At 19:11 02-11-2002 -0600, Ronn Blankenship wrote:
Maybe the new generation on the Internet have never heard this joke? I
first heard it at least 30-some-odd years ago . . .
Happens all the time, and not just on the Internet. Just look at what is
happening in pop music: many songs are
At 19:16 02-11-2002 -0600, Ronn Blankenship wrote:
One thing I find interesting, going over this thread: All responses
spawned by that one post of Jeroen's that come through as being part of
the thread as threaded by Netscape come either from people in Jeroen's
town in The Netherlands, or
The line was:
Subj:Rates Have Dipped...Approvals Are Up!
And I had read it as:
Subj:Rants Have Dipped...Approvals Are Up!
*sigh*
Wishful misthinking.
William Taylor
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Erik Reuter wrote:
On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 10:41:57PM -0600, Ronn Blankenship wrote:
At 04:28 AM 11/2/02, J. van Baardwijk wrote:
Do you have any idea how arrogant your post sounds?
Do you have any idea how arrogant _your_ post sounds?
Do you have any idea howudo you have any idea
William Taylor wrote:
Judy, Judy,---
Thipht.
Jud---
Swith..THUNK!
Argh.
Do you have any idea how arrow Grant this post tries to sound?
Sorry, William, but you tried *waay* too hard for this one. Gonna have to
ding you for it. ;-)
Jim
The first time I saw this, I thought it was a joke, then I realized that the
link goes to the United States Patent and Trademark office. Kind of
spooky.
http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/ac/ahrpa/opa/pulse/epulse/images/april/home
landsecurity.gif
Erik Reuter wrote:
On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 10:41:57PM -0600, Ronn Blankenship wrote:
At 04:28 AM 11/2/02, J. van Baardwijk wrote:
Do you have any idea how arrogant your post sounds?
Do you have any idea how arrogant _your_ post sounds?
Do you have any idea howudo
Ronn Blankenship wrote:
At 07:41 PM 11/1/02, Julia Thompson wrote:
Julia
who doesn't want to hear a damn thing more about Perry or Sanchez for a
couple of days, but will probably fail to avoid their ads :P
Can hardly be any worse than our gubernatorial race between Siegelman
Ronn Blankenship wrote:
At 10:50 AM 11/2/02, Julia Thompson wrote:
And I'm supposed to be doing some sort
of crawl this evening for a bachelorette party for a close friend's
younger sister, and I'm not looking forward to this evening's weather
for *that*. (At least it'll be downtown
J.D. Giorgis wrote:
Cincinnati (+3) at Houston - Everyone is jumping a
little too hard on the anti-Bengals bandwagon, and is
forgetting that this is still an NFL team. Sure, the
Bengals are on the road, but when you are as bad as
the Bengals are, getting away from the boo-birds at
the home
Erik Reuter wrote:
Do you have any idea howudo you have any idea how to
make a really good chocolate chip cookie?
Le Dimanche 3 novembre 2002, à 08:58 , Jim Sharkey a écrit :
No, but my wife does. Every year on the day before Thanksgiving, she
and her father spend the
evening
Erik Reuter wrote:
Do you have any idea howudo you have any idea how to make a
really good chocolate chip cookie?
Le Dimanche 3 novembre 2002, à 11:39 , Julia Thompson a écrit :
I might have a good recipe. I made a bunch of cookies for fellow
dorm-mates around final exam time one
Jean-Louis Couturier wrote:
Erik Reuter wrote:
Do you have any idea howudo you have any idea how to make a
really good chocolate chip cookie?
Le Dimanche 3 novembre 2002, à 11:39 , Julia Thompson a écrit :
I might have a good recipe. I made a bunch of cookies for fellow
At 09:54 AM 11/3/2002 -0500 Gary Nunn wrote:
The first time I saw this, I thought it was a joke, then I realized that the
link goes to the United States Patent and Trademark office. Kind of
spooky.
http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/ac/ahrpa/opa/pulse/epulse/images/april/home
landsecurity.gif
Le Dimanche 3 novembre 2002, à 12:00 , Julia Thompson a écrit :
Jean-Louis Couturier wrote:
Erik Reuter wrote:
Do you have any idea howudo you have any idea how to
make a
really good chocolate chip cookie?
Le Dimanche 3 novembre 2002, à 11:39 , Julia Thompson a écrit :
I
On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 10:39:18AM -0600, Julia Thompson wrote:
given a few recipes by someone whose grandparents had a bakery. If I
still have that paper, I could give you a good recipe.
