http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/stories.nsf/News/A4CE375042FC097E862
56D280072957D?OpenDocumentHeadline=Police+raid+three+buildings,+detain+oc
cupants
Police raid three buildings, detain occupants
By Heather Ratcliffe Post-Dispatch
updated: 05/16/2003 03:57 PM
St. Louis police detained an
Eric Rudolph, abortion clinic bomber, suspected Atlanta Olympics bomber,
appears to have been finally captured after years on the FBI most wanted
list. Early reports are that he is being held in Charlotte North Carolina.
Rudolph has had a $1,000,000 bounty on his head for many years.
I'll post a
At 03:55 AM 5/31/2003 -0500 The Fool wrote:
http://www.bayarea.com/mld/mercurynews/news/politics/5954295.htm
Supreme Court further dilutes Miranda protections
BY STEPHEN HENDERSON
Knight Ridder Newspapers
WASHINGTON - (KRT) - A splintered Supreme Court took another swipe at the
landmark Miranda
At 09:33 PM 5/29/2003 -0700 d.brin wrote:
He said the oversight was a lesson about unforeseen tools being used.
No. The lesson is to let all passenger KEEP their pocket knives.
thanks for showing this.
db
So, do you also agree that there was a recent lesson that teachers in
school should
From: The Fool [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Speaking as someone who has been immersed in HIPAA for the last 2 years for
my job, this article is HORRIBLE and full of inaccuracies.
Whether you know it or not you now have a medical
identification number.
Er, no. You don't.
I just received a
Horn, John wrote:
There are parts of the HIPAA rule that I don't like, but there are
plenty more that I do like. Both as a member of the healthcare
community and as a patient.
HIPAA legislation is costing a lot of companies a great deal of money, though. Some
of what we do at BCA includes
At 10:21 AM 5/31/2003 -0400 John D. Giorgis wrote:
At 09:33 PM 5/29/2003 -0700 d.brin wrote:
He said the oversight was a lesson about unforeseen tools being used.
No. The lesson is to let all passenger KEEP their pocket knives.
thanks for showing this.
db
So, do you also agree that there
On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 09:31:44AM -0500, Horn, John wrote:
this article is HORRIBLE and full of inaccuracies.
Which is what I have come to expect from most of the articles posted by
Fool. I used to at least skim the articles he posted, but now I usually
delete them without opening them. He
At 04:19 PM 5/28/2003 -0700 d.brin wrote:
Instead now we see an immature, triumphalist Pax Americana, almost
deliberately spitting in the eyes of everybody in sight, driving
Paris, Berlin, Moscow, Beijing and Teheran into each others' arms.
Not subtle. Not far-seeing. Not wise.
Uhhh
From the archives.
At 12:12 PM 9/23/2002 -0700 Matt Grimaldi wrote:
By intervene, do you mean protect those people who
are being attacked or topple the existing regime
and install one that does things your way? I would
support possbily sending troops to defend their villages
and/or find
From: Jim Sharkey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Horn, John wrote:
There are parts of the HIPAA rule that I don't like, but there are
plenty more that I do like. Both as a member of the healthcare
community and as a patient.
HIPAA legislation is costing a lot of companies a great deal
of
Deborah Harrell wrote:
--- Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Fool wrote:
NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Giving soon-to-be
mothers and newborns doses
of good bacteria may help prevent childhood
allergies up to age four,continuing research
suggests.
Erik Reuter wrote:
On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 09:31:44AM -0500, Horn, John wrote:
this article is HORRIBLE and full of inaccuracies.
Which is what I have come to expect from most of the articles posted by
Fool. I used to at least skim the articles he posted, but now I usually
delete them
The Fool wrote:
http://www.startribune.com/stories/587/3909558.html
Democrats: Lowest-earning families denied child tax credit
David Firestone, New York Times
Published May 30, 2003 TAXC30
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- The Bush administration on Thursday defended the
decision of congressional
On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 01:27:38PM -0500, Julia Thompson wrote:
It's a tax cut, not a benefits increase.
If you have no tax liability, you're not eligible for a tax *cut*.
What can you cut off of $0?
True enough. But I think the point, that apparently he made quite
poorly, is that this tax
Erik Reuter wrote:
On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 01:27:38PM -0500, Julia Thompson wrote:
It's a tax cut, not a benefits increase.
If you have no tax liability, you're not eligible for a tax *cut*.
What can you cut off of $0?
