Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1
--- Em ter, 13/11/12, Armin K. escreveu: De: Armin K. Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1 Para: BLFS Development List Data: Terça-feira, 13 de Novembro de 2012, 13:51 On 11/13/2012 05:49 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: checking for GLIB - version = 2.33.1... no *** Could not run GLIB test program, checking why... *** The test program failed to compile or link. See the file config.log for the *** exact error that occured. This usually means GLIB is incorrectly installed. configure: error: GLIB 2.33.1 or later is required to build libsoup []s, Fernando Can you post your config.log ? Anyways, I've upgraded glib and libsoup few hours ago to latest available versions. But, I doubt it will help anything there. Armin, I have it erased, glib-2.34.1 installed, so libsoup-2.40.1 has configured , mde and installed properly. Thus, I have trimmed a copy of the whole build log to just the first unfinished one and attached, perhaps it will be enough. []s, Fernando libsoup-2.40.1-2012.11.13-blfs-dev.log Description: Binary data -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1
--- Em ter, 13/11/12, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu: De: Fernando de Oliveira Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1 Para: BLFS Development List Data: Terça-feira, 13 de Novembro de 2012, 14:01 --- Em ter, 13/11/12, Armin K. escreveu: De: Armin K. Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1 Para: BLFS Development List Data: Terça-feira, 13 de Novembro de 2012, 13:51 On 11/13/2012 05:49 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: checking for GLIB - version = 2.33.1... no *** Could not run GLIB test program, checking why... *** The test program failed to compile or link. See the file config.log for the *** exact error that occured. This usually means GLIB is incorrectly installed. configure: error: GLIB 2.33.1 or later is required to build libsoup []s, Fernando Can you post your config.log ? Anyways, I've upgraded glib and libsoup few hours ago to latest available versions. But, I doubt it will help anything there. Armin, I have it erased, glib-2.34.1 installed, so libsoup-2.40.1 has configured , mde and installed properly. Thus, I have trimmed a copy of the whole build log to just the first unfinished one and attached, perhaps it will be enough. One more thing: in configure I have --sysconfdir=/etc just for historical reasons. []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1
On 11/13/2012 06:01 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: Armin, I have it erased, glib-2.34.1 installed, so libsoup-2.40.1 has configured , mde and installed properly. Thus, I have trimmed a copy of the whole build log to just the first unfinished one and attached, perhaps it will be enough. Apparently you were missing either glib pkg-config files (.pc ones) or development headers. This was error in your config.log configure:12019: checking for GLIB - version = 2.33.1 configure:12152: result: no configure:12180: gcc -o conftest -g -O2conftest.c 5 conftest.c:24:18: fatal error: glib.h: No such file or directory Glad you've fixed it. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1
--- Em ter, 13/11/12, Armin K. escreveu:
De: Armin K. kre...@email.com
Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1
Para: BLFS Development List
Data: Terça-feira, 13 de Novembro de 2012, 16:33
On 11/13/2012 06:01 PM, Fernando de
Oliveira wrote:
Armin, I have it erased, glib-2.34.1 installed, so
libsoup-2.40.1 has configured , mde and installed properly.
Thus, I have trimmed a copy of the whole build log to
just the first unfinished one and attached, perhaps it will
be enough.
Apparently you were missing either glib pkg-config files
(.pc ones) or
development headers. This was error in your config.log
configure:12019: checking for GLIB - version = 2.33.1
configure:12152: result: no
configure:12180: gcc -o conftest -g -O2
conftest.c 5
conftest.c:24:18: fatal error: glib.h: No such file or
directory
Glad you've fixed it.
Thanks, Armin, for your attention.
But they both are there (I left VMWLFS7.1 with libsoup in its older
version for a while, to discuss better this matter):
$ find /usr -name glib.h -exec ls -lh {} \; -o -name glib\*.pc -exec ls -lh {}
\; 2/dev/null
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3,3K Mai 8 2012 /usr/include/glib-2.0/glib.h
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 392 Mai 8 2012 /usr/lib/pkgconfig/glib-2.0.pc
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 579 Abr 17 2012 /usr/lib/pkgconfig/glibmm-2.4.pc
Problem was with the version, as I understood in the first reference to
the error. That is the reason I upgraded it, so fixed the problem.
My real question is related to the libsoup's Required section in the
book.
