On Sep 18, 2016 12:10 PM, "Bruce Dubbs" wrote:
>
> akhiezer wrote:
>
>> One might wish to consider including in the book an alternative:
>>
>>http://www.graphicsmagick.org/
>
>
> Interesting. It does seem worth considering.
>
> -- Bruce
>
I will note that GraphicsMagick seems to be more po
akhiezer wrote:
One might wish to consider including in the book an alternative:
http://www.graphicsmagick.org/
Interesting. It does seem worth considering.
-- Bruce
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: S
On 09/18/2016 10:05 AM, akhiezer wrote:
From blfs-dev-boun...@lists.linuxfromscratch.org Sat Sep 17 22:05:43 2016
To: BLFS Development List
From: Bruce Dubbs
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2016 16:25:50 -0500
Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] ImageMagick-6.9.5-8
Paul Hentschel wrote:
Hello. This version doesn&#
> From blfs-dev-boun...@lists.linuxfromscratch.org Sat Sep 17 22:05:43 2016
> To: BLFS Development List
> From: Bruce Dubbs
> Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2016 16:25:50 -0500
> Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] ImageMagick-6.9.5-8
>
> Paul Hentschel wrote:
> > Hello. This version doe
On 09/17/2016 05:25 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Paul Hentschel wrote:
Hello. This version doesn't appear to exist on the servers anymore. There
is a version 6.9.5-9. In fact, there is no -6, -7 or -8, but the
ImageMagick change log has them listed. It looks like they don't keep
many
of the "-x" versi
Paul Hentschel wrote:
Hello. This version doesn't appear to exist on the servers anymore. There
is a version 6.9.5-9. In fact, there is no -6, -7 or -8, but the
ImageMagick change log has them listed. It looks like they don't keep many
of the "-x" versions other than -10.
We had a note in the b