True enough. But I think the point, that apparently he made
On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 02:50:46PM -0500, Julia Thompson wrote:
So, instead of making the tax cut package *quite* as big, increase
EIC payments, if that's not being done already. (Anyone have stats
regarding that?) Or increase some other benefits that these folks
with little enough income
http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/002/730avutr.asp
(And yes, I know these folks have a bias, and it comes out in the political
examples -- but the non-political ones make the point I wanted to share.)
One major point is that smart != good.
One thing the author never
20,000 soldiers is a hell of a lot, and the US has
more urgent/important things to do ...
The message was that the Iraqi government had some weaponised anthrax
and radio-active materials, both of which would cause a great deal of
trouble if released in Washington, DC or London, England.
Chad Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Its easy to criticize, but what would you have done differently, other
than not gone to war in the first place?
That is not the question.
After the war, after more troops had arrived, why did not the US
dispatch some of them for several days, to
At 05:58 PM 5/30/2003 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A) What could possibly be more important than finding the weapons
of mass destruction that were the entire justification for the
invasion in the first place?
John D. Giorgis [EMAIL PROTECTED] responded
Off the top of my head:
At 10:28 PM 5/30/03 -0700, Deborah Harrell wrote:
Would an Uplifted chimp be
able to use tingers and tumbs to drive while reading a
laptop and eating?
And still have one extremity free for New York's official bird . . .
Flip Remarks Maru
-- Ronn! :)
God bless America,
Land that I love!
At 09:41 PM 5/31/03 +1000, Ray Ludenia wrote:
d.brin wrote:
He said the oversight was a lesson about unforeseen tools being used.
No. The lesson is to let all passenger KEEP their pocket knives.
thanks for showing this.
I don't think this is what is likely to happen. There are strong calls
At 10:44 PM 5/30/03 -0400, Erik Reuter wrote:
Out of curiosity, Fool, about what percentage of articles that you read
(all the way through) on the web do you post to Brin-L?
Another question might be: What percentage of said articles do you read
all the way through before you post them to
At 02:55 PM 5/31/03 -0500, Julia Thompson wrote:
http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/002/730avutr.asp
(And yes, I know these folks have a bias, and it comes out in the political
examples -- but the non-political ones make the point I wanted to share.)
One major point is
--- The Fool [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Jan Coffey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Andrew Crystall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 29 May 2003 at 15:25, The Fool wrote:
From: Jan Coffey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Opinions: http://www.newamericancentury.org/
???
Fascist
Matt Grimaldi wrote:
So I found a deal on a van that runs on natural
gas.
Erik Reuter wrote:
So, how far do you have to drive to fill up the
tank with natural gas, compared to the nearest
gasoline station?
Well they're not on every other corner like gasoline
stations, but there's
Erik Reuter wrote:
Horn, John wrote:
this article is HORRIBLE and full of inaccuracies.
Which is what I have come to expect from most of the articles
posted by Fool.
I was afraid I was the only who'd noticed that. One of his pension articles was so
full of inaccuracies and half truths I
Horn, John wrote:
Jim Sharkey wrote:
HIPAA legislation is costing a lot of companies a great deal
of money, though.
Trust me. Even for a big shop like mine, it's a momentous task.
We are spending a huge amount of money on it. And it's not over
yet! But, hopefully, when all is set and
--- Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Deborah Harrell wrote:
--- Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
The Fool wrote:
NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Giving soon-to-be
mothers and newborns doses
of good bacteria may help prevent childhood
allergies up to age four,continuing research
Deborah Harrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But I did note in a later post (different thread, I
think 'reactor woes'?) that it *is* possible that
normal background radiation helps 'prime' immune cells
to hunt for mutant cells, just as exposure to normal
gut bacteria seems to help the
Julia Thompson wrote:
One major point is that smart != good.
This is true. I know plenty of smart people that don't seem like they *think* before
speaking or acting. This quote from the article, however, is bull: We live in an age
when pure intelligence is valued and honored beyond all
Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At 01:18 PM 5/31/03 -0500, Julia Thompson wrote:
At 02:55 PM 5/31/03 -0500, Julia Thompson wrote:
http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/002/730avutr.asp
(And yes, I know these folks have a bias, and it comes out in the political
examples
Deborah Harrell wrote:
Thanks for prompting me to review polio info!
You're welcome. It's one of my hot-button diseases, having had an uncle
die of it in 1952, his 3-year-old (IIRC) son end up having to wear a leg
brace all his life (and nobody will let him drive a rental car, BTW),
and his
On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 08:55:23PM +, Robert J. Chassell wrote:
saying the US could not do both. I think the US is strong enough to
have both protected Americans against a threat the US president stated
he saw and restored civic order in Bagdad in a military occupation.
