Re: [blfs-dev] Perl modules in /usr/share/perl5

2020-08-09 Thread Marty Jack via blfs-dev
On Sun, 09 Aug 2020 16:20:45 -0500 Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: > On Sun, Aug 09, 2020 at 11:04:09AM -0500, Marty Jack via blfs-dev wrote: > > > > The INSTALL file for git recommends the following incantation to derive the > > path (at line 100). > > This doesn't need updating when the Perl v

Re: [blfs-dev] Perl modules in /usr/share/perl5

2020-08-09 Thread Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev
On 8/9/20 5:08 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: On Sun, Aug 09, 2020 at 04:49:05PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote: On 8/9/20 4:20 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: On Sun, Aug 09, 2020 at 11:04:09AM -0500, Marty Jack via blfs-dev wrote: The INSTALL file for git recommends the follow

Re: [blfs-dev] Perl modules in /usr/share/perl5

2020-08-09 Thread Ken Moffat via blfs-dev
On Sun, Aug 09, 2020 at 04:49:05PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote: > On 8/9/20 4:20 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 09, 2020 at 11:04:09AM -0500, Marty Jack via blfs-dev wrote: > > > > > > The INSTALL file for git recommends the following incantation to derive > > > the

Re: [blfs-dev] Perl modules in /usr/share/perl5

2020-08-09 Thread Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev
On 8/9/20 4:20 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: On Sun, Aug 09, 2020 at 11:04:09AM -0500, Marty Jack via blfs-dev wrote: The INSTALL file for git recommends the following incantation to derive the path (at line 100). This doesn't need updating when the Perl version changes. perllibdir=/usr/

Re: [blfs-dev] Perl modules in /usr/share/perl5

2020-08-09 Thread Ken Moffat via blfs-dev
On Sun, Aug 09, 2020 at 11:04:09AM -0500, Marty Jack via blfs-dev wrote: > > The INSTALL file for git recommends the following incantation to derive the > path (at line 100). > This doesn't need updating when the Perl version changes. > > perllibdir=/usr/$(/usr/bin/perl -MConfig -wle 'print subs

Re: [blfs-dev] Perl modules in /usr/share/perl5

2020-08-09 Thread Marty Jack via blfs-dev
The INSTALL file for git recommends the following incantation to derive the path (at line 100). This doesn't need updating when the Perl version changes. perllibdir=/usr/$(/usr/bin/perl -MConfig -wle 'print substr $Config{installsitelib}, 1 + length $$Config{siteprefixexp}') I tested it with m

[blfs-dev] Perl modules in /usr/share/perl5

2020-08-05 Thread Ken Moffat via blfs-dev
One of the longstanding annoyances, at least for me, has been that git installs its perl modules in /usr/share/perl5 instead of somewhere below /usr/lib. With the new-style perl install, a lot more (plain) perl modules are installed, both in /usr/share/perl5/core_perl/ and in /usr/share/perl5/site

Re: [blfs-dev] Perl modules branch : ready to merge ?

2018-11-18 Thread Ken Moffat via blfs-dev
On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 12:56:15AM -0600, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote: > On 11/17/2018 11:37 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: > > > > The problem with svn, in general, is that it is obscure and very > > poorly documented (in particular, things which are claimed to work > > might not work in B

Re: [blfs-dev] Perl modules branch : ready to merge ?

2018-11-17 Thread Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev
On 11/17/2018 11:37 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 10:38:07PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote: On 11/17/2018 05:18 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: That was absolutely horrid. First, merge requires the revision numbers (I sort-of expected that, and was read

Re: [blfs-dev] Perl modules branch : ready to merge ?

2018-11-17 Thread DJ Lucas via blfs-dev
On 11/17/2018 11:37 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: Anyway, it is done now. But if you mention making a branch for future changes which are intended to end up in trunk, I'll be gone. LOL. Understand that. That stash equivalent should work well enough for future, though I've still used

Re: [blfs-dev] Perl modules branch : ready to merge ?

2018-11-17 Thread Ken Moffat via blfs-dev
On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 10:38:07PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote: > On 11/17/2018 05:18 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: > > > > That was absolutely horrid. First, merge requires the revision > > numbers (I sort-of expected that, and was ready). But secondly, it > > handles the same th

Re: [blfs-dev] Perl modules branch : ready to merge ?

