Original Message:
-
From: Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 23:13:09 -0500 (CDT)
To: brin-l@mccmedia.com
Subject: Re: Nature Assumption (was Asbergers)
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, William T Goodall wrote:
The dynastic tendency in families is a counterexample
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of hkhenson
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 6:09 PM
To: brin-l@mccmedia.com
Subject: Re: Nature Assumption (was Asbergers)
At 12:00 PM 6/25/2008, Dan M wrote:
I read that, and found holes large
At 12:00 PM 6/25/2008, Dan M wrote:
I read that, and found holes large enough to drive a tank through. It's
true that, once kids have a peer group, that group becomes much more
influential on their behavior outside the home than the parents.
Well, you got the main point of the book anyway.
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, William T Goodall wrote:
The dynastic tendency in families is a counterexample to this. It's very
noticeable how the children of doctors tend to be doctors or
veterinarians. Also politics, acting, sports, music and writing. There
are some second-generation cosmonauts
On 9/30/06, Reggie Bautista [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's a certain truthiness to that...
That's because I was being probalogical!
Nick
--
Nick Arnett
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Messages: 408-904-7198
___
Nick Arnett wrote:
On 9/30/06, Reggie Bautista [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's a certain truthiness to that...
That's because I was being probalogical!
Are you sure that word is cromulent?
Julia
___
In a message dated 10/1/2006 8:21:03 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Are you sure that word is cromulent?
Julia
Crom never lent Conan anything.
Vilyehm
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
On Sep 28, 2006, at 8:45 PM, jdiebremse wrote:
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mauro Diotallevi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
My grandmother used to say two things about this depending on her
mood; either Catholic heirarchy created this reverence of Mary
because she's the most submissive role model those
On Sep 29, 2006, at 7:56 PM, Nick Arnett wrote:
On 9/29/06, Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, it's the SAME SIZE as each of the first two. THAT'S the one that
took me a week or two to wrap my head around. :)
No, they're not the same size. I'm sure of it. I counted them.
Okay,
At 10:49 PM Friday 9/29/2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Infinity - (Infinity -1) = Infinity
My brain hurts.
Can I have a cookie?
Visit any number of web sites and you can have a pop-up, too.
-- Ronn! :)
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Infinity - (Infinity -1) = Infinity
My brain hurts.
Can I have a cookie?
You can have a cookie. :)
And if I'd done my little project of photographing several kinds of
cookies, I'd send you a .jpg of one
Julia
Charlie Bell wrote:
On 30/09/2006, at 1:43 PM, Julia Thompson wrote:
Nick Arnett wrote:
On 9/29/06, Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, it's the SAME SIZE as each of the first two. THAT'S the one that
took me a week or two to wrap my head around. :)
No, they're not the same
Nick wrote
On 9/29/06, Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, it's the SAME SIZE as each of the first two. THAT'S the one that
took me a week or two to wrap my head around. :)
No, they're not the same size. I'm sure of it. I counted them.
Okay, I didn't count ALL of
JDG wrote:
Not at all. The Assumption is interesting because it is a two-
fer. If you disagree with this dogma, then by definition, you also
have to disagree with the dogma of papal infallability.
Would you claim that any person that believes in some dogmas
of the Roman Catholic Church
On 29 Sep 2006, at 1:09PM, Alberto Monteiro wrote:
Would you claim that any person that believes in some dogmas
of the Roman Catholic Church but disbelieves in other dogmas
[say, a person that claims to be a good catholic but regularly
gets impregnated by different men and goes to an abortion
Robert Seeberger wrote:
She gave birth to GOD!
She must have been stretch marks from the neck down!
xponent
Admit It, You Were Thinking It Too! Maru
I was thinking that none of the gods born to goddesses here actually
involved pregnancy and childbirth...I've been known to crib about
Alberto Monteiro wrote:
Would you claim that any person that believes in some dogmas of the
Roman Catholic Church but disbelieves in other dogmas is, in
reality, not a catholic?
That's an interesting question. I think, in general, most people pick
and choose from a menu of sorts, regardless
On 29 Sep 2006 at 8:38, Jim Sharkey wrote:
However, since we are done having kids, I got a snipping. And
as such, I think there are Catholics out there who would say she's
not a good Catholic because of that fact alone.
Interesting. I mean... okay, yes, Jews are a people as well as a
jdiebremse wrote:
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Robert Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Bodacious???
Bodacious???
My God man!
She gave birth to GOD!
She must have been stretch marks from the neck down!
xponent
Admit It, You Were Thinking It Too! Maru
rob
Actually, there is a tradition of
Nick Arnett wrote:
On 9/28/06, Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn't a little infinite a contradiction, like a little bit . . . ?
No... some infinities are smaller than others, as is easily demonstrated.
There are an infinite number of even numbers and an infinite number of odd
At 07:33 AM Friday 9/29/2006, Ritu wrote:
Robert Seeberger wrote:
She gave birth to GOD!
