>>1. Xinit 1.4.1
>>Can anyone expain why we have to use the parameter
>>"--with-xinitdir=/etc/X11/app-defaults" for Xinit?
>>That's because I find that the folder "/etc/X11/app-defaults/xinitrc.d" is
>>not created while some applications will install thier "sh" >>files to
1. Xinit 1.4.1
Can anyone expain why we have to use the parameter
"--with-xinitdir=/etc/X11/app-defaults" for Xinit?
That's because I find that the folder "/etc/X11/app-defaults/xinitrc.d" is not
created while some applications will install thier "sh" files to
"/etc/X11/xinit/xinitrc.d". As a
On 2019-06-26 13:52 -0500, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote:
> On 6/26/19 1:47 PM, Xi Ruoyao via blfs-dev wrote:
> > On 2019-06-26 12:22 -0500, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote:
> >
> > > [2]: https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/advisories/mfsa2019-18/
> > [2] affects mozjs as well.
> >
>
On 6/26/19 1:47 PM, Xi Ruoyao via blfs-dev wrote:
On 2019-06-26 12:22 -0500, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote:
[2]: https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/advisories/mfsa2019-18/
[2] affects mozjs as well.
Should we upgrade mozjs to 60.7.2 or provide a patch?
We should probably provide
On 2019-06-26 12:22 -0500, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote:
> [2]: https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/advisories/mfsa2019-18/
[2] affects mozjs as well.
Should we upgrade mozjs to 60.7.2 or provide a patch?
--
Xi Ruoyao
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University
--
On Jun 25, 2019 9:46 PM, "DJ Lucas via blfs-dev" <
blfs-dev@lists.linuxfromscratch.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 6/25/2019 6:21 PM, Joe Locash via blfs-dev wrote:
>>
>>
>> Seriously? Ok, so missed a couple of packages.
>>
>> Maybe I shouldn't contribute to the goal of the project. My bad.
>>
> Joe, your
Good morning folks,
Last week, critical security vulnerabilities were unveiled in Mozilla
Firefox and Mozilla Thunderbird [1]. These vulnerabilities allowed for
arbitrary code execution, sandbox escape, and denial of service. The
problem with these vulnerabilities is that they are being
On June 26, 2019 2:22:03 AM CDT, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev
wrote:
>On 26/06/2019 05:55, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
>> On 6/25/19 9:54 PM, DJ Lucas via blfs-dev wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 6/25/2019 9:19 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 6/25/19 9:08 PM, DJ Lucas via blfs-dev wrote:
On 26/06/2019 05:55, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
> On 6/25/19 9:54 PM, DJ Lucas via blfs-dev wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 6/25/2019 9:19 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
>>> On 6/25/19 9:08 PM, DJ Lucas via blfs-dev wrote:
On 6/25/2019 2:55 PM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
>
On 26/06/2019 04:15, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
> On 6/25/19 9:02 PM, DJ Lucas via blfs-dev wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 6/25/2019 2:55 PM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I've not gone that far with my elogind testing:
>>> -
>>> pierre [ ~ ]$ startx
>>> xauth: file
On 26/06/2019 04:08, DJ Lucas wrote:
>
>
> On 6/25/2019 2:55 PM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've not gone that far with my elogind testing:
>> -
>> pierre [ ~ ]$ startx
>> xauth: file /home/pierre/.serverauth.2289 does not exist
>>
>>
>> X.Org X Server 1.20.4
>> X
Am Sonntag, den 23.06.2019, 17:55 -0400 schrieb Joe Locash via blfs-
dev:
> Is there any interest in adding MATE to BLFS? I have it working, just
> tweaking the minor issues out.
Due to change of my ISP, my answer to this thread gots lost in space. All of
what I'd like to comment has been said
12 matches
Mail list logo