2018-11-17 Thread Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev
On 11/17/2018 05:18 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 06:33:28PM +, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 08:37:25PM -0600, renodr wrote: Can you give us all a three hour or so notice prior to committing? My plan is to start at 22:00 UTC (which

Re: [blfs-dev] Perl modules branch : ready to merge ?

2018-11-17 Thread Ken Moffat via blfs-dev
On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 12:02:36AM +, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: > > and also tidy up the alphabetical ordering and clean up what I had > in the changelog. I thought the renaming might get help (it was s/help/held/ -- If a man stands before a mirror and sees in it his reflection, what

Re: [blfs-dev] Perl modules branch : ready to merge ?

2018-11-17 Thread Ken Moffat via blfs-dev
On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 11:18:16PM +, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: > > > 2. Archive the old perl-modules page. > > > > 3. Rename new-perl-modules.xml to perl-modules.xml. > > > > 4. Attempt to find all the internal links to new-perl- and change to > > perl-. > > and also tidy up the alph

Re: [blfs-dev] Perl modules branch : ready to merge ?

2018-11-17 Thread Ken Moffat via blfs-dev
On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 06:33:28PM +, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: > On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 08:37:25PM -0600, renodr wrote: > > > > Can you give us all a three hour or so notice prior to committing? > > > > My plan is to start at 22:00 UTC (which should be 16:00 in the -0600 > timezone).

Re: [blfs-dev] Perl modules branch : ready to merge ?

2018-11-17 Thread Ken Moffat via blfs-dev
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 08:37:25PM -0600, renodr wrote: > > Can you give us all a three hour or so notice prior to committing? > My plan is to start at 22:00 UTC (which should be 16:00 in the -0600 timezone). I expect it to take some time. Current plan (each step will be a commit): 0. Merge r

Re: [blfs-dev] Perl modules branch : ready to merge ?

2018-11-14 Thread renodr via blfs-dev
On 2018-11-14 20:03, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: I think the perl modules branch is ready to merge - subject to any objections. For people who want to read the rendered versions I've again updated the copies at http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~ken/perl-changes/ and this time I've added a prov

[blfs-dev] Perl modules branch : ready to merge ?

2018-11-14 Thread Ken Moffat via blfs-dev
I think the perl modules branch is ready to merge - subject to any objections. For people who want to read the rendered versions I've again updated the copies at http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~ken/perl-changes/ and this time I've added a provisional entry to the Change Log (that is not in the br

[blfs-dev] Perl Modules Branch : updated after testing.

2018-11-06 Thread Ken Moffat via blfs-dev
I've now made some fixes to the perl modules branch, and uploaded up-to-date rendered versions of the book to http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~ken/perl-changes/ Since my previous announcements, the following things have changed: 1. Dependencies have been updated for DateTime::Locale, File::Copy::

Re: [blfs-dev] Perl modules branch: An invitation to the brave

2018-11-05 Thread Ken Moffat via blfs-dev
On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 09:45:33AM -0600, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote: > On 11/04/2018 09:39 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 04, 2018 at 08:41:28PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote: > > > > > > One question I have is what are the consequences of using the cpan install >

Re: [blfs-dev] Perl modules branch: An invitation to the brave

2018-11-05 Thread Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev
On 11/04/2018 09:39 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: On Sun, Nov 04, 2018 at 08:41:28PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote: One question I have is what are the consequences of using the cpan install for LWP::Protocol::https? That does not use the patch. As best I can tell, a grep for LWP

Re: [blfs-dev] Perl modules branch: An invitation to the brave

2018-11-04 Thread Ken Moffat via blfs-dev
On Sun, Nov 04, 2018 at 08:41:28PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote: > > One question I have is what are the consequences of using the cpan install > for LWP::Protocol::https? That does not use the patch. As best I can tell, > a grep for LWP::Protocol::https only shows up in biber and then

Re: [blfs-dev] Perl modules branch: An invitation to the brave

2018-11-04 Thread Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev
On 11/04/2018 06:36 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: I think that the perl modules branch (perl dependencies broken down into those modules directly referenced by other packages in the book, and a second page of those which are only there as dependencies of other modules) are now ready for test

[blfs-dev] Perl modules branch: An invitation to the brave

2018-11-04 Thread Ken Moffat via blfs-dev
I think that the perl modules branch (perl dependencies broken down into those modules directly referenced by other packages in the book, and a second page of those which are only there as dependencies of other modules) are now ready for testing by the brave, and for review. Rendered versions at:

Re: [blfs-dev] perl modules branch

2018-09-29 Thread Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev
On 9/29/18 12:38 PM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote: > On 9/28/18 5:21 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote: >> How about this: >> >> >> >> And have blfs key off of "perl-instr" to use >> >> perl Makefile.PL && >> make && >> make test    && >> sudo make install >> >> Or similar.