She must have been stretch marks from the neck down!
xponent
Admit It, You Were Thinking It Too! Maru
I was thinking that none of the gods born to goddesses here actually
involved pregnancy and
At 02:34 PM Friday 9/29/2006, Andrew Crystall wrote:
Also, I don't believe there's such a thing as a non-practicing Muslim
by definition, either you practice or you're not..
...alive any more.
-- Ronn! :)
___
- Original Message -
From: Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 5:34 PM
Subject: Re: Infinities large and small (was Re: The Assumption Re:
9/11conspiracies)
Nick Arnett wrote:
On 9/28/06, Ronn!Blankenship
At 07:09 AM Friday 9/29/2006, Alberto Monteiro wrote:
JDG wrote:
Not at all. The Assumption is interesting because it is a two-
fer. If you disagree with this dogma, then by definition, you also
have to disagree with the dogma of papal infallability.
Would you claim that any person that
Andrew Crystall wrote:
Also, I don't believe there's such a thing as a non-practicing Muslim
by definition, either you practice or you're not..
That's an erroneous belief. There are plenty of non-practising muslims -
people who are born into the religion, brought up as muslims, and don't
On 9/29/06, Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, it's the SAME SIZE as each of the first two. THAT'S the one that
took me a week or two to wrap my head around. :)
No, they're not the same size. I'm sure of it. I counted them.
Okay, I didn't count ALL of them. But I counted
Robert Seeberger wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 5:34 PM
Subject: Re: Infinities large and small (was Re: The Assumption Re:
9/11conspiracies)
Nick Arnett wrote:
On 9/28
Nick Arnett wrote:
On 9/29/06, Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, it's the SAME SIZE as each of the first two. THAT'S the one that
took me a week or two to wrap my head around. :)
No, they're not the same size. I'm sure of it. I counted them.
Well, hey, they are a COUNTABLE
Infinity - (Infinity -1) = Infinity
My brain hurts.
Can I have a cookie?
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
On 30/09/2006, at 1:43 PM, Julia Thompson wrote:
Nick Arnett wrote:
On 9/29/06, Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, it's the SAME SIZE as each of the first two. THAT'S the one
that
took me a week or two to wrap my head around. :)
No, they're not the same size. I'm sure of it.
Robert Seeberger wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Dave Land [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 1:11 PM
Subject: Re: The Assumption Re: 9/11 conspiracies
On Sep 27, 2006, at 4:28 AM, jdiebremse wrote:
The Assumption
- Original Message -
From: Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 10:12 AM
Subject: Re: The Assumption Re: 9/11 conspiracies
Robert Seeberger wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Dave Land [EMAIL
At 06:27 PM Thursday 9/28/2006, Robert Seeberger wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 10:12 AM
Subject: Re: The Assumption Re: 9/11 conspiracies
Robert Seeberger wrote
On 9/28/06, Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn't a little infinite a contradiction, like a little bit . . . ?
No... some infinities are smaller than others, as is easily demonstrated.
There are an infinite number of even numbers and an infinite number of odd
numbers. Those two
At 08:01 PM Thursday 9/28/2006, Nick Arnett wrote:
On 9/28/06, Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn't a little infinite a contradiction, like a little bit . . . ?
No... some infinities are smaller than others, as is easily demonstrated.
There are an infinite number of even
On Sep 27, 2006, at 4:28 AM, jdiebremse wrote:
The Assumption: The dogma of the Catholic Church that at the end of
her
earthly life, Mary, mother of Jesus, was assumed bod and soul into
heavenly glory.
I was raised in the Roman Catholic Church, and do not recall anyone
ever referring to the
On 9/27/06, Dave Land [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 27, 2006, at 4:28 AM, jdiebremse wrote:
The Assumption: The dogma of the Catholic Church that at the end of
her
earthly life, Mary, mother of Jesus, was assumed bod and soul into
heavenly glory.
I was raised in the Roman Catholic
- Original Message -
From: Dave Land [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 1:11 PM
Subject: Re: The Assumption Re: 9/11 conspiracies
On Sep 27, 2006, at 4:28 AM, jdiebremse wrote:
The Assumption: The dogma of the Catholic
At 01:11 PM Wednesday 9/27/2006, Dave Land wrote:
On Sep 27, 2006, at 4:28 AM, jdiebremse wrote:
The Assumption: The dogma of the Catholic Church that at the end of
her
earthly life, Mary, mother of Jesus, was assumed bod and soul into
heavenly glory.
I was raised in the Roman Catholic
At 07:59 PM Wednesday 9/27/2006, Robert Seeberger wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Dave Land [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 1:11 PM
Subject: Re: The Assumption Re: 9/11 conspiracies
On Sep 27, 2006, at 4:28 AM
On Sep 27, 2006, at 7:47 PM, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At 07:59 PM Wednesday 9/27/2006, Robert Seeberger wrote:
She gave birth to GOD!
She must have been stretch marks from the neck down!
Not if God is a spirit, in which case He could presumably ooze through
any opening without having to
41 matches
Mail list logo
