In a message dated 1/17/2006 9:37:47 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You must have been spared the cliche of your parents starting to ask
on your wedding day how soon they could expect to become grandparents.
Au contrarie mon ami. I was not all spared this event.
On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 20:33:08 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 1/17/2006 9:37:47 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You must have been spared the cliche of your parents starting to ask
on your wedding day how soon they could expect to become grandparents.
At 08:31 PM Saturday 1/21/2006, Doug Pensinger wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 20:33:08 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 1/17/2006 9:37:47 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You must have been spared the cliche of your parents starting to ask
on your wedding day
Doug Pensinger wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 20:33:08 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 1/17/2006 9:37:47 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You must have been spared the cliche of your parents starting to ask
on your wedding day how soon they could expect to
Julia wrote:
In a message dated 1/17/2006 9:37:47 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You must have been spared the cliche of your parents
starting to ask
on your wedding day how soon they could expect to become
grandparents.
Au contrarie mon ami. I was
Ronn! wrote:
At 08:31 PM Saturday 1/21/2006, Doug Pensinger wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 20:33:08 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 1/17/2006 9:37:47 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You must have been spared the cliche of your parents starting to ask
on
Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At 12:16 PM Tuesday 1/17/2006, Julia Thompson wrote:
William T Goodall wrote:
On 17 Jan 2006, at 4:39 am, Ritu wrote:
William T Goodall wrote:
Enormous costs and intangible benefits that sound like members of a
cult :)
Hee!
So is this your new Cause then?
somebody other than
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Having said this I don't think there is any drive to create grfandchildren.
Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
] You must have been spared the cliche of your parents starting to ask
] on your wedding day how soon they could expect to become
At 11:14 AM Wednesday 1/18/2006, Matt Grimaldi wrote:
somebody other than
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Having said this I don't think there is any drive to create grfandchildren.
Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
] You must have been spared the cliche of your parents starting to ask
] on your
On 17 Jan 2006, at 4:39 am, Ritu wrote:
William T Goodall wrote:
Enormous costs and intangible benefits that sound like members of a
cult :)
Hee!
So is this your new Cause then?
Just expanding my hobby of railing at human idiocies into a new area...
And I'm sure there's a connection
William T Goodall wrote:
On 17 Jan 2006, at 4:39 am, Ritu wrote:
William T Goodall wrote:
Enormous costs and intangible benefits that sound like
members of a
cult :)
Hee!
So is this your new Cause then?
Just expanding my hobby of railing at human idiocies into a
new
Ritu wrote:
So is this your new Cause then?
The capital c was a nice touch. Should we call him William the
Crusader from now on? It has a nice, epic ring to it. Parents,
Christians and Saracens beware, for William the Crusader comes!!! ;-)
Jim
On 17 Jan 2006, at 12:53 pm, Ritu wrote:
William T Goodall wrote:
And I'm sure there's a connection between the evil poisonous
filth of
religion and the pointless self-harm of procreation somewhere :)
You can always start by checking out the correlation between
atheism and
child-free
Doug Pensinger wrote:
On wrote:
I dunno. Here's some possibilities, though:
Because there's more to life than a low stress level?
Not much.
Life*zero stress=zero life
8^)
I don't know about that formula. By that formula, the more stress you
have, the better your life. I would
William T Goodall wrote:
On 16 Jan 2006, at 8:13 pm, Jim Sharkey wrote:
William wrote:
The study's findings will make happy reading for couples who have
decided to enjoy the freedom and lack of responsibility associated
with not having children.
This just in: living only for
William T Goodall wrote:
On 16 Jan 2006, at 6:54 pm, Matt Grimaldi wrote:
William wrote:
The study's findings will make happy reading for couples who have
decided to enjoy the freedom and lack of responsibility associated
with
not having children.
Doug wrote:
Hmmm, having
William wrote:
The study's findings will make happy reading for couples who have
decided to enjoy the freedom and lack of responsibility
associated with
not having children.
Doug wrote:
Hmmm, having children can be extremely stressfull, but I can hardly
express the pride and
On 17 Jan 2006, at 5:51 pm, Julia Thompson wrote:
William T Goodall wrote:
On 16 Jan 2006, at 8:13 pm, Jim Sharkey wrote:
William wrote:
The study's findings will make happy reading for couples who
have decided to enjoy the freedom and lack of responsibility
associated
with not
Matt Grimaldi (aka EvilTopPoster grin!) wrote:
Congratuations!
Damon (the soon-to-be-perpetually-sleep-deprived)
wrote:
As a new daddy (my kid was born on 1.6.06) it's a
pretty great feeling...
Hup, Hup, Huzzah!
Name? Weight? Etc.?
Not-news flash: not having children does not mean
At 12:16 PM Tuesday 1/17/2006, Julia Thompson wrote:
William T Goodall wrote:
On 17 Jan 2006, at 4:39 am, Ritu wrote:
William T Goodall wrote:
Enormous costs and intangible benefits that sound like members of a
cult :)
Hee!
So is this your new Cause then?
