012 08:30 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
The command
install -v -m644docs/* \
${XORG_PREFIX}/share/doc/MesaLib-8.0.1
did not execute correctly for me, and stoped the build script. The reason:
there is a (probably useless) directory named OLD inside docs.
On 03/19/2012 09:25 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
--- Em seg, 19/3/12, Armin K.kre...@email.com escreveu:
De: Armin K.kre...@email.com
Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] install and llvm - MesaLib-8.0.1
Para: BLFS Development Listblfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org
Data: Segunda-feira, 19 de Março de
On 03/20/2012 02:05 PM, Pierre Labastie wrote:
I just realize that python and the python module `libxml2' are needed
for building the gallium drivers in MesaLib 8. This means python should
be built before libxml2. Maybe somebody could promote
python to a recommended dependency of libxml2, and
On 03/21/2012 09:33 AM, Nathan Coulson wrote:
ntpd says it's pidfile is in /var/run, when it should be in /run.
/var/run is symlink to /run, so does it really matter?
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See
As the title says, glib 2.32 stable has been released and it introduces
a change that breaks compiling of some packages if they include some
glib headers other than glib.h ... I'd like for someone to help me
checking packages others than from gnome sections for such failures
(I've noticed
On 03/25/2012 01:46 PM, Ragnar Thomsen wrote:
Armin wrote:
As the title says, glib 2.32 stable has been released and it introduces
a change that breaks compiling of some packages if they include some
glib headers other than glib.h ... I'd like for someone to help me
checking packages others
It is not buildable with libpng 1.5 ... Also, 0.16 has qt3 support. See
if building with libpng 1.5 is fixed there. But if you are going to keep
KDE3 (Trinity), we could also keep GNOME2 (MATE) too, don't you say? I
say it's stupid to maintain two versions of them in the book, even if
it's
On 03/25/2012 06:50 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
The book has:
freetype-doc-2.4.9.tar.bz2
Download MD5 sum: 538c925059e90be23928b454c14df728
but I get:
39c0881d426db837aa6ff1856e44af86 freetype-doc-2.4.9.tar.bz2
-- Bruce
Hell, I never even saw that download ... I need to pay attention.
On 03/25/2012 07:30 PM, Thomas de Roo wrote:
On 03/25/12 13:26, Armin K. wrote:
As the title says, glib 2.32 stable has been released and it introduces
a change that breaks compiling of some packages if they include some
glib headers other than glib.h ... I'd like for someone to help me
On 03/26/2012 11:21 AM, Matthias Rüster wrote:
On 03/26/12 11:03, Nathan Coulson wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 1:47 AM, Matthias Rüsterrues...@molgen.mpg.de
wrote:
On 03/26/12 10:00, Thomas de Roo wrote:
On 03/26/12 09:22, Ragnar Thomsen wrote:
We should consider removing the following
Original Message
Subject: GNOME 3.4 released
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 10:20:59 -0400
From: Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com
Reply-To: desktop-devel-l...@gnome.org
To: gnome-announce-l...@gnome.org, devel-announce-l...@gnome.org
GNOME 3.4 Released
On 03/30/2012 10:20 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
On one of my LFS-7.0 systems I'm still ploughing through the
remaining gnome-3.2 packages I haven't built. [ Or at least, I will
be once I've sorted out why my mouse now only works on the new
machine - probably I've dislodged a cable. ] Just
On 03/31/2012 12:40 PM, Andrew Benton wrote:
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 11:10:08 +0100
Armin K.kre...@email.com wrote:
On 03/31/2012 03:26 AM, Andrew Benton wrote:
It's not Gnome specific. It's required by WebkitGTK+
It is gnome specific. Only packages that are not gnome specific and
depend on
On 03/31/2012 07:04 PM, Andrew Benton wrote:
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 16:55:40 +0100
Bruce Dubbsbruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
Easy guys. I can see both sides here, but tend to agree with Andy. If
a package can be used by Gimp (directly or indirectly), then it's not
Gnome specific any more, even
On 04/01/2012 06:47 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Missing krb5-1.10.1-signed.tar
The book has an md5sum of 95b770bdae70789f72553ea428af97aa
Actual download md5sum: 43d6a2f6f4f96fbf8423732065b49f0f
-- Bruce
Hm, I might have used md5sum of .tar.gz archive inside the tarball. It
should be
On 04/01/2012 11:02 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
I've now completed my (partial) gnome build on my new machine.