Re: [blfs-dev] perl modules branch

2018-09-29 Thread Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev
On 9/28/18 5:21 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote: > On 09/28/2018 02:11 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote: >> On 9/28/18 7:51 AM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: >>> On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 12:17:07AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote: On 09/27/2018 11:54 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev

Re: [blfs-dev] perl modules branch

2018-09-28 Thread Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev
On 09/28/2018 02:11 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote: On 9/28/18 7:51 AM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 12:17:07AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote: On 09/27/2018 11:54 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: I've updated the online rendered versions of the branc

Re: [blfs-dev] perl modules branch

2018-09-28 Thread Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev
On 9/28/18 7:51 AM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: > On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 12:17:07AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote: >> On 09/27/2018 11:54 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: >>> I've updated the online rendered versions of the branch, again at >>> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~ken/per

Re: [blfs-dev] perl modules branch

2018-09-27 Thread Ken Moffat via blfs-dev
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 12:17:07AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote: > On 09/27/2018 11:54 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: > > I've updated the online rendered versions of the branch, again at > > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~ken/perl-changes/ > > > > The versions shown on the front pa

Re: [blfs-dev] perl modules branch

2018-09-27 Thread Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev
On 09/27/2018 11:54 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: I've updated the online rendered versions of the branch, again at http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~ken/perl-changes/ The versions shown on the front pages remain at 18th September, but the individual pages are correctly labelled as 27th Sept

[blfs-dev] perl modules branch

2018-09-27 Thread Ken Moffat via blfs-dev
I've updated the online rendered versions of the branch, again at http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~ken/perl-changes/ The versions shown on the front pages remain at 18th September, but the individual pages are correctly labelled as 27th September. That probably means I missed the date change in g

Re: [blfs-dev] Perl Modules

2018-09-04 Thread Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev
On 09/04/2018 12:49 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 11:24:37AM -0500, DJ Lucas via blfs-dev wrote: On September 4, 2018 7:22:02 AM CDT, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: Take a look here: https://tdg.docbook.org/tdg/5.0/ch02.html That's for 5.0, but section 1.3 applie

Re: [blfs-dev] Perl Modules

2018-09-04 Thread Ken Moffat via blfs-dev
On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 11:24:37AM -0500, DJ Lucas via blfs-dev wrote: > On September 4, 2018 7:22:02 AM CDT, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev > wrote: > > Take a look here: https://tdg.docbook.org/tdg/5.0/ch02.html > > That's for 5.0, but section 1.3 applies equally to Docbook 4.5. > Thanks, so the 'l

Re: [blfs-dev] Perl Modules

2018-09-04 Thread DJ Lucas via blfs-dev
On September 4, 2018 7:22:02 AM CDT, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: >On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 02:41:01AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 02:56:53AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: >> > >> > Once the dust has settled on 8.3, I hope to have another go at >> > trying to make the structu

Re: [blfs-dev] Perl Modules

2018-09-04 Thread Ken Moffat via blfs-dev
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 02:41:01AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 02:56:53AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > > > > Once the dust has settled on 8.3, I hope to have another go at > > trying to make the structure of the perl modules more like what we > > do for python modules (one pag

Re: [blfs-dev] Perl Modules

2018-08-27 Thread Ken Moffat
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 02:56:53AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > > Once the dust has settled on 8.3, I hope to have another go at > trying to make the structure of the perl modules more like what we > do for python modules (one page for all modules, pulling in a file > for each) - the difference will

Re: [blfs-dev] Perl Modules

2018-08-27 Thread Bruce Dubbs
On 08/27/2018 12:42 AM, Ken Moffat wrote: On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 12:02:33AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: On 08/26/2018 08:56 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: You know that cpan fetches the sources, checks dependencies, builds the packages and runs the tests, right? The difference is that the process is han