Just expanding my hobby of
In a message dated 1/16/2006 4:56:00 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Somewhere I've heard that the biological drive to procreate can only
be completely satisfied by grandchildren. :-) I have quite a few
years
to wait before first-hand experience.
There a sense in
At 07:25 PM Tuesday 1/17/2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 1/16/2006 4:56:00 PM Eastern Standard Time,
somebody other than
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Somewhere I've heard that the biological drive to procreate can only
be completely satisfied by grandchildren. :-) I
At 04:07 PM Tuesday 1/17/2006, Deborah Harrell wrote:
Matt Grimaldi (aka EvilTopPoster grin!) wrote:
Congratuations!
Damon (the soon-to-be-perpetually-sleep-deprived)
wrote:
As a new daddy (my kid was born on 1.6.06) it's a
pretty great feeling...
Hup, Hup, Huzzah!
Name? Weight? Etc.?
William wrote:
The study's findings will make happy reading for couples who have
decided to enjoy the freedom and lack of responsibility associated with
not having children.
Doug wrote:
Hmmm, having children can be extremely stressfull, but I can hardly
express the pride
William wrote:
The study's findings will make happy reading for couples who have decided
to enjoy the freedom and lack of responsibility associated
with not having children.
This just in: living only for yourself is less stressful than taking
responsibility for the mental, physical and
On 16 Jan 2006, at 8:13 pm, Jim Sharkey wrote:
William wrote:
The study's findings will make happy reading for couples who
have decided to enjoy the freedom and lack of responsibility
associated
with not having children.
This just in: living only for yourself is less stressful than
On 16 Jan 2006, at 6:54 pm, Matt Grimaldi wrote:
William wrote:
The study's findings will make happy reading for couples who have
decided to enjoy the freedom and lack of responsibility
associated with
not having children.
Doug wrote:
Hmmm, having children can be extremely
To:Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com
Subject: Re: Having children 'is bad for your mental health'
On 16 Jan 2006, at 8:13 pm, Jim Sharkey wrote:
William wrote:
The study's findings will make happy reading for couples who
have decided to enjoy the freedom and lack of responsibility
William T Goodall wrote:
Jim Sharkey wrote:
This just in: living only for yourself is less stressful than
taking responsibility for the mental, physical and moral
development of another human being.
So why would anyone want to do that then?
I dunno. Here's some possibilities, though:
Because
--- On Fri 01/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: brin-l@mccmedia.com
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 21:39:52 + GMT
Subject: Re: Having children 'is bad for your mental health'
Sent from my BlackBerry wireless handheld.brbr
At 03:37 PM Monday 1/16/2006, William T Goodall wrote:
On 16 Jan 2006, at 6:54 pm, Matt Grimaldi wrote:
William wrote:
The study's findings will make happy reading for couples who have
decided to enjoy the freedom and lack of responsibility
associated with
not having children.
Doug
William wrote:
The study's findings will make happy reading for couples who have
decided to enjoy the freedom and lack of responsibility
associated with
not having children.
Doug wrote:
Hmmm, having children can be extremely stressfull, but I can hardly
express the
Congratuations!
-- Matt
- Original Message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 13:39:52
Subject: Re: Having children 'is bad for your mental health'
Biology. Desire to pass genes on to a new generation. Love kids
Jan 2006 16:50:36
To:brin-l@mccmedia.com
Subject: Re: Having children 'is bad for your mental health'
--- On Fri 01/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: brin-l@mccmedia.com
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 21:39:52 + GMT
Subject: Re
On 16 Jan 2006, at 9:47 pm, Jim Sharkey wrote:
William T Goodall wrote:
Jim Sharkey wrote:
This just in: living only for yourself is less stressful than
taking responsibility for the mental, physical and moral
development of another human being.
So why would anyone want to do that then?
On 16 Jan 2006, at 10:58 pm, Matt Grimaldi wrote:
William wrote:
The study's findings will make happy reading for couples who have
decided to enjoy the freedom and lack of responsibility
associated with
not having children.
Doug wrote:
Hmmm, having children can be extremely
William T Goodall wrote:
Jim Sharkey wrote:
Because there's more to life than a low stress level?
Not much.
Tell that to every Type A personality out there.
Because you did a favorable cost-benefit analysis?
Enormous costs and intangible benefits that sound like members of
a cult :)
Costs not
William T Goodall wrote:
This just in: living only for yourself is less stressful
than taking
responsibility for the mental, physical and moral development of
another human being.
So why would anyone want to do that then?
I dunno. Here's some possibilities, though:
Because
William wrote:
The study's findings will make happy reading for couples who have
decided to enjoy the freedom and lack of responsibility associated with
not having children.
Hmmm, having children can be extremely stressfull, but I can hardly
express the pride and satisfaction I feel
William T Goodall wrote:
If you thought that the joys of watching your young ones grow up was
one of life's simple pleasures, think again. Parenthood is actually
bad for your mental health, according to the latest research.
Questions included how often you felt lonely, you felt depressed,
40 matches
Mail list logo