One of the purposes of this was to try using py2cairo instead of
pycairo - I assume the name has been changed from pycairo to tell
people that its a python2 program, not python3. Anyway,
On 04/02/2012 08:24 AM, Ragnar Thomsen wrote:
I have not been able to build Q4 with the new Glib (2.32). It fails
consistently when building javascriptcore in qtwebkit.
Tried with both QT 4.8.0 and the fresh QT 4.8.1. Using the -no-glib configure
switch doesn't help either.
I have to
On 04/03/2012 05:34 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Armin K. wrote:
I do not agree with /usr/libexec stuff ... I'd agree if it only
installed executables there, or even better -
/usr/libexec/package/{executable1,executable2,etc} ... But no, it
installs also directories there, too which is sort
On 04/03/2012 05:23 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
- Forwarded message from Ken Moffatzarniwh...@ntlworld.com -
Sent this after a very long night, but it doesn't seem to have
arrived. Trying again.
Well, I've now fixed my mouse (cable problems) and tested gdm.
I've now got it working
On 04/03/2012 06:04 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 04:23:20PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
UPDATE: if this mail gets through, I'll reply with the logs showing
where it searches.
from the log, timestamp and host removed to slightly shorten these
DEBUG(+): GsmUtil: Looking for
On 04/03/2012 06:45 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Armin K. wrote:
Great. And then everyone told me how /etc/gnome and prefix other than
/usr can work. Well, yes they can. But there is a lot of additional
configuration that needs to be done, and also I still haven't found a
way to make policykit
On 04/03/2012 07:28 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Armin K. wrote:
On 04/03/2012 06:45 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Armin K. wrote:
Great. And then everyone told me how /etc/gnome and prefix other than
/usr can work. Well, yes they can. But there is a lot of additional
configuration that needs to be done
On 04/03/2012 08:27 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Armin K. wrote:
On 04/03/2012 07:28 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Armin K. wrote:
On 04/03/2012 06:45 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Armin K. wrote:
Great. And then everyone told me how /etc/gnome and prefix other than
/usr can work. Well, yes they can
On 04/03/2012 10:49 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 08:13:46PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 07:51:52PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
1.2 I suppose we could stress that anyone not building in /usr
/etc needs to provide symlinks in /etc/xdg if they want to use gdm ?
On 04/04/2012 10:31 AM, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
On 04/04/12 09:56, DJ Lucas wrote:
On 04/03/2012 06:36 PM, Andrew Benton wrote:
On Tue, 03 Apr 2012 17:07:23 +0100
Armin K.kre...@email.com wrote:
Great. And then everyone told me how /etc/gnome and prefix other than
/usr can work. Well, yes
On 04/06/2012 05:35 PM, Stuart Stegall wrote:
I have found that the current version of PyGObject requires PyCairo
and can optionally use libffi. Py2cairo is actually listed on the old
version of PyGObject.
Go n-éirí leat,
Stuart
libffi is pulled by glib, since it is it's required
On 04/06/2012 05:49 PM, Stuart Stegall wrote:
Another update - apparently it's complicated ...
From the Python Modules BLFS page: PyGObject-3.0.3 provides Python 3
bindings to the GObject class from GLib. - This is not true, these are
Python2 AND Python3 bindings and the py2cairo/pycairo
On 04/07/2012 02:23 AM, Ken Moffat wrote:
After building all of gnome-3 on my old hardware, I had hoped that
my newer hardware (an i3 with integrated intel graphics) would be
able to run clutter applications such as gnome-shell and totem, but
it wasn't up to it. So, I've moved on to my
On 04/14/2012 05:30 AM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
I have upgraded Xorg in five generation LFS machines.