Re: [blfs-dev] Perl Modules

2018-08-26 Thread Ken Moffat
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 12:02:33AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > On 08/26/2018 08:56 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: > > You know that cpan fetches the sources, checks dependencies, builds the > packages and runs the tests, right? The difference is that the process is > handled by cpan and automated. At the

Re: [blfs-dev] Perl Modules

2018-08-26 Thread Bruce Dubbs
On 08/26/2018 08:56 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: I'm just about to "promote" IO::Socket::SSL and "HTTP::Daemon" to full members of the book. The reason is that their use by wget matches Bind's use of Net::DNS which is already fully in the book. For the future, I'm going to suggest that we do not, as a

[blfs-dev] Perl Modules

2018-08-26 Thread Ken Moffat
I'm just about to "promote" IO::Socket::SSL and "HTTP::Daemon" to full members of the book. The reason is that their use by wget matches Bind's use of Net::DNS which is already fully in the book. For the future, I'm going to suggest that we do not, as a matter of course, update perl module versio

Re: [blfs-dev] perl modules required for ntp-4.2.8p11 are external links

2018-03-24 Thread Ken Moffat
On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 06:08:08PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > I certainly do not want to throw away what we have. I just do not want to > go overboard with specifying every detail. By the time a user gets to the > perl modules, he should have the ability to read the cpan output or perl > mess

Re: [blfs-dev] perl modules required for ntp-4.2.8p11 are external links

2018-03-24 Thread Bruce Dubbs
On 03/24/2018 05:34 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 10:22:07PM +0100, Pierre Labastie wrote: On 23/03/2018 21:26, Bruce Dubbs wrote: On 03/23/2018 02:56 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: I think that (at least) Net::SSLeay and Mozilla::CA should be promoted to full members of the book. Doe

Re: [blfs-dev] perl modules required for ntp-4.2.8p11 are external links

2018-03-24 Thread Ken Moffat
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 10:22:07PM +0100, Pierre Labastie wrote: > On 23/03/2018 21:26, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > On 03/23/2018 02:56 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: > >> > >> I think that (at least) Net::SSLeay and Mozilla::CA should be > >> promoted to full members of the book. > >> > >> Does anybody disagree

Re: [blfs-dev] perl modules required for ntp-4.2.8p11 are external links

2018-03-23 Thread Pierre Labastie
On 23/03/2018 22:22, Pierre Labastie wrote: > On 23/03/2018 21:26, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> On 03/23/2018 02:56 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: >>> Catching up with what has changed since my last build, I got to ntp. >>> This added links to search.cpan.org for the perl modules it now >>> requires. >>> >>> In my

Re: [blfs-dev] perl modules required for ntp-4.2.8p11 are external links

2018-03-23 Thread Pierre Labastie
On 23/03/2018 21:26, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > On 03/23/2018 02:56 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: >> Catching up with what has changed since my last build, I got to ntp. >> This added links to search.cpan.org for the perl modules it now >> requires. >> >> In my opinion, required deps should be documented in the

Re: [blfs-dev] perl modules required for ntp-4.2.8p11 are external links

2018-03-23 Thread Bruce Dubbs
On 03/23/2018 02:56 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: Catching up with what has changed since my last build, I got to ntp. This added links to search.cpan.org for the perl modules it now requires. In my opinion, required deps should be documented in the book rather than external links. For perl modules we

[blfs-dev] perl modules required for ntp-4.2.8p11 are external links

2018-03-23 Thread Ken Moffat
Catching up with what has changed since my last build, I got to ntp. This added links to search.cpan.org for the perl modules it now requires. In my opinion, required deps should be documented in the book rather than external links. For perl modules we have listed modules, and any dependencies, b

Re: [blfs-dev] perl modules

2017-08-25 Thread DJ Lucas
On 08/25/2017 08:47 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Ken Moffat wrote: Update on the "not found by cpan" remark: searching for Scalar-List-Utils (_always_ use dashes when searching cpan) the Using cpan to install uses the colons, e.g cpan -i Archive::Zip Just like we have in the section "

Re: [blfs-dev] perl modules

2017-08-25 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Ken Moffat wrote: On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 09:58:18PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Ken Moffat wrote: On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 04:32:25PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: I was going though all the perl modules for blfs-8.1 and have have some issues with two modules. 1. Scalar::List::Utils is not found by