If a package A cannot be built for some dependency B is missing or
obsolete, should not it be included as required directly?
I did not need to upgrade any other dependency, just glib-2.32.3 to
glib-2.34.1.
[]s,
Fernando
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1
Dana 13.11.2012 21:43, Fernando de Oliveira je napisao:
--- Em ter, 13/11/12, Armin K. escreveu:
De: Armin K. kre...@email.com
Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1
Para: BLFS Development List
Data: Terça-feira, 13 de Novembro de 2012, 16:33
On 11/13/2012 06:01 PM, Fernando de
Oliveira wrote:
Armin, I have it erased, glib-2.34.1 installed, so
libsoup-2.40.1 has configured , mde and installed properly.
Thus, I have trimmed a copy of the whole build log to
just the first unfinished one and attached, perhaps it will
be enough.
Apparently you were missing either glib pkg-config files
(.pc ones) or
development headers. This was error in your config.log
configure:12019: checking for GLIB - version = 2.33.1
configure:12152: result: no
configure:12180: gcc -o conftest -g -O2
conftest.c 5
conftest.c:24:18: fatal error: glib.h: No such file or
directory
Glad you've fixed it.
Thanks, Armin, for your attention.
But they both are there (I left VMWLFS7.1 with libsoup in its older
version for a while, to discuss better this matter):
$ find /usr -name glib.h -exec ls -lh {} \; -o -name glib\*.pc -exec ls -lh
{} \; 2/dev/null
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3,3K Mai 8 2012 /usr/include/glib-2.0/glib.h
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 392 Mai 8 2012 /usr/lib/pkgconfig/glib-2.0.pc
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 579 Abr 17 2012 /usr/lib/pkgconfig/glibmm-2.4.pc
Problem was with the version, as I understood in the first reference to
the error. That is the reason I upgraded it, so fixed the problem.
My real question is related to the libsoup's Required section in the
book.
If a package A cannot be built for some dependency B is missing or
obsolete, should not it be included as required directly?
I did not need to upgrade any other dependency, just glib-2.32.3 to
glib-2.34.1.
[]s,
Fernando
It really depends on a package. If you are upgrading, I suggest that you
upgrade everything or you might get strange results at runtime.
Required packages ARE required, recommended are recommended and you're
on your own if you don't install some of them. The instructions are
originaly meant to pick up where LFS left off, so we set dependencies
according to it.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1
--- Em ter, 13/11/12, Armin K. kre...@email.com escreveu:
De: Armin K. kre...@email.com
Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1
Para: BLFS Development List blfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org
Data: Terça-feira, 13 de Novembro de 2012, 18:01
Dana 13.11.2012 21:43, Fernando de
Oliveira je napisao:
--- Em ter, 13/11/12, Armin K. escreveu:
De: Armin K. kre...@email.com
Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1
Para: BLFS Development List
Data: Terça-feira, 13 de Novembro de 2012, 16:33
On 11/13/2012 06:01 PM, Fernando de
Oliveira wrote:
Armin, I have it erased, glib-2.34.1 installed,
so
libsoup-2.40.1 has configured , mde and installed
properly.
Thus, I have trimmed a copy of the whole build
log to
just the first unfinished one and attached, perhaps
it will
be enough.
Apparently you were missing either glib pkg-config
files
(.pc ones) or
development headers. This was error in your
config.log
configure:12019: checking for GLIB - version =
2.33.1
configure:12152: result: no
configure:12180: gcc -o conftest -g -O2
conftest.c 5
conftest.c:24:18: fatal error: glib.h: No such file
or
directory
Glad you've fixed it.
Thanks, Armin, for your attention.
But they both are there (I left VMWLFS7.1 with libsoup
in its older
version for a while, to discuss better this matter):
$ find /usr -name glib.h -exec ls -lh {} \; -o
-name glib\*.pc -exec ls -lh {} \; 2/dev/null
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3,3K Mai 8 2012
/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib.h
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 392 Mai 8 2012
/usr/lib/pkgconfig/glib-2.0.pc
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 579 Abr 17 2012
/usr/lib/pkgconfig/glibmm-2.4.pc
Problem was with the version, as I understood in the
first reference to
the error. That is the reason I upgraded it, so fixed
the problem.
