On 10-12-2014 20:41, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 08:40:38PM +, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 07:09:48PM +, akhiezer wrote:
Apols if is stated clearly earlier in thread, but: for non-build issues,
if possible could you post - or refer to place(s) in thread -
From blfs-dev-boun...@lists.linuxfromscratch.org Wed Dec 10 20:28:01 2014
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 20:40:38 +
From: Ken Moffat zarniwh...@ntlworld.com
To: BLFS Development List blfs-dev@lists.linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] Texlive and current svn
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 07
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 09:41:46AM +, akhiezer wrote:
1. Context, as noted, is sometimes broken and craps out if you run
'context --version'.
It gives fairly explicit tex error messages - the problem was with
the supporting files from the garden or whatever the context site is
called.
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 06:19:14AM -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
On 10-12-2014 20:41, Ken Moffat wrote:
Meanwhile, although I find texinfo somewhat addictive, the world,
or at least that part of it that Fernando has committed to BLFS,
is moving ever onwards ;-) So, I'll be
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 11:53:08PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Ken Moffat wrote:
BTW - did I ever mention how much I hate this stuff ?
The only thing I can say is that we appreciate it.
Thanks. I guess that what I actually hate, apart from the
presumption that binaries are the way to go,
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 18:39:59 +
From: Ken Moffat zarniwh...@ntlworld.com
To: BLFS Development List blfs-dev@lists.linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] Texlive and current svn
.
.
For xindy : yes, I used distros in qemu -
I did not get around to testing
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 07:09:48PM +, akhiezer wrote:
Apols if is stated clearly earlier in thread, but: for non-build issues,
if possible could you post - or refer to place(s) in thread - the cmdlines
that you're seeing not work, along with the errors that you're seeing,
and what is
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 08:40:38PM +, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 07:09:48PM +, akhiezer wrote:
Apols if is stated clearly earlier in thread, but: for non-build issues,
if possible could you post - or refer to place(s) in thread - the cmdlines
that you're seeing
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 10:11:52PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Ken Moffat wrote:
On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 08:54:04PM +, Ken Moffat wrote:
This is just a heads up that there is something rotten in the state
of texlive when built from source, at least on i686.
[...]
2. My test script
Ken Moffat wrote:
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 10:11:52PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Ken Moffat wrote:
On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 08:54:04PM +, Ken Moffat wrote:
This is just a heads up that there is something rotten in the state
of texlive when built from source, at least on i686.
[...]
2.
On Sat, Dec 06, 2014 at 10:47:36AM +1300, Christopher Gregory wrote:
I have yet to install texlive without the binary installer. I was
waiting for you to find all the errors/bugs and get rid of them before I
did. :)
Yeah, despite what I said in another thread, there *is* a Spam folder
in
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 10:00:15AM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Ken Moffat wrote:
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 10:11:52PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Ken Moffat wrote:
On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 08:54:04PM +, Ken Moffat wrote:
This is just a heads up that there is something rotten in the state
of
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 02:57:41AM +, Ken Moffat wrote:
I'll now see if I can find upstream's latest version of asymptote,
and see if I can confirm that the failure while installing the docs
is caused by gcc-4.9.2. Even if that does indicate what to blame,
it does not provide a
Ken Moffat wrote:
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 10:00:15AM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Ken Moffat wrote:
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 10:11:52PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Ken Moffat wrote:
On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 08:54:04PM +, Ken Moffat wrote:
This is just a heads up that there is something
On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 08:54:04PM +, Ken Moffat wrote:
This is just a heads up that there is something rotten in the state
of texlive when built from source, at least on i686.
[...]
2. My test script for xindy now fails, because the index (which is
the whole point of xindy) is not
Ken Moffat wrote:
On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 08:54:04PM +, Ken Moffat wrote:
This is just a heads up that there is something rotten in the state
of texlive when built from source, at least on i686.
[...]
2. My test script for xindy now fails, because the index (which is
the whole point
On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 08:54:04PM +, Ken Moffat wrote:
2. My test script for xindy now fails, because the index (which is
the whole point of xindy) is not created. That was how things used
to be when my clisp build was inadequate. Not sure if this is the
same problem, I did see an
On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 08:54:04PM +, Ken Moffat wrote:
There is also the problem with Valgrind failing when using
pdfxmltex during 'make download-docs' (#5882) which Christopher
reported.
Now that I have downloaded the valgrind source, I find that was
already broken in LFS/BLFS-7.6
On Fri, 2014-12-05 at 20:54 +, Ken Moffat wrote:
This is just a heads up that there is something rotten in the state
of texlive when built from source, at least on i686.
I've been building it in my build of LFS-svn-20141124 with
BLFS-svn-20141127. Two breakages :
1. The asymptote
19 matches
Mail list logo