The sequence and instrucions are the same as in the book, only many versions
change:
util-macros-1.17.0
xorg-proto
makedepend-1.0.4
libXau-1.0.7
libXdmcp-1.1.1
libpthread-stubs-0.3
On 04/14/2012 12:00 PM, Andrew Benton wrote:
On Sat, 14 Apr 2012 10:48:29 +0100
Armin K.kre...@email.com wrote:
Have you checked if xorg server 1.12 can compile against libX11 =
1.4.4, since libX11 1.5.0 is still in rc stage. I use xorg-server
1.12.0, but with development libX11.
On 04/14/2012 02:58 PM, Andrew Benton wrote:
On Sat, 14 Apr 2012 12:49:11 +0100
Armin K.kre...@email.com wrote:
I needed to split xbitmaps from xorg applications since newer version is
in other directory than applications. Also, I think that we should not
modify xinit xsession directory,
On 04/14/2012 03:58 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
On 14-04-2012 09:58, Andrew Benton wrote:
On Sat, 14 Apr 2012 12:49:11 +0100
Armin K. wrote:
I needed to split xbitmaps from xorg applications since newer version is
in other directory than applications. Also, I think that we should
On 04/14/2012 05:37 PM, Ragnar Thomsen wrote:
On Friday 13 April 2012 20:30:20 Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
I have upgraded Xorg in five generation LFS machines.
The sequence and instrucions are the same as in the book, only many versions
change:
util-macros-1.17.0
xorg-proto
On 04/15/2012 08:39 AM, DJ Lucas wrote:
Anybody have an objection to a Java Components page such as is done with
Perl or Python as opposed to 10 new package pages? Items such as ECJ,
JUnit, JAI, Jakrata, Net-Commons, Xerces, XalanJ, etc. could be placed on
a single page such as is done with
On 04/15/2012 09:43 AM, DJ Lucas wrote:
After an annoying battle with Gallium, KMS, firmware, etc. on my
new(ish) system, I think we should probably cover this in the book
someplace, but I'm not sure how to go about adding it. For starters,
where does it belong, in Post LFS or in Xorg? I'd be
On 04/19/2012 04:52 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Ken, Andy, Ragnar, Armin, Fernando,
Could you please let me know what you are planning to work on for the next few
weeks. I've been working tickets and we are now down to 30!
I'm sure there are packages that are not quite up to date and not in the
On 04/19/2012 11:37 AM, Ragnar Thomsen wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 4:52 AM, Bruce Dubbsbruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
Ken, Andy, Ragnar, Armin, Fernando,
Could you please let me know what you are planning to work on for the next
few
weeks. I've been working tickets and we are now down to
On 04/19/2012 11:52 AM, Andrew Benton wrote:
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 09:52:24 +0100
Armin K.kre...@email.com wrote:
The wacom driver from sourceforge. gnome-settings-daemon (I am not sure
if it requires it since I had it installed) looks for xorg-wacom.pc
which is part of xf86-input-wacom (it's
On 04/20/2012 05:55 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I noticed for the following packages that the ftp and the http urls are
identical. Probably the only entry should be http.
gnome-dictionary-3.4.0.tar.xz
gnome-font-viewer-3.4.0.tar.xz
gnome-screenshot-3.4.1.tar.xz
gnome-search-tool-3.4.0.tar.xz
On 04/20/2012 11:33 AM, a...@linuxfromscratch.org wrote:
Author: andy
Date: 2012-04-20 03:33:30 -0600 (Fri, 20 Apr 2012)
New Revision: 9956
Modified:
trunk/BOOK/x/lib/atk.xml
trunk/BOOK/x/lib/gdk-pixbuf.xml
trunk/BOOK/x/lib/gtk+3.xml
trunk/BOOK/x/lib/pango.xml
Log:
1 - 100 of 706 matches
Mail list logo
