I think this is a case of using a fancy new construction when a
simpler construction would do just as well.
For some reasons some people, even beginners, are absolutely fond of
first-class modules, and insist on using them in situation where
they're really not needed. I not eager to see what they
**
Second CALL FOR PAPER
Sixth Workshop on Intersection Types and Related Systems (ITRS 2012)
June 29th, Dubrovnik (Croatia).
http://itrs2012.di.unito.it/
Workshop held in
Le jeudi, 8 mars 2012 à 22:27, Sylvain Le Gall a écrit :
It does it the right way ;-)
The I'm going to vomit files across your whole file system so that you
need another bureaucratic tool/database too keep track of what I did
whenever you want to remove me way. Sure if you're looking
On 8 Mar 2012, at 22:26, Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
2012/3/8 Adrien camarade...@gmail.com:
Hi,
On 08/03/2012, Sylvain Le Gall sylv...@le-gall.net wrote:
Hi,
2012/3/8 Daniel Bünzli daniel.buen...@erratique.ch:
Le jeudi, 8 mars 2012 ŕ 09:31, Sylvain Le Gall a écrit :
setup.ml will be enough
A Makefile works just fine (and making the autogenerated code less complex
rather than more would be better).
This is the template Makefile I use:
https://github.com/avsm/ocaml-github/blob/master/Makefile
Plus you can generate this file from _oasis, via. DevFiles plugin e.g.
Plugins:
Taking one step back, what you actually want is a data structure that:
-is a container for elements of some type 'a
-some elements are tagged with a state tag 'b
-the elements have an ordering
-you can add elements
-you can tag elements with a state tag
-you can remove the current element
-you
OCAML USERS AND DEVELOPERS WORKSHOP 2012
OUD 2012
http://oud.ocaml.org
CALL FOR PRESENTATIONS
Copenhagen, Denmark
Fri, Sep 14th
Co-located
Le vendredi, 9 mars 2012 à 12:56, Gerd Stolpmann a écrit :
You can call it KISS, but I would call it short-sighted. This has nothing
to do with bureaucracy. Imagine a package has also some utilities to
install (and feeled every second package has). You just don't want to have
to include tons
Hi,
On 03/08/2012 03:12 PM, Gerd Stolpmann wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 08.03.2012, 14:58 +0100 schrieb Sebastien Ferre:
Hi,
I am considering developping an OCaml
application using Lablgtk2 for the GUI,
and using ocaml-java/Nickel for calling
a Java library (namely, OWL-API). I am
working on
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 4:21 AM, Gabriel Scherer
gabriel.sche...@gmail.com wrote:
I think this is a case of using a fancy new construction when a
simpler construction would do just as well.
For some reasons some people, even beginners, are absolutely fond of
first-class modules, and insist on
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 03:09:17PM +0100, Sebastien Ferre wrote:
This looks promising, and adequate to my needs.
However, the last version dates back to 2004, and
is for java-1.4. Is there any chance it stills
works ? Has anybody used it recently ?
The version on SVN has more recent changes
On 03/09/2012 09:26 AM, Daniel Bünzli wrote:
Without going into the dependency resolving thing, I still think it's
an issue. Basically with odb you don't really know what you are
downloading.
http://oasis.ocamlcore.org/dev/odb/
This page shows the stable, testing and unstable versions of each
Le vendredi, 9 mars 2012 à 17:26, Edgar Friendly a écrit :
http://oasis.ocamlcore.org/dev/odb/
Ah missed that. Maybe you should mention the link in the README.md (searching
for odb ocaml on the web brings me directly to github).
While I agree it'd be nice to just parse oasis files,
*To be removed from our mailing list, please respond to this message with
UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject*
*
2012 INTERNATIONAL SPRING SCHOOL IN NATURAL COMPUTING
SSNC 2012
Tarragona, Spain
May 28 June 1st, 2012
Dear camlers,
I used js_of_ocaml several times and was really stunned of how clever
(notably because writing interfaces boils down to writing types) and
efficient this approach is. Would a similar thing work for the JVM, that is
a compiler from ocaml bytecode to java bytecode? I guess it wouldn't
Le 09/03/2012 18:12, Philippe Veber a écrit :
Dear camlers,
I used js_of_ocaml several times and was really stunned of how clever
(notably because writing interfaces boils down to writing types) and
efficient this approach is. Would a similar thing work for the JVM, that
is a compiler from ocaml
Le 8 mars 2012 à 15:12, Gerd Stolpmann a écrit :
Am Donnerstag, den 08.03.2012, 14:58 +0100 schrieb Sebastien Ferre:
Hi,
I am considering developping an OCaml
application using Lablgtk2 for the GUI,
and using ocaml-java/Nickel for calling
a Java library (namely, OWL-API). I am
working
Le jeudi, 8 mars 2012 à 22:27, Sylvain Le Gall a écrit :
Let say that if you just use $htmldir, it will help whatever packaging
system that cooperate with oasis to enforce it in the future.
In fact it is possible to not say anything at all, just don't mention
InstallDir, oasis doesn't
Hi,
2012/3/9 Daniel Bünzli daniel.buen...@erratique.ch:
Le jeudi, 8 mars 2012 à 22:27, Sylvain Le Gall a écrit :
Let say that if you just use $htmldir, it will help whatever packaging
system that cooperate with oasis to enforce it in the future.
In fact it is possible to not say anything
Le vendredi, 9 mars 2012 à 20:11, Sylvain Le Gall a écrit :
Document reference
Title: Xmlm's documentation and module reference
Format: html
Index: Xmlm.html
Install: true
DataFiles: doc/*.html, doc/*.css
Document distribution
Title: Xmlm's distribution information files
E.g setting Type:
ocamlbuild + a couple of field to tell that your doc will be
extracted from some libraries/module and build using ocamldoc +
ocamlbuild:
Document api-ounit
Title: API reference for OUnit
Type: ocamlbuild (0.2)
BuildTools+: ocamldoc
XOCamlbuildLibraries: oUnit
On 03/09/2012 05:06 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 03:09:17PM +0100, Sebastien Ferre wrote:
This looks promising, and adequate to my needs.
However, the last version dates back to 2004, and
is for java-1.4. Is there any chance it stills
works ? Has anybody used it
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 08:34:12AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 06:10:15PM -0700, Kurt Seifried wrote:
On 02/06/2012 06:05 PM, Kurt Seifried wrote:
So going through various things looks like Ocaml is vulnerable and has
not had a CVE # assigned for this issue
23 matches
Mail list logo