My real question is related to the libsoup's Required
section in the
book.
If a package A cannot be built for some dependency B is
missing or
obsolete, should not it be included as required
directly?
I did not need to upgrade any other dependency, just
glib-2.32.3 to
glib-2.34.1.
[]s,
Fernando
It really depends on a package. If you are upgrading, I
suggest that you
upgrade everything or you might get strange results at
runtime.
Required packages ARE required, recommended are recommended
and you're
on your own if you don't install some of them. The
instructions are
originaly meant to pick up where LFS left off, so we set
dependencies
according to it.
Sorry, I have not made myself clear yet:
I am just following the book. But libsoup could not be installed without
glib.
I think glib should be *required* in libsoup. It cannot be built without
glib. At this moment, it is not in the required list in that page.
Configure script looks for it.
[]s,
Fernando
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1
--- Em ter, 13/11/12, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu:
De: Fernando de Oliveira
Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1
Para: BLFS Development List
Data: Terça-feira, 13 de Novembro de 2012, 18:26
--- Em ter, 13/11/12, Armin K.
escreveu:
De: Armin K.
Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1
Para: BLFS Development List
Data: Terça-feira, 13 de Novembro de 2012, 18:01
Dana 13.11.2012 21:43, Fernando de
Oliveira je napisao:
--- Em ter, 13/11/12, Armin K. escreveu:
De: Armin K.
Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1
Para: BLFS Development List
Data: Terça-feira, 13 de Novembro de 2012,
16:33
On 11/13/2012 06:01 PM, Fernando de
Oliveira wrote:
Armin, I have it erased, glib-2.34.1
installed,
so
libsoup-2.40.1 has configured , mde and
installed
properly.
Thus, I have trimmed a copy of the whole
build
log to
just the first unfinished one and attached,
perhaps
it will
be enough.
Apparently you were missing either glib
pkg-config
files
(.pc ones) or
development headers. This was error in your
config.log
configure:12019: checking for GLIB - version
=
2.33.1
configure:12152: result: no
configure:12180: gcc -o conftest -g -O2
conftest.c 5
conftest.c:24:18: fatal error: glib.h: No such
file
or
directory
Glad you've fixed it.
Thanks, Armin, for your attention.
But they both are there (I left VMWLFS7.1 with
libsoup
in its older
version for a while, to discuss better this
matter):
$ find /usr -name glib.h -exec ls -lh {} \; -o
-name glib\*.pc -exec ls -lh {} \; 2/dev/null
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3,3K Mai 8 2012
/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib.h
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 392 Mai 8 2012
/usr/lib/pkgconfig/glib-2.0.pc
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 579 Abr 17 2012
/usr/lib/pkgconfig/glibmm-2.4.pc
Problem was with the version, as I understood in
the
first reference to
the error. That is the reason I upgraded it, so
fixed
the problem.
My real question is related to the libsoup's
Required
section in the
book.
If a package A cannot be built for some dependency
B is
missing or
obsolete, should not it be included as required
directly?
I did not need to upgrade any other dependency,
just
glib-2.32.3 to
glib-2.34.1.
[]s,
Fernando
It really depends on a package. If you are upgrading,
I
suggest that you
upgrade everything or you might get strange results at
runtime.
Required packages ARE required, recommended are
recommended
and you're
on your own if you don't install some of them. The
instructions are
originaly meant to pick up where LFS left off, so we
set
dependencies
according to it.
Sorry, I have not made myself clear yet:
I am just following the book. But libsoup could not be
installed without
glib.
I think glib should be *required* in libsoup. It cannot be
built without
glib. At this moment, it is not in the required list in that
page.
Configure script looks for it.
Now, if you tell me that I am wrong, glib is not required directly or
something like this with the reason, I will thank you very much for
educating me.
[]s,
Fernando
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1
Dana 13.11.2012 22:26, Fernando de Oliveira je napisao:
--- Em ter, 13/11/12, Armin K. kre...@email.com escreveu:
De: Armin K. kre...@email.com
Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1
Para: BLFS Development List blfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org
Data: Terça-feira, 13 de Novembro de 2012, 18:01
Dana 13.11.2012 21:43, Fernando de
Oliveira je napisao:
--- Em ter, 13/11/12, Armin K. escreveu:
De: Armin K. kre...@email.com
Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1
Para: BLFS Development List
Data: Terça-feira, 13 de Novembro de 2012, 16:33
On 11/13/2012 06:01 PM, Fernando de
Oliveira wrote:
Armin, I have it erased, glib-2.34.1 installed,
so
libsoup-2.40.1 has configured , mde and installed
properly.