Tell me if I ought to look.
Yes! Never turn down a good chocolate chip cookie recipe!
--
Erik Reuter
Ronn Blankenship wrote:
So, those 10.7% are people that _chose_ to invalidate
the vote.
Is that anything like giving them a way to vote for None of the
Above?
Yes - in fact, two ways of voting for None of the Above
[something like options I don't care and The hell with all
of them]
At 11:21 PM 11/2/02, Erik Reuter wrote:
Do you have any idea howudo you have any idea how to make a
really good chocolate chip cookie?
No, but I know where to go to buy them . . .
M . . . chocolate chip . . .
--Ronn! :)
I always knew that I would see the first man on
At 07:58 AM 11/3/02, Jim Sharkey wrote:
Erik Reuter wrote:
Do you have any idea howudo you have any idea how to
make a really good chocolate chip cookie?
No, but my wife does. Every year on the day before Thanksgiving, she and
her father spend the evening making about a jillion
At 11:42 PM 11/2/02, William Taylor wrote:
In a message dated 11/2/2002 10:14:10 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes, I feel like saying A pox on both their houses . . . except that
these days, someone would probably take it as a terroristic threat . . .
Or try to
In a message dated 11/3/2002 7:07:50 AM US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sorry, William, but you tried *waay* too hard for this one. Gonna
have to ding you for it. ;-)
Well I did say tries
I'll go back to trying to win the Eatin' an Arrow contest.
William
At 07:21 AM 11/3/02, William Taylor wrote:
The line was:
Subj:Rates Have Dipped...Approvals Are Up!
And I had read it as:
Subj:Rants Have Dipped...Approvals Are Up!
*sigh*
Wishful misthinking.
ROTFLOL, though.
--Ronn! :)
I always knew that I would see the first man on the
In a message dated 11/3/2002 9:50:33 AM US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Oh, and I decided around 8 or 8:30 that following wasabi with sweet wine
was really nice. Around 10, I was thinking of reconsidering. Around
midnight, I decided that if I could stand some discomfort
On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 11:46:21AM -0600, Ronn Blankenship wrote:
At 11:42 PM 11/2/02, William Taylor wrote:
Just playing catch-up . . .
That just doesn't cut the mustard
--
Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
At 07:31 02-11-2002 -0500, John Giorgis wrote:
Anyhow, I suppose that I should clarify this by noting that I am
currently strongly considering voting for Green Party candidates
in two or three races here.
rubs eyes, reads message again
What, JDG voting Green Party? What caused this
From: John D. Giorgis [mailto:jxg9;po.cwru.edu]
At 02:07 PM 11/1/2002 -0600 Horn, John wrote:
Would all of these permanent members have a veto? If not,
which ones would?
Virtually every country under consideration for a permanent
UNSC seat in
the future has stated that they would
J.D. Giorgis wrote:
Dallas (+3) at Detroit - This is a really lousy team,
but for anyone who doesn't think that QB's are
important, just loook at what Heisman Joey has done
for these guys. Pick: LIONS and to cover
Guess they didn't quite cover, eh?
That was a *weird* game. In the first
From: Ronn Blankenship
This is the second list I have received it from (with minor
differences).
Maybe the new generation on the Internet have never heard
this joke? I
first heard it at least 30-some-odd years ago . . .
I didn't have access to a computer 30-some-odd years ago when I
- Original Message -
From: Ronn Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 02, 2002 7:13 PM
Subject: Re: Dinging plans (was RE: test)
And does your friend consider himself a professional person?
Definately. It was after we were discussing how
At 03:47 PM 11/3/2002 -0600 Horn, John wrote:
As Jim said earlier, wouldn't that make it next to impossible to get
anything done on the UNSC? I can't imagine almost any even remotely
controversial proposal not being vetoed by one of that group?
There is a bit of game theory involved.
I was watching a TV propaganda of Nike, when Natalia
commented: Did you know that Nike uses child slave
labour?
Alberto Monteiro
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Just in case, I'm going to stick some spoiler space in here. Please
include it when replying. If you haven't seen the episode yet, I don't
think my question will give away too much.
S
P
O
I
L
E
R
/
S
P
A
C
E
/
S
P
O
I
L
E
R
/
S
P
A
C
E
What did Moe say at the very end of the gun story? I
32 matches
Mail list logo