Of course it is
Fiction and the Tax Cut
A personal anecdote. I saw my accountant on Thursday (needed an extension because I
was traveling too much in March and April to see him). He is a rich guy because he
provides an excellent and honest service to a clientle of people like me; physicians
making
Jim Sharkey wrote:
Julia Thompson wrote:
One major point is that smart != good.
This is true. I know plenty of smart people that don't seem like
they *think* before speaking or acting. This quote from the article,
however, is bull: We live in an age when pure intelligence is valued
and
I'm snipping various parts of this post (lots of
...s) for brevity.
--- Robert J. Chassell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[I wrote:]
But I did note in a later post...that it *is*
possible that normal background radiation helps
'prime' immune cells to hunt for mutant cells...
...Certainly,
Julia Thompson wrote:
One major point is that smart != good.
Jim Sharkey wrote:
At least that's been my observation for a long
time. All I know is, when you're growing up,
being smart is the biggest sin of all. Maybe
there's a chicken/egg thing, where smart people
start off with a
From: Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
At 10:44 PM 5/30/03 -0400, Erik Reuter wrote:
Out of curiosity, Fool, about what percentage of articles that you read
(all the way through) on the web do you post to Brin-L?
I thought I plonked You.
5%.
---
Another question might be: What
On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 06:44:20PM -0500, The Fool wrote:
5%.
So, on days that you post 4 or 5 articles to Brin-L, you have actually
read 80 or 100 articles? Wow, I thought you said you were not that well
read.
All of them. Sure not every article is as coherent and to the point
as want them
Julia Thompson wrote:
(Speaking of gym class, ask me sometime about the volleyball
incident.)
Speaking of gym class, if there's any group that is elevated far beyond its logical
station, it's athletes.
Jim
Who does want to hear about the volleyball incident Maru :)
In a message dated 5/31/2003 4:00:07 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
To say that these new rules and regulation are to protect
your medical
privacy is bureaucratic double-speak at its worst.
Let me way in from the provider side of this debate. HIPA is going to make the
Alan Wisotsky, an attorney for Oxnard and the police officer who
interrogated Martinez, said the court's ruling was a victory for
persistent police work.
If someone had kidnapped your child, wouldn't you want police doing
everything they possibly could to get information from someone who
Uh. I don't see how the reporter reaches this conclusion. It seems
rather obvious that someone's right to not self-incriminate is not violated
if that person is never incriminated, whether by one's self or otherwise.
So, in other words, as long as you are not a suspect, the police
2) What is wrong with that strategy? It seems to me we are finally doing
what
is necessary to make the world a better place to live in, even if,
especially
if, you are a middle eastern Muslim. War is never the best way to solve
anything. I do not believe I am mistaken when I say that I
Who's Behind the Attack on Liberal Professors?
http://hnn.us/articles/1244.html
Medium-ish with links. These are the guys propagating the false 'liberal
media bias' that you hear unendingly from right wing ideologues.
___
H.I.P.A.A.
Whether you know it or not you now have a medical identification number.
I just received a copy of an in-house memo from an employer concerning
HIPAA Compliance. It states, Attached is a privacy notice that (name of
company) is required to provide to you based upon a new health
From: John D. Giorgis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 03:55 AM 5/31/2003 -0500 The Fool wrote:
http://www.bayarea.com/mld/mercurynews/news/politics/5954295.htm
Supreme Court further dilutes Miranda protections
BY STEPHEN HENDERSON
Knight Ridder Newspapers
WASHINGTON - (KRT) - A splintered
I thought about titling this post I hate you . . ., but then I thought
about the just-passing-time conversation between Garibaldi and Sinclair on
their way to B4 in Babylon Squared. Garibaldi is asking about how one
fastens pants, fasten then zip or zip then fasten. Turns out both are
fasten
Horn, John wrote:
Jim Sharkey wrote:
HIPAA legislation is costing a lot of companies a great deal
of money, though.
Trust me. Even for a big shop like mine, it's a momentous task.
We are spending a huge amount of money on it. And it's not over
yet! But, hopefully, when all is set and
Jim Sharkey wrote:
Julia Thompson wrote:
(Speaking of gym class, ask me sometime about the volleyball
incident.)
Speaking of gym class, if there's any group that is elevated far beyond its logical
station, it's athletes.