Thus, I have trimmed a copy of the whole build
log to
just the first unfinished one and attached, perhaps
it will
be enough.
Apparently you were missing either glib pkg-config
files
(.pc ones) or
development headers. This was error in your
config.log
configure:12019: checking for GLIB - version =
2.33.1
configure:12152: result: no
configure:12180: gcc -o conftest -g -O2
conftest.c 5
conftest.c:24:18: fatal error: glib.h: No such file
or
directory
Glad you've fixed it.
Thanks, Armin, for your attention.
But they both are there (I left VMWLFS7.1 with libsoup
in its older
version for a while, to discuss better this matter):
$ find /usr -name glib.h -exec ls -lh {} \; -o
-name glib\*.pc -exec ls -lh {} \; 2/dev/null
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3,3K Mai 8 2012
/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib.h
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 392 Mai 8 2012
/usr/lib/pkgconfig/glib-2.0.pc
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 579 Abr 17 2012
/usr/lib/pkgconfig/glibmm-2.4.pc
Problem was with the version, as I understood in the
first reference to
the error. That is the reason I upgraded it, so fixed
the problem.
My real question is related to the libsoup's Required
section in the
book.
If a package A cannot be built for some dependency B is
missing or
obsolete, should not it be included as required
directly?
I did not need to upgrade any other dependency, just
glib-2.32.3 to
glib-2.34.1.
[]s,
Fernando
It really depends on a package. If you are upgrading, I
suggest that you
upgrade everything or you might get strange results at
runtime.
Required packages ARE required, recommended are recommended
and you're
on your own if you don't install some of them. The
instructions are
originaly meant to pick up where LFS left off, so we set
dependencies
according to it.
Sorry, I have not made myself clear yet:
I am just following the book. But libsoup could not be installed without
glib.
I think glib should be *required* in libsoup. It cannot be built without
glib. At this moment, it is not in the required list in that page.
Configure script looks for it.
[]s,
Fernando
We tend to use dependency chains.
On libsoup page it says that it depends on glib-networking.
glib-networking itself depends on gsettings-desktop-schemas
gsettings-desktop-schemas depends on glib.
So, you should have had glib installed before you've built libsoup or
you didn't build mentioned deps.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1
Armin K. wrote: Dana 13.11.2012 22:26, Fernando de Oliveira je napisao: --- Em ter, 13/11/12, Armin K. kre...@email.com escreveu: I am just following the book. But libsoup could not be installed without glib. I think glib should be *required* in libsoup. It cannot be built without glib. At this moment, it is not in the required list in that page. Configure script looks for it. We tend to use dependency chains. On libsoup page it says that it depends on glib-networking. glib-networking itself depends on gsettings-desktop-schemas gsettings-desktop-schemas depends on glib. So, you should have had glib installed before you've built libsoup or you didn't build mentioned deps. Guys, please trim your responses. I'd like to add that we should only use required packages in the dependency chains. As Armin shows above, that is true for libsoup. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1
--- Em ter, 13/11/12, Armin K. escreveu: De: Armin K. Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1 Para: BLFS Development List Data: Terça-feira, 13 de Novembro de 2012, 19:20 Dana 13.11.2012 22:26, Fernando de Oliveira je napisao: ... We tend to use dependency chains. On libsoup page it says that it depends on glib-networking. glib-networking itself depends on gsettings-desktop-schemas gsettings-desktop-schemas depends on glib. So, you should have had glib installed before you've built libsoup or you didn't build mentioned deps. Thanks, Armin. That clarifies everything. Really appreciate your reply. []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1
--- Em ter, 13/11/12, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: De: Bruce Dubbs Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1 Para: BLFS Development List Data: Terça-feira, 13 de Novembro de 2012, 19:27 Guys, please trim your responses. Ok. (I did trim the latest, at least.) I'd like to add that we should only use required packages in the dependency chains. As Armin shows above, that is true for libsoup. Yes, I wrote in that message that finally understood. Thank you too, Bruce. []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
