On Sep 6, 2006, at 7:47 PM, jdiebremse wrote:
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], William T Goodall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's nice that this topic has attracted some interest and that people
are giving some thought to the sickening poisonous evil filth of
religion and the ghastly damage it causes
Rich wrote:
My atheist father used to tell me that might makes right is a bad
philosophy? Why?
Isn't might makes right basically the religious position?
Uh, no. At least not in the religion I was born into. We do have a
saying which translates into 'Truth always wins' but that is never
William T Goodall asked:
Richard Baker wrote:
If not, then I fail to see how the religious and atheist positions
differ.
Or: how does God Himself decide what is good and evil? Isn't He, at
least, basically in the same position as us atheists?
I guess so, unless he himself has a God
O.k. time for another season
Week 1
Miami at Pittsburgh - Big Ben may be out, but the Steelers are still
defending champs, and Miami is living on a reputation of beating a lot
of bad teams at the end of last season. Pick: STEELERS
Baltimore at Tampa Bay - Its always tough to win in the heat
Wow, you were using the propel cans?
A compressor will work much better...you don't have to pry it up when it
freezes to the table...
Damon, fun with physics...
Damon Agretto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
At 09:07 AM Thursday 9/7/2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wow, you were using the propel cans?
A compressor will work much better...you don't have to pry it up
when it freezes to the table...
Damon, fun with physics...
When starting out and not doing a whole lot with it, $10 for a can
William T Goodall wrote:
On 6 Sep 2006, at 4:13PM, Brother John wrote:
Richard Baker wrote:
If not, then I fail to see how the religious and atheist positions
differ.
Or: how does God Himself decide what is good and evil? Isn't He, at
least, basically in the same position as us atheists?
Alberto Monteiro wrote:
I think you should be careful to define _what_ are the goals,
so that you can define what is good and what is evil. If the
goal is the long-range survival of intelligence and diversity,
or even of diversity of intelligence, then killing weak babies
is evil.
But it
William T Goodall wrote:
The atheists eat less babies than the theists though due to having a
rationally designed, probably vegetarian, diet.
There is nothing rational about a vegetarian diet. Vegetarianism is just
a form of holier-than-thou for atheists.
John W. Redelfs
On 07/09/2006, at 6:58 PM, Brother John wrote:
William T Goodall wrote:
The atheists eat less babies than the theists though due to having
a rationally designed, probably vegetarian, diet.
There is nothing rational about a vegetarian diet. Vegetarianism is
just a form of holier-than-thou
On 7 Sep 2006, at 4:56PM, Brother John wrote:
In the absence of God or gods, why would one goal be preferable to
any other? I might have one goal. You might have another. If they
are contradictory, then the strongest man's goal is the right one.
Or in other words, the concept of right
JohnR said:
There is nothing rational about a vegetarian diet. Vegetarianism is
just a form of holier-than-thou for atheists.
Yeah? Well, I'm vegetarian for aesthetic reasons and I really don't
much care who else is or isn't vegetarian as long as they don't try
to make me eat meat.
And
Charlie said:
Rich, atheist and vegetarian.
Me, atheist and omnivorous.
Doesn't matter a damn to me what you eat.
You overlook the obvious fact that I am holier than you are.
Rich
GCU Saintly
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
On 7 Sep 2006, at 5:06PM, Charlie Bell wrote:
On 07/09/2006, at 6:58 PM, Brother John wrote:
William T Goodall wrote:
The atheists eat less babies than the theists though due to
having a rationally designed, probably vegetarian, diet.
There is nothing rational about a vegetarian diet.
This is why the Democrats will always lose: we lack the will to feed
poisonous lies to children to achieve our ends.
Begin forwarded message:
From: Media Matters for America [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: September 7, 2006 10:02:21 AM PDT
Subject: ABC, Scholastic injecting conservative misinformation
On 07/09/2006, at 8:29 PM, William T Goodall wrote:
On 7 Sep 2006, at 5:06PM, Charlie Bell wrote:
On 07/09/2006, at 6:58 PM, Brother John wrote:
William T Goodall wrote:
The atheists eat less babies than the theists though due to
having a rationally designed, probably vegetarian, diet.
Hi,
The ABC television network -- a cog in the Walt Disney empire -- unleashed a
promotional blitz in the last week for a new docudrama called The Path to
9/11. ABC has thrown its corporate might behind the two-night production, and
bills it as a public service: a TV event, to quote the ABC
Brother John wrote:
There is nothing rational about a vegetarian diet.
I once recall reading something about how the vegetarian proteins are
easier for humans to assimilate as compared to the proteins found in
meat. Does anyone else have ay recollection of something like this?
Vegetarianism
Hullo,
So many missives to catch up on. I've been busy.
As an artist hovering around the computer industry since High School I
find it amazing that AndrewC initially claims to be a non-expert, yet
sells computers he regularly builds. Andrew, you undercut yourself on
the credibility factor
On 7 Sep 2006, at 3:47AM, jdiebremse wrote:
Wow. I do have to admire your chutzpah..
That's cute from the guy whose favourite topic reduces to accusing
everyone who uses contraception of being a mass-murderer.
Goose Maru
--
William T Goodall
Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web :
There's a bit of convolution here; before a meaningful discussion can
happen in some areas I think some of it has to be untangled.
On Sep 6, 2006, at 4:58 AM, John W Redelfs wrote:
My atheist father used to tell me that might makes right is a bad
philosophy? Why?
Succinctly, if it were a
On 9/7/06, Charlie Bell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 07/09/2006, at 6:58 PM, Brother John wrote:
William T Goodall wrote:
The atheists eat less babies than the theists though due to having
a rationally designed, probably vegetarian, diet.
There is nothing rational about a vegetarian diet.
On 9/7/06, Richard Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And there in fact is a rational argument in favour of vegetarianism,
because a given area of land can feed more vegetarians than meat
eaters essentially because of thermodynamics. More solar energy gets
into plants used as human food than into
From: John W Redelfs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I confess that I do not know as much about atheism as an atheist does, or a
least not as much that is correct. But neither do atheists know as much
about religion as religious people do, at least not as much that is
correct. Some things you
24 matches
Mail list logo
