Am 10/12/13 03:03, schrieb Ken Moffat:
/me resolves never to touch squid with the proverbial barge-pole.
ĸen
Hello Ken,
just a curious question: what do you dislike about squid? And which
alternative do you use?
Thanks,
Thorsten
--
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 11:09:44AM +0200, thorsten wrote:
Am 10/12/13 03:03, schrieb Ken Moffat:
/me resolves never to touch squid with the proverbial barge-pole.
ĸen
Hello Ken,
just a curious question: what do you dislike about squid? And which
alternative do you use?
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 02:03:43AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
Glad you were right - I've just posted that this seemed unlikely
to
be the error, but if it builds then you are sorted.
/me resolves never to touch squid with the proverbial barge-pole.
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 02:03:43AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
Glad you were right - I've just posted that this seemed unlikely to
be the error, but if it builds then you are sorted.
/me resolves never to touch squid with the proverbial barge-pole.
I agree; IMO squid is probably
On 10/13/2013 12:40 PM, Richard Melville wrote:
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 02:03:43AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
Glad you were right - I've just posted that this seemed unlikely to
be the error, but if it builds then you are sorted.
/me resolves never to touch squid
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 02:03:43AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
Glad you were right - I've just posted that this seemed unlikely to
be the error, but if it builds then you are sorted.
/me resolves never to touch squid with the proverbial barge-pole.
Slept on it, decided that since I am
On 10/12/2013 10:18 AM, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 02:03:43AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
Glad you were right - I've just posted that this seemed unlikely to
be the error, but if it builds then you are sorted.
/me resolves never to touch squid with the proverbial barge-pole.
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 10:38:19AM -0400, Casey Daniels wrote:
On 10/12/2013 10:18 AM, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 02:03:43AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
Glad you were right - I've just posted that this seemed unlikely to
be the error, but if it builds then you are sorted.
On 10/12/2013 11:59 AM, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 10:38:19AM -0400, Casey Daniels wrote:
On 10/12/2013 10:18 AM, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 02:03:43AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
Glad you were right - I've just posted that this seemed unlikely to
be the error,
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:11:59AM -0400, Casey Daniels wrote:
On 10/10/2013 11:35 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 11:09:09PM -0400, Casey Daniels wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to compile Squid 3.3.9 from Source and I keep getting the
error
checking size of size_t ...
On 10/11/2013 06:00 AM, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:11:59AM -0400, Casey Daniels wrote:
On 10/10/2013 11:35 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 11:09:09PM -0400, Casey Daniels wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to compile Squid 3.3.9 from Source and I keep getting the
Too few people to build every package and to keep them up to date.
Yes I know, but when you have an awesome project you always want
more from it.
Also, which LFS version ? I see that Arch use the following:
# gcc 4.6 doesn't support -fhuge-objects.
sed '/^
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 10:59:12AM -0400, Casey Daniels wrote:
Did a search for those items you asked and this is what it comes up
with. I copied from what looked like the last good entry above it to
where it started talking about cached variables. Hopefully something
useful in there?
On 10/11/2013 02:40 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 10:59:12AM -0400, Casey Daniels wrote:
Did a search for those items you asked and this is what it comes up
with. I copied from what looked like the last good entry above it to
where it started talking about cached variables.
On Fri, 2013-10-11 at 16:42 -0400, Casey Daniels wrote:
Okay so I'm a little confused as to where we stand on this issue is it a
dead end and there is no support, or is it just going to take time for
you to look into something?
Can you attach the entire config.log please?
Ta,
Matt.
--
Casey Daniels wrote:
Okay so I'm a little confused as to where we stand on this issue is it a
dead end and there is no support, or is it just going to take time for
you to look into something?
This is a package where none of the editors has any experience. I would
think a better place to
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 04:42:15PM -0400, Casey Daniels wrote:
On 10/11/2013 02:40 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 10:59:12AM -0400, Casey Daniels wrote:
This looks like most of the program fragment. I think any useful
error messages come between the line where it said
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 04:03:57PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Casey Daniels wrote:
Okay so I'm a little confused as to where we stand on this issue is it a
dead end and there is no support, or is it just going to take time for
you to look into something?
This is a package where none of
Ken Moffat wrote:
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 04:03:57PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Casey Daniels wrote:
Okay so I'm a little confused as to where we stand on this issue is it a
dead end and there is no support, or is it just going to take time for
you to look into something?
This is a package
On 10/11/2013 05:03 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Casey Daniels wrote:
Okay so I'm a little confused as to where we stand on this issue is it a
dead end and there is no support, or is it just going to take time for
you to look into something?
This is a package where none of the editors has any
its missing libnfnetlink.so.0, which installs in /usr/local/lib, I
created a symbolic link from the /lib and everything is fine.
Casey
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 08:41:03PM -0400, Casey Daniels wrote:
On 10/11/2013 05:03 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Casey Daniels wrote:
here is what maybe Ken might be looking for, I have to look into the
library it names
My original thought was that's right, but on looking a bit more
closely
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 08:59:33PM -0400, Casey Daniels wrote:
its missing libnfnetlink.so.0, which installs in /usr/local/lib, I
created a symbolic link from the /lib and everything is fine.
Casey
Glad you were right - I've just posted that this seemed unlikely to
be the error, but if it
On 10/11/2013 09:01 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 08:41:03PM -0400, Casey Daniels wrote:
On 10/11/2013 05:03 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Casey Daniels wrote:
here is what maybe Ken might be looking for, I have to look into the
library it names
My original thought was that's
Ken Moffat wrote:
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 08:41:03PM -0400, Casey Daniels wrote:
On 10/11/2013 05:03 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Casey Daniels wrote:
here is what maybe Ken might be looking for, I have to look into the
library it names
My original thought was that's right, but on looking a
Hello,
I'm trying to compile Squid 3.3.9 from Source and I keep getting the
error
checking size of size_t ... configure error in '/sources/squid-3.3.9'
Configure error: cannot compute size of (size_t).
here is the top of my config.log I have the whole thing, its just huge
and I also piped
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 11:09:09PM -0400, Casey Daniels wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to compile Squid 3.3.9 from Source and I keep getting the
error
checking size of size_t ... configure error in '/sources/squid-3.3.9'
Configure error: cannot compute size of (size_t).
here is the top
On 10/10/2013 11:35 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 11:09:09PM -0400, Casey Daniels wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to compile Squid 3.3.9 from Source and I keep getting the
error
checking size of size_t ... configure error in '/sources/squid-3.3.9'
Configure error: cannot
28 matches
Mail list logo
