to,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Dale Leavens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: blindhandyman@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 5:45 PM
Subject: Re: Re:[BlindHandyMan] water saver johns
I don't have any experience with low volume cans at all but it seems to me
I read
Spiro, the standard toilet that most of us probably know, have the valve
in the bottom of the tank operated by the flush handle.
The valve less have a kind of tank or bucket inside the tank that tilts to
dump. The push to make water saver toilets resulted in small tanks that didn't
] water saver johns
Spiro, the standard toilet that most of us probably know, have the valve in the
bottom of the tank operated by the flush handle.
The valve less have a kind of tank or bucket inside the tank that tilts to
dump. The push to make water saver toilets resulted in small tanks
:[BlindHandyMan] water saver johns
Hi Bob,
That tip an inner bucket idea sonds odd. But that is my ignorance
showing.
I do remember one high wall tank that seemed to work well consistantly.
As long as it works, I'm happy to have your guidence.
We have a hole in the floor, (covered
Lenny, the couple inches difference between the low and the comfort johns
really makes a difference. I sat on the different units and the higher comfort
unit really was easy compared to the lower ones. I have been in places where
the floor area under the john has been built up to allow the
they don't float and that makes
them right expensive for the game I play at...
- Original Message -
From: chiliblindman
To: blindhandyman@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2008 3:42 PM
Subject: [BlindHandyMan] water saver johns
Hello Spiro. I have found there are a lot
Thank you.
The reasons given are why I don't want to make a mistake when I next buy a
toilet. It wil l be soon as a wash cloth stopped up the one that then
cracked when I investigated the continuing clog.
So sounds like 2 gall is safe.
I will remember to look for 16-17 inch and around 2g.
But