Re: [blfs-dev] perl modules

2017-08-25 Thread Ken Moffat
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 09:58:18PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Ken Moffat wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 04:32:25PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > > I was going though all the perl modules for blfs-8.1 and have have some > > > issues with two modules. > > > > > > 1. Scalar::List::Utils is not f

Re: [blfs-dev] perl modules

2017-08-22 Thread Ken Moffat
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 09:58:18PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Ken Moffat wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 04:32:25PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > > I was going though all the perl modules for blfs-8.1 and have have some > > > issues with two modules. > > > > > > 1. Scalar::List::Utils is not f

Re: [blfs-dev] perl modules

2017-08-22 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Pierre Labastie wrote: On 22/08/2017 04:58, Bruce Dubbs wrote: be for a few days. I don't think the perl module SGMLSpm has anything to do with docbook-related packages. Am I missing something? According to the book, it is optional for postgresql and docbook-utils. Indeed. I missed it due

Re: [blfs-dev] perl modules

2017-08-21 Thread Pierre Labastie
On 22/08/2017 04:58, Bruce Dubbs wrote: be for a few days. > > I don't think the perl module SGMLSpm has anything to do with docbook-related > packages. Am I missing something? According to the book, it is optional for postgresql and docbook-utils. Pierre -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/

Re: [blfs-dev] perl modules

2017-08-21 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Ken Moffat wrote: On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 04:32:25PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: I was going though all the perl modules for blfs-8.1 and have have some issues with two modules. 1. Scalar::List::Utils is not found by cpan. The current comments say that this module is not needed with perl-5.26 wh

Re: [blfs-dev] perl modules

2017-08-21 Thread Ken Moffat
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 04:32:25PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > I was going though all the perl modules for blfs-8.1 and have have some > issues with two modules. > > 1. Scalar::List::Utils is not found by cpan. The current comments say that > this module is not needed with perl-5.26 which is, of

[blfs-dev] perl modules

2017-08-21 Thread Bruce Dubbs
I was going though all the perl modules for blfs-8.1 and have have some issues with two modules. 1. Scalar::List::Utils is not found by cpan. The current comments say that this module is not needed with perl-5.26 which is, of course, in lfs-8.1. I recommend removing this. 2. SGMLSpm has be

Re: [blfs-dev] Perl modules

2016-10-02 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Ken Moffat wrote: On Sun, Oct 02, 2016 at 02:29:00PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Ken Moffat wrote: I'm still working out the deps for the new version of biber - I have them all now (more than 100 _plus_ LWP), including those needed at runtime and for testing, it's just a question of which (minor)

Re: [blfs-dev] Perl modules

2016-10-02 Thread akhiezer
> From: Bruce Dubbs > Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2016 14:29:00 -0500 > Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] Perl modules > > Ken Moffat wrote: > > I'm still working out the deps for the new version of biber - I have > > them all now (more than 100 _plus_ LWP), including those needed at &

Re: [blfs-dev] Perl modules

2016-10-02 Thread Ken Moffat
On Sun, Oct 02, 2016 at 02:29:00PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Ken Moffat wrote: > > I'm still working out the deps for the new version of biber - I have > > them all now (more than 100 _plus_ LWP), including those needed at > > runtime and for testing, it's just a question of which (minor) > > dep

Re: [blfs-dev] Perl modules

2016-10-02 Thread DJ Lucas
On October 1, 2016 8:58:31 PM CDT, Ken Moffat wrote: >I'm still working out the deps for the new version of biber - I have >them all now (more than 100 _plus_ LWP), including those needed at >runtime and for testing, it's just a question of which (minor) >dependencies need which other minor depe

Re: [blfs-dev] Perl modules

2016-10-02 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Ken Moffat wrote: I'm still working out the deps for the new version of biber - I have them all now (more than 100 _plus_ LWP), including those needed at runtime and for testing, it's just a question of which (minor) dependencies need which other minor dependencies. At a guess, probably no more

[blfs-dev] Perl modules

2016-10-02 Thread Ken Moffat
I'm still working out the deps for the new version of biber - I have them all now (more than 100 _plus_ LWP), including those needed at runtime and for testing, it's just a question of which (minor) dependencies need which other minor dependencies. At a guess, probably no more than 5 levels of dep