Jim
Who does want to hear about the volleyball incident Maru
G. D. Akin wrote:
I understand Sinclair is not in season 2. This saddens me. I know from 30
years military experience I would have enjoyed a few more commanders like
him. PLEASE DON'T tell me what his fate is. I know he is not gone from the
series as Babylon Squared reveals and there is
The Fool wrote:
From: Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
At 10:44 PM 5/30/03 -0400, Erik Reuter wrote:
Out of curiosity, Fool, about what percentage of articles that you read
(all the way through) on the web do you post to Brin-L?
I thought I plonked You.
5%.
How much time do
At 10:40 PM 5/31/03 -0500, Julia Thompson wrote:
Julia
who hates hearing about plonking on-list, actually
Boinking, on the other hand, is apparently a different matter . . .
-- Ronn! :)
God bless America,
Land that I love!
Stand beside her, and guide her
Thru the night with a
At 10:47 PM 5/31/03 -0500, Julia Thompson wrote:
Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At 10:40 PM 5/31/03 -0500, Julia Thompson wrote:
Julia
who hates hearing about plonking on-list, actually
Boinking, on the other hand, is apparently a different matter . . .
Talking about specific instances
At 12:07 PM 6/1/2003 +0900, you wrote:
snip I hate you
George A
All I can say is, I think you are on the wrong end of the Babylon 5/SG1
trade, unless your friend really wanted B5 more. B5 is almost the perfect
series. I can think of one episode I hated. I'm sure there were others I
didn't
At 10:38 PM 5/31/2003 -0500, you wrote:
G. D. Akin wrote:
I understand Sinclair is not in season 2. This saddens me. I know from 30
years military experience I would have enjoyed a few more commanders like
him. PLEASE DON'T tell me what his fate is. I know he is not gone
from the
series
Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
Julia Thompson wrote:
who hates hearing about plonking on-list, actually
Boinking, on the other hand, is apparently a different
matter . . .
We do seem to know a bit more about each others' sex lives than one might expect,
don't we? :)
Jim
Julia Thompson wrote:
How much time do you spend reading articles?
Julia
who hates hearing about plonking on-list, actually
What is plonking, anyway? Is this some bit of Internet lingo I just happened to miss?
Jim
___
Join Excite! -
Well they're not on every other corner like gasoline
stations, but there's about 50 or so refueling stations in
the LA/Orange County area, so it's not that terrible an
inconvenience. Another caveat is that the compressed air
tanks don't hold as many gasoline gallon equivalents (gge)
as would be
From: G. D. Akin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The possible I hate you . . . post title comes from the realization that
all of you on this list told me I would grow into B5 after watching the
series mature. I just finished the last episode and . . . you were RIGHT!
Woot! Glad you like it!
Now I hate you
Jim Sharkey writes:
Julia Thompson wrote:
How much time do you spend reading articles?
Julia
who hates hearing about plonking on-list, actually
What is plonking, anyway? Is this some bit of Internet lingo I just
happened to miss?
I seem to have missed it, too. Anyone care to clue us in?
At 03:48 PM 5/31/2003 -0400, you wrote:
On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 02:50:46PM -0500, Julia Thompson wrote:
So, instead of making the tax cut package *quite* as big, increase
EIC payments, if that's not being done already. (Anyone have stats
regarding that?) Or increase some other benefits that
--- G. D. Akin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Garibaldi is asking about how one
fastens pants, fasten then zip or zip then fasten. Turns out both are
fasten first kind of guys; makes me feel good, so am I.
If you zip first then fasten, sometimes you got to do a bit of re-zipping.
Still do it that
Jan Coffey wrote:
Has anyone considered why the ending of the series was the way it was? I
think that they hope to bring it back eventually and know they might not get
the same actors back. For Criton and Sung that would end the show, unless
Their DNA is mixed...or something... Thoughts?
It's
George said:
I'm really impressed by the way the threads interweave dovetail in
Chrysalis. Events are poised for things to burst out in season 2.
This is probably the most coherent, intriguing, and ripe with
anticipation season ending cliffhanger of any of the most popular SF
series.
Richard Baker said after
George said:
I'm really impressed by the way the threads interweave dovetail in
Chrysalis. Events are poised for things to burst out in season 2.
This is probably the most coherent, intriguing, and ripe with
anticipation season ending cliffhanger of any of the
On Sunday, June 1, 2003, at 06:49 am, Bryon Daly wrote:
Jim Sharkey writes:
Julia Thompson wrote:
How much time do you spend reading articles?
Julia
who hates hearing about plonking on-list, actually
What is plonking, anyway? Is this some bit of Internet lingo I just
happened to miss?
I seem
69 matches
Mail list logo
