At 03:43 PM 6/15/03 -0700, Jan Coffey wrote:
--- Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 01:08 PM 6/15/03 -0700, Jan Coffey wrote:
You still don't get that form jeroen (and other's) perspecitve what was
done to him did appear to be abusive.
[Ronn!:]
Did you read the copies of his
Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
The current spate of multiple copies of multiple messages to the private
accounts of everyone on the list started after _one_ mention of Jeroen in a
list message. Is it realistic to expect that no one will ever mention his
name again, even in a neutral or even
Ray Ludenia wrote:
Suggestion to Nick: Set up a filter that automatically rejects any message
with that particular keyword in it.
Duh..
I mean any message to the list, not to Nick personally.
Probably reduce list traffic by half,
but would remove an awful lot of aggravation as new people
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 10:26:56PM +1000, Ray Ludenia wrote:
Suggestion to Nick: Set up a filter that automatically rejects any
message with that particular keyword in it. Probably reduce list
traffic by half,
Nick, I am against this. We shouldn't restrict what people can say in
their
Erik Reuter wrote:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 10:26:56PM +1000, Ray Ludenia wrote:
Suggestion to Nick: Set up a filter that automatically rejects any
message with that particular keyword in it. Probably reduce list
traffic by half,
Nick, I am against this.
Me too!
Regards, Ray.
I could have responded to any number of posts but I am responding directly to
this one becouse it is the easiest to include everything I wish to say.
I would like to note here that I strongly disagree with JvB's ideas and
opinions on almost every political topic and many other topics as well,
Jan wrote:
You still don't get that form jeroen (and other's) perspecitve what
was done
to him did appear to be abusive. Can you not step outside your
norms, outside
your own feelings and history? Can you not stretch to view anothers
perspecitve? Maybe that skill is something you learn when
At 01:08 PM 6/15/03 -0700, Jan Coffey wrote:
You still don't get that form jeroen (and other's) perspecitve what was done
to him did appear to be abusive.
Did you read the copies of his messages I sent you off-list? Do I need to
send you copies of the rest of the messages he sent to the list
--- Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 01:08 PM 6/15/03 -0700, Jan Coffey wrote:
You still don't get that form jeroen (and other's) perspecitve what was
done
to him did appear to be abusive.
Did you read the copies of his messages I sent you off-list? Do I need to
send you
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 03:43:13PM -0700, Jan Coffey wrote:
How far down does one have to go, before you let them starT to climb
back up?
He CAN climb back up. You are not listening, Jan. I posted one way he
can do it (others agreed or mentioned similar ways he could show that he
made an
- Original Message -
From: Jan Coffey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2003 5:43 PM
Subject: Re: Interpreting language (was RE: A friendly request JVB)
While every person must be responsible for their own actions, and while
Jan wrote
Can we all just agree to his proposal and end this thing?
Erik replied
No. For the last time, Jan, his proposal amounts to
blackmail. I and others have explained this. YOU, Jan, are
making this worse by encouraging his behavior. Since you are
so fond of
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 10:57:52PM -0400, Gary Nunn wrote:
Erik, you also accused me of making the situation worse by encouraging
his (Jeroen's) behavior. I may not be the most intelligent person
on this list, but I fail to see how giving someone the benefit of
the doubt is encouraging bad
Erik wrote
It seems you are a sucker for whining.
You are being naive.
That's all I'm going to say to you about this.
Erik, you are clearly an intelligent person and I have always enjoyed
reading your posts - even when you are being abrasive, so please know
that this next comment was
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Gary Nunn
...
He made a peace offering. Regardless of how he worded it, it is a peace
offering none the less. He specifically said that he was not making
threats, but merely having insight into what will
15 matches
Mail list logo
