Re: Harry Potter 5 (no spoilers)

2003-08-01 Thread Reggie Bautista
Russell wrote: A lot of this is simply the context the books are written in - it is entirely from Harry's perspective. I can't think of any narration that occurs outside Harry's observation, and Harry only associates himself with the good guys. Draco, Dolores, Lucius et al probably have quite

Re: Harry Potter 5 (no spoilers)

2003-07-31 Thread Matt Grimaldi
Horn, John wrote: I do like how the books are becoming more mature and sophisticated as Rowling has gone on. I wonder how much of that is intentional or just a result of her maturing as a writer. That is intentional. IIRC, Rowling is writing the books to be age appropriate for the

RE: Harry Potter 5 (no spoilers)

2003-07-30 Thread Ritu
Gautam Mukunda wrote: I have to admit that I _was_ a little surprised by who died. I thought right up until the final battle that it would be Hagrid - and by the time the battle started I was too caught up in it to even remember that someonme was supposed to die. I agree that it didn't,

Re: Harry Potter 5 (no spoilers)

2003-07-30 Thread Reggie Bautista
Jim (I think) wrote: Of course, I'm about the only person who liked Luna Lovegood among people I;ve talked to, so what do I know? :) Jon replied: I like Looney too. :) Me Too (tm)! Reggie Bautista No Value Added Maru _ Add photos

Re: Harry Potter 5 (no spoilers)

2003-07-30 Thread Russell Chapman
Tom Beck wrote: In general, I think, Rowling does much better with her good guys than with her villains. A lot of this is simply the context the books are written in - it is entirely from Harry's perspective. I can't think of any narration that occurs outside Harry's observation, and Harry

Re: Harry Potter 5 (no spoilers)

2003-07-29 Thread Gautam Mukunda
--- Horn, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I must disagree. I was somewhat disappointed in #5. The plot was sort-of pointless, if you think about it. The great mystery of who would die was pretty obvious to me. And for both my wife and myself, there was ZERO emotional reaction when the

Re: Harry Potter 5 (no spoilers)

2003-07-29 Thread TomFODW
I enjoyed #5 immensely. I especially liked the way Rowling developed Ginny Weasley - she's turning out to be a very interesting young witch. In general, I think, Rowling does much better with her good guys than with her villains. I also liked the way a lot of stuff that happened in this novel

Re: Harry Potter 5 (no spoilers)

2003-07-29 Thread Jim Sharkey
Tom Beck wrote: In general, I think, Rowling does much better with her good guys than with her villains. Generally true, but I *loved* Dolores Umbridge. Of course, I'm about the only person who liked Luna Lovegood among people I;ve talked to, so what do I know? :) Jim

Re: Harry Potter 5 (no spoilers)

2003-07-29 Thread TomFODW
Generally true, but I *loved* Dolores Umbridge.  Of course, I'm about the only person who liked Luna Lovegood among people I;ve talked to, so what do I know?  :) A) I don't consider Umbridge to be completely a villain. She's certainly wrongheaded and even cruel and destructive. But she's

Re: Harry Potter 5 (no spoilers)

2003-07-29 Thread Jim Sharkey
Tom wrote: A) I don't consider Umbridge to be completely a villain. She's certainly wrongheaded and even cruel and destructive. But she's not in the same category as Voldemort or Bellatrix Lestrange or even Lucius Malfoy. B) I like Luna, too, although I wish we'd had at least a mention of

Re: Harry Potter 5 (no spoilers)

2003-07-29 Thread TomFODW
S P O I L E R S P A C E Just because Dolores' motives for her actions were not of the slay everyone and take over the world variety does not mean she's not a villain.  Evil doesn't have to wear a black cape and cackle maliciously in order to be evil.  I found her brand

Re: Harry Potter 5 (no spoilers)

2003-07-29 Thread Jim Sharkey
Tom wrote: S P O I L E R S P A C E Why does Snape, who clearly abhors Voldemort and all the Death Eaters, still show any favor at all to Slytherin just because it's his own house, when it is full of people who at the very least sympathize with Voldemort? Keeping up appearances, I

Re: Harry Potter 5 (no spoilers)

2003-07-29 Thread Reggie Bautista
Tom wrote: S P O I L E R S P A C E Why does Snape, who clearly abhors Voldemort and all the Death Eaters, still show any favor at all to Slytherin just because it's his own house, when it is full of people who at the very least sympathize with Voldemort? Jim replied: Keeping up appearances, I

Re: Harry Potter 5 (no spoilers)

2003-07-29 Thread Reggie Bautista
Someone wrote: S P O I L E R S P A C E Just because Dolores' motives for her actions were not of the slay everyone and take over the world variety does not mean she's not a villain.  Evil doesn't have to wear a black cape and cackle maliciously in order to be evil.  I found

Re: Harry Potter 5 (no spoilers)

2003-07-29 Thread Jon Gabriel
From: Jim Sharkey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Harry Potter 5 (no spoilers) Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 20:38:47 -0400 (EDT) Tom Beck wrote: In general, I think, Rowling does much better with her good guys than with her villains

Re: Harry Potter 5 (no spoilers)

2003-07-29 Thread David Hobby
Jim Sharkey wrote: Tom wrote: S P O I L E R S P A C E Why does Snape, who clearly abhors Voldemort and all the Death Eaters, still show any favor at all to Slytherin just because it's his own house, when it is full of people who at the very least sympathize with Voldemort?

Re: Harry Potter 5 (no spoilers)

2003-07-29 Thread Bryon Daly
From: David Hobby [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jim Sharkey wrote: Tom wrote: S P O I L E R S P A C E Why does Snape, who clearly abhors Voldemort and all the Death Eaters, still show any favor at all to Slytherin just because it's his own house, when it is full of people who at the very