[blfs-dev] Perl Modules - small reorganization

2016-09-25 Thread Ken Moffat
tldr; for "second class" perl modules used by multiple other perl modules, I've moved t hem to the top level in the perl modules page, but without any version number. I'm (still) in the process of building the individual biber dependencies using cpan to install each on a minimal system (and then b

Re: [blfs-dev] Perl modules with programs or libs in /usr/{bin, lib}

2015-06-05 Thread Ken Moffat
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 05:06:38PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Ken Moffat wrote: > >I was aware that biber installed a program in /usr/bin, but it has > >its own page which allows that to be documented. > > > >Today, while I was looking at the new version of Text-BibTeX I > >realised that it too pu

Re: [blfs-dev] Perl modules with programs or libs in /usr/{bin, lib}

2015-06-03 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Ken Moffat wrote: I was aware that biber installed a program in /usr/bin, but it has its own page which allows that to be documented. Today, while I was looking at the new version of Text-BibTeX I realised that it too puts programs in /usr/bin : biblex, bibparse, dumpnames (all compiled progs) :

[blfs-dev] Perl modules with programs or libs in /usr/{bin,lib}

2015-06-03 Thread Ken Moffat
I was aware that biber installed a program in /usr/bin, but it has its own page which allows that to be documented. Today, while I was looking at the new version of Text-BibTeX I realised that it too puts programs in /usr/bin : biblex, bibparse, dumpnames (all compiled progs) : and it also install

Re: [blfs-dev] Perl Modules and wget-list

2015-01-24 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Armin K. wrote: It's done, now every package is properly detected, even the Biber module which had the directory changed from previous version. It did require adding an URL override for all of the modules, which makes me wonder would it upset Bruce to add 200+ new lines to the currency script (I

Re: [blfs-dev] Perl Modules and wget-list

2015-01-24 Thread Armin K.
On 01/24/2015 04:08 PM, Armin K. wrote: > On 01/24/2015 03:59 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 02:23:12PM +0100, Armin K. wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I've noticed a lot of Perl Modules tickets last night and wondered why >>> they weren't picked up by the currency scripts. After some

Re: [blfs-dev] Perl Modules and wget-list

2015-01-24 Thread Armin K.
On 01/24/2015 03:59 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 02:23:12PM +0100, Armin K. wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I've noticed a lot of Perl Modules tickets last night and wondered why >> they weren't picked up by the currency scripts. After some >> investigation, the format used for specifyin

Re: [blfs-dev] Perl Modules and wget-list

2015-01-24 Thread Ken Moffat
On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 02:23:12PM +0100, Armin K. wrote: > Hi all, > > I've noticed a lot of Perl Modules tickets last night and wondered why > they weren't picked up by the currency scripts. After some > investigation, the format used for specifying the URL and md5sum isn't > the standard one us

Re: [blfs-dev] Perl Modules and wget-list

2015-01-24 Thread Armin K.
On 01/24/2015 02:23 PM, Armin K. wrote: > Hi all, > > I've noticed a lot of Perl Modules tickets last night and wondered why > they weren't picked up by the currency scripts. After some > investigation, the format used for specifying the URL and md5sum isn't > the standard one used by other packag

[blfs-dev] Perl Modules and wget-list

2015-01-24 Thread Armin K.
Hi all, I've noticed a lot of Perl Modules tickets last night and wondered why they weren't picked up by the currency scripts. After some investigation, the format used for specifying the URL and md5sum isn't the standard one used by other packages and none of the perl modules end up in the wget-l

Re: [blfs-dev] Perl-modules download urls

2014-11-17 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
On 17-11-2014 00:21, Christopher Gregory wrote: > Well after the rendering of the book the clickable links were still giving > 404's when clicking on them. > > I looked again in the xml code and found that all of the 404's were being > caused by this: > > ulink url=" http:// I had noticed an f

Re: [blfs-dev] Perl-modules download urls

2014-11-16 Thread Christopher Gregory
On Mon, November 17, 2014 2:47 pm, Christopher Gregory wrote: > Hello, > > > As those of you who have read the list know, I am going through testing > all of the packages that have been updated since we released the last > stable. > > I am now going through all the perl modules and have noticed tha

[blfs-dev] Perl-modules download urls

2014-11-16 Thread Christopher Gregory
Hello, As those of you who have read the list know, I am going through testing all of the packages that have been updated since we released the last stable. I am now going through all the perl modules and have noticed that cpan have changed a number of the donwload links, or at least that is